Iran stops 50 women at airports for un-Islamic dress

Keeping the world safe from exposed ankles. Sharia Alert, from Agence France-Presse:

TEHRAN, May 13, 2007 (AFP) - Iranian police have prevented 50 women from boarding flights in their ongoing crackdown on dress styles deemed to be out of line with Islamic dress rules, officials said on Sunday.
"Fifty badly-veiled women were prevented from boarding domestic and international flights for failing to respect Islamic dress rules," said the head of airport police Mamoud Bot-Shekane, according to the Fars news agency.
He said that the airport police have handed out "17,135 warnings to women who are not fully respecting the Islamic veil and 850 of them have had to make a written pledge to respect the veil more."
Out of these, the cases of 80 women as well as 50 men have been sent to the judicial authorities, he added.
Iran's police have been enforcing a nationwide crackdown on slack dressing for the past three weeks -- a regular pre-summer event that has been pursued with increased vehemence this year.
Women in Iran are obliged to cover all bodily contours and their heads but in recent years many have pushed the boundaries by showing off naked ankles and fashionably styled hair beneath their headscarves.
Some conservatives have applauded the crackdown as important to protect the security of society but moderates have publicly questioned whether Iran would be better off tackling poverty and crime rather than slack dressing.

But minding other people's business is so much easier.

Iran's police chief Esmaeeli Ahmadi Moghadam has insisted that the crackdown is not temporary and will continue.
| 23 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

23 Comments

Hard to believe this is the 21st century when reading such stories.

Good job they're on the ball, wouldn't want them to deal with poverty, illiteracy, or basic health care, well just let the west do that stuff.

In current times a glimpse of ankle
Is something that's bound to wrankle
'Cause Allah knows, nothing goes...

While we are on the subject of the exalted level of sexual morality in Iran, consider the case of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, The Supreme Leader of Iran, the Shia Grand Ayatollah, 1979-89

He married a ten-year old and reduced the legal marriageable of girls to nine.
The Islamic theocracy of Iran consider him a good and holy man.
God only knows what they consider to be a pervert.

Here are some exerts from his teachings.

"A MAN CAN HAVE SEXUAL PLEASURE FROM A CHILD AS YOUNG AS A BABY. However he should not penetrate, sodomising the child is OK. If the man penetrates and damages the child then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her
life. This girl, however does not count as one of his four permanent wives.The man will not be eligible to marry the girls sister."

From Khomeini's book, "Tahrirolvasyleh", fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom,
Iran, 1990
Book Title Page/ Cover
Inside Cover of Book
Excerpt: Page [1] | Page [2]


Actually some translations read thus:

"A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. If he penetrates and the child is harmed then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however would not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl's sister."

Which is the correct translation? Can anyone tell me?
It is not clear. Did he say “sodomising the child is OK” or not? Obviously Khomeini was a monster but how much of a monster?

I been researching some crime statistics and I am unable to find one case of a pervert convicted with an ankle fetish....

Shoe fetish, MAYBE...

I DID find some cases of serial toe suckers...

Those are the worst of the worst!

Why are Muslims allowed on planes, since none existed when Mohammad lived?

They should use women-faced mules to fly like he did.

Odyessus

I don't know the answer, but it looks like the sodomy part might be implied, possibly based on the definition of the word translated as "penetrate".

If so, then the later translation is probably more literal, omitting the unsavory implications to make it somewhat less disgusting to English-speaking audiences.

The latter translation also uses "harmed" instead of "damaged", which might possibly be more evidence that the translation is misleading. "Damaged" could be in reference to women as property, with the loss of their virginity making them "damaged goods", so to speak. Sodomy would not then cause "damage".

Again, this is purely speculation, based on my analysis of the two translations.

Perverts like Khomeini are terrified of grown up
women who might laugh when they see his prick-probably some did before he became such a 'holy'
man.Having sex with children gives inadequate men
sense of power & complete control : also vent to
sadist fantasies.
You'd have to be very sick to even contemplate having sex with a helpless little baby-would shoot them myself rather than such evil happen
to kids.
Filthy horrible,cruel Bigot-hope Khomeini died slowly and in great pain. Have always thought concentration of Islam on sex & bodily functions is creepy,obscene & totally Depraved-makes for a great argument to shunt the Death Cult down toilet pan of History.

hhmmmm, maybe there should be an enterprising person with the sign in a sales stall at the airport,

Buy your 'throw away' burkas here!
Many styles, many colors, many sizes - you can fit an army inside one - or your favorite shahid!
Cheap!
Duty Free
(it will get you passed the guards)

somebody send them a hustler mag, that will drive them insane!!!!

I like Ahmedinejad. He’s done more to educate us about Islam than all of the College Professors, in all of the Universities, for the last 50 years.

He’s forcing our leadership to act like grown ups. And he might just give the electorate a wake up call too. If there is no electricity, you can't watch American Idol.

Ha,ha.....kafir_kelbeh, there is no "MAYBE" about MY shoe fetish. Yes, you can tell a lot about a woman by looking at her shoes. Based on pictures I have seen, some of the Iranian ladies have excellent taste in shoes!

The REAL reason...well, only two reasons, they really do force coverings (but won't admit to)...

1) the female is as ugly as a camels @$$ & it's "unlawful" for property to embarass her master.

2) the female is hot, and their master doesn't want to share, so "law" says he must hide his property so the other weak-willed, can't-keep-it-in-their-pants losers won't get a boner in public because they're not getting any anyway.

They're not kidding anyone...lol.

the islamic version of makeup & short skirts...the shoe!

Shame on you, kafir!
That's an insult to shoes everywhere!
LOL
(j/k)

I certainly hope this trend doesn't catch on here in America. Imagine going to the airport and being told they don't like your hair or attire?

And, then, instead of getting the benefit of Isaac Mizrahi with his wonderful sketch pad, some big guy with a five o'clock shadow tells you his camel has better legs and to go home and cover yourself up! Or, their version of Clinton and Stacy yell, "Surprise, you're on What Not To Wear and you're going to prison for that ensemble, missy!" And, their version of "The Look for Less," is probably, "The Look of Head-Less."

Of course, there is an up side to the burka. Burka Fridays. Covers the pajamas quite well. Still, Isaac with sketch pad, makes me think these women are getting a bad deal.

An Iranian friend of mine just came back from Iran. He told me his wife was approached in Tehran by a woman in full chador who claimed to be an Islamic guard. This woman began to harangue my friend's wife for not dressing Islamically. My friend was nearby with his uncle and brother when he saw his wife being harrassed. He then turned the tables in a most effective matter.

He walked up to the hijabed woman and then began pointing at her and shouting loudly that she was a prostitute who offered him and the other two men oral sex for 50 rials. He kept shouting until some male police officers arrived. The three men then demanded the Islamic woman guard be arrested for solicitation for prostitution. The woman then tried to run away while the three men kept shouting she was whore. Needless to say, his wife had successfully "disappeared" into a nearby store while all this was happening.

Provoslavni,
I hope the woman your friend accused of being a prostitute was not arrested.
These countries have rather draconian punishments.

Now I know what to start screaming if I have an unfriendly encounter with the bagged ones...

Odyessus,

I disagree. Ms Islamic Enforcer deserves whatever punishment she gets.