Former employee recounts suspicious activities of Islamic charity at trial

Background on Kifah Wael Jayyousi, formerly an official with Detroit and Washington, D.C.'s public schools, can be found here and here. "Witness: Islamic charity work suspicious," by Curt Anderson for the Associated Press:

MIAMI --A Muslim convert testified Tuesday that he grew suspicious and distanced himself from the leader of an Islamic charity after an associate returned from war-torn Chechnya with part of a leg missing from a land mine explosion.
Jeremy Collins, 33, said he worked at American Worldwide Relief that was headed by Kifah Wael Jayyousi, who is on trial along with alleged al-Qaida operative Jose Padilla and an another man on charges of contributing to Muslim extremist causes worldwide. All three face life in prison if convicted.
"It was just chaos. There was no relief work," Collins said he learned from his associate. "There seemed to be more fighting than relief work."
Collins' testimony focuses on Jayyousi's years in San Diego, well before Padilla, a U.S. citizen held for 3 1/2 years as an enemy combatant, came on the scene.
Questions about the organization also were raised when the group's $20,000 satellite telephone was shut down in early 1996 at the request of the Russian government, said Collins, who was the organization's then-vice president.
The Russians claimed it was being used by Chechen rebels, who are attempting to break free from Russian rule and set up an Islamic state.
"How did a phone get into rebel hands, and get shut off and not reinstated?" Collins said he thought at the time.
Along with his relief organization, Jayyousi, 45, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Jordan, was head of another group that published a newsletter called the Islam Report. Prosecutors say the American Islamic Group's newsletter was a propaganda and fundraising tool for radical causes, which Jayyousi has denied.
Every issue included a "theaters of jihad" section recounting armed struggles around the world and usually had editorials written by Jayyousi on subjects such as a trial of blind Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, who is serving a life prison sentence for plotting to blow up New York City landmarks and assassinate Egypt's president.
But Jayyousi attorney William Swor sought to counter the supposed links to violence by asking Collins if it was not also possible to have "jihad of the heart ... jihad with your checkbook, jihad with your pen?"

Sounds like "jihad with your checkbook" was exactly what Jayyousi's "charity" was all about, though not in the way Swor meant.

"Yes," he answered.
"In all the years that you knew Kifah Jayyousi, he always emphasized doing things legally, right?" Swor asked.
"Correct," Collins answered.

Of course, that could also be a perfect cover for Jayyousi's other activities.

Prosecutors are attempting to show that an organization that included Jayyousi and co-defendant Adham Amin Hassoun recruited Padilla as part of a global network to support violent Islamic causes.
[...]
After an off day Wednesday, testimony is to resume Thursday with an FBI agent expected to testify about how Hassoun, Jayyousi and others used code language in telephone calls to discuss violent Islamic extremism.
For example, "tourism" was code for "fighting jihad" and "getting fresh air" meant going to an area of conflict.
| 9 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

9 Comments

who would have thought that muslim charities support muslim jihad......

the bombs will have to go off in Washington DC before the feds will believe...........

prepare...be armed...be ready for it is coming......

Ft Dix is only a snow flake on the ice berg.......

"tourism" was code for "fighting jihad" and "getting fresh air" meant going to an area of conflict"....from headline.

And "religion of peace" must be code for "we hate you, we want to kill you".

I get it now!

From the article:

The Russians claimed it was being used by Chechen rebels, who are attempting to break free from Russian rule and set up an Islamic state.

More crock-o-sh*t reporting. Chechnya was granted defacto independent status in 1996, and they did "set up an Islamic state". What happened next? They started bombing Moscow and invaded neighboring Dagestan.

How many times do we have to listen to this "they only want an independent homeland" chestnut, in Israel, Philippines, Thailand, Russia, Somalia, and anywhere else Muslims emigrate to? Let them "break free" and "set up an Islamic state", grant their every wish, and that will only be the beginning of the violence, not the end.

"It was just chaos."

....which is an Islamic speciality....

specialty...(should be)..

ExSgtBrown,

Specialty or speciality if your doing a mock southern accent. They're both good! (And dead on correct.)

"Jihad with your checkbook"

There is a new phrase that has entered the lexicon of life. Already burnt in.

Someday we'll get beyond the intellectual impediment that jihad or material support of jihad is 'extreme' in some way.

It's not some extemity - it's a fundamental organ of Islam. I sure wish it weren't but I can't deny reality.

Extreme, extremist, radical, highjacker, rebel, insurgent...

Did none of us read Orwell in college? Seems like it.

Call it Islam, and call them Moslems (or Muslims, if you're a submisive White Guy), and call them Jihadis.

But whatever self-comforting bullshit name you choose to use, we're not engaged in a War on Terror; we're engaged in the Global Jihad, as declared by Osama bin Laden in 1996 AD.

Get it?

For Christ's sake, let us stop, or cease and desist to use the lawyerly phrase, with the self-deluding language. It's killing us, and I say that in the literal sense of the word killing.

They are upon us with the violence that is the central predicate of Islam, they proclaim and admit as much, and we're too pussy to acknowledge this extremely disturbing fact.

Am I missing something here? Should it be the case where Moslems and their natural allies the Marxists are allowed to speak openly of what they're doing, but we are proscribed from making similarly realistic statements?

I live in Minnesotastan, so I understand Sharia. Thank you Bob Ulrich of Target Corporation.

But are we now proscribed from using plain accurate language to deal with Islam?

That is the most central question.

May we not use our own self-chosen and self-accepted terminology? Is this forbidden to us by the elite rule of Pinch Sulzberger, Bill O'Reilly, Tim Russert, Sean Hannity, and that hapless capitalist Bob Ulrich?

Again, I refer you to that great Englishman novelist and essayist George Orwell.

Hello?