He allegedly hid them when applying for a job at...Andrews Air Force Base.
By Dan Morse for the Washington Post (thanks to all who sent this in):
On April 19, 2005, Darrick Jackson completed an application to work as a private security guard at an entrance gate to Andrews Air Force Base."Have you ever used or been known by another name?" he was asked in the second of 20 queries.
"No," Jackson answered.
He got the job.
Federal prosecutors now allege that Jackson intentionally withheld his Muslim name, Abdul-Jalil Mohammad, to conceal a connection to a controversial imam in Southeast Washington. Jackson, 37, who is no longer in the civilian job, has been charged with making a false statement, a felony punishable by up to five years in prison.
In a pretrial hearing scheduled for today, prosecutors are expected to argue that they should be permitted to present evidence at trial that they say links Jackson to extremist views. The evidence includes speeches in which the imam wishes for the U.S. government's collapse, essays posted on Jackson's MuslimSpace Web page and a mosque directory listing Jackson as the head of security.
But Jackson's lawyers say he thought it was a question about maiden names. Why he thinks an interviewer would ask him is maiden name is left unexplained:
Jackson's attorneys argue that he believed the question applied to maiden names for female applicants and that the omission was at worst an innocent mistake. They say that Jackson has never advocated violence toward the United States, that his religious and political views are irrelevant to the case and that airing them before a jury would deprive him of his right to a fair trial."In these times in our country, the mere suggestion that a defendant may be a terrorist sympathizer is extraordinarily prejudicial," John Chamble, one of Jackson's attorneys, wrote in a court filing last month.
of course is, Chamble.
In addition, the defense alleges that authorities built the case to goad Jackson into giving up information on the imam, who claimed in an interview that the FBI has been watching him for four decades....Abdul Alim Musa, 62, is the outspoken imam at the mosque, Masjid al-Islam. In public statements, Musa has called Jews cowards, denounced the United States as the most criminal government in the world and lauded suicide bombers as heroes. He has praised Hezbollah and Hamas, the Islamic Resistance Movement, and advocated the creation of an Islamic state in the United States by 2050.
If he is convicted, he will never see a day behind bars. There can be no doubt he wanted that job, a security job, at the AFB to protect the interests of the United States Military. Oh, wait. NOT!!!!!
Hes just practicing what he was taught! Lie to get in, lie to get out. If he is convicted then he is a victum of islamophobia! Its time to get tough with these people. Lets enforce the laws.
"Private security guard"
And:
"Air Force Base"
These two phrase do not, and must not, EVER go together
I have always opposed the Hessian-ization of the military's support services, because such "mercenaries" are only loyal to their wallet.
And open the possibility of unsecured infiltration.
2050 seems doable. Wise man, has patience.
If anyone doubts that they are among us.
EXACTLY.
So how long did he have the job before the background check came back?
Hey his imam has been saying the same things as our left leaning scum have been also saying about us for decades - so whats the rub ?
It must therefore be the ACLU defending him.
Multiculturalism gone mad.
Once again we hear the argument on the accused behalf that doesn't address the issue.
"In these times in our country, the mere suggestion that a defendant may be a terrorist sympathizer is extraordinarily prejudicial," John Chamble, one of Jackson's attorneys, wrote in a court filing last month.
That said, the issue is;
Did he misrepresent the truth - lie - during his application? He did.
'He allegedly hid them when applying for a job at...Andrews Air Force Base.'
I hear the echo of a suppressed er.
Well well you all must know that was a trick question!like at the DMV (dept.motor vehicles)
Let him go back to his job.With an Apology from the
evil and vile Dick Chaney and say One million dollars........yeah thats a start,on getting this country turned in the right(left) direction.were's harry reid (no caps)when you need him!
Assalamu Alaikum
hello everyone
leon the pig farmer here.
1 question dear brothers and sisters....
I was led to believe that muslims, especially iranians, never wore TIES, as ties are too western. am i wrong?
sorry, i'll get my coat...............
I wonder if Barack (Hussein) Obama has been coaching this guy...
Dear Profitsbeard:
The words "muhammed," "private security guard" and "Air Force Base" should never go together.
As with the former IAEA head mohammed el-baradei,
no one named "mohammed" should be in charge of anything "nuclear."
The enemy within...yet more classic case-in-point.
Pretty spiffy policing there.
CaptialistGig-
"...no one named 'mohammed'..."
Agreed.
Since no believing Muslim can honestly claim to want to uphold the Constitution, they should be in Mecca, not America.
A man or woman cannot serve two masters.
Huh...
I wonder if Darrick "Mo" Jackson has any friends in the area who are in the "pizza delivery business" (like up at Ft. Dix) ?
Pray, Plan, and Prepare to take care of yourselves and your families before it is too late!
Like someone said on this forum or another. We are being stuck with a thousand pin knives. They will not turn until they think they can win.
I guess another analogy would be the fog in a pan of cold water sitting on a burner. No body knows or believes what is going on until it is too late.
Tell your friends, family (extended), office workers or anyone who will listen. Don't be rude. The public does not have a clear image of who we are fighting. Just ask them who is the enemy we are fighting today. As apposed to the enemy of WWII.
The answer is Islam.
Maiden names?
No, by the looks of his name, Darrick Jackson, he was likely raised here, unless I'm missing something.
If I'm not, then this skunk damn well knows the difference between other names and maiden names. If he doesn't, then he was too stupid to hold a job like that anyway.
Attorney John Chamble said
As opposed to, say, 150 years ago, when the suggestion that a defendent was a terrorist sympathizer greatly impressed a jury. But these days, we've lost our moral compass and become prejudiced against terrorist sympathizers. Merely because of their hatred of our nation and our society, and their wish to destroy them both by violent attacks against our unarmed citizens, we judge them as "dangerous" or "undesireable". Can't we see that terrorist sympathizers have every right to drive our childrens' schoolbuses, pilot our airplanes, and guard our nation's ports? It is well nigh time that we set aside our prejudice, and welcome the world's terrorist sympathizers to our shores with open arms. C'mon everyone, show that you're open minded: hug a terrorist sympathizer today!
"In these times in our country, the mere suggestion that a defendant may be a terrorist sympathizer is extraordinarily prejudicial..."
Whatever you do don't accuse someone of being a terrorist sympathiser because even if he/she is such a thing it is 'extraordinarily prejudicial'. Don't name the crime. Don't call someone a murderer or a rapist because that is 'prejudicial'. Don't call someone a thief because that is 'prejudicial'. Don't call someone a vandal because that is 'prejudicial'.
Whatever you do just don't name the crime. Better still, don't charge anyone with anything - after all, we all know that they can't help it: they're just victims of circumstances beyond their own control. Self control and personal morality, and such like, are obviously so far out of fashion as not to be regarded in any Court of Law as having any validity - if one commits a crime then something must have made you do it - obviously you cannot be held to account, for circumstances must have absolutely dictated your action(s). It is transparently obvious that no Human Being has any form of choice or free will. We, and they, (so this specious reasoning goes), simply respond instinctively to the circumstances in which we and they find ourselves.
Please, one commits actions in the full knowledge that there may be a reaction. If one doesn't acknowledge this fact then one is intellectually sub-normal and should be guided into whatever provisions the State in which you live makes for the intellectually challenged.
Each and every person is responsible for their own actions and challenges up until such a point at which it can be proved that they are so far short of the norm that they cannot be held accountable. Jackson is accountable - whether or not he is guilty is another question. His pathetic attempt to say that he cannot be held accountable because of some systemic failure ('it wasn't properly explained to me' style of defence) is just pathetic and reveals exactly how guilty he may be.
Are we witnessing here a new approach by militant Islam in its efforts to use our own laws against us? Possibly! But I'll bet my bottom dollar that this is one arrogant guy who never expected to be caught until such time as he had already wreaked his havoc.
dgene/
Thank-you! As one of the 'left-leaning scum' who does not say these things then I think that my existence sort of disproves your overly simple generalisation.
The use of private security guards as gate security and even interior security(generally unarmed) at Air Force bases has risen dramatically since the invasion of Iraq.
What has happened is that the Air Police units have been deployed and retasked in Iraq as convoy and base security units.
As a result the Air Force as had to hire relatively low level private security guards to replace the men deployed to Iraq.
As for Jackson, had he got the job, he would have eventually got free run of the base and would find its security holes. That would have been a disaster for the AF.
dgene/
Just thought that I ought to remind you about a statement on the ACLU website. It goes as follows:
The American system of government is founded on two counterbalancing principles: that the majority of the people governs, through democratically elected representatives; and that the power even of a democratic majority must be limited, to ensure individual rights.
Majority power is limited by the Constitution's Bill of Rights, which consists of the original ten amendments ratified in 1791, plus the three post-Civil War amendments (the 13th, 14th and 15th) and the 19th Amendment (women's suffrage), adopted in 1920.
The mission of the ACLU is to preserve all of these protections and guarantees:
Your First Amendment rights - freedom of speech, association and assembly; freedom of the press, and freedom of religion.
Your right to equal protection under the law - equal treatment regardless of race, sex, religion or national origin.
Your right to due process - fair treatment by the government whenever the loss of your liberty or property is at stake.
Your right to privacy - freedom from unwarranted government intrusion into your personal and private affairs.
Now, any of that you actually disagree with? Is there any of that that you actually think could harm you in any way? Come on, speak up! I'd be delighted to hear exactly what your arguments with the ACLU are!
dgene/
Of course, you probably disagree with another of the ACLU's statements on their website ( http://www.aclu.org/about/index.html ):
The ACLU has maintained the position that civil liberties must be respected, even in times of national emergency.
In which case what the h*ll are we fighting for?
Madduck/
That is totally bad taste and completely disgusting. Exactly how do you know it's a mohammedan male human? You are simply seeking to confuse the issue here and that is in very poor taste indeed compared to the link that you posted! You, in your bad taste and vile comparisons, have actually succeeded in turning a very humorous video clip into something that no decent thinker would want to watch. What a filthy and perverted mind you must have! I suppose that you have a clip of mohammedans eating Christian babies, also! Go on, show it to us! Fool!
Oliver..get a life..
Back in the day (1990s), when one wished to work in a sensitive military job, he was questioned about any sympathies towards the Communist Party (and about assaulting teachers). After passing the entrance exam, he then had to pass periodic lie detector tests, with questions like “are you attracted to women other than your wife”. All in the name of national security, and probably warranted.
In 2007, Muslim women are encouraged to wear traditional coverings when they come to work in the State Department.
2:10 Disbelievers are diseased.
2:99 Disbelievers are evil people.
2:104 For disbelievers is a painful doom.
2:171 Disbelievers are deaf, dumb, and blind.
3:28 Let not the believers take disbelievers for their friends in preference of believers.
3:73 Don't believe anyone who is not a Muslim.
3:48 Don't be friends with non-Muslims. They all hate you and want to ruin you.
4:89 Have no unbelieving friends. Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.
4:63 Oppose those who refuse to follow Muhammad.
4:101 The disbelievers are an open enemy to you.
4:144 Do not choose disbelievers as friends.
5:51 Don't take Jews or Christians for friends. If you do, then Allah will consider you to be one of them.
5:51 Jews and Christians are losers.
5:60 Allah turned unbelievers into apes and swine.
5:59 Jews and Christians are evil people.
5:57 Don't choose Jews, Christians, or disbelievers as guardians.
6:106 Stay away from disbelievers.
8:55 The worst beasts in Allah's sight are the disbelievers.
9:5 Slay the disbelievers wherever you find them.
9:28 Disbelievers are unclean.
9:30 Christians and Jews are perverts. Allah himself fights against them.
The world is upside down. Dot com bubble, housing bubble, and now this. Robert on the radio today was excellent, as usual. The American public sees excellence on a regular basis and gets used to it, taking it for granted. Personally, I think he is a genius. Thank you on behalf of my family.
Madduck - I've got one - and it's a bloody good one - and it certainly doesn't involve posting disgusting videos in a stupid attempt to slander and vilify the enemy in ways that cannot be sustained. You, and others like you, are the reason why Mr. Spencer is so often vilified. You do him no service by your pathetic attempts at humour. The sooner that you realise that and refrain from such childish postings then the sooner he will be taken seriously by those whom we seek to influence.
The problem is that you do not see that your attempts at humour play directly into the hands of our enemies. Although I see the humour, though I am disgusted by it, is no guarantee that others will see the humour. Posting such links as this at Mr Spencer's blog doesn't serve him well - in fact, it leaves him open to exactly the types of attacks that we here, and he, spend much of our time having to refute.
This is Frat. House humour. Get over it! Move on and become adult!
Why are troops not guarding the Base? Instead of hiring just anyone!!! It do not pay to be careless today with terrorists (who appear to be like us)....Troops should guard the base!
ACLU is a anti-American group of bimbo lawyers and some are Muslims. ACLU do not balance out anything..they are on a one way street to help all but the true Americans. (Patriotic Americans)
We were told months back that Muslims would take English names!!!Oh, they think they so slick....they snakes!
"But Jackson's lawyers say he thought it was a question about maiden names"....from headline.
Right. How many guys have maiden names? Uh, none! He'll have to come up with a better excuse than that. And his attorney is a snake for defending this bull.
Cher/
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is an American non-profit organization the publicly stated aim of which is "to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country [the USA] by the Constitution and laws of the United States".
Exactly, what is your beef with the ACLU? That it upholds the Constitution of your great country? That it upholds the laws of your great country? That it insists that in all circumstances due process takes place? That it defends your liberty to disagree? That it defends even you?
Please, tell me! What exactly is wrong with the ACLU - apart from the fact that its concept of freedom is at variance with your's and that it (the ACLU) would defend your right under your constitution to have your difference recognised and respected.
Oliver,
The rhetoric sounds great, but the performance is wanting.
If you are a lefty, one can only wish you a speedy recovery, or a period of growth.
We are in a war, a struggle for our civilization.
It is not a time to humour children.
Welcome to a great website.
Oliver --
Here's a link you may want to research that takes a closer look at the ACLU stating "10 Reasons To Stop The ACLU":
http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2005/11/10/top-ten-reasons-to-stop-the-aclu/
Madduck;
Tasteless display which we really didn’t need to see (but was pretty funny). Now…
What do the donkey farmer and General Petraeus have in common?
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article2268369.ece
P.S. Oliver --
I'm posting reason #3 from the link for your convenience:
"#3. The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism."
dgene/
Thank-you for replying. Let me deal with your points (?) one-by-one:
From your post: The rhetoric sounds great, but the performance is wanting. Indeed, so it is. Your rhetoric is wonderful and fantastic but it has no substance. You accuse the ACLU of being in the enemy camp without producing a single shred of evidence to support your assertion. Well done!
From your post: If you are a lefty, one can only wish you a speedy recovery, or a period of growth. Your gratuitous assumption that a belief in social justice - the primary tenet of left-wing politics - is somehow inimicable with the ideals of freedom and democracy is simplistic and simply not born out by the facts of the existence of modern liberal democracies, including your own. That social justice was assumed, in times past, to be only possible through a communist model is obviously erroneous and your hidebound viewpoint that such a concept must, therefore, be counter to the Western democratic experience is simply silly. Social justice is equally achievable within free-market capitalism and my left-wing stance in such matters is not a question of personal growth but a question of capital growth and the spread of libertarian left-wing capitalism - regulated (but not controlled) capitalism allied to, and coupled with, maximum democracy.
Again, from your post: We are in a war, a struggle for our civilization. Has there ever been a moment when we have not had to defend our civilisation? Do you think that there ever was some 'golden age' in which we did not have to do battle?
Again, in your own words: It is not a time to humour children. Granted, but why, then, do you insist upon being so childish and simplistic in your view of the world? Perhaps you should try to see the world as it is - a vastly complex place with enormously relative and sophisticated values.
Once more from your post: Welcome to a great website. Thank-you. On this, at least, I can agree with you. This is a great website. May we have many interesting discussions here and may we add to the total of the human experience.
Once more, thank-you for replying - I much appreciate your viewpoint even if I disagree with you on some points.
Re: Robert Spencer and genius:
Sherlock Holmes once told Dr. Watson, "Watson, mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself. It takes talent to recognize genius." –From HR Rickover’s address linked to below
I’m not a genius. But I did come back to my hometown and beat the local know-it-all chess guy twice in a row convincingly. I may be talented, or this may be too small of a town. In any case, I regard Robert Spencer as a genius.
The link is to Rickover, a true American genius, independent of the size of the town. Rickover would respect Robert Spencer but never tell him.
http://nielsolson.us/Writing/RickoverRotaryAddress10FEB77.html
He hated the very country he got a job with...which also means his pro-hamas ties is aiding and abetting the enemy...ok, that right there constitutes ESPIONAGE.
We're in wartime status.
Only one penalty for Espionage in wartime here:
DEATH
Off topic, but a NRO article cites heavily from Robert Spencer---further evidence that there is progress being made in terms of information dissemination
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZDc4OGFhY2MxMGZjMDI5MzczZGI1ZjdmZjcxYTY4NzY=
champ/
Sorry, but I rather thought that the right of an accused person to remain silent, when appropriate, was one of the founding principles of our modern Western legal systems - this, surely, is one of the tests that sets us apart from the more primitive legal systems such as sharia. Since when has an accused person refusing to testify been necessarily a proof of guilt in our legal systems? I really do suggest that you examine, most closely, your constitution and its Amendments - particularly the Fifth Amendment.
champ/
I have read at
http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2005/11/10/top-ten-reasons-to-stop-the-aclu/
and I have laughed.
That this idiotic perversion of reason could gain credence in a rational mind is what made me laugh. Perhaps I am wrong, but I doubt it.
However, thank-you for the link. I will always keep this in mind - although perhaps not in the way that you would want me to.
Oliver --
I am well aware of the Fifth Amendment, and suggesting further study on my part is merely a diversion tactic -- and is in no way pertinent to the presenting issue: National Security and our Fifth Amendment.
As stated in the link I've provided, it is privacy advocates -- like yourself -- who are jeopardizing our national security:
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/macdonald200405180845.asp
Iranian front groups are in action in the UK.
http://www.mwaw.net/2007/07/17/ftiran/
http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/index.php?q=node/2615
Glad you were amused -- so am I -- by your superiority complex.
Nighty Night, Ollie!
Those "rights" in question apply to those citizens who live by them, and under them...not to those whose system does not.
But we're giving the same right those those animals who give rights to none of their victims.
We give them so because we chose to, not because we have to...same for the Geneva Convention, which in its literal format, only applies signatories of said convention (our enemies have not), yet do anyway because the enemy within (read that as the brownshirts of political correctness, who aid and abet the enemy) scream and throw fits until we give in just to shut their snivelling asses up...which is a HUGE mistake.
We don't owe them a damned thing, especially anyone who aids and abets the enemy in ANY way, yet thrives off that very same system who they seek to destroy.
All bets are off in that case...legally.
By the way,
if we took the law that are thrown in our faces by those very same 5th column elements (read that as enemies within), then he worked on a military base, thus, it's under military law, not civilian.
Ouch...lol
The moral of the story is:
Be careful what ya wish for (or in this case, push for), you may just get it (just not the way you expected).
;-)
Perhaps it's different in America but where I come from a maiden name is just that, .....the surname of a female before she marries, hence when she is a maiden, prior to her taking (sometimes) her husband's surname.
Therefore this man and his attourney must be thick, daft or just trying to bulls**t everybody as blokes do not have maiden names
...The military should be guarding the military installations....military personel caught misbehaving are dealt with by military courts...when dealing with civilians caught misbehaving on military posts they are dealt with by civilians...this usually creates a situations referred to as SNAFU...long drawn out investigations, ignorant civil rights agencies, limpwristed judges, and way too much money spent on lengthy trials which often tend to end in short sentences (if any) and which tend to make American security efforts look like smoke in the wind....Since this man was supposed to be guarding a military installation, he should be subject to a military trial which eliminates all those biased civilians from trying to show that America is stupid and evil....
Oliver -
There actually is a video out there, taken from an American helicopter, of a loney jihadi getting it on with a cow. Very entertaining, although I pity the cow.
Humour is one of our greatest weapons against the enemy - they really can't take being laughed at, it leads to.....guess what? Outrage!
What sort of idiot believes what the ACLU proclaims on their website? Why don't you look at the CAIR website, Oliver, and then you can fall in love with another organization of freedom-denying liars?
The ACLU has a very selective way of endorsing pedophiles, anti-Americans, and anything bent on destroying our country. Oh, they throw us off now and then. But the silence we get from them on substantial issues affecting life and libery is deafening.
"In these times in our country, the mere suggestion that a defendant may be a terrorist sympathizer is extraordinarily prejudicial," John Chamble
The idiot!!
In any times, in any western country, the mere suggestion that a defendant may be...
a rapist
an armed robber
a murderer
a paedophile
a serial killer
a purjurer
... any of these is bound to be prejudicial. That doesn't mean there aren't any such criminal folk at large, or that we shouldn't charge or prosecute them. You can't prosecute a crook without laying before the court the suggestion, and evidence, that he is one. What a pin-head.
Oliver...thanks for displaying your superior intellect and putting these errant posters in their places. If not for elevated posters such as yourself, this site would soon degenerate and start talking about jihad...crack the whip, keep commenter's on topic, which seems to be the glories of the ACLU...Your psychological diagnosis of Madduck was interesting...where did you get your doctorate, or are you just stating an 'unqualified' opinion?
Jackson...as a muslim, there is no way he has not heard about jihad. As a muslim, he has probably heard a lot about jihad. As a muslim he knows his obligation to jihad. As a muslim he knows it is alright to lie to gain against infidels. As a muslim he knew of security concerns at the base.
As a muslim he knows his maiden name, it is 'Darrick Jackson' his married name is Abdullah, slave to Allah. As a muslim he knows his first and only obligation is to his husband Allah.
Besides the job probably pays good, a paycheck from the enemy could be considered a form of jizya, or loot, which in Islam is lawful.
No matter what, it is fortunate that the authorities caught up with him. Somebody was paying attention...give that man/woman a promotion...
If he thought the question was about maiden names, he would have left it blank, drawn a line through it or answered "N/A" (not applicable). He wouldn't have said, "No".
Any government forms I've seen have been very obvious. If the government wanted to know your maiden name, the form would ask for it outright and would state that the question pertained only to women who were or had been married (just in case you thought it was asking for your mother's maiden name).
The question, "Have you ever used or been known by another name?", obviously applies to both genders and does not mention maiden names.
Fortunately, there seems to be more evidence against him than one lie on an application form, or else "the stupidity defense" might work.
Our non- U.S. readers may not be aware that Andrews air Force Base, just off of the Washington D.C. Beltway, is the facility where the Presidential aircraft, "Air Force 1" is based. "W", Condi, Mr. Cheney, etc. should be very happy that this potential security problem was detected. I agree with those who believe that military facilities should be secured by military personnel, not contracted civilians. Perhaps each graduating boot camp class could be detailed for two weeks to supplement security before proceeding to AIT. The British have the Royal Air Force Regiment whose basic task is protecting their air bases.
Way OT - Has the ACLU ever done any work to protect Second Ammendment Rights? - as a former poster would say, "just doin' some thinking..."
Oliver states: "Your rhetoric is wonderful and fantastic but it has no substance. You accuse the ACLU of being in the enemy camp without producing a single shred of evidence to support your assertion. Well done!"
Sounds like you're projecting your own failings with this statement, as you are the one who did not produce a single shred of viable evidence that supports the ACLU outside of copy/pasting the "mission statement" from their website; and through the statements made from your own fantasies about this group. All you have really done is pontificate empty praises of this backstabbing organization.
I expect REAL evidence from a know-it-all.
As with the former IAEA head mohammed el-baradei,
no one named "mohammed" should be in charge of anything "nuclear."
Posted by: CapitalistGig
As in this case, all posts at Military bases, civilian Nuclear plants, storage of nuclear waist, power production, oil refinerys, chemical plants, and many more that may have to be considered, to have under direct military personal control of all who enters and works at these places. Otherwise we may be headed to a major knife, or "sward to the neck", taking the country and all here as hostages.
Islam is the enemy. May all of us in the west come to understand this before the next attack.
islam is very good at instructing its sheep to "LIE" and if caught "LYING" to "LIE" some more. and if that fails the "VICTIM" act is brought out.
As with the former IAEA head mohammed el-baradei,
no one named "mohammed" should be in charge of anything "nuclear."
Posted by: CapitalistGig
As in this case, all posts at Military bases, civilian Nuclear plants, storage of nuclear waist, power production, oil refinerys, chemical plants, and many more that may have to be considered, to have under direct military personal control of all who enters and works at these places. Otherwise we may be headed to a major knife, or "sward to the neck", taking the country and all here as hostages.
Islam is the enemy. May all of us in the west come to understand this before the next attack.
First of all.Darrick Jackson had been working for USPROTECT.for over 11 months.Before the questionnaire was done. The Post makes it look like someone asked him a verbal question and then he got the job.Not true!The questions were on paper and he did in fact put (n/a) on the app.By this criteria most Americans ARE GUILTY OF THIS CRIME!HOW MANY OF YOU HAVE PUT YOUR SILLY NICKNAMES OR E-MAIL WEBNAMES ON APPLICATIONS WHERE THE SAME QUESTION WAS ASKED?(Have you been known by any other name?)guess what you are guilty of the same thing.This is what should concern citizens.Not this bogus case.Btw most of the Government's so-called evidence is being thrown out of court one by one.Because intelligent people can see that the real target is his religion,His Imam and the Mosque that he attends.On his application he listed Personal References of his .All of the people had Islamic names.Does this sound like he was trying to hide something?By the way the F.B.I. have been harassing these same References at their jobs.Darrick Jackson has been working in Government Security all his life with multiple Security Clearances.Long before he converted to Islam.This is the man's line of work and livlihood!I've known this man since 1982 When he was 12 years old.And this portrayal of him is laughable but we knew it would come out this way.I was there when the Reporter showed up.The Reporter was surprised to see children playing,Food being served,Classrooms,And the Fellowship going on in the Mosque.HE SAID IT WAS NOTHING LIKE WHAT HE HAD BEEN LEAD TO BELIEVE.On applications such as these the requirement is for other{LEGAL} names that you are known by.Abdul-Jamil Mohammed is not his {Legal}name.Nor was Big D,Porkchop,Or other nicknames we used to call him.I supposed he should of listed these other nicknames also.Would you if you were him?Catholic Christians,Jews, Muslims all take other names when they convert.So everyone should be concerned about this type of probing because none of you are immune.Don't believe everything that is pushed in your head by the Media.Be true Patriots.Stand up against Government Witchhunts or you just might be next one being tackled and arrested for nothing.My friends.Has The U.S.Government become so thin-skinned that it can't handle criticism from it's own people when it does wrong?I thought that was what Democracy was all about.I am a Former Army Soldier and this is not the same Government that I swore allegiance to sometime ago.And that frightens me.And it should frighten you too.
First of all.Darrick Jackson had been working for USPROTECT.for over 11 months.Before the questionnaire was done. The Post makes it look like someone asked him a verbal question and then he got the job.Not true!The questions were on paper and he did in fact put (n/a) on the app.By this criteria most Americans ARE GUILTY OF THIS CRIME!HOW MANY OF YOU HAVE PUT YOUR SILLY NICKNAMES OR E-MAIL WEBNAMES ON APPLICATIONS WHERE THE SAME QUESTION WAS ASKED?(Have you been known by any other name?)guess what you are guilty of the same thing.This is what should concern citizens.Not this bogus case.Btw most of the Government's so-called evidence is being thrown out of court one by one.Because intelligent people can see that the real target is his religion,His Imam and the Mosque that he attends.On his application he listed Personal References of his .All of the people had Islamic names.Does this sound like he was trying to hide something?By the way the F.B.I. have been harassing these same References at their jobs.Darrick Jackson has been working in Government Security all his life with multiple Security Clearances.Long before he converted to Islam.This is the man's line of work and livlihood!I've known this man since 1982 When he was 12 years old.And this portrayal of him is laughable but we knew it would come out this way.I was there when the Reporter showed up.The Reporter was surprised to see children playing,Food being served,Classrooms,And the Fellowship going on in the Mosque.HE SAID IT WAS NOTHING LIKE WHAT HE HAD BEEN LEAD TO BELIEVE.On applications such as these the requirement is for other{LEGAL} names that you are known by.Abdul-Jamil Mohammed is not his {Legal}name.Nor was Big D,Porkchop,Or other nicknames we used to call him.I supposed he should of listed these other nicknames also.Would you if you were him?Catholic Christians,Jews, Muslims all take other names when they convert.So everyone should be concerned about this type of probing because none of you are immune.Don't believe everything that is pushed in your head by the Media.Be true Patriots.Stand up against Government Witchhunts or you just might be next one being tackled and arrested for nothing.My friends.Has The U.S.Government become so thin-skinned that it can't handle criticism from it's own people when it does wrong?I thought that was what Democracy was all about.I am a Former Army Soldier and this is not the same Government that I swore allegiance to sometime ago.And that frightens me.And it should frighten you too.
cdog --
I consider most -- if not all -- of your above comments to be dangerous and careless; both to our national and personal security.
We live in a different world now, and we can thank those responsible for 9/11 for this radical change.
My liberties ARE important to me, so don't misunderstand where I'm coming from, but they will never come before saving the lives of my loved ones or fellow Americans. Besides, what good are our liberties if we aren't alive to enjoy them?
We are at war with radical Islam, and anything that so much as smells like a terrorist needs to be examined -- thoroughly.
Oliver,
I look forward to pimpslapping you on these boards on a regular basis.
You have no point, no logic, no reasoning.
All you do is insult, insinuate you have logic, and talk while saying absolutely nothing.
You have not debunked any points here just taking up too much space.
Hungarian Crusader-1453
I am sure you dont even know the significance of the year.
You will make a supreme dhimmi for the muslims.
Pimpslapping -- sounds painful -- hope he doesn't bruise easily. LOL!
Champ....Are you telling me that "truth" is dangerous and careless?Tell me that's not the case.I am stating "facts" from firsthand knowledge.Unfortunately people on this board got their facts from the Post.And drew their own conclusions.Basically condemning the man based off of an article.Example just suppose you were driving your car on a sunny afternoon,Doing the speed limit, signaling when you change lanes..etc.Suddenly a person jumps out in the road..You swerve to avoid hitting that person..But in doing this you accidently hit another pedestrian and kill them.You call 911 you try to revive them, you do everything that you can do to help.You become very distraught.A reporter shows up questioning people.Keep in mind that this reporter is not an eyewitness to the accident.The next day the headline is CARELESS DRIVER KILLS PEDESTRIAN.Everyone reads that headline.Suddenly you are the Devil Himself.What would you do?..Champ.If you are willing to give up even one of "your" Civil Liberties for so-called security...Check History that is exactly how Republics and Democracies always morph into Dictatorships.BY PEOPLE WILLING TO GIVE UP THEIR "GOD-GIVEN" FREEDOMS IN THE NAME OF SO-CALLED "SECURITY AND SAFETY"It is the oldest trick in the book!But I appreciate your post.Would you not defend a friend or family member that you know the real facts about against an article and people who know nothing about the real facts?I'm sure you would.I know you would.But as I stated thanks to intelligent people in the courts ,Justice will prevail.I'm suprised that so many on this board really believe everything the Media and Government Tells them... But then again I used to believe the same thing. Come on folks you have to be smarter than that.You are not the Blind Sheep that certain people{Not all)In The Government wants you to be.Patriotism requires open eyes not closed minds.Yes the government should seriously investigate.But this is something being done to get dirt on an outspoken Iman.Darrick Jackson was mostly question about his Imam...Not about himself.One more thing "Jihad" means "Struggle" not "Holy War".You see I don't just take the word of people just because they are "Media" Or "Government Officials"I find out for myself.For example if you had a terminal illness that you were fighting.That is an example of a "Jihad."If you were fighting against Alcoholism or drug addiction,Then you are going through a "Jihad".If you were on a boat and fell overboard and you didn't know how to swim.Then you would be going through a personal "Jihad".Get the point.There is no such word or thing as a "Jihadist"That would be like someone calling you a "Strugglist"
cdog --
Thanks for writing back, and I do understand where you are coming from, but keep in mind that the individual in question has a Muslim background, something that most "average" Americans do NOT have; so your defense of this particular mans rights border on being hypersensitive and completely out of balance because you're making him equal to you and me, and he isn't.
Your response seems to be foregetting this fact, and you're defending the average American withwhom these rights would apply, but in my opinion, they should not apply to would-be terrorists; and the only way to know for sure is to examine them under a microscope.
Communism -- come on! That is not what's at risk here and you know it. Sorry, but it sounds like you are grasping at straws.
Privacy advocats need to remember that we are at war with radical Islam and that we are fighting an enemy who is taking ADVANTAGE of our civil liberties. Don't play into their hands by defending the right thing for the wrong reason during a time of war. Your privacy will not exist anyway if Islam gets a foothold into America.
If it does, then you can kiss ALL of your freedoms goodbye!
....and I don't mean to sound so sterile and like I don't "get" where you're coming from, nor do I want to come across like I'm judging you (which I apologize for if I have), but my main objective is to save lives -- period -- and if I come across a little hard then I'm sorry, because I don't know you from Adam, and for all I know, you could be the nicest person I could ever meet. So please don't take my position personally.
Have a nice day!
Well said...Champ.But keep in mind there are "others" Within "our" own Government who are taking advantage of these times also.These are the people who have believed that Americans had too many freedoms anyway.The Patriot Act was actually concieved in the late 1970S.But no President or Congress in their right minds wanted to touch it because of the freedoms it restricted.It was always shot down in every major vote until 9/11.So while everybody was so busy worrying about the "Islamic Fascists" Invading and Taking our liberties they never noticed the "American Fascists"Who have blatantly crushed our Bill Of Rights and the Constitution...During the last seven years.THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE NEED TO WAKE UP AND UNDERSTAND.We have a duty to defend our freedoms from all enemies"Foreign" {AND} "Domestic" According to the Oath.Never forget that.Keep your head up Champ.Thanx