Seven rallies today against the global jihad

Make some noise!

Its worth noting that at the really an amazing Muslim speaker named Ibrahim Abdul Mumin will be speaking to support the work of UAC. Unfortunately, I think brother Ibrahim will likely be teh only Muslim there in support.

My guess is that the KozNazis and CAIR will suddenly lose their appreciation for free speech and demand that such expressions of "Islamaphobia" be henceforth banned ...

Posted by: Haidon

Fighting Islamic terrorism, doesnt require killing all Muslims, only the bad ones.

In my eyes the bad ones are also the merchants of Taqiya and dawa,and you are a perfect example,along side Tariq Ramadan

Did you not give a lecture in Australia to fellow muslims on how to answer critics of Islam

You have also quoted That your muslin name is
Hamza Mohammed but stopped using it in 2001.

WAR IS DECEIT

You are misconstruing and mis-articulating the problems of Islam which has proven a remarkably successful at raking in enormous sums from well-paid lectures,and fleecing dhimmie goverments

These are the true Moslems,the ones who did not convert for a fat pay check

http://illustratedpig.blogspot.com/2007/03/d.html

There is no such thing as moderate Islam. There is only one, and you know what it advocates. Until there is such a thing as moderate Islam, there is no such thing as a good Moslem, any more than there was an idea of a good Nazi.

That aside, I think that burning an effigy is pretty lame. That's the kind of thing we laugh at third world civilizations for doing. When we do it, that's just pathetic.

I'll be shocked if this gets ANY coverage by the mainstream media.

by the way Thomas.....Infidel Pride is NOT a supporter of terrorism...quite the contrary. Some folks in this country are just fighting mad and are intelligent and aware of what is coming....others are pacifists (Bread & Circuses) that think everything can be accomplished by kissing your enemies ass.

Fighting Islamic terrorism, doesnt require killing ALL Muslims.....

It requires outlawing Sharia law, and any RELIGION that

1. Threatens the constitution of the United States of America

2. Threatens United States citizens.

3. Does not accept freedom of religion.

Folks, you can keep adding to this list.

Hey wheres the rallies in Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Syria, etc..................

Wheres the rally in Londonistan? Would be wonderful to travel over and make some noise!

Should make it a regular thing... on 9/11 would be good too.

Rally Against Islamofascism Day.

Its name should be changed to "Rally Against Islam Day".

Indeed it should be named 'Rally Against Islam Day'. But we can't stare our enemy in the face -- we might blink. Instead, we'll continue to appease all the way up to when the bullets start flying on Washington Avenue like it's Beirut.

At least these rallies are a good effort, but the next batch need to be where they'll get real coverage -- like Minneapolis or Dearborn, MI. Here's why:

Multimedia: ‘30 Days as a Muslim’

l hope they all get coverage, and especially near ground zero in NYC! make those polititicans know who really holds the vote, not the dirty long haired scumbags who go to anti war rallies, aka ex commies.
show these politicians that all the regualr DOES make the country work, and actually do vote!

Thank you, Goobs & om namah Shivaiya. By the looks of it, Haidon managed to get my above post calling for the burning of our enemy's flags e.g. Iran, Palestinian Authority, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, etc deleted. Because, if the problem was merely the plugging of another evidently objectionable website, that sentence could simply have been deleted without altering the meaning of the rest of what I wrote.

I didn't get to read Haidon's response, but apparently, I'm accused of supporting Terrorism. Given that so is Israel and Serbia and US, I consider that accusation an honor coming as it does from a Mohammedan.

I'll repeat my original non controversial (to Infidels) point: we don't need demonstrations where taquiyya artists would have no reservations in joining us. We need demonstrations that highlight the differences between Infidel aspirations and Mohammedan designs, not the similarities in the negative reactions to 9/11, which most Muslims view as bad PR anyway.

I am not able to get to any of those areas today, but I hope it goes well. Thanks for everyone who is putting their time and support behind this!

Rally Against Islamofascism Day.

Its name should be changed to "Rally Against Islam Day".

Posted by: anonymous at March 31, 2007 09:35 AM

Anonymous: "Islamofascism" is a euphemism for "Islam." Political correctness requires the use of the long-winded term.

Anonymous: "Islamofascism" is a euphemism for "Islam." Political correctness requires the use of the long-winded term.

I am not at all convinced that people use the term "Islamofascism" as a euphemism for "Islam", I think they believe there is a difference between "Islamofascism" and "Islam".

As for what political correctness requires, why should anyone fighting Islam strive to be politically correct?

Some people, esp. those who are wedded to the conceit that Islam is "the religion of peace," do in fact believe that there is a distinction between the terms "Islam" and "Islamofascism." For those who recognize Islam for what it is, the terms are interchangeable. Pointing that fact out would be considered inflammatory by many, so in an effort not to derail the larger debate, it's often not prudent not to harp on the fact that the two words are synonomous.

and Democrat Pelosi is on her way to tea with terrorist Assad of Syria.

For those who recognize Islam for what it is, the terms are interchangeable.

Actually, those who know that there is no difference between Islam and Islamofascism are precisely the people who should not use the terms interchangeably and instead insist on only using the term "Islam". One should not adopt Islam apologist jargon unless one wants to be an Islam apologist.

and Democrat Pelosi is on her way to tea with terrorist Assad of Syria.

Posted by: Lame Cherry

Contributing to Global Warming and Global Jihad.
Go Nance!

Unfortunately, I think brother Ibrahim will likely be teh only Muslim there in support.

Posted by: Haidon

I was at that rally. The one at Ground Zero. There was an American moslem there by that name. I am not sure why he'd want to stay a moslem after all the evidence against islam coming straight out of the KKKoran.

He made like a nice sympathetic guy and cracked a few jokes. First time I ever seen a moslem make a joke or even try.

When he took the mike and started talking about how the misguided moslems are misinterpreting the word or Mahomet I was ready to puke.

Either this dude is deluded or he's up to something Taquiyya-like. He even calmed down a moslem passerby who started shouting at an American who had a copy of the KKKoran whith all the "bad" stuff highlighted in yellow. Pretty funny stuff. There was a LOT of yellow in his book.

Anyway, the passerby walked up while the American was quoting the violent passages from the KKKoran to Ibrahim. He even dropped a page on the ground during the argument. Nice to see the KKKoran all dog-eared and marked-up too!

I don't think Ibrahim liked the "infidel" handling of the KKKoran very much. He seemed flustered and uncomfortable. Maybe I am just paranoid but that's what I observed.

I mean it's nice to see the moslem-against-jihad but he also defused the agument with the passerby as fast as he could by hugging the guy and calling him brother.

He didn't call any of the Americans brothers the whole day.

He also made and interestinf slight of the tongue while he was on the podium. He said that violence is against the will of Allah and all other Gods.

Am I alone in finding that worth noting?

There was a speaker from the Loyalist Party who was most on point of all the speakers. I didn't catch his name nor those of hardly anyone else. The soundsystem had problems.

Anyway I looked up the link to their site since the speaker was so excellent. He sounded almost like Robert. He knew everything there is to know about islam and he was laying it out there.

http://www.loyalistparty.com/

I'd love to hear what others have to say who attended one of the rallies. I also met someone who says he goes on JW but even though we talked we didn't exchange any personal information.

I have a few pics which I took at the event.

Should make it a regular thing... on 9/11 would be good too.

Posted by: MusHuntCowboy

I spoke to one of the organizers and suggested July 4th might be a great time for the next rally. Maybe a little tailgating action.. some hotdogs and beer after the main part of rally.

The "moderate moslem test": have a few dogs and a coupla beers.

By the way.. I also interpret anti-islamofascism day to mean anti-islam day. It's obvious they'd have HUGE problems right off the bat if they called it what it is. And they are giving guys like Ibrahim a chance to be show us the moderate side of things.

Personally, I am sceptical. Ibrahim is either deluding himself or he is deluding us.

We should have these things more frequently.

Islam is evil and it must be stopped.

Linking ISLAM and FASCISM in one word- for the popular mind- is not a bad thing, even if clunky.

As more read the playbook of the pedophile warlord and Hadiths (Kooky Thoughts of Chairman Mohammad on slave fondling, devil farting and other facts about Islam's fearless leader), the fascism part will seem redundant.

Read the Koran.

SPREAD THE DREAD!

Seattle wrap up:

Good:

- UAC coordinator is a good guy, albeit a little green in dealing with muslim terrorists.
- Decent Americans showed up but the age demographic was 35+.
- Seattle Police made their presence known in a polite fashion as always.

Bad:

-CAIR was there and handed out business cards and korans.

Very Bad:

-CAIR bragged about their close relationship with the enemies of America, the traitors and scum that should have been in the Trade Centers instead of innocent people, the fbi and ice and a couple of other TLA traitorous enemies of the American people. CAIR championed yet another upcoming meeting with them next week.

The external enemy will never be defeated until the internal enemies are defeated.

May Ha Shem deal with all enemies of America, external and internal, swiftly.

Chairman Mao's thoughts (such as they were...) were recorded in his Little Red Book. Perhaps people should start occasionally referring to the Qur'an as 'Mohammed's Little Green Book', in order to set up a - wholly applicable - association in people's minds. Alternatively: 'Mohammed's Mein Kampf'.

First, sketchy impressions from New York (just returned home on a super ride on the Greyhound):

-the UAC New York organizer of the rally is a mighty lady; she managed to assemble a mostly intelligent pack of speakers that kept going well after the closing time;

-a majority of the speakers were women from all walks of life, knowledgeable, articulate, well-grounded. One, speaking about the plight of Israel, was very emotional and kind of lost her bearings. I guess it's hard to be cool and composed when speaking from near Ground Zero

-the guy who called himself Ibrahim, perhaps an American convert to Islam who looked like an aging biker/Vietnam Vet, made very little sense with his allegiance to the path Mohammed set, despite his condemnation of "terrorists." The guy seemed honest but deluded. He made you wander if he really knew what that Mohammedan path really was.

-there was a young guy with a new party, the Loyalist Party, right at the end, who seemed to know Islam, but he was an ad-hoc speaker, and he could not expand, though the people wanted to hear him.

-there was a "born-again" lady, inviting Muslims to accept Jesus

-a minor scholarly disputation, right at the end, between a man who professed to know the whole truth about Islam, and a Muslim passing by who claimed we, in the West, don't know anything about Islam. The disputation remained confined at verbal exchanges and finger-pointing (literally).

-hordes of tourists and on-lookers, taking pictures with their digital cameras, held above and at a distance from their eyes, and focused on the image they received on the little camera screen for evidence of the excentricity of New York and America that the object of the picture was clearly lost on them.

-a chilly, windy day, and no good coffee joint nearby, just a Burger King and a "Panini Cafe" with an all-Asian staff--let's call it, generously, a "fusion" fast-food joint.

I AGREE! Let's trade Pelosi for the Brits. Heck, let's throw in Harry Reid and DICK Durbin, John Murtha, John Kerry, Dennis Kucinich, and the RINO's in the US Congress as well!

Shiva wrote

Fighting Islamic terrorism, doesnt require killing all Muslims, only the bad ones.

In my eyes the bad ones are also the merchants of Taqiya and dawa,and you are a perfect example,along side Tariq Ramadan

Did you not give a lecture in Australia to fellow muslims on how to answer critics of Islam

You have also quoted That your muslin name is
Hamza Mohammed but stopped using it in 2001.

You are misconstruing and mis-articulating the problems of Islam which has proven a remarkably successful at raking in enormous sums from well-paid lectures,and fleecing dhimmie goverments

These are the true Moslems,the ones who did not convert for a fat pay check

Nice subtle threat shiva... What the f*** are you talking about? I never gave a lecture in Australia on any such topic. I did however take place in a discussion in New Zealand in May 2003 on how Muslims should address the media. In that discussion I advised Muslims, that they must avoid taking the path of Muslim apologists and be open, honest and forthcoming, as opposed to shifting blame to non-Muslims.

You are correct, I did stop using my Muslim name, but in 2002. I still ocassionally use it however.

As far as me engaging in taqiyya, produce your proof. I have always spoke in one voice, almost to my own peril. I have always acknolwedged Islam has real problems that must be addressed. And as far as your other baseless accusation, I wont even respond.

Yours sincerely
Thomas

llahfanculo, ovidius_naso and anyone else interested. That young man speaking at Ground Zero from the Loyalist Party was Vito Vaccaro. He is our first actual candidate for office as he will be seeking a seat in the New York state assembly in the 27th district. His speech would have been even better if we knew of it in advance. Many of us in the crowd were fuming that this so called moderate muslim was given the podium to spew his taqiyya nonsense, islam really is peaceful, only radicals twist the true teachings, blah blah. So Mr. Vaccaro asked if he could speak and was given a slot. More spot on he could not have been and the crowd was with him all the way. When the emcee was telling him his time was up many in the crowd were shouting to let him speak. The most entertaining part was when the muslim speaker now in the crowd was yelling at Mr.Vaccaro that he was the real terrorist, sound familiar? The Loyalist Party is looking to build something that is an alternative to the existing parties that not only understand the dangers of islam but will have the courage to do something about it in the political arena. It is extremely small, we have just begun, but it must start somewhere. We are looking for candidates for congress all the way to city councils and county boards and volunteers in all states. We have already started here in NY. When you visit the website it seems like not a lot is going on but there is much being done behind the scenes. There are plenty of informational sites and forums such as this one and are doing a great job. The Loyalist Party is about effecting change politically. We cannot do this with our current legislators so we must put our own in office.If interested go to the website and contact Briann, no matter what state you are in, if in New York feel free to contact me.

From post above:

Actually, those who know that there is no difference between Islam and Islamofascism are precisely the people who should not use the terms interchangeably and instead insist on only using the term "Islam". One should not adopt Islam apologist jargon unless one wants to be an Islam apologist.

Agreed, in part. I try to refer to "Islam" where others are talking about "Islamofascism" and have gotten into heated debates over whether they are synonomous. It is often, but not always, a debate worth having. As an example of when it is not worth it, when calling into a radio show on some Islamic topic, if you make the point that those 2 terms are the same, that will derail the other point you called in about, as you will face shocked and offended hosts and guests, and have to risk being cut off as a "racist" (one who hates members of the Islamic race??) or the ever popular "Islamophobe."

Hi All. I'm a co-founder of the Loyalist Party, and was the first to speak with Vito.

I must say, he's extremely passionate, and he is unflinchingly anti-Islamic. He will NEVER bow to Islam. EVER.

He is exactly why we founded this party. Brian and I will gladly fund any N.Y. activities in the future that he speaks at.

Franco Germain

Franco

I've been a fan of the Loyalist party ever since I read about it in these pages. I'd love to see it emerge as the largest 3rd party - you certainly deserve to be there ahead of the Greens, the Libertarians (even though I consider myself one), and all the rest. For the mainstream, I'm supporting Tancredo

I read your website. What do you think of the current Iraq policy - do you agree with Hugh here that we ought to withdraw from Iraq and let Shia and Sunni from throughout the region converge there and have at it, or do you have a different approach?

Thanks for all the kind words Infidel Pride. The Libertarian party’s platform has some good positions. However, on the most important issues, they are way off. Their platform specifically states that individuals must not be constrained by our government in the crossing of political boundaries. They are for open borders, and immediate amnesty. And they would never take a stand against Islam.

As far as Iraq goes, I've heard that argument several times. I’m going to spend a bit of time on this subject, and it will reappear on our webpage as an opinion piece.

90% of the Islamic terrorists are non-Iraqis. Remember that. Say it again and again if you have to, because it’s crucial to understanding Iraq's role in the global jihad.

We must understand that this 90%, is the beginning of an unlimited supply of Jihadists entering from all corners. They are the product of the Islamic Revolution of 79, that spread throughout the world. They’re a generation of the most virulent, destructive creatures in humanity, that have been strategically brainwashed by the mosques and institutions to pledge their life to jihad. The more we wait, the more their numbers increase. They used to be only 60-75% of the Iraqi insurgence.

That doesn’t mean that the secular division doesn’t exist in Iraq. Of course it does, as it does in so many other Muslim countries, but it’s being used as a tool by the external 90% to expedite the Iraq’s topple. Ahmadinejad is training, supplying, and funding both Sunni and Shiite paramilitary organizations, because he knows it has been the key to the softening our politicians' and changing of their views on the war.

If and when we leave, the external forces will quickly push for secession movements as they have in all similar situations. There will still be secular strife, but the 90% will now see it as only secondary importance. In the long term, the secular clashes will be brought down to a level resembling other secularly spit Muslim countries.

Why are the 90% of foreign Islamists drawn to Iraq? The Islamists understand the importance of Iraq falling as part of their Islamic cause. Not just because it will become another safe-haven for Islamic paramilitaries and brainwashing, but because it will send a clear message to the west. THIS!!!!! is what happens if you mettle in the Muslim world. We outnumber you 1000 to 1, and we kill 100 million babies before we let you chip away our Islaomfascist Reich.

Look at how effective this strategy has been. Iran is unbelievably emboldened. Ahmadinejad is openly telling the world that he is in the planning stages of a second genocide, and not a single European country wants to even consider a tactical strike, because they are scared to create ‘another Iraq.’ Instead, they are in a state of bewilderedness. They are diluted, convincing themselves that the Iran’s Mullacracy is on the verge of falling, and their pathetic symbolic sanctions will expedite this.

So getting back to the question of a different approach to Iraq.

In a perfect world, we will focus all our attention on the stopping the flow of Jihadists into Iraq. Like flies to garbage, this is where a large portion of the global Jihadists have chosen to flock to, so we must continue to meet them there with loaded guns.

And the rest of the Islamic world that has fueled this Jihad must be treated as we treated the Third Reich. There must not be a single institution left standing that preaches or embodies its form of disgusting hate. The world must become De-Islamified.

BUT, I know this will never happened. I know we are about to leave Iraq, and possibly even Afghanistan in the long term. I know that Islam is winning the war of patience and propaganda, and the west has responded by reverted to isolationism, and ignoring their imminent doom. We are repeating the 30’s all over again and I fear the age of nuclear Jihad is almost upon us. I hope when it comes, by some act of god, the Loyalists are on our country’s doorstep.

Franco Germain