"Police found a number of job descriptions and applications including one for a cleaning supervisor for Greater Manchester Police and another for a job as a trainee teacher at Bolton College," along with computer contents discussing, among other things, "killing soldiers and police officers," and "demolishing infidel universities."
"'Terror hoard' on dad's computer," from the Manchester Evening News:
TERROR manuals and graphic images of executions were stashed on a computer by a father-of-three at his Greater Manchester home, a court was told.
The jury was told Omar Altimimi has links with convicted terrorists overseas and was discovered with false identity cards hidden in the sole of his shoe when he was arrested.
Manchester Crown Court was told there was a “considerable amount of serious terrorist related material” on two computers found at Altimimi’s Bolton home and another address in the town used by him. The computers included bomb instructions and details of how to run terror cells as well as video footage of terrorists and of executions in Iraq.
The 36-year-old faces a series of charges under the Terrorism Act, including possession of instructions on how to make a detonator and explosive device and instructions on the use of chemicals and bombing strategies. He denies the charges.
Prosecuting Tim Barnes QC said: “There was a large number of files which were concerned with a variety of terrorist activities and which also included graphic and appalling video footage of the execution of those who had been taken hostage or were considered enemies by insurgent factions in Iraq.” He added: “The terrorist content of this computer-held material becomes still more significant when we consider associations which the Crown can prove this defendant had with other terrorists convicted in Holland and France.
“He is associated through an address in Rotterdam with Arab terrorists in Europe. The Crown can also prove that he sent a money order to Thailand to a man who was subsequently convicted in his absence of terrorist offences in France.”
The court heard sections from a chart found on one of the computers talked about the organisational structure of a terror cell with information on explosives, chemicals, kidnapping and assassination, the monitoring of presidents, police, diplomats, the media and other organisations.
One section, it was alleged, referred to Jihad and the holy war against democracy and communism. It was said to talk of, killing soldiers and police officers, assassinating the head of the country, demolishing electricity stations and petrol stations, demolishing “infidel universities”, mixed schools and pubs and killing embassy diplomats.
Foreign travel
Describing “intelligence” it talks of following the movements of the president and military including foreign travel and where they spend their leisure time. It said the information should be passed to the operational arm for use in planning assassination.
[...]
Mr Barnes said further investigation revealed Altimimi was a failed asylum seeker who claimed to be an Iraqi fleeing persecution. His claim failed because the authorities did not believe his story. He said Altimimi’s nationality was not known.
The court heard police found a number of job descriptions and applications including one for a cleaning supervisor for Greater Manchester Police and another for a job as a trainee teacher at Bolton College.
[...]
The jury was told police initially began investigating Altimimi and two other men after being called in to look at a fraudulent bank transfer of $54,610 from the Yemeni Tourist Board to the Nationwide Building Society in Bolton.
Mr Barnes said the fraud investigation widened when Altimimi was searched at Astley Bridge Police Station after his arrest and found to have the documents in his right shoe.
They included an Immigration and Nationality Directorate card issued by the Home Office in the name of Iraqi, Abdullah Mahr Abou Hawas, a Halifax debit card in the name of AHM Abdullah and a Co-op bank card in the name of Abou Hawas.
[...]
The jury was told co-accused Yusuf Abdullah, 29, also known as Nashwan Gassar, of no fixed address was charged with acquiring criminal property, namely $54,610. He pleaded guilty to the charge under the Proceeds of Crime Act on Monday. Another defendant by the name of Bakhtiyar Berwiss wanted in connection with the bank transfers absconded while on bail.
and some fools still insist there is no "war on terror' or if there was one, we have no business fighting it...(see dhimmicrats, defeatocrats, leftists, Rosie, appeasists and apologists and Harry Reid who has already surrendered).
Muslim pornography: Murder and Mayhem.
Very titillating stuff for the Muhammadan.
Hey Sarge,
How much longer do you think, before we attain VICTORY in Iraq and can bring our troops home secure in the knowledge that the Jihadis in Iraq have been routed and true democracy and human-rights established. Just curious for your military opinion on this.
Everybody knows you put the bomb in your shoe............
The British reaction will be "My God! How awful! Let's bring in another few thousand Muslim immigrants, and let's have our universities set up more Muslims-are-peaceful indoctrination courses."
Gaaagh!
Allah did not create anything without a purpose, but Muslims come close...
Demolishing infidel universities? That would be like sticking a knife in your best friend's back, no?
Greek Fire said
Ishaq:369 “Thereupon Mas’ud leapt upon Sunayna, one of the Jewish merchants with whom his family had social and commercial relations and killed him. The Muslim’s brother complained, saying, ‘Why did you kill him? You have much fat in you belly from his charity.’ Mas’ud answered, ‘By Allah, had Muhammad ordered me to murder you, my brother, I would have cut off your head.’ Wherein the brother said, ‘Any religion that can bring you to this is indeed wonderful!’ And he accepted Islam.”
The "moral" of the story? No matter how much fat you put in their belly, it is never enough. You will never be safe, they can turn on you at any moment.
"Hey Sarge,
How much longer do you think, before we attain VICTORY in Iraq and can bring our troops home secure in the knowledge that the Jihadis in Iraq have been routed and true democracy and human-rights established. Just curious for your military opinion on this.
Posted by: Ynkedoodl2"
....if the Gods of War are allowed to actually unlease their firepower and actually be allowed to kill the enemy without the fear of being persecuted by their own PC Government, the conflict would be resolved quickly..but the MoveOn.org types and the dhimmicrats continually and intentionally try to block military action at all phases of the conflict, from the supplies, to the funding, to the armament, to the deployment, to the rules of engagement and the constantly seek to jail the soldiers, the they proceed to disrupt the fallen soldiers funerals and create chaos and discord within the soldiers family circle...
With such weak and devisive leadership and fear of actually killing the enemy, the battle will have no immediate end...
The only way to fight a war is to fight the war to win in the quickest and most efficient way possible,, and the way you do this is you must kill the enemy in massive numbers...check your WWII history for examples...
The only way to fight a war is to fight the war to win in the quickest and most efficient way possible,, and the way you do this is you must kill the enemy in massive numbers...check your WWII history for examples...
--posted by exsgtbrown
Sarge, would you kill the Sunnis and leave the Shia (The DAWA party and The Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq) to govern Iraq? Do you trust Maliki and his Iranian-sponsored thugocracy to achieve victory as our allies. And, assuming the democrats got off the Presidents back, how long do you think before Iraq is stable, democratic and respectful of religious minorities, women, gays, Israel, and of course, the U.S.A.?
i think "terror trove" would have had a nicer ring to it, but a very interesting report, which i had not seen elsewhere. thanks !
Holy war against democracy and communist. uhm..
Strange he put those two together. Thought they like communist!? Just the dictatorship he is accoustomed to, live's by, ran from- to America!
Guess he was going to inflict a few of his own? ideas on us! That's right it says here in the queran kill them ALL!
The only way to fight a war is to fight the war to win in the quickest and most efficient way possible,, and the way you do this is you must kill the enemy in massive numbers...check your WWII history for examples...
--posted by exsgtbrown
And, assuming the democrats got off the Presidents back, how long do you think before Iraq is stable, democratic and respectful of religious minorities, women, gays, Israel, and of course, the U.S.A.?
--posted by Ynkedoodl2
In addition to the fight to win using massive destruction as we did in WWII, we also need to mandate what and what is not allowed in the constitution. In allowing Japan to create a constitution we told them that there would be no mention of religion (Shintoism) and we required that the Emperor publicly declare that he was not a diety. That mandated that they create a secular society that allow individual conciousness in religion.
And as a result, we've had a devout ally and one of the strongest economies in world history.
In Iraq, we let the lawyers and the press dictate rules of engagement, and we let the imams dictate the constitution. And as a result, we are caught in the middle of a sunni/shia pissing match, while non-muslims are driven from thier homes, churches destroyed and clerics murdered.
Had we told them no attachemnt to sharia in the constitution. And the dhimmicrats and media to STFU, things would be a lot different in Iraq and Afghanistan.
@walterc
Liked your post until the end when the wheel rolled off and burned:
"Had we told them no attachemnt to sharia in the constitution. And the dhimmicrats and media to STFU, things would be a lot different in Iraq and Afghanistan."
=====================================
You can't tell Muhammadans no Sharia unless you've got the testicular fortitude of a Saddam Hussein. George al-Bush ibn Bush just wanted his re-election victory in '04.
"Apres moi, le deluge!"
translation: "I don't give two craps what happens after I leave the White House. I just want to be a two-term President unlike my Daddy."
p.s.
The democrats didn't get us into this mess.
@sarge,
I was obviously joking when I asked you:
"...how long do you think before Iraq is stable, democratic and respectful of religious minorities, women, gays, Israel, and of course, the U.S.A.?"
Cuz it ain't never gonna happen!
There is an attraction, by certain depraved mentalities, to get sexual, or deviant pleasure, by watching the suffering of other's. It seem's like there must be a significant number of muslim's, who enjoy torture and beheading video's. Almost all them discovered, and arrested, have these images on hand.
One report said, a while back, that beheading video's out rent porno in Baghdad. What do you think these jihadist types are doing while watching these? Eating popcorn?
When those four German Generals, tried to blow Hitler up, failed and were found out, Hitler had them impaled on meat hooks untill dead. He had the whole thing filmed. Later he spent six hours, by himself, watching these men die in agony. What do you think he was doing for six hour's? Eating popcorn? See the similarity, Hitler and the rest of the deviant's get off on this, sheer depravity.
Just the kind of jihadi you want living next door...
Does anyone out there believe that the Muslims can be defeated?
Does anyone out there believe that the Muslims can be defeated?
Posted by: homefiresburning
Of course muslim's can be defeated. But it is the wrong question. It's, can Islam be defeated?
The answer to that is yes, in my opinion, but it wont happen quickly because Islam has an undeserved advantage. The political correctness of its enemy, the west, mostly America and Isreal. The lack of planning, the lack of identifying the enemy, the lack of understanding the enemy, our gov official's giving aid and comfort to the enemy, allowing the enemy to invade from all our border's, but mainly the southern one. Islam exploits all these weak spot's. We will eventually win the war with Islam and with terror, but it is going to require a government with some gut's. We dont have that at the moment, but hopefully, help is on the way. The only problem is that Bush still has more than a year to keep thing's screwed up. It may be that if the gov continues to fail its citizens, the citizens, may have to save themselves.
We see & hear the same stuff from illegal separatist invaders (same ones demanding amnesty-and reconquista) here in the US-also planning their own attacks...gee, coincidence?
"It may be that if the gov continues to fail its citizens, the citizens, may have to save themselves." Posted by: duh_swami
duh_swami,
I'm really beginning to feel that this last is going to be the only outcome possible. The government? No joy there, no matter who gets the Oval Office.
Our society, as a whole, has been bound and gagged by the PC and multi-culti crowd. I think this means that all potential survivors are on their own.
Just imagine the looks on the faces of the PC, diversity, lovepeaceandhappiness bunch, when they are brutally attacked, for no apparent reason, by the very people to whom they have forced everybody else to grant such huge concessions! Their expressions should be priceless.
Rattlesnakes are cuddly, as long as they need your body warmth. When the sun comes up, it's a different story.
Altimimi was a failed asylum seeker who claimed to be an Iraqi fleeing persecution.
Why did he pick the UK? Because our Government wants to import New Labour supporters so makes it easy for them to enter the country.
What we should do with Muslim asylum seekers is tell them to try another Muslim country and send them back on the next flight/boat/raft/dinghy. After all, why would an Iraqi want to come here when he could choose Afghanistan, Syria, Iran etc. - all of which are a lot closer.
It sure beats me.
Could it possibly be that life in the West is better than life in Muslim countries? No, that can't be right. Why would Allah have got things mixed up?
It was said to talk of, killing soldiers and police officers, assassinating the head of the country, demolishing electricity stations and petrol stations, demolishing "infidel universities"...
The British seem to have the demolishing infidel universities thing down pretty well all by themselves.
One report said, a while back, that beheading video's out rent porno in Baghdad. What do you think these jihadist types are doing while watching these?
--posted by duh_swami
Um...slapping their salami?
Does anyone out there believe that the Muslims can be defeated?
Posted by: homefiresburning
Absolutely. Project Samson.
PROJECT SAMSON
Summary
The West needs to examine closely the beliefs and practices dictated by Islam and then update its definition of what Islam is. Islam is not a race in the genetic sense, but a belief system. Any fool or child can be indoctrinated – regardless of the color of their eyes. Islam isn’t a religion in the classic western definition either. It is a fascistic, totalitarian, supremacist belief system with material and political goals here on Earth and is focused on subjugating the rest of the world by violent force if necessary. Other cultures may define Islam as a religion, but it is unlike any of the others in its focus on dominating the world. It recognizes no other authority than itself and Islam as it stands today is incompatible with liberal, representative democracies as a political system. It is a direct threat and an enemy of the western institutions and documents like the Magna Carta, the U.S. Constitution and other constitutions as well as the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Islam wants to destroy these principles. The Islamic belief system defines itself as being at constant and eternal war with all other belief systems and institutions. It is by definition, seditious if promoted by True Believers in the United States and treasonous if fully practiced.
Islam is the antithesis of Western governance and spirituality. Islam is properly translated ‘Submission’, not as “Peace”. Salaam stands for peace. Islam stands for ‘Submission’ – literally: submission to the will of Allah as commanded in the Qur’an, in the words and deeds of the prophet and through shari’a or Islamic law, which is derived from the Qur’an and the Sunnah (the example of the prophet).
It might seem strange to think of this as a misconception, but in fact it is. The root word of Islam is "al-silm" which means "submission" or "surrender." It is understood to mean "submission to Allah." In spite of whatever noble intention has caused many a Muslim to claim that Islam is derived primarily from peace, this is not true.
From http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/notislam/misconceptions.html
Today the Western nations are strong but blind – like Samson in the old Testament. Tolerance of everything leads to blindness. Belief systems which threaten the very foundation of a society and which are willing to work towards the overthrow of their host societies need to be seen for the threat that they pose and dealt with accordingly.
The world is divided into an absolute dichotomy for the True Muslim Believer: black & white: the believer and the infidel, the dar al-islam (the house of Islam where Islamic law rules) and the dar al-harb( the house of War – the lands and peoples which Islam must either convert, subjugate or kill). Dar al-Islam is the bubble universe of Mohammed, who was one of the most successful charismatic sociopaths and a predecessor to Hitler, Charles Manson, Jim Jones and others. Mohammed created the Islamic belief system, which rests on a set of five official ‘pillars’ and a sixth un-official but equally important pillar, jihad or ‘holy struggle in the cause of Allah’.
Unbelievers in the dar al-harb need a Project Samson. In the old bible story Samson destroyed the main Philistine temple and the leaders of his enemies by pulling down the pillars which supported everything. Unbelievers in the present need to use their strength to pull down the pillars of Islam so that the whole house of cards, the Dar al Islam, will be reduced to rubble.
We need to apply force in many ways and from every angle possible weaken and then destroy the temple of Islam, which is supported on six pillars:
1) profession of faith
2) ritual prayer
3) charitable giving
4) fasting
5) pilgrimage to Mecca
and jihad.
The following is an outline based on the six pillars. Each Islamic pillar is identified with suggestions on how the infidel world can weaken or counteract it, as well examples of specific infidel groups that could play a pivotal role.
• The profession of faith in Allah (Shahadah) - the declaration that there is none worthy of worship except Allah and that Mohammed is his messenger.
The Qur’an -show how it could not be from the god known as Yahweh
The imbecilic argument that the Qur’an is immutable because it was written by god needs to be demolished. Its inaccuracies and deficiencies must be highlighted, and the miserable knowledge-base of such a god be brought into scorn.
The Defects of the Qur’an
mistakes in history
mistakes in biblical teachings
legendary material ( contains the Romance of Alexander)
plagiarism from Jewish Talmudic sources
mistakes in science
incomplete
inexact
injustice
intolerant
inconsistent
abrogation (internally inconsistent)
absurdities
incites violence - 164 jihad verses
100 + ‘kill infidel’ or ‘dirty infidel’ verses
The Historical Qur’an
The mainstream Islamic belief that the Qur’an is the eternal, unchanging and perfect words of Allah himself can be further demolished by a detailed look at the following:
1. How can it be a ‘clear guide for all mankind’ as it claims if the only authoritative version is written in medieval Arabic script?
2. Mohammed, and all his followers, were, for the most part illiterate.
3. The passages of the Qur’an were passed on as an oral tradition for the first two hundred years.
4. Not all the passages in the Qur’an, in its entirety, were known to all of Mohammed's followers.
5. At times even Mohammed seemed uncertain of his memory of certain passages.
6. Some of these passages were written down in the local language, not in Arabic.
7. The evolution of the Arabic script during the critical 7th Century period when the Qur’an was first "written" and when it was finally codified, sometime in the 10th Century.
8. Several versions of the Qur’an existed until it was decided that only one should be kept, and the rest were destroyed.
9. The earliest extant version of the Qur’an manuscript, found in the Yemen, should be closely examined archaeologists and language scholars to help get a fix on the Qur’an as it was, and what it has become today.
Assassinate Allah’s character – doesn’t deserve respect, let alone worship
Allah ‘needs’ us more than we need him.
sadistic
uncaring
predetermination = no free will for humans but punishes anyway
unjust
irrational
Assassinate Mohammed’s character – he could not possibly speak for God
actions
pedophile
consummated marriage to Aisha when she was 9 years old
highway robber
78 offensive ‘raids’ vs. 3 defensive battles
killed political and intellectual opponents
killed for money
war criminal
raped captive women
killed captive men and boys ( 600+ in one case)
broke every treaty he entered
paraphrase: “it’s not fit to show mercy until a prophet has made wide slaughter in the land”
superstitions
magic
devils
ritual behavior
curses
stupidity
expediency over ethics, consistency, principle
denied monotheism in the Satanic verses for women, money and power ( i.e; ‘sold out’)
Destroy the authority of the Ahadith – canonical text of reports of Mohammed’s words
hearsay - would not be accepted as testimony in any non-Islamic court
the insad ( chain of transmission ) arbitrary
Earliest accounts are written down 200+ years after Mohammed’s death
(Groups leading this effort: non-muslim religious leaders, western religious scholars, apostates from Islam, archeologists and scientists.)
Our best weapon is information and truth, and Muslims know this. We must all continue to take the fight to the enemy by spreading the truth of Islam to all (Muslim and non-Muslim). A religion that claims the Jewish Temple never existed (despite every bit of historical and archeological evidence). A religion that claims the Gospels are true (Surah 3:7 and 5:46-47) and yet Jesus was not crucified and claimed to be a "prophet" of Allah (and claiming Mohammed brought the "final" revelation to something he didn't even know well). A religion that claims the Christian trinity is Mary, Son, and Father. A religion that claims Mary was the sister of Moses. A religion the exhorts followers to kill in the name of an all-powerful God who made all humans (he doesn't need anyone's help in "punishing" so-called "infidels", particularly if "infidels" are headed to Hell). A religion the tells young Muslims they will go straight to "paradise" for murdering infidels while committing suicide. When rational, un-biased Muslims are given a choice (with all the facts) most would not stay Muslim. It is only held together by force: Apostasy laws, proselytization laws, no criticism of Islam/Mohammed, Hellfire for questioning the Qur’an.
Islam is a collection of irrational beliefs kept cohesive by fear, coercion, and lies. It will fall apart as soon as enough people are informed about the ridiculous claims of the Qur’an, Ahadith and Sira, which comprise the accepted canon of Islam. Islam’s only hope is to prevent it's followers from hearing the truth from non-Muslims. Thus the absolute requirement for apostasy and prosyletization laws in Islamic countries. Mohammed realized the need for these laws to prevent the house of cards (Islam) from crashing to the ground. He also realized that Islam could not coexist with other religions and ideas. The absolute requirement for Muslims is blind faith, despite every fact. That forms the basis for mandatory Jihad: the whole world must be under the delusion of Islam and nobody can speak the truth.
What will it take for the middle east to wake up to the reality of what it faces?
• people must have a marketplace of competing ideas
• people must be free from physical threat (apostates and skeptics)
• people must be released from psychological threat (fear of hell)
•
Prayer (Salat) - establishing of the ritual of five daily Prayers.
In the Middle East, Africa and Asia:
Make the argument – what’s the point? your blind ritual & groveling is worthless to an all-powerful god, but very valuable to a sociopathic narcissist. Mohammed deceived you.
Make the argument that Allah punishes the Muslims more than He does the Infidels. Use objective statistics.
• Death tools of catastrophes: muslims die at 100:1 over infidels
Counteract the Call To Prayer and Jihad with ‘Radio Free Infidel’.
Drown out the Call To Prayer with a Voice of America – style propoganda effort as in the Cold War.
Get other faiths to take a public stand.
In the West:
What will it take for the west to wake up to the reality of what it faces?
• Redefinition of Islam from a religion to a political ideology bent on sedition.
• Recognition that the ‘Moderate Muslim’ is an impossibility based on the Qur’an and the Sunnah.
Ummah (the nation of Muslims) has dual citizen ship but is loyal to Islam first.
Dispel the notion that “we all want the same things.”
•
The paying of alms (Zakat) - which is generally 2.5% of the total savings for a rich man working in trade or industry, and 10% or 20% of the annual produce for agriculturists. This money or produce is distributed among the poor. Also, on\e may give 25% of found treasure such as money won in a non-gambling lottery.
In both the East and West:
Disrupt financial networks funding jihad, seize assets of proven contributors, turn it against the cause
Eliminate all U.S. foreign aid to governments which support implementation of shari’a law or which support terrorism or terrorists either financially or in the press or media.
• Egypt
• Pakistan
• Saudi Arabia
• others meeting the criteria
Objective measurements of how the Muslim world combined, aside from patroleum exports, has the GDP of Finland.
Demonstrate materially how Allah favors the infidel over the Muslim
• lifespan
• income
• access to good things in life
• number of universities
• amount of fresh water
• relative physical security of infidels vs. citizens under Islamic regimes
• other objective measurements proving Allah ‘loves’ the infidel more.
In the West use savings in foreign aid to:
• reduce dependence on ME sources of oil
• make more deals with non-OPEC countries
• find new sources of oil
• find new sources of energy
• U.S. government should expedite the adoption of existing energy alternatives
awards to private industry
the Manhattan project for energy sources
• Western people need to consider implications of their purchases ( big SUV means Saudis have more $$$)
• reduce need – become more efficient
Reduce trade with Islamic regimes to a minimum
• isolate them economically
Containment a la the Cold War Policy revisited
• reduce contact with them culturally
• disallow travel to/from unless diplomatic ( no tourism visas)
• no student visas for countries on the list either.
• find all persons on visas currently in the United States and send them back
• Use the RICO act anti-mafia laws against it Islamic charitable organizations.
• Fasting (Sawm) - refraining from eating, drinking or satisfying sexual needs from dawn to dusk in the month of Ramadan, the ninth month in the Islamic lunar calendar.
show how arbitrary shari’a is – how it is built on inference and subjective.
demonstrate the pre-Islamic pagan elements in the mishmash of Islamic ritual and superstition
Women:
Explain the status and treatment of women in the Qur’an, the attitudes of Mohammed and how historically women have been treated.
• men may beat women, women are for men’s pleasure, women are property of men
• women are animals made to resemble men so that men will have children; women don’t have same souls as men and most of the people in hell are women ( I’m not making this stuff up…)
• property rights ( women get ½ the inheritance of men)
• testimony of women worth ½ that of men
• have to return dowry to husband at divorce
• can’t divorce in practical terms
• segregation from men other than immediate relatives
• isolation from public life
• the hajib, burqa
• clitorectomies (circumcision of external female genitalia) as lust control
Elevate female Apostates and Dissenters- i.e.; Ayaan Hirsi Ali make sure they can be heard.
Get women’s organizations in the west to acknowledge what their Islamic sisters live with.
Islamic Law - (shari’a)
• Show some of the asinine rulings which come from the mullahs and imams
• Show the lack of rationality in rulings from Islamic courts
• Show the complete insanity and injustice of it - temp marriages, sex with infants, Pakistani courts order gang rape as justice … it’s all there waiting to be used.
Supremacist Ideology
Show that Islam is a totalitarian ideology which justifies itself and camoflauges itself with religious elements.
The leader (Caliph) is both the leader of the belief system and the political system.
Islam doesn’t separate what is Caesar’s and what it God’s.
+ Islam seeks obedience above all else
The ummah (nation of Muslims) has rights, the individual has few if any
+ Muslims have loyalty to the Islam and the Ummah above any other belief or nation.
Islamic regimes install the notion of Muslim supremacy over all other beliefs.
Jews and Christians are at best dhimmis or second class citizens
vulnerable to actions of the mob and tyrant
have to pay jizyah which translated means ‘protection tax’
must be ‘humiliated and feel subdued’ by Muslims as a commanded by Allah (9:29)
+ People of other beliefs are ‘pagans’ and should be slaughtered (9:5)
The world and all material things belong rightfully to Muslims and they can take them as they please.
Laugh at them. Make fun of them… use humor. Mock them. Laughter is a serious weapon against their puffed up importance as shown by the Mohammed cartoons. True Believers are supremacists without a ‘conscience’ in the western notion. Mocking them will win some over and force the hand of others, further proving our points ( i.e; I will threaten you with death if you continue to say Islam is not a religion of peace.)
Other Islamic practices:
Get groups like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) people riled up against the halal laws on food – ritualistic slaughter of animals by cutting throats and other ‘mistreatment’ and cruelty to animals.
In the West: put the Qur’an and Ahadith on trial as ‘hate speech’. Even if the effort fails in court - all the hate will be a matter of public record and discussed by people in the west. Dissemination and discussion are powerful weapons.
• The Pilgrimage to Mecca (Hajj) –
threaten disruption & desecration for terrorist actions vs. the West
We don’t need to destroy mosques and Mecca – just drop pig manure on them from the air. Desecrate all the jihadis hold dear. A ‘dirty Mecca’ removes two of the five official pillars: prayer (in the direction of Mecca) and Hajj
a person can’t be a ‘true Muslim’ if they can’t do the five pillars. This is a real threat to terrorist networks, which can’t be threatened or negotiated with and are ephemeral. Mecca and the holy sites are fixed. To be responsible for the desecration of the principle focal points of the cult of Islam is a serious thing for a jihadi to consider.
Recognize the threats from demographics
• Muslims gaining a larger population in infidel countries is another form of jihad – the soft, slow one.
recognize the threat of da’wa (proselytizing, mosque building)
• acknowledge the effect that the Saudi money is having on radicalizing elements in countries around the world
• hold the Saudis accountable for the hate speech they spread
• this is another form of the soft, slow jihad.
Hold Mullahs accountable – go after them
Friday sermons in the middle east – memri.org full transcripts and video
Madrassas ( Islamic schools) as terrorist factories
Inciting Muslims to violence
• roles of mullahs in the cartoon riots
• threats against the life and property of unbelievers
• intimidation and death threats for artists, apostates and skeptics
Running the country of Iran into the economic graveyard
keeping their people down in ignorance and irrationality
• show – don’t tell - how the Mullahs have ruined the lives of the Faithful
• sixth (unofficial) pillar - Jihad –
Actively battle them everywhere they poke heads up and continue to fight them until they can no longer mount sustained attacks of any scale.
Military Actions
• take away the means to fight
• destroy them
• destroy their havens and refuges
• destroy their material & weapons
• take away the will to fight
• psych ops
• defeating them in battle
Nothing succeeds like destroying the enemy. The jihadis are apocalyptic and won’t be reasoned with. Give them what they want – give them their personal apocalypse now!
Internet Jihad
• get script kiddies and hackers and pros to disrupt their stuff…
• both malicious and intelligence gathering
• viruses for Arabic character set only..?
• open systems hacking effort…put infidel kids to work in a worthy cause.. they’ll wreak serious havoc.
Define jihadis properly
Try jihadis in military court – not civilian. Jihadis are soldiers of Islam and are sworn enemies to the Magna Carta, the Rights of Man, the Enlightenment, the scientific method, the western court system, US constitution, the UN universal declaration of rights and every other codified system and document of liberal, western style governance.
Jihadis are the sworn enemies of Freedom of belief, freedom of expression, freedom of conscience. They are not criminals. Try the captured ones in military court.
Conclusion:
The single most important thing to do is call the Muslims out into the light of rational discourse and scrutiny. Hugh Fitzgerald, a principal contributor to the jihadwatch.org website, sums it up well:
The most intelligent thing to do is for Muslims to be put constantly on the defensive, to be constantly made aware that non-Muslims no longer will accept the nonsense about a "religion" (call it a belief-system, with elements of worship, and a great deal of everything else -- a political system, a social system -- one which is based on a clear division of the Universe between Believer and Infidel. Let Islam be criticized, let Islam be mocked. There will be a gigantic campaign, by Muslims -- there is such a campaign, uncoordinated, spontaneous, by all kinds of Muslims everywhere, to protect the Faith from those who do not discuss it exactly as Believers think they should -- which is exactly in the way that Believers do. But as Ali Sina (founder of faithfreedom.org and an apostate from Islam) says, constant mockery, constant awareness of Islam as a totalitarian system, an awareness displayed on every occasion by Infidels, will force certain changes, or at least stop the onward march of Islam.