Saudi king slams 'illegitimate occupation' of Iraq

Friend and Ally Alert. By Lydia Georgi for AFP, with thanks to Mackie:

RIYADH (AFP) - Saudi King Abdullah, whose country is a close US ally, on Wednesday slammed the "illegitimate foreign occupation" of Iraq in an opening speech to the annual Arab summit in Riyadh.

"In beloved Iraq, blood is being shed among brothers in the shadow of an illegitimate foreign occupation, and ugly sectarianism threatens civil war," Abdullah said.

He also said that Arab nations, which are planning to revive a five-year-old Middle East peace plan at the summit, would not allow any foreign force to decide the future of the region.

Really? What will they do to prevent this? Does this go for any attempt to stop Iran's genocidal nuclear ambitions also?

| 26 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

26 Comments

Saudi King Abdullah needs to go to the desert and pound royal Saudi sand up his ***

That's the thanks we get for keeping Saddam from overthrowing the Saudi regime in 1990.

Time for a Manhattan Project of Alternative Energy.

And then Let Them Drink Oil.


The occupation in Iraq is to be condemned by every human being with a conscious. As for the blood shed, it is purification of the land from the filth of shia paganism.

So the old Fox's grandson is still playing the game in wanting Iraq and not willing to reveal his sectarian violence while Islamofascist and Islamocommunist is all Islamo based in his chosen religion which his nation funded to keep the revolutionaries pointed at Jews instead of his throne.

Abdullah is a great actor and plays well to his audience which are the chanting mobs.
Let Americans not forget that most leaders are liars and George Bush in being honest about what his purposes are is a rare exception. Abdullah is a liar in public and in private, because that is what el presidente for life always are.

Old, degenerate, lazy Islamic royalists who carouse in private with blue-eyed harem-girls should learn the meaning of fear.

I think I'll get the chance to witness Saudi groveling in my lifetime. Call it another hunch.

Abdullah

You might need to cleanse Syria as well from Alawites, and Lebanon from Hizbullah as well.

Get your Ikhwan brothers lined up.

Yes, the illegitimate foreign occupation of Iraq by Arabs is disgusting.

Illegal occupation, huh? Yet he wants the US to stay there so his kingdom remains protected. Talk about chutzpah-these people redefine that word on a daily basis!

Hmmm, I thought Saudi Arabia wanted us there to protect their Sunni interests in the country and that we were their staunch ally. Well, well, well, I was wrong.

As a show of decency and to respect the wishes of the King, we should withdraw all troops immediately and if the Iranian backed Shia take over Iraq, then so be it.

Bush has protected Saudi Arabia from accountability for its actions before and after 9-11. He has done this for Pakistan as well.

Clinton's impeachment in 1998 and 1999 followed Pakistan's nuclear test in spring 1998. We missed a chance to do something about it. Clinton did add to the existing sanctions. Bush has taken off from them and given them money.

They had 38 billion in foreign debt on 9-11 2001. Bush has helped them with that debt.

Some are talking of Bush's impeachment. If Bush is going to solve our problems, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi support of radicalism, etc. then we can't afford to impeach him like Clinton and miss solving problems like Pakistan.

However, Bush has shown little inclination to go beyond Iraq in a substantive way. Bolton is highly critical of Bush's handling of North Korea.

What is Bush good for in his last 2 years? Does Bush stand in the way of action on Iran, Pakistan, North Korea, immigration, know-how transfer, rising income inequality, etc?

Bush has to have a plan that makes sense and goes beyond just Iraq. We would have done better to have removed Clinton and have given Gore a couple years to do something.

Since we are all having fun here with different best-case scenarios, why not have the Americans arm and back to the hilt the huge tribe of the Jabal Shammar, that bestrides both Iraq and Saudi Arabia, long ago defeated by Ibn Saud's Wahhabi warriors, and help them retake Nejd and Hasa, and promise the Shi'a around the oilfields much better treatment, and crush the Wahhabis and let up on the use of oil money for the world-wide support of mosques and madrasas.

Did I forget to mention that all assets of the Saudi royals should be seized by Infidel governments, sold, and the profits be used to pay for the increased security made necesaary by Saudi expenditures just over the past three decades). Possibly the Hejaz, or the Two Holy Sanctuaries could be -- temporarily -- left as a consolation prize to the Al-Saud. They can live on the tourist dollars, what with all the high-rises and other gaudy attractions they are building, like nobody's business, all over supposedly "sacred" Mecca. That, and other Hajj-related revenues, should tide them over.

Good suggestions Hugh.

We need to recognize what we face:

al Qaeda Pakistan Iran Saudi (aQPIS) Axis of Islam.

Saudi King has decided to forego an April 17 dinner at White House due to scheduling problems:


Bush's Royal Trouble comments at WaPo


May God Bless you Gracious King,as you do His will.

Time to have Bandar Bush over for dinner again.

"What is Bush good for in his last 2 years?"


...hate fodder for dhimmicrats....

Abdullah,

If the US and its allies leave tomorrrow, what do you think will happen to Iraq and the Sunni's after that?

let us know.

Take care.

How can he say that?

We are allowing a 'foreign force' to decide the future of our region, America.

Does he not like it in his back yard?

Abdullah did not have a problem when the infidel west was protecting him during gulf war 1. Such allies like him who needs enemies

Speaking of SAUdis:

http://www.myvideo.de/watch/337215

get a good laugh!


And here's more stuff these SAUdis ae saying:
[maybe Bush will soon realize they are NOT our friends?]

DEBKAfile Exclusive: The halt of Jewish immigration to Israel is one of two key Arab pre-conditions for engaging the Jewish state in peace talks
March 26, 2007, 11:56 PM (GMT+02:00)


Our Arab sources reveal that the two conditions will be incorporated in the final resolutions approved by the Arab League summit in Riyadh on Thursday.
1. Israel must halt Jewish immigration so that the Israelis leaving the country or revoking their citizenship are not replaced by newcomers.
2. The international community must condemn Israel’s High Court of Justice for authorizing targeted assassination of Palestinians in cases of security threats. Arab justice ministers will lobby international judicial bodies to elicit this condemnation.


If these pigs weren't so rabidly anti-semitic i'd say they have a lot of Chutzpah! I will say they are full of something smelly!

Hypocrites and Pharisees.

The occupation in Iraq is to be condemned by every human being with a conscious. As for the blood shed, it is purification of the land from the filth of shia paganism.

Posted by: Abdullah


No. We need to invade and occupy SOWdiarabia. Then take that black rock and put it on an Apollo.. and send it to outer space.

Like the Peter Tosh song.

Lucifer son of the morning.
I'm gonna send you out of Earth.

[...]

Abdullah

You might need to cleanse Syria as well from Alawites, and Lebanon from Hizbullah as well.

Get your Ikhwan brothers lined up.

Posted by: Infidel Pride

Abdullah wants to practice a little ethnic cleansing, that's all. or should I call it sectual cleansing, eh? islam is a cult made up of many feuding sects after all.

I don't mind if Abby wants to do the "dirty work" for us. After all it's HIS cult which causes all the problems. Abby and the rest of the mos should clean up the mess!

"whose country is a close US ally..."
-- from the article by Agence France Press above

Says who? On what evidence?

Hey, Abdullah -- they say the truth hurts, so here's two for you and others like you:

Liberal Algerian Daily Criticizes U.S. Anti-War Movement

In an opinion piece in the liberal Algerian daily Liberté, columnist Mustapha Hammouche criticizes what he sees as the simplistic populism of the anti-war movement in the U.S. He argues that the anti-war protests are primarily a result of nostalgia for the protest movement against the Vietnam War, and that they ignore the realities of the current war in Iraq - which, he says, has helped terrorism diminish Iraqis' hopes and has eroded their support for democracy.


http://memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD152207

Liberal Author Mamoun Fandy: Adding of the Right of Return to the Saudi Initiative Changed It From 'The Start of an Earnest Dialogue' to 'An Initiative Impossible to Implement'

http://memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD152507

Why dont we just put a Marine Expeditionary force in the Red Sea, with a few Aegis equipped cruisers- and land a few thousand Marines in the Hijaz.

We could force all the Muslim apologists out into the open and force Europe to choose a side- as the Muslims would go nuts in their streets. Hell, we could burn down Mecca and Medina and end the Saudi oil money network that fuels the Jihad.

Alas, it cannot happen.

Not yet.

nabi ZK says you are all banned, even Hugh, for thinking these banned thoughts. Bad JW'ers.

I nabi ZK have spoked

nabi ZK

Not you (Ab)dullard. You are a f%^#ing prince! Go at those rafidite dogs and don't let up till you are martyred ( the best of fates) or achieve victory (sorry, close but no cigar).

your nabi - he of the clear vision 20/20 even

nabi ZK