Indonesian jihad leader will not stop misunderstanding Islam

Where did Abu Dujana get the idea that "jihad is a war"? Where are all the moderate Muslim leaders who should be rushing to explain to him that he has gotten it all wrong? An update to this story. "JI leader will not relinquish 'jihad' commitment," from ABC Radio Australia (thanks to the Constantinopolitan Irredentist):

In Indonesia, the captured Jemaah Islamiya leader Abu Dujana says he will not give up his commitment to "jihad" despite his recent arrest.

Our Indonesia correspondent Geoff Thompson reports from Jakarta that in a new interview with Indonesia's ANTV Abu Dujana said that "jihad" is a war and that long ago when he was fighting in Afghanistan against Soviet forces he met Osama Bin Laden.

Abu Dujana said he became involved in the conflict in Poso in Central Sulawesi to defend and uphold the dignity of Muslims.

He went on to say that despite being caught by police, his commitment to jihad was undiminished.

| 9 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

9 Comments

If the only good jihadi is a dead one, then the only good muslim is the one temporarily on one's side.

The vicious disease that is islam.

What a pity that millions are born into this evil ideology that ranges from the apathy of surrender to the murder of unbelievers.

Lose all hope ye who enter (or ye who try to reason with) islam.

Realise we Infidels have left something out of the equation-THESE GUYS LOVE BEING JIHADIS! Where
else do you have the opportunity to be perpetually 'on holiday' in interesting countries
such as Kashmir,Chechnya,Iraq,etc with all the thrill and adrenalin rush of being a 'Holy Warrior'? The chance to dress up as a Ninja Turtle complete with face mask & head band adorned with holy arabic writing-doesn't matter if you can't read it-to strap yourself with explosives if accepted for Islam's highest honour-of being a Shashid! Wow-that's cool.Hot really,Burn Baby Burn but in a twinkling you will be with Allah and those promised 72 Virgins...
For those less favoured as a'perfumed bloody if burnt sacrifice' for Allah,there is the mundane
excitement of throwing acid into faces of young
women who have committed the heinous sin of being
UNVEILED. For that alone,any Jihadi who fancies
it [unless preferring boys] may rape the whore and leave her DEAD on the side of the road for she is now not only unveiled but IMPURE.
For the more discriminating Jihadi,all the refinements of severe TORTURE may be practised
with impunity upon any SINNERS they catch which
include Non Muslims as well as Muslims who are not Muslim enough.
A true Jihadi though is armed with a shiny Beheading knife in addition to an AK47 & Rocket
Launcher. And a video camera of course to record
his brave deeds...ALLAHU AKBAR!
Sorry Folks-how are we to keep 'em down on their
primitive farms once Jihadi Lads have tasted the
joys of GOING ON JIHAD??

"Where did Abu Dujana get the idea that "jihad is a war"? Where are all the moderate Muslim leaders who should be rushing to explain to him that he has gotten it all wrong?"


Hmmmmm spot on question, there aren't any moderate muslims are there!!

...do you have the lack of desire to think independently, do you lack the desire to work hard and to earn money honestly, are you unable to get a girlfriend by demonstrating some desirable traits that a woman finds attractive, do you abhor law and order, do you find that education is boring and that you have nothing to gain by staying in school, do you feel all your problems are caused by some other groups of people (i.e. the Jews, Whitey, the IRS, the Police, or the Moral Majority), do you feel hemmed in by civil law, do you feel the urge to control others, making them get on their knees and plead for mercy, do you feel trapped in a society that rewards those who have the ability to invent something , run businesses earning millions of dollars, or have the brains to discover cures for diseases while you feel you are punished by the lack of getting the breaks that seem to befall the others, do you feel discouraged because other people like to be clean and clean shaven, while you prefer to be unkempt and you love beards and weird clothes, do you feel anger towards those who have the nice car or nice home, do you feel angred because other people have kind friends who may just go to a church or a synagogue, do you feel others are supposed to give you a job, give you money, or give you anything you desire just because you feel you deserve it....Well, you can convert to Islam, they authorize you to take whatever you want from those you despise, you can take their money, their property, their women, all you have to do is give up your will to succeed on your own and to bow down to Islam....what a deal....Islam is for losers...

Islamists usually say what they mean and mean what they say. The problem is it seems no one in law enforcement is listening.

Agreed with EliasAlucard, there seems to be an epidemic of Islamic misunderstanders, met with the usual chorus of crickets from the pool of those who should correct them.

"Jihad" is silly putty to the apologists.

It can take any form, depending on who your are trying to delude.

As "Islam" means "peace" (not).

And as "jihad" can mean "my struggle" (which, in German becomes "Mein Kampf", curiously enough).

"By their fruits, ye shall know them." is a btter gauge.

Bloodfruit, mostly.

Re. Jim Sutter, a Christian man of the cloth who is not concerned with spreading the good word of Christ, but rather trying to convince the rest of us infidels that Muslim moderate voices do condemn Islamic violence and that we should cease the exploration of Islam itself.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

Good one "Jim", that made my day.

Dear "Rev." Sutter:

If you actually read the "condemnations of terrorism" that you showcase at your site, they don't condemn the idea of jihad warfare. They just say it is a defensive war to establish justice -- which from the point of view of traditional Islamic law means to a war to establish Sharia, and thus to subjugate non-Muslims.

It is also noteworthy that so much of what you tout as condemnations of terrorism comes from the Council on American Islamic Relations, an unindicted co-conspirator in a terrorism funding case.

One wonders why you do not see that as calling any of their fine words into question.

Cordially
Robert Spencer

Awake,

"Reverend" Jim Sutter is unlikely to be in any genuine sense a "Christian man of the cloth." He is in reality a mendacious poseur who has claimed to be an ordained Catholic minister, "higher than a Deacon, but slightly lower than a priest" -- a position that does not exist. There are three levels of the ordained ministry in the Catholic Church: deacons, priests, and bishops, with nothing in between.

http://groups.google.com/group/bit.listserv.ada-law/msg/98eeaf68912e2cf5?hl=en&

Then elsewhere he has contradicted himself, claiming not to be a Catholic deacon/priest at all, but to have been a Catholic Eucharistic Minister, which is not an ordained ministry, and to have received his ordination from a Baptist entity:

http://revjimsutterfacts.blogspot.com/2007/04/just-facts.html

There is much more about this unsavory character that will come out in due time. Of course, his unsavoriness doesn't mean that what he is saying is false. That is demonstrable on numerous other grounds, as I have explained in many examinations over the years here of the condemnations of terrorism that he touts. But it does give us some indication of the quality of the judgments he offers.

Cordially
Robert Spencer