Europe to donate $5.2 million to Palestinian presidency

No, the jizya is not coming from 'Europe'. It's coming from hapless Europeans, leeched out of their enterprise and hard work.

What fevered universe does this Jeremy Hobbs live in? '...restore the faith of Palestinians in the European Union...' Does any Palestinian even know or care two nail bombs about this European Union?

The peoples of Western Europe have, as members of the oil-consuming nations, have had to pay a very large share, over the past third-of-a-century, of the ten trillion dollars that has been transferred from oil-consumers to the oil (and gas) producers of the Arab and Muslim nations of OPEC, and who are now paying, on top of those amounts, huge sums for security to protect themselves against the acts of their local Muslim populations, including the cost of monitoring such populations, and the cost of police, lawyers, judges, and then of course prisons for all those Muslims who are caught engaged in the kind of activities, from robbery to rape of Infidels -- that are not seen as criminal, but rather what the Infidels deserve, what they have coming to them, by presuming to lord it over Muslims, presuming to think that Infidel laws and institutions and social arrangements have any value, and should be protected from Infidel demands.

And then there are, in addition, the vast sums transferred through all the benefits that sometimes absurdly generous welfare states, set up by, and with the money of, Infidels, and which welfare systems are now being milked for everything they can by the burgeoning Muslim populations of France, of Spain, of Great Britain, of Belgium, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Netherlands, Denmark, and Italy.

And if all those ways of transferring Infidel wealth to the Camp of Islam, both in Dar al-Islam and to the Muslims now settled deep behind what Muslims themselves are taught to regard as enemy lines were not enough, European governments, and for that matter North American ones, persist in thinking it is they, it is their Infidel taxpayers, who should be transferring still further billions, siphoned off so often in corrutpion, to Egypt, to Pakistan, to Jordan, and to the local Arabs, renamed post-1967 as the "Palestinians," who are merely the shock troops of the Arab Muslim siege, that is without end but can be managed through the principle of Darura (that is, ensuring that Israel is not only stronger, but perceived as overwhelmingly stronger, so that the principle of necessity or "darura" will permit or even require Arab states not to go in for the kill, through military means, but to merely contine to wage war through economic, diplomatic, and demographic pressure -- which an aroused Israel, with a government and people properly informed and with the rest of the Infidel world alarmed about its own prospects for withstanding the menace of Jihad not quite as cruelly miscomprehending and hostile to Israel than it has been, will be able to handle.

On what possible basis do the "Palestinian" Arab "refugees" -- the Arabs of Gaza are not "refugees" nor are those of the "West Bank" --they didn't leave anywhere, and those who did leave in 1948 left to end up in Lebanon, Syria, and other countries, mostly in Arab lands where they lived among those who, in the main, shared the same language, religion, culture, worldveiw, and deadly dreams, and if those countries refused citizenship to the Arab "refugees" -- those who for the past forty years, in a deliberate campaign to disguise the Lesser Jihad against Israel as a clash of two "nationalisms."

Thee Two Tiny Peoples Argument, with one people being called not the Jews but the "Israelis" and the other "people" being called the "Palestinians" rather than the Arabs, has had a long run. Notice, however, that in Iraq we all speak about Arabs, and Kurds. And we speak about Darfur, and Arabs and black Africans. And we speak about Morocco, or Algeria, and in those countries, about Arabs and Berbers. Why then, why only in the case of Israel, do we speak not of Arabs but of something called the "Palestinian people"? Are they special in a way that the Arabs of Iraq (as in "Arabs and Kurds") or Arabs of Algeria and Morocco (as in "Arabs and Berbers") or as Arabs in the Sudan (as in "Arabs and black Africans") are not?

Could that way simply be correctly identified as a political campaign, a campaign designed to re-present the war on Israel, the endless siege by hundreds of mmillions of Muslim Arabs (and supported by hundreds of millions of non-Muslim Arabs, because Islam does not permit a non-Muslim sovereignty on land that was once controlled by Muslims, and while ultimately the whole world must be subjugated to Islam ("Islam is to dominate and is not to be dominated"), in the Muslim view those lands that were, for whatever length of time, under Muslim rule -- not only Israel, but also Spain, Sicily, Greece, the Balkans, Bulgaria and Rumania, even southern Hungary, much of Russia, and almost all of India -- have a certain priority. But that does not mean if a territory never controlled by Islam -- such as the Netherlands or Great Britain or France (at least above Poitiers) were through demographic conquest to be dominated by, hence ruled by, Muslims, that the world's Muslims would refuse because it had taken place, say, before other areas on the To-Do list above, had not yet succumbed.

A great deal of attention has been given at this website to the two most obvious fissures in the Camp of Islam that can be seen, and exploited, in Iraq. These are the ethnic fissures, between Arab and Kurd, and the sectarian fissures, between Shi'a Arab and Sunni Arab. Both kinds of fissures are not limited to Iraq, and their widening within Iraq would almost certainly have effects -- from our point of view good, from the point of view of Muslims bad -- on other countries where there are clashes between Arabs and non-Arab Muslims, and on those Muslim lands where Sunnis and Shi'a live, and with both sects large enough so that they will fight back rather than simply fearfully endure the dominance of the other side. Shi'a may make up only 10-15% of the world's Muslims, but in Bahrain they are 70-75%; in Saudi Arabia they dominate the Eastern Province, with the oilfields; in Yemen they make up 45%; in Lebanon they are now the largest sect, having outbred the Christians, the Druse, and even the Sunni Muslims; in Pakistan they may be persecuted, but there are tens of millions of Shi'a, and they are capable of fighting back; in Afghanistan, the Hazara, whom the Taliban tried to wipe out, still exist and may now be better prepared, or better supplied with arms, to resist. On the other hand, in Iran there is a Sunni minority, especially in Baluchistan, and if that simmering revolt were to be encouraged by the example of restive Kurds (who would have responsed to the existence of an independent Kurdistan) in the north, and Arabs in Khuzistan, and possibly even restive Azeris, who might not wish to remain under the control of their Persian masters in Teheran, then it is possible that the Shi'a will repress the Sunnis, purely as a defensive measure in light of the Sunni-Shi'a clashes next door in Iraq.

But there is a third fissure, within the Camp of Islam, that has not been discussed as much, because it does not present itself in Iraq for the purposes of exploitation. That fissure is the economic divide between the rich Muslim states -- i.e., those with oil -- and the poor ones, that is those without (Tunisia and Turkey, having managed to tame or constrain Islam, have managed to make economic progress, certainly far more than one sees in those countries such as Egypt, or Jordan, or Pakistan, or certainly than the apparently permanent recipient of Infidel manna, the "Palestinians.").

The Western countries have fallen into the habit of keeping up payments to these Muslim states and peoples, no matter how obviously stupid or unhelpful to the West those payments may be, because the classic psychological stance of non-Muslims forced to pay the Jizyah under Muslim rule, has come to be exhibited by Western governments, afraid to cut their aid to Muslims for fear of what the Muslim reacton might be. In other words, that Western aid to Muslims has become a kind of "protection money." And if that were not bad enough, the Muslim recipients are not one whit grateful, but demand that aid as of right. Just look at how the "Palestinians" appear to believe that they have a right to Western aid, and that the brief denial of that aid, because of some temporary attempt to demonstrate, however pitifully, that Western states will not give financial aid to a terrorist group, Hamas, that runs the "Palestinian" Authority. The fiction is maintained by these governments that Hamas and Fatah are quite different. In fact, Fatah is for the Slow Jihad and Hamas for the Fast Jihad, and they agree completely on the ultimate goal -- that of erasing Israel as a Jewish, i.e., Infidel state, and differ only on matters of tactics and timing.

Just look at how the Arabs, especially the "Palestinians," describe the suspension of foreign aid from Infidels. They call it an "economic embargo" or a "boycott." They are genuinely indignant. They regard Infidel taxpayers not coming through with more billions, even though many of the previous billions simply disappeared into the private coffers of Arafat, and his "wife," and of course into the pockets of the PLO leaders, who bought themselves villas, and have large bank accounts, in France and elsewhere in the Western world -- the money coming from ordinary Infidel taxpayers who were not consulted on where their money should go.

It is not an "embargo" nor a "boycott" to cease to support the shock trooops of the Lesser Jihad against Israel. All Western transfers of wealth to Muslims , other than those of necessity (oil and gas purchases) should cease. to buy oil and natural gas, should cease. And again and again, publicly, Western governments should say that those rich Muslim countries, the ones that have "received ten trillion dollars in oil revenues" (this figure should be on every politician's lips in the Western world, until everyone else knows what the rich Arabs have taken in), should be "sharing their wealth" with "fellow members of the Muslim community." Keep embarrassing them. Force the "Palestinians" and others to go hat in hand to Riyadh, or to the Emirates. Or perhaps not hat in hand -- perhaps a little more threateningly. It doesn't matter.

Then one of two things will happen. Either the rich Arabs and Muslims will give money to the poor ones, or they won't. Either way, resentments will naturally follow. For if they don't give the aid, the poorer Arabs will be enraged and begin to talk about "the Arab wealth" that "must be shared." And that can only make the Saudis and the people in the Emirates and Kuwait and Qatar nervous. And if some money is forthcoming, then it will never be enough, and there will be constant demands for more, and inevitably there will be resentments on the side both of those who give, and those who take. And those resentments will grow -- why should not the Arabs generally, the poor ones will think, have equal shares "in Arab wealth" which is merely manna from Allah.

Why, indeed?

And from that realization, and those resentments, the economic fissure within the Arab and Muslim world can have a spotlight placed on it by intelligent Infidels, and the trouble it will cause within the Camp of Islam will be, or could be, considerable.

Meanwhile, just stop the Jizyah to the "Palestinians" and, if Europeans with to feel guilty, they should be more intelligent in their chose of whom to feel guilty toward. In the Middle East, it is not the Arabs and Muslims who should be the recipients of their support of any kind. But there is one tiny country, under permanent assault, with whatever weapons come to hand, by far more powerful, richer, more numerous fanatical enemies, in the Middle East, toward whom the countries of Western Europe have not only a right, but a duty, to feel guilty about --the very country they have been maligning (or allowing others in the media to freely malign and misreport about), and slowly abandoning, for the past forty years. And that tiny country, of course, is Israel.

They produce nothing, they create nothing, they want you dead and they tell you every day, but you pay for it?

http://sheikyermami.com/2007/04/12/pali-minister-seeks-13-billion-in-jiziyah-aid-for-the-jihad-of-course/

Does any Palestinian even know or care two nail bombs about this European Union?

Posted by: Dane

Question is: does any European?

This wasting of money is SO frustrating. No the pals go buy more rockets and moer AK-47s they can wave in the streets.

Please send Sue Myrick to Europe to talk some sense into those dhimmis!!

Aren't we spending enough on these clowns living in our countries proper?

This aid will allow us to improve the work, the performance and the running of the presidency," Husseini said after the signing.

This work, of course, is the killing of Jews. I cannot believe that the anti-semitism of the European arrogants are behind this. Do they ever listen to any of the speeches of this Islamic tyrant? The EU is the worse manifestation of European culture and, if not stopped, will aid in the destruction of that culture.

Again the devil is doing his trade against the Jews, he wants them wiped out it's all Biblically related too and during the end times every nation will gang up on an Israel of the future. Oh guess what there is an Israel now and what are people doing ww2 was just first base?
As predicted the Arab countries will surround the future Israel and you name it that's that plan is at hand today, this of course before Islam was even established. The rest of the world will follow in time but attitudes prove that; we should not blame our selves in Europe for this because the devil will do his part in exterminating the Jews and giving people delusions. Of course people can say I am deluded in all this talk, but by comparing the now and comparing prophecy you have to be silly to deny it as non related, some may just never heard of it in this day and age but people too busy to see the world around them and even Christians fail to relate from a Biblical point of view.

Europeans have no care for the Israelis, it is common knowledge even if they do not state that fact outright. they have a long history of jewish hatred. Of course, I am generalizing and I am sure there are some who are ok with them. But, the Europeans vote for those politicans they have who are paying jizya to muslim countries.

In fact, the Europeans are so very fond of the likes of Che, Castro, etc. disgusting. They are the same as our left who are very often financed by communist, or socialists left of Stalin. And that goes to the very top of the left - the Democrat party.

There is a tie between islam and nazism too.
You can google it - al husseini islam nazi - to name a few key words, other key words are wahabbism nazi.

http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/gallery/

but, even the koran has been broken down along with Mein Kampf and how similar they are in their writings. One writing is an article by Mr. Spencer: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=10708

Another article is: http://democracyfrontline.org/blog/?p=880

You can google for yourselves of all the articles on this. I have not read Mein Kampf, but I have read the koran and say that I find it a very rude book. I don't find it very holy, but I do find that one can learn the fighting tactics of jihadists in it too. A lot of death, slavery, kidnapping, the sharing of booty (human booty included), lying to others, stealing, torture etc to do to others. Even all the cruelties that should be done to women are in it.

is long past time for the West that giving aid to the terrorists of fatwa and Hamas and Hezbollah through our foreign aid donations as long as their stated goal is the following because Islam does not permit a non-Muslim sovereignty on land that was once controlled by Muslims, and while ultimately the whole world must be subjugated to Islam ("Islam is to dominate and is not to be dominated"), in the Muslim view those lands that were, for whatever length of time, under Muslim rule -- not only Israel, but also Spain, Sicily, Greece, the Balkans, Bulgaria and Rumania, even southern Hungary, much of Russia, and almost all of India --
this idea may have been okay in their pedophile prophet's time but that time is long past and like Christianity is long past time for Islam to have its own Reformation! The refugees from the 1949 war now known as Palestinians are a tool of jihad dreamed up by the Saudi's the Jordanians and other Middle Eastern Arab countries see how much money the Saudi Arabians have let pay for the upkeep of the refugee problem that they created

Let the oil-rich Muslim lands throw their money into this pit.

Israel should have ejected all Muslims in 1967 when they had the wartime justification, and accepted the consequences, which are exactly what they have gained by trying to be "moderate" and "decent" and "understanding":

endless jihad war to annihilate them.

At least they then wouldn't have had to worry about the parallel demographic-"democratic" erosion-invasion from within, as well.

Their scorned and assassinated 'prophet' Meir Kahane was right.

As Pim Fortuyn and Theo Van Gogh were right in Holland for the West.

Let the Muslims pay for their own warriors.

Cut the jizyah; cut the crap.

"by Western governments, afraid to cut their aid to Muslims for fear of what the Muslim reacton might be. In other words, that Western aid to Muslims has become a kind of "protection money."

.....time to quit giving the schoolyard bully your lunch money....you already know his intention when you see him approaching you....

.....next time you see him....give him a good thrashing and send him and his bloody nose home...tell him that if he behaves , you won't take his money.....

no more foreign aid, no more jizyah, no more submission....only death can be assured...one way or another....