Muhammad burned in effigy in Denmark

burningmohammed.jpg

Gates of Vienna has details, along with video (thanks to all who sent this in). The Danes who did this probably realize that they are, uh, playing with fire. If the puppetmasters decide to make an issue of this, there could be worldwide riots.

But ultimately it comes down to the same old questions. Freedom of speech encompasses precisely the freedom to annoy, to ridicule, and to offend. If it doesn’t, it is hollow: inoffensive speech doesn’t need the protection of a constitutional amendment. The instant that any person or ideology is considered off-limits for critical examination and even ridicule, freedom of speech has been replaced by an ideological straitjacket.

Will the West acquiesce in the Islamic world's efforts to place Islam beyond criticism -- and at a moment when jihad terrorists use Islamic texts and teachings to justify violence? Or will we stand up and defend ourselves?

| 53 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

53 Comments

Mo looks so lovely burning up...!

It's so ironic that the thing that most deserves criticism, Islam, is demanding it never be criticized.

Which shows how much we need to continue criticizing it until the World is safe at some point in the future from the Islamic scourge.

The answer is: We stand up and defend ourselves.

I salute those who did this!


Now, we wait for the muslims to murder some old nuns, or old women now, or bomb someone and say it was because of this. Maybe they will destroy some churches - again. All the while - the masses of 'moderates' do absolutely nothing.

Two for the price of one -- the effigy and the bomb/turban caricature.

Islamic Rage Boy, call your office.

Well, jihad galore now!

No one invited me to the barbeque...I had my pork hot dog already to roast on this fire.

Finally!
Maybe the idea of more civil protest will catch on in other european countries.

Marisol

Good thing here - Abu Laben - the Imam who travelled throughout the Middle East to stoke cartoon rage that surfaced a few months before the cartoon originally ran, is fertilizing the soil from below. Not that there won't be replacements for him attempting a re-run.

One thing - we do see how Mohammedans reacted simply to Rushdie being knighted. What should happen is that random events like this should take place for a week or a month throughout the West - an effigy burning in Denmark one day, a Quran descecration in Washington another, a descecration of the Saudi flag (which contains the Shehada) in UK a third, a mock beheading of Ali in Paris a fourth, a dramatized killing of Imam Hussein (a parallel to the Ashura, but without the real human bloodletting) a fifth in Montreal, a sixth in Den Hague - just keep performing such acts for a period of time on a daily basis. We've seen how Mohammedans react to single events, like the Danish cartoons or the Rushdie knighthood. Let's see how they react to a series of well publicized insults to Islam on a daily basis for a given period. Rage boy and others would have enough of their veins bursting with rage, and we'd hopefully see a magnified version of those riots - in other words, a mini civil war - break out throughout the Islamic empire.

Can this be arranged?

Muslims had better get used to seeing similiar actions blossoming everywhere...people are fed up with Islam...Islam is for losers...

As if he were not burning already...

-XRDC

Has there been any M.E /Muslim reaction yet?

When are we gonna show Mo as he really is, burning in the 9th level of Hell in one of the Mouths of Satan? I think Brutus deserves a mild reprieve in comparison...

(No debate required on the religious aspect of my post...it's Dante's perspective, not mine!) >:)

Burn baby burn MUSLIM INFERNO burn baby burn!

Does wanting them to create a brooharhar over this make me a bad person?

Is that the koran in Mo's right hand?

Yep...this should get 'em stirred up!
IRB (Islamic Rage Boy) should have a full day in the news tomorrow.

Mo fell down in a burning lake of fire
he fell down, down, down
and the flames burned higher.
And it burns, burns, burns
Mo's on fire,
Mo's on fire.

Greetings:

You jihad me...No, me jihad you.

Well, I can't speak for the rest of the world about defending their right to speak freely...
...but here, it's not the first amendment that gives us cause for reprieve from worry, it's our SECOND amendment (the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED)...

-when you have more guns than population
-120 million houses-2.9 guns per household
(source US Census Bureau)
-25% of the total are full automatic (machine guns),
-35% of the total are assault weapons,
...more armed citizens than all of histories armed forces recorded combined (200 million+),
and the wherewithall to use them
(71% have various degrees of military experience and know how to use them, and they they're just waiting for another attack to make THEIR voice heard),
...you can say any damned thing you wish.

That's why we don't see riotous rampages and murderous rage here like we saw in europe...we WILL shoot back.

;-)

An Intoxicated group from a lager swilling nation insults the Prophet(PBUH) by setting fire to his effigy. Is there not a Dane out there with a modicum of conscience who can find it within himself to go forth and dampen those searing flames? -Probably.

I'm glad to see that someone in the E.U. is willing to let themselves be heard. Just wondering where the copies of the koran and the flag burnings are to go along with it?

Oh, and what have we heard from the "hate speech" crowd? You know it's coming.

People seem to forget that most of the worldwide riots were in Muslim countries, there most of the damage happened. In the west they were vocal outburst with threats but not real material damage, more like alfa baboons showing there teeth to discourage a rival. What the Danes are up too is to provoke them into more of these displays and over a longer period of time. This has happened in more places in Denmark, these good Danes have two more videos that they have taken of the same procedure, burning images of the prophet, they are going to release these at one month intervals. The muslims wont be able to keep up these displays for ever they will have to put up or shut up. What ever they do it will be a win win situation for the Danes and the west, if they shut up it will prove that they are nothing more that posing wind bags and if they do something they will condemn themselves even more by their intolerance. I personally don't think that anything will happen. The Cartoon affair was coordinated at a government level, they didn't cower the Danes then and they wont cower them now. Why waste your time organizing three months of riots in your own country if you are not going to get anything out of it. The MSN will not do anything they are not going to rock the boat unless they decide to report any of the so called spontaneous riots in different muslim capital cities. And as those will not be forthcoming nothing will happen.

The nice thing that most people missed about the Cartoon affair is that Denmark is the Western country that would be least affected by an Arab boycott. Denmark is virtually Energy independent. They have an oil field in the North Sea that supplies most of the needs of the country and they supply 20% of there energy needs through renewable resources. Denmark have vast Windmill parks both in the North Sea and the Baltic. Denmark's trade is not dependent on exports to the Middle East. What they lost in trade in the middle east they more than made up for by the rise in exports to the non islamic countries. Denmark is stronger now than when it was before the Cartoon crisis.

It would be nice if the rest of the Western world followed in their footsteps.

Of course, ideally an event like this should be accompanied by a short, sharp speech explaining exactly WHY it is considered appropriate to burn Muhammed in effigy. Such as a prominent feminist, say, reading out that horrible passage from the Quran concerning the proper way to discipline wives whom the husband merely FEARS may be insubordinate - together with some of the contemporary data about extreme domestic violence in Islamic societies, honour killings, etc. Hey - have a public screening of 'Submission'...THEN go out and burn the effigy.

Or one could have a Sudanese refugee giving their testimony on what it's like to be a peaceful Christian black African villager when the Islamic jihad rides into your village waving guns and bent on raping every female, stealing the kids, stealing the livestock, burning the houses and the church and executing the priest. Plus historical stats and the unpleasant fact that no Islamic theologian has EVER firmly and explicitly condemned slavery.

Or just read out the Quran text about how the dhimmis must 'feel themselves subdued', THEN illustrate by reading the viciously discriminatory clauses of the Pact of Omar, the original Rules for Dhimmis...That would certainly make ME feel like burning Mohammed in effigy.

I agree - small protests of this kind, 'offences', but always with a cool, sober, educative element for the fellow-citizens,
should be snowballing across the Non-Muslim lands, so many that the Muslims won't know which to react to first. Confuse them by the sheer multiplicity of targets.

We don't necessarily have to burn effigies, either.

Hey: some mayor or university chancellor or bishop could invite Ms Hirsi Ali to a gala reception, bodyguards and all.

Another idea: In many Muslim lands, historically, dhimmis weren't allowed to wear ANYTHING green, because that was the special Islamic colour. Let your mind now dwell upon the Irish flag, "The Wearing of the Green", shamrocks, and ...Ireland and the Irish on St Patrick's Day, a sea of glorious...GREEN!!! Oh my Irish kinsmen, O land of my ancestors, do you know you defy Islam every St Patrick's Day? For the Christians, at least, maybe the Irish could bring out bright green T-shirts or headbands inscribed in gold with the first line of St Patrick's Breastplate in Gaelic and English: "Atomriug indiu niurt tren togairm trinoit"/ "I bind unto myself today the Strong Name of ...the TRINITY". To be worn at anti-dhimmitude protests.

It would be nice if the rest of the Western world followed in their footsteps.

Indeed.

Skoal!

"But ultimately it comes down to the same old questions. Freedom of speech encompasses precisely the freedom to annoy, to ridicule, and to offend. If it doesn’t, it is hollow: inoffensive speech doesn’t need the protection of a constitutional amendment. The instant that any person or ideology is considered off-limits for critical examination and even ridicule, freedom of speech has been replaced by an ideological straitjacket". -Robert the Great

The first amendment was not put in place to protect majority opinion. It was meant to protect ideas and opinions that are unpopular, that are at first rejected. This is why John Quincy Adams so strongly opposed the "gag rules" re restrictions on speech (in congress and elsewhere) against slavery. He warned (as Calhoun and others attempted to criminalize unpopular opinions and ideas re slavery) that the issue (slavery) was an issue that was vital, not only to the African(American) (and btw, the Arabs were deeply involved in the slave trade) but to all free men.

Muslims fear critical analysis. They want "gag rules".

It would be nice if the rest of the Western world followed in their footsteps.

Posted by: Holger Dansker

No argument there.

BUT THERE"S THOSE DARN HATE SPEECH CODES. Burning Muhammad is one thing but can you desecrate the Koran without ending up before a judge?

The First Amendment will be further amended in this century. Let us just hope that it follows my ideas of reasonable protections against the incursions of any religion or ideology bent on deposing the Constitution -- and not simply to impose Sharia Law.

Best to start thinking about change now. Waiting will simply turn us towards Islam and one day it will be too late to stop the tide.

Assalamau Laikum all,

Well it had to happen sometime or other...but what do you call this act?

IMHO it is not an act of freedom of speech but one of unwarranted and deliberate provocation ...an attempt to seek attention.

Denmark...the poor forgotten little country of Eurabia....burning a little photo that has nothing to do with Allah's SWT messanger ...childish, pathetic and piss poor.

What was even worse for me was the comments made by Marisol of JW. She was always someone I thought of making rational and informed comments...but no she let her self and her hair down badly today...and I lost a lot of respect for her...

Why does Denmark ask for her to be seen as a troublemaker...virtually all muslims in the world are peaceful...we know that this is a true statement.

In truth Danish peoples are a forgotten peoples seeking attention...and are trying to put muslims in a no-win situation.

So, here is my message to muslims/wuslims ...all is the will of Allah SWT....even these acts by mindless morons of Denmark...one day Allah SWT will bring them to wear brillo beards...please no nothing to react to deleberate provocation....these images cannot break your bones ...you are bigger than this.

As for Denmark, you too will be part of Eurabia....not if but when! Do this for now ...in the future your own burka clad grandaughters will prevent you from doing it!

I call it Free Will, Naseem.

You may not understand the forces that are arraying to confront Islam on this planet, but I do.

Enjoy your moment in the light like a modern day Tokyo Rose while you may: it's propaganda on time limit.

You and the other 10 Muslims that take turns typing your words will need to work a lot harder to sway hearts and minds. I brush you off like raindrops.

IMHO it is not an act of freedom of speech but one of unwarranted and deliberate provocation ...an attempt to seek attention.
--Naseem

Kind of like the Flying Imams, eh Naseem?

Better than all of the cities and libraries and human beings that Islamic imperialism has humorlessly burned throughout their past 1350 years.

But Islam doesn't understand symbolism, humor or freedom of thought.

Frozen in joyless dogma.

Which, like all forms of paralysis, will causes it to ultimately fail.

Assalamau LAikum Mr Foehammer,

There are no 10 others taking typing words. Once Anwer died I concentrated more on offering Dua to the Westerner.

There is not much point in me going to Islamic sites..as there is little point in preaching to the converted.

I like you Mr. Foehammer, you have conviction and a path to follow...infact you would make a very good wuslim...why don't you offer dua to allah SWT on your website....the rewards of being Allah's slave are guaranteed in this all other lifetimes too...don't miss out!

Muslims will not implement "gag rules" in our society as in Muslim countries. They will fail here, just as Calhoun and the "Slaveocracy" (as John Q. Adams called it) failed to curtail and silence critical analysis of slavery in the era before the Civil War.

Islam is just another rationalization for Imperialism (e.g., the Imperialist-Pig Pizarro was a typical Jihad-Muslim-Pig-Imperialist type using "god" to sanction supremacism.) At its core Islam is Arab Imperialism (but the Ottomans also did a lot of destruction of "indigenous cultures", "indigenous peoples").

As a symbolic gesture, let us all flip the bird to Mecca. No "gag rules" here.

Isn't it amazing that the Islamic Imperialist Pigs (especially the Arabs) are only the Imperialist Pigs left who dont feel guilt for the crimes they have comitted in history? Everybody else (British, Japanese, the Chinese, even the US with the "native Americans)" are required to apologize for the aggression comitted in the name of "religion" or ideology. But not these Arab-Ottoman-Muslim Imperialist Pigs.

I don't know, Naseem #6; perhaps the Arch-angel Michael whispered words of war in my ear, set the record straight and I'm on a path for retribution. Or maybe he did not. It's humorous though, to think how easy it would be to convince you and others like you of such an event if I had the mind to concoct such a notion.

Either way, I'm coming, making huge leaps forward in recent weeks and the path is straight and clear.

Nice try though. Flattery is always nice and the world knows I have an ego.

Assalamau Laikum Mr. Profitsbeard.

You said "Better than all of the cities and libraries and human beings that Islamic imperialism has humorlessly burned throughout their past 1350 years".

Islam's perfection has been stained by it's leaders who have been blinded by greed and power. Your Abu Mr. Abe Lincoln said "If you want to test a man's character ...give him power!" and there is much truth in this.

Saddam had several palaces built with toilets that had gold taps...but half a mile away his peoples starved..and this is in a country that has the 2nd largest reserves of oil....well that is disguisting ...but is that the fault of Islam?

I say NO, Allah SWT provided us with a way of living that is hard to better...that is pure and disciplined...but the leaders cannot see beyond themselves. Burning civilisations is not unique to Islam...let's not forget that...

You say Islam.. like all forms of paralysis, will causes it to ultimately fail.

Perhaps Mr Profitsbeard, perhaps...but will you be saying that when you sport your brillo beard.

"Two for the price of one -- the effigy and the bomb/turban caricature.

Islamic Rage Boy, call your office.

Posted by: MarisolJW at June 26, 2007 3:42 PM "


Classic!

Isn't it sleepy time down in Lahore, Pakistan?

The current issue with Islam is "deja vu again" re rationalizations for Imperialism in history. (Islam is at its core the engine of Arab Imperialism). However, this process (religious-ideological rationalizations) are at their core a human problem. All groups do this as they use "disinterested principle" (religion or ideology) to permit the subduing, exploitation of what they consider "Infidels" (we all have our "infidels").

It's a human problem. Every group engages in this crap. It's a broken record in history. In my opinion Islam should be studied as an Imperialist rationalization system (along with Chinese, British, American ("democracy"), Aztec, etc. systems). Islam is an Imperialist rationalization system (primarily Arab Imperialism). It's time for humans (but not cats) to think outside the box on this crap.

Assalamau Laikum Mr Foehammer,

So what would it take for you to turn then....money, property, carer progression, power, womens?

Are you married Mr. Foehammer...what if you met a really nice stunning muslima...only a small sahada stood in the way...one which you could say...only to her ...nobody else need even know?

How about it ...surely a lifetime's pleasure is worth a few words nobody else hears.

What say you Mr. Foehammer?

Don't mess with those Vikings! Get ready for a new wave of protests, violence and howls of outrage from the Muslim howler monkeys.

Everybody has their price, Naseem. You are a no dummy. But you are in a place where you can't really speak your mind, dear.

Naseem,

Acquiring women has never been a problem for me and I'm afraid I don't have much of a taste for Middle Eastern or Indian cuisine, so there's really no way to tempt me.

I'm an alpha zealot on steroids -- with red, white and blue in my veins.

"...childish, pathetic and piss poor."?
Compare Denmark's GNP and educational level with some third world POS country like Pakistan. It's readily evident which country is "......childish, pathetic and piss poor."
Also to add insult to injury, is that a woman's burka they dressed Mohammed in, lol?!

Naseem,

You give your people too much credit. They may be able to walk into underdeveloped countries in Africa or the 3rd world nations in the Middle East and take over, but you will never rule in the West. Why would we have a shitty life as a slave for a good afterlife (that doesn't exist). We are too smart for that.

People are realizing the threat, and your people are too busy killing each other and bending over for your false prophet to pose any serious threat.

You Mulsims are sad, reckless and too pathetic to have the Western citizen convert (just the sad, reckless and pathetic ones). You'll have to convert us by force, maybe you can take some time off from killing eachother to pose a mediocre threat.

losers

How about it ...surely a lifetime's pleasure is worth a few words nobody else hears.
What say you Mr. Foehammer?
Posted by: Naseem

You are suggesting to 'Mr' Foehammer that he become a prostitute to Allah, by selling his soul for sex. That make's you a pimp. Doe's Allah swt know about this? I bet you never tell him do you? That call's for a song called 'Pimpin for Allah'; maybe sheik yer mami would be interesting in puting it to music...
Foehammer's to smart for that Naseem, the pimp, better go back to the drawing board and come up with something better.

I don't think there will be much reaction to this unless some newspaper features it. It's interesting to speculate: Will Muslims take offense at pictorial reporting of defilement of Mohammed's image, even if the newspaper is not advocating anything? The cartoons were a sort of editorial, but this is an event not connected to the news media.
On the other hand, the people who have done this may be in danger.

Assalamau Laikum everyone

sorry, just kidding

i'm in a cheerful, nay festive mood after watching that video. It warmed me cockles it did!

but seriously, this wasn't organised by a national media outlet, unfortunately. so will muslims even see these? and wont they just assume it to be from right wingers and so will not see it as a government level orchestrated attack on their (religion) cult. if this is realeased on, lets say, danish news then expect riots, old nun beheadings and innocent tourists getting kidnapped but if its not then, back to the drawing board i guess.

i could possibly see the muslims getting "annoyed" with the danish government if this is a monthly occurence and the danish government made no arrests nor spoke out against it.

lets hope that this act of national pride spreads, dare i say it, like wild fire! (no pun intended)

lets hope that this act of national pride spreads, dare i say it, like wild fire! (no pun intended)

Posted by: leonthepigfarmer

I think we are the only 2 left on this thread,lol!
But I fully endorse what you say!

Burning the mo foe. Like the first Austin Powers Movie with the fembots at the sight of Austin in his Union jack briefs, Muslims the world over will be triangulating and beeboppin their heads and blowing up their brains the world over. I love my country, but this might be better than the 4th of july.

I doubt our resident court jester has a clue what "provocation" is, even if it bit him in the ass.
*yawn*

Why does Denmark ask for her to be seen as a troublemaker...virtually all muslims in the world are peaceful...we know that this is a true statement.
Posted by: Naseem

No naseem we here know this is a FALSE statement.

naseem seems very fragile today.

Naseem posted - "..virtually all muslims in the world are peaceful.."

I don't agree, I think they appear peaceful when they are outnumbered is all, cowards.

Big up to the people who did this, nice one!!

So what would it take for you to turn then....money, property, carer progression, power, womens?
..only a small sahada stood in the way...one which you could say...only to her ...nobody else need even know?
How about it ...surely a lifetime's pleasure is worth a few words nobody else hears.

Naseem draws this from the example of Mohammed in Sunnah and in Qur'an.


053.019

YUSUFALI: Have ye seen Lat. and 'Uzza,
PICKTHAL: Have ye thought upon Al-Lat and Al-'Uzza
SHAKIR: Have you then considered the Lat and the Uzza,

053.020


YUSUFALI: And another, the third (goddess), Manat?
PICKTHAL: And Manat, the third, the other?
SHAKIR: And Manat, the third, the last?

053.021


YUSUFALI: What! for you the male sex, and for Him, the female?
PICKTHAL: Are yours the males and His the females?
SHAKIR: What! for you the males and for Him the females!

053.022


YUSUFALI: Behold, such would be indeed a division most unfair!
PICKTHAL: That indeed were an unfair division

Mohammed put these verses into the Qur'an because he 'sold out' to the Quraish in Mecca. They had offered him money, property, carer progression, power, (maybe?) womens if he'd acknowledge some of the other stone fetishes in the Kaa'ba.

Guess what? Allah backed Mohammed up again... or wait... It was actually Satan who spoke these ayahs to Mohammed.

Mohammed gave up the concept of Monotheism for pay offs here on Earth. He's unrealiable for this reason alone. Mohammed abandoned the central thesis of his belief system when he could benefit materially.

What Mohammed failed to see is that a few words he spoke would be heard by many and he could never really retract it once it was said.

Naseem - this is one of the reasons why Mohammed had to flee to Medinah - The Quraish proved he was full of shit.

When Mohammed came back he killed people who knew about his sell out. :)