Jihad against 70 year-old Buddhist men. Thai Jihad Update, from Reuters:
An elderly Buddhist man was shot dead and his body set on fire in Thailand's restive south of Narathiwat, police said on Monday.
Thongmee Mainman, 70, was attacked as he drove his motorbike home from a market in Narathiwat, one of three Muslim-majority southern provinces beset by a three-year separatist insurgency in which more than 2,000 people have been killed, they said.
So obvious this wasnt the action of a muslim because Islam forbids burning people with fire as it is only Allah's exclusive right.
Abdullah,
There you go again, rationalizing the irrational...
(Where does it say in the Qur'an the fire is only Allah's exclusive right?)
Anyway, I'm glad you didn't blame the Jews right off the bat, this time...
Cheers,
http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com
christian young men high on jesus juice beat a homeless man in San Francisco. His was homosexuiality and homelessness. He was taken to hospital with severe head injuries. He spend 3 days in coma and later released. Eyewitnesses said that the 4 young chrstian men had a conspicious cross dangling from their neck. They are thought to have gone into rapture.
HadithVolume 4, Book 52, Number 259:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle sent us in a mission (i.e. am army-unit) and said, "If you find so-and-so and so-and-so, burn both of them with fire." When we intended to depart, Allah's Apostle said, "I have ordered you to burn so-and-so and so-and-so, and it is none but Allah Who punishes with fire, so, if you find them, kill them."
Then again, the majority of the Southerners are probably illiterate, much less scholars of the Hadith, so they may be excused for not knowing about this, and simply ritually beheading the Buddhists in the required way (slitting their throats while chanting the name of their pagan moon god)
papbear....that is a lie....a criminal lie, filthy pig, stop lieing about Islam...
This is how I know Islam forbid burning with fire....Ali ibn abi talib the prophet's nephew was approached by a man who claimed that Ali was devine. He said to Ali, 'anta huwa' 'you are Him' ie meaning you are Allah. Ali was so enraged by this that he burnt the man alive on the spot....
This sad news had reached a scholar by the name Ibn Abbass who came to see Ali to inform him about the matter he engaged in. Ibn Abbass told Ali to he had heard Allah's apostle say 'do not burn anyone with fire as it is Allah's right to do on the day of judgement'......Ali then repented.
How can this fool above say the messenger told people to burn people....WHAT A PREPOSTEROUS LIE
Abdullah, follow the link. I am quoting your own scriptures, from a site maintained by Muslims.
The link points to a web site maintained by the Muslim Students Association. The link goes directly to the Hadith, to the section on "Fighting for the Cause of Allah (Jihaad)"
I urge everyone to read that chapter of the Hadith in its entirety
While you're at it, take a look at some of the other loathsome and psychotic things that Mo has done. To start out with
On Mohammod's Having Sex With a Nine Year Old Girl
Volume 8, Book 73, Number 151:
The abd doesn't even know his own religion!
Has he read the sunna?
Ibn Abbass told Ali to he had heard Allah's apostle say 'do not burn anyone with fire as it is Allah's right to do on the day of judgement'......Ali then repented.
How can this fool above say the messenger told people to burn people....WHAT A PREPOSTEROUS LIE
Posted by: Abdullah
Oh, the fine details of who is allowed to kill and how they should do it.. Abby.. talking on a cell phone can cause AIDS.. yep.. a new rumor straight from islaminazistan.
Abdullah wrote:
"bn Abbass told Ali to he had heard Allah's apostle say 'do not burn anyone with fire as it is Allah's right to do on the day of judgement'......Ali then repented.
How can this fool above say the messenger told people to burn people....WHAT A PREPOSTEROUS LIE"
In defense of his claim that the prophet did not sanction burning anyone with fire as it was Allah's right Abdullah cited the above passage. Abdullah, your passage condemns you and your perverse religion to evil personified on the spot. The passage you cite indicates, no consequence for Ali, rather that Ali should be careful because he may be depriving allah of allah's pleasure to torture. Are you saying the Muslim who did this was not a Muslim because it was not a Muslim act? Are you saying this is a Muslim who did it, but a misguided one because the Muslim should have allowed allah to murder the infidel. Do you support a public execution of the ones who killed this poor peaceful monk, the victim of yet another muslim atrocity? You are the pervert for not denouncing the murderers. You are the pervert for denouncing this site for pointing out another atrocity committed ostensibly with allah's blessing. Allah is an evil god. Your prophet came up with a great code for 7th century thieving murdering bandits. allah is a scam and the devil. Pray to him at your peril.
"So obvious this wasnt the action of a muslim because Islam forbids burning people with fire as it is only Allah's exclusive right.
Posted by: Abdullah "
...hey Abby, read your own teachings:...
Sura (4:56) - Those who disbelieve Our revelations, We shall expose them to the Fire. As often as their skins are consumed We shall exchange them for fresh skins that they may taste the torment Lo! Allah is ever Mighty, Wise
Abby, what is going on here?...
"Bukhari (54:487) - Someone asked, "O Allah's Apostle This (ordinary) fire would have been sufficient (to torture the unbelievers)," Allah's Apostle said, "The (Hell) Fire has 69 parts more than the ordinary (worldly) fire, each part is as hot as this (worldly) fire." In other words, ordinary fire isn't hot enough to torture non-Muslims. Therefore the fire in Hell is 69 times hotter"
Abby, one more from "your Book"
"Sura (40:71-72) - When the fetters and the chains shall be on their necks; they shall be dragged Into boiling water, then in the fire shall they be burned"
Phoney dullard doesn't know that Kinnana was set on fire to get him to "tell where the treasure be". This on the direct orders of mohamet. dullard is trying to do a portrayal of a nasty radical. But he is doing a poor job because he doesn't know much about mohametanism.
In his silly little game dullard becomes an accomplice to this.
http://illustratedpig.blogspot.com/2007/04/this-is-not-bbc-cnn.html
nabi ZK
Completely acceptable in Islam
2.193. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allâh) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allâh (Alone). But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zâlimûn (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)
'idn batutta' posted about a Christian, white person who beat up someone and I would like to tell her about the different societies - ours vs islamic/sharia law.
We treat those kinds of persons as criminals: catch them, give them a trial and mete out a judgement (jail time, fine, etc). In muslims societies they do very little if anything at all, especially if they are not a muslim. In fact, they teach in their schools very little else but to hate, torture and kill non-muslims.
The only valid point I can opinionated to this article is that 2,000 people have been killed on this on going behaviour and usually in the name of Islam because it's about separatist’s movements.
Why separatist? Because obviously Muslims world over can not and will not abide by other rules not even for peace like in a democracy, its all a one way game when it comes to Islam and the compromises or diplomacies are not equal either.
You can see in the our democracies how Muslims keep asking for separatist demands in every corner of free society expressing not freedom but introvert behaviours and rules by extroverting it on others with demands if not bring fear to the people who have to deal with it.
If muslims were so against killing people and then burning them - then those men they killed in Iraq, burned them and then hung them on a bridge - was just horseplay I suppose.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/22/AR2005102201192.html
And keep in mind that these men were there to help Iraq rebuild, while what were the Iraqi men doing?
Good work, PapaBear!
Just a little more and Abby (normal) may have the head explosion (a la Mars Attacks).
I heard the old Buddhist was going to Afghanistan to recarve the Bamiyan Buddhas and had to be stopped.
Don't want people seeing a religious figure smiling.
Allah forbid!
Possible Sudden Jihad Syndrome at Va. Tech.
20 dead, "Asian gunman"
Idn Battuta:
You're right.
We should be cutting off their heads and setting their bodies afire, Islamic style!
A 70 year old man was shot while on his motorbike while coming home from the market?
Now that's what I call a fair fight. This 70 year old man undoubtedly knew that there would be a fight, and he was armed with a gun himself. Right? He was only on his motorbike because he wanted to make a quick escape after firing 100 rounds at the enemy he had agreed to engage in battle with. Right?
One thing that can be said about jihadists is that they certainly fight fair.
And for all you jihadist junkies out there who think I'm serious, you need to know that I am being sarcastic. You actually fight like the dirty dog your evil prophet was and is.
Very similar to this story of a 26 year-old Thai Buddhist woman being killed and burned, also on a motorbike:
http://illustratedpig.blogspot.com/2007/04/this-is-not-bbc-cnn.html
Seems to be a trend with these barbarians.
"more than 2,000 people have been killed"
.....mostly old men, women, and children....do not foget those fierce fighters the ice cream vendors!, The rubbertree plantation workers!, the tomato salesman!, the elderly nuns!......
......Islam is a thrill kill machine....makes Freddie Kueger look like Elmo....
It should be no surprise to anyone posting here that Abdudulah is confused, misinformed or simply denying about the facts and information concerning islam. It is the hallmark of a religion of hate orchestrated to seduce it's followers and designed to overcome everyone not in their belief system to use the parts that are relevant to the cause and throw out the others at will. Sorry that was such a long and rambling sentence....
the part that amuses me is that muslims can't kill people with fire because it is allah's devine right, not because its cruel and inhuman....
actually, answer that one mate.