Hiyam Darbak, Who Founded an Egyptian Association for Promotion of Polygamy: Every Month, I Encourage My Husband to Marry Another Wife

polygamy.jpg

Wife to husband: please marry another woman! Man Bites Dog Alert from MEMRITV:

Following is an interview with Hiyam Darbak, who founded an Egyptian association for the promotion of polygamy, which aired on MBC TV on November 28, 2006:

Interviewer: How did you come up with the idea of founding the "One Wife is Not Enough" association?

Hiyam Darbak: I came up with the idea because of the new statistics in society - the rising rates of women who never married, divorced women, and widows in Arab countries, such as Iraq and Palestine, and in Islamic countries where there are wars and so on. Women without men have become a phenomenon in society, and they constitute time bombs in society – especially the millions of women who never married. There are armies of women who never married in Arab society. This also poses a danger to the morality of society.

[...]

Interviewer: You expect the wife to agree to share her husband with another woman?

Hiyam Darbak: Why not?

Interviewer: Are you married?

Hiyam Darbak: Yes.

Interviewer: Is your husband married to another woman?

Hiyam Darbak: I suggest this to him every month.

Interviewer: So he refuses?

Hiyam Darbak: He refuses because I am sufficiently cultured to keep him to myself....

| 59 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

59 Comments

Hiyam Darbak: I came up with the idea because of the new statistics in society - the rising rates of women who never married, divorced women, and widows in Arab countries, such as Iraq and Palestine, and in Islamic countries where there are wars and so on. Women without men have become a phenomenon in society, and they constitute time bombs in society – especially the millions of women who never married. There are armies of women who never married in Arab society. This also poses a danger to the morality of society.

maybe there would be more men if they didnt keep blowing themselves up and taking up arms for jihad.

If I had her for a wife, I too would want another

Maybe she is a lesbian and hoping her hubby will marry someone who plays for both teams.

She would be a more credible proponent of polygamy if she had shared her husband with three other women for the past 20 years.

I would expect each wife to be at least five years younger than the previous wife, so she would be, say, 35, the next one 30, the next one 25, and the next one 20.

I would expect each wife to bear at least five children.

So, as the first and oldest wife, she would share her husband with three younger women and at least 15 children that are not her own.

If she could get someone like that to tell us how wonderful polygamy is, then I might at least think she was deluded but honest.

I don't trust her motives.

How much government money is she getting for this? What does this mean? Is she gunning for the creation of a new department of "Polygamy Police", which she would be more than qualified to head?

Note her statements that unmarried or widowed women pose a "danger to the morality of society" and "constitute time bombs in society".

Note that Islamic converts to Christianity also pose a "danger" to Egyptian society and can therefore be imprisoned.

Her husband is afraid he'd get anmother one like her.

Where's the polyandry?

The interviewer failed to ask the big question:Are you insane or just stupid? Inquiring minds want to know.

Maybe her hubby is ugly or a bit kinky, over sexed and being a good Muslim wife she has no say over her body and can't take it anymore so she tried getting fat and ugly and still he "has his way", so her only hope now is to get him another sex slave.

Any broad as ugly and mean-spirited as this biotch would be enough to make any man unlucky enough to get snagged by her turn GAY!

Why isn't her hair covered? Someone deep enough into this cult to approve of polygamy should follow ALL the rules, not just some of them. Off with her head!

"Women without men have become a phenomenon in society, and they constitute time bombs in society"
--Hiyam, from the article--

Literally taken, this is the understatement of the year.

Greetings:

I don't think my first wife was a Muslim or believed in polygamy, but she used to urge me to take another wife every day.

Now I know why Muslims take wife beating seriously....

"He refuses because I am sufficiently cultured to keep him to myself...."

Oh---my---gosh!!!

Grace be to you and peace from God the Father, and from our Lord Jesus Christ, Who gave Himself for our sins, that He might deliver us from this present evil world, according to the will of God and our Father: to Whom be glory forever and ever.


Yes, women without men. In Islamic societies, that means they each are persona non grata, since following the Koran literally does not allow for single women to be able to function in life. No education, no jobs, no social life, no ability to even go out and feel the sun on her face or the warm sand between her toes. Honestly, such an ignorant, backward, works-based belief system!

No thank you, I'd rather be dead than worship a God that prescribes this. Just more proof that old Mo was bonkers and arrogant to boot.

What a horrible proposal.

This women has obviously not come across the many Muslim women where polygamy is an agony.

Dang, I thought my mean looks were scary. Woof.

Updated Message to United States citizen jihad watchers:

It’s the middle of the fourth day of posting this request at Jihad Watch, and we are up to 24 volunteers. Florida, Virginia, and California are now tied, with three each.

I'm looking for at least two people in every state of the Union who would be willing to purchase a copy of Robert Spencer's Religion of Peace? Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn't and mail it to one of the senators in your state. I'm organizing an effort to get the book simultaneously to all 100 senators, in order to send a strong message.
If we get more than two people per state, we’ll also send copies to the House of Representatives.

If you’d like to be involved, please write to me at traehnam@yahoo.com under the subject heading “Senate,” and tell me the state your senator represents, an email address where I can reach you, and a nickname. No need for your real name. And I will never share your email address with anyone, not even with other volunteers for this project.

And visit www.jihadawareness.blogspot.com to get more info on this project and to leave comments other volunteers can read. You can also see there the growing list of participants in this project, and the states their senators represent. I’ll try to update the list at least once a day. I've also designed a new graphic that might amuse. Scroll down when you get to the site.

Once we have at least two people from every state, we can agree on a mailing date and then each of us can mail a copy of the book on that date.

Right before we do the mailing, we can issue a press release to various media outlets in every state, and in that way announce and explain the mailing. And perhaps we can come up with some other ways of maximizing the effectiveness of this project and gaining as much positive attention as possible.

Update: one of the project's volunteers suggested contacting Rep. Sue Myrick, who started the anti-Jihad caucus in Congress. I'll try to coordinate this project with Rep. Myrick to maximize its effectiveness. I've also called several congressional offices to try to get advice on how best to go about this. And I'll soon contact Regnery, Robert Spencer's publishing company, to ask their advice and to see if we can coordinate with them in some way.

Offtopic - to Elric66 re the jihad parade - looks like you've just got a possible date for a 'Stop Islamification of USA' event. Same day as, or day before, jihad parade. Call it Celebrating Jahiliyya, or Kaffirs Come Out to Play, or something like that, since the jihad parade is Muslim Day Parade.

Ever heard of a bike advocacy group called Critical Mass? Some of their ideas might be worth borrowing. Lots and lots and lots of people just 'happen' to all converge on Ground Zero, and they all 'just happen' to be visibly, publicly violating the dhimmi laws, especially the rules forbidding public recitation of Torah and Gospels, and the rules forbidding criticism or complaint concerning Mohammed, Sharia and Quran, and the rules forbidding public display of wine and pork, and that rule that forbade the wearing of green by non-Muslims (all Irishmen in the world should be given pause by that one - maybe St Patrick's Day should be seized upon as a springboard for anti-jihad anti-sharia manifestations, specially as St Pat used the Shamrock as a visual aid to explain the doctrine of the Trinity which is anathema to Muslims). And of course lots of gorgeous women in every possible non-Muslim national costume, all of which 'offend' the Muslims by their 'immodesty'.

Different idea - perhaps on the day of the jihad parade families and friends of those who died in the Towers should stand shoulder to shoulder in silence encircling Ground Zero and holding placards inscribed in English and Arabic with the words, "We Will Never Submit".

"Interviewer: Is your husband married to another woman?
" Hiyam Darbak: I suggest this to him every month.
" Interviewer: So he refuses?
" Hiyam Darbak: He refuses because I am sufficiently cultured to keep him to myself...." --from the interview posted above

It seems that this woman is playing at some sort of reverse affirmation, suggesting courses of action for other women, appearing pious in the process and yet having her worth as a person affirmed by her husband's (up to this point anyway) continuing disinterest in other women, because she is "sufficiently cultured" to keep him to herself. It sure doesn't sound like she thinks polygamy is all the great for her own situation!

This is pathetic and sick. Polygamy sustains a culture in which the father is remote and the mothers become breed mares, leaving the children with little in the way of positive adult role models, male or female.

And what about all the men who won't be able to find a wife because so many of them are in polygamous relationships.

Now that IS a time bomb for society.

And what about all the men who won't be able to find a wife because so many of them are in polygamous relationships.

Now that IS a time bomb for society.

This wild slutty womens is wearing colored underwear no doubt...

HARAM, I say.. THIS IS HARAM!!! alla skankbar!

Centuries of Polygamy - why there are so many Mohammedans.

Has nothing to do with quality - just quantity.

What an insane society.

As Arafat said, "The womb of the Arab woman, my strongest weapon." (X 4).

Quick call Michael Savage. Tell him to make up a couple of animals for this situation. I'm sure his choice will be outstanding.

"Every Month, I Encourage My Husband to Marry Another Wife"

Husband: That time of the month dear?

If Hiyam gains any more weight, her hubby will be looking for another wife.

Me: "I have recently founded my own North Carolinian Association for the promotion of sticking chopsticks in ones ears. I promote the concept because I believe in confronting horrible things head on in order to overcome one's fear of horrible things."

reporter: "That's not only fascinating but really quite admirable! Have you done it yourself"?

Me: "Hell No! I'm way too cultured for that! But the message I'm trying to convey here is "Do as I say and not as I do! It's a kind of radical experiment in the concept of "You first". I'm pretty much hoping that other intrepid folks, inspired by the radical "You first" slogan, will actually stick chopsticks in their ears and then come back and tell us about the experience, thereby enlightening us all on the overall moral concept I'm trying to convey here in the "you first" movement, which is "Do as I say and not as I do". And once enough people have actually followed through on this radical "You first" experiment, I plan to write a book about their experiences."

reporter: "Awesome! You're really pushing the envelope here. It's immensely brave of you really. Very very edgy! I look forward to reading the book!"

Is this really a dhimmitude issue? Why do we care about what Muslims do in their own countries. Seems to me this article would be better posted on some women's rights watch web site.

Or can someone explain why this is dhimmitude in action?

Regards

Hey, baby, with those eyes of yours popping out of your head I'd check the old inter-cranial pressure if I were you.

> the "One Wife is Not Enough" association

Is this a dhimmitude issue? Yes.
The order of superiority is as follows;

Muslim male.
Camel.

Muslim female.


Kafir females. (war booty)

Kafir male.

"Every month, I encourage my husband to marry another wife", she said. She then added, "Right around the same time every month. I don't know what all that's about. In fact, at that same time every month, I smack him and generally yell at him a bit. No idea. Kinda cranky, I guess. Anyone have a saltine?"

- Prophet Geoff

If it purely relates to how one muslim treats another, its not dhimmitude..

That is a very good way to expand islam.Marrying more women means producing more future islamists to conquer infidel lands by the way of demographic jihad.

Also with the continuing suicide bombings in iraq,afghanistan and other islamic paradise,the need has arisen for new muslim babies(future islamists) to replace their bretherns killed in ongoing jihad for future jihad.

Mr. Darbak, who recently reached an unprecedented 2.3 cm in length, with the aid of an ingenious penile implant, was unavailable for comment.

He was overheard humming an old 70's cigarette aid wishing for a "silly millimeter longer..."

2.3 CM that's one inch in the old measure isn't it?

"Is this really a dhimmitude issue? Why do we care about what Muslims do in their own countries. Seems to me this article would be better posted on some women's rights watch web site.

Or can someone explain why this is dhimmitude in action?" --from above

Yes, I believe it is a dhimmitude issue. Increasingly the West is turning a blind eye to this practice but the practice is hidden in plain sight. The reason for this disregard may be ignorance ("Hey I thought the younger one was her sister") or cultural relativism ("It's what they do and it'sjust as good as what we do") or misguided good manners ("It's none of my business"). The fact remains that polygamy is not standard practice in the West and its presence now is due to the influx of Islam practitioners. Polygamy is a threat not only to the quality of family life for those practicing it but a threat to the quality of life of those not so practicing, due to the unequal demands it places on social services and resources: can one man driving a cab really support two or more women and their children?

In my opinion, ignoring this problem is acquiesing to a Islamic more. Dhimmitude

Chatillon -

You are absolutely correct, ignoring and tacitly allowing muslim polygamy in the west, is dhimmitude.

Caroline, you nailed it. It seems that the women are allowed more freedoms if they are working on ways to keep other women oppressed. Then it's OK.

'...perhaps on the day of the jihad parade families and friends of those who died in the Towers should stand shoulder to shoulder in silence encircling Ground Zero and holding placards inscribed in English and Arabic with the words, "We Will Never Submit".

Dumbledoresarmy, I like your idea very much. I will post it in a local online forum where I live, where there are many immediate family members & close friends of those who were lost on 9/11. I'm sure most are not even aware of this Muslim Day Parade. (I wasn't; so thanks Eric66 for your post of the frontpagemag article.)

If an organized protest like this doesn't get organized, perhaps it will just be little ol' me with the sign. Better one than none.

And Alexon, "ill with Islam" - perfect sound bite; mind if we use it?

Do as I SAY, not as I DO.

What does "suffiently cultured" really mean?

Geoff -- Change saltine to chocolate and you'll have it just right. ; )

I think the posters who believe this is dhimmitude because these things should not happen in the west, did not notice that the woman concerned is based in Egypt, not USA.

Let them suffer their own problems.

As far as letting fake wives into the West, our immigration departments could prevent that if they had the will.

And I think, wasn't it Mormonism originally brought Polygamy to USA?

Payingattention,

To "bring" something to the US, it implies that it originated some place else. Mormon Polygamy was something dreamed up by "The Prophet" Joseph Smith and further supported by Bringham Young. It's what got Mormons run out of the eastern and midwestern US (among other things like the fact that they boasted about NOT being Christians and conducted shady buisiness deals, but I digress). Oldstyle Mormon men could have as many wives as they could support. Bringham Young had something like 15 or so wives. You hear people boast about being a decendant of Bringham Young, but really, it's no big deal. There's hundreds of 'em out there!

By the way, the reorganized LDS church broke from Bringham Young and went north after Joseph Smith was murdered. They did not espouse polygamny and were tolerated in the midwest. There are still Reorganized LDS towns in the UP of Michigan of all places.

There are still isolated communities in the western US where polygamy is practiced. Of course the LDS church does not recognise these "fundamentalists," but they don't go out of their way to abolish it either: almost like they are waiting for politics to change or something. The authorities know perfectly well what is going on but do NOTHING. Young teen age girls are married off to their father's friends and buisiness parteners. The "wives" get welfare for all the children they have. It's disgusting to know that the authorities know this is happening and do little to help these girls or tackle this corruption. If we can't get a handle on this, how do we expect to tackle Islamic polygamy when it gets a foothold here?

Polygamy is NOT A FAMILY VALUE.

never_submit

In my humble opinion, I think that Smith ripped off a bunch of ideas from Muhhamed, to serve his own purpose. Like this "oh this angel came down and gave me this book and he also said that having loads of wives was cool."

I might be wrong, but isnt that "revelation" suspiciously similar?

Anyway that's off topic. It's still not dhimmitude because it is muslims telling muslims what to do. And if it is imported to the west, its not dhimmitude, its stupidity.

"And if it is imported to the west (polygamy), its not dhimmitude, its stupidity." --from above

Can't entirely agree. If polygamy is imported into the West, it is illegal. Ignoring is minimally stupid and maybe craven cowardice. This is paying a tribute of sorts to Islamic mores. Dhimmitude in other words. Let's not pay the tribute. Let's not pay the jizya. Let's not pay the allah-mony.

Every month,eh? She doesn't want to get pregnant!
I wonder how often he request it?

Polygamy will be legal again in the west. After the 30 year war in Europe the Holy Toman Emporous at the time encourage men to take than second or third wifes an he otder the law enfotcement type not to enforce the law against polygamy. May-be this woman cannot bear childern and she want his hushand to marry than other woman so there will be kids in the house.

No it won't, Defender, because we American women won't put up with it. Remember Myra Morton?

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/homepage/20070807_Did_Montco_slaying_victim_have_two_wives_.html

But if you're real lucky you will have a choice when you ask us, as to whether we shoot you in the balls or the head.

Isabellathecrusader you are than very sick person. First laws can be change it the people votes for these change. Is Islam become than religion of say 30% of the america people then congress can repeal the law that ban Polyamy. Most people donot care how many wives than man have, only a tiny number of eacist are against polyamy marraiger. To make the member of the Mormon Church happy the law will state that the number of wives allow will be up to what the religious laws of the believer say he can have.

Defender of Islam' - oh be quiet and go away. As for that woman Hiyam Darbak, she's stupid. If she wants to wreck her own life by setting up a rival in her own house, in a Muslim country that encourages and permits such destructive folly, fine; but us Christian women know better.

I am a Western, Christian woman. I am married to just one husband, for twenty years. I LIKE monogamy. I LIKE not having to share my husband; not EVER having to worry about whether he'll get tired of me and bring home some other woman to f*** in our bedroom under our roof. I LIKE it that when we got married, he and I publicly vowed to 'forsake ALL OTHER', so long as we both should live. And we've kept those vows. Chastity and fidelity and monogamy are great!

I am sure that lots of women throughout the West think exactly like I do. We are not about to give up monogamy (nor any of the other good things and the freedoms that we have) - and we have the vote, don't forget, and we make up a LOT more than 30 % of the population.

Polygamy is a really bad idea. It's psychologically and socially extremely destructive. The Jews saw that, more than two thousand years ago, and stopped doing it, even though their ancestors had sometimes practised it. Christians maintained the hard-won Jewish wisdom and taught monogamy from the start.

Quit with the revolting arrogance Mr 'Defender of Islam'. Quit with the spiritual violence. Quit with the Big Lies. Can you not understand one simple little word: NO? No means NO. N.O. N.O. No to any and every aspect of sharia law - it isn't perfect, it's DISGUSTING, it destroys people and turns whole societies into poverty-stricken prisons full of fear and hypocrisy, full of tyrants and slaves, men trampling on women, Muslims trampling on non-Muslims and treating them like dirt.

Islam will never become the religion of 30 % of the American people - and it will NOT catch on in Australia, either.

The self-education of the Kuffar, led by people like Robert Spencer and Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Wafa Sultan, is speeding up. Ordinary American people are soon going to 'get' what Islam is about, and what horrible things it does to people - like poor, silly, self-abusive Ms Darbak.

And then you - if you live in America you sneering, arrogant Mohammedan (dreaming perhaps of a hareem stuffed with ten- and twelve-year-old black and blonde and redskin American slave-girls?) - you won't know what's hit you.

Defender,

You are not listening (as usual.) You call me sick? Honey, you are so deluded. It's no more sick of me to remove your people's manhood than it is for you to remove our women's sexual feeling as well as legal rights. An eye for an eye, remember? But bring it on, if you think you have it in you. We Americans effectively got rid of Polygamy because it is a bad system, just like your favorite form of totalitarianism, Islam, is a bad system.

The thing you don't get is we won't sit by and watch you impose this on us. We will fight you at every turn, just like we are doing now. Why do you think Fibrahim Hooper has practically gone apoplectic? He's beside himself because we don't want his system, won't have his system and if you keep it up you will come to regret it because we will only put up with so much, and you are coming dangerously close to pushing us too far.

Keep shooting your mouth off, big mouth. You'll get a lot more than you bargained for if you do. ; )

Isabellathrcrusader first it you donot want to share your man fine but donot force your beilf on other. Time are changeing your far right wing christian. It
Morman want to have more than one wife fine with me, I read about how you Christian force your belief on the Morman and how many you christian killed ib cold blood. Polygamy is rare in the moslim world but is allow which show that moslim people are better than christian people any day. You must be really worry that it polygamy become legal that your hushand might want than other woman also so you decide to make it illegal which isnot working as there are many christian man with more than one wives at the same time. One christian saleman have 50 wives that didnot know about the other one in each state untril he die an 50 wives show up in court to claim his wealthly estate with all they childern that the government was force to recognite each marraige as equality valid as they where unable to reach than ruleing fair for everyone. Place that allow Polygamy donot have this touble as they have estate law which can deal with this. Islam recognite that not all man will be happy with one woman so they will allpw you to have more than one wifes but you are legality bound to her which mean you must support her and her childern and treated all equally, unlike than kept woman in western societry where king have royal kept woman they slept around with with many of these woman still married to they hushand.

Isabellathecrusader -

Isn't it funny how you're being told not to force your views, when the whole point is about Darbak encouraging -- almost scolding --women to do this? I love the smell of irony in the morning...

Thanks GoldieLox!

'Sorry to disappoint you, Defender, but we're here talking about real issues in real time. No one cares about your misogynistic fantasies. Do what you want in the hellhole you live in but bring your crap to my country and we will deal with you accordingly.

BTW, is this you in the video? I thought so.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Jz1u6oo_Lg&NR=1

"You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality."

Ayn Rand

Site Meter