He said it. "Iranian regime’s judiciary advisor defends the inhumane punishment by stoning," from the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (thanks to Ig):
NCRI - Mohammad-Javad Larijani, the mullahs’ Judiciary Chief Advisor and an ideologue within the clerical regime, attended a gathering of “Prosecutors from Islamic Capitals in Tehran,” in which he defended the inhumane punishment of stoning and said, “We will never surrender Islam in the face of human rights concerns … During the adoption of these (human rights) laws, the world of Islam was in complete ignorance while liberals and secular parties formulated and imposed these laws onto the entire world … We must elucidate punishment by stoning clearly to those who denounce it. We had a revolution so that Islamic laws would be implemented … We will never give up Islam in the face of these challenges” (State-run news agency ILNA, May 30, 2007).In another development, Saeed Agha Sadeghi, an advisor to the Chief of the Iranian regime’s Prisons Organization announced that the youth arrested and charged with being “thugs and hooligans” during the recent wave of crackdowns “will be denied all privileges in prison.” This is clearly an inhumane measure, which blatantly violates all international norms with regards to treatment of prisoners.
The Iranian Resistance draws the attention of the United Nations Secretary General, High Commissioner for Human Rights, UN Human Rights Council, and all international human rights organizations to the rising and systematic human rights violations in Iran. It also calls for the referral of the mullahs' appalling human rights record to the UN Security Council for the adoption of binding decisions.
There we have it-straight from the horse's mouth (or is it the other end?)-human rights, like democracy, are not compatible with Islam.
Now who in their right mind does not believe that this belief system is sick and twisted and produces maniacs eager to commit all kinds of atrocities?
We will never surrender Islam in the face of human rights concerns … During the adoption of these (human rights) laws, the world of Islam was in complete ignorance
Islam is still in complete ignorance of the modern world and the people in Iran that follow this cult seem to want to return the seventh century where they were overlords of a lot of the known world and kept Female slaves and we need to remember the Islamic version of human rights to a Muslim only applies to Muslims because they only consider themselves a fully human person, and they will exploit and protect the dhimmi because of the protection money they can squeeze from them the following is a example
Maududi likewise wrote that non-Muslims have “absolutely no right to seize the reins of power in any part of God’s earth, nor to direct the collective affairs of human beings according to their own misconceived doctrines.” If they do, “the believers would be under an obligation to do their utmost to dislodge them from political power and to make them live in subservience to the Islamic way of life.”
But Qutb and Maududi did not originate these ideas. They are an extrapolation of Qur’anic passages such as 9:29, which assumes that Muslims will wield state power over Jews and Christians, exacting from them a poll tax (jizya) and making sure that they pay it “with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” There is no concept in the Qur’an, Islamic tradition, or Islamic law of non-Muslims living as equals with Muslims in an Islamic state: Muslims must be in a superior position. The Muslim prophet Muhammad emphasized this
These kinds of things are useful as they put the fear of Muhammadans into the heart of even the dimmest and most dull-witted dhimmi.
How many dhimmis have I radicalized by simply explaining that whereas Jesus forgave the woman who was condemned to death by stoning saying "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone," the fiend Muhammad said: "Bring the bitch to me that I may stone her myself." And he did. Not once, but time and time again.
Islamophobization complete!
"Iranian regime’s judiciary advisor defends the inhumane punishment by stoning," from the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Council of Resistance of Iran.
Hey, the big, brave muslim men also like to send out children with little keys ('keys to heaven', as they told the kids) and be little, human mine sweepers. They did this during the Iraq/Iran war. Why should they have any concerns?! They use this as population control in muslim countries.
Democracy is not compatible with Islam.
Freedom is not compatible with submission.
Only one can prevail.
Only one will survive.
Ynkedoodle, and where the muslims get the idea that if another muslim leader wishes someone dead - then they should go ahead and murder that someone - was from the big MO too. Mohammed was bothered by a woman poet who was making fun of him, who didn't want to convert to his 'religion', so he said that he wished someone would kill her. So, a big, brave muslim male went and killed her and her child who was breast feeding at the time. (sorry, but in most cases I cannot label these males as men, murdering thugs - yes, but not men.
Yep, it is one guy that strikes at the soul of the devoted - mostly the devoted who like to murder. And I keep saying islam is nothing but a 'religion' that breeds murderers.
And this kind of law and order is exactly what the jihadists are struggling to establish in the west!
"How many dhimmis have I radicalized by simply explaining that whereas Jesus forgave the woman who was condemned to death by stoning saying "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone," the fiend Muhammad said: "Bring the bitch to me that I may stone her myself." And he did. Not once, but time and time again."
Funny, I still ain't scared...aren't us bitches supposed to cower when we hear Mo's demands?
Just curious...
Miss_Anthrope
You're not supposed to be "scared" of Islam...
You're supposed to be "phobic" about it.
islamophobia: "having a horror of or a strong aversion to the misogynistic, anti-semitic, blood-thirsty 'religion' known as Islam and the cultists who practice it."
There's nothing irrational about it. It's a survival instinct in the face of mortal danger.
still doesn't affect me, tho'...
now a SEVERE HATRED of it should keep me on the team, right?
@Miss_Anthrope
Let's not mince words. "Severe hatred" is a very reasonable way to feel about the cult of the fiend muhammad. It in no way disqualifies you as an IPhobe member in good standing.
Thank you...the last thing I want is to be excluded from the club.
:D
What the Iranian regime fears more than the nuclear bomb is for their young people to convert to other religions.
It's simple: Mohammed never said anything about "human rights". All he ever said was "Allah says you have to listen to me and I'm always correct". And that's left the poor Muslims trying to make sense of his verbal meanderings ever since.
Geneva synagogue fire was arson:
http://sheikyermami.com/2007/06/01/geneva-synagogue-fire-was-arson-investigator-says/
"the world of Islam was in complete ignorance"....from headline.
Don't blame me -- they said it!
ISLAMISFORLOSERS: Now who in their right mind does not believe that this belief system is sick and twisted and produces maniacs eager to commit all kinds of atrocities?
Nobody of my acquaintance, if that makes you feel better.
Abscedere