Pakistan: Two Christian girls of 11 and 16 kidnapped, converted to Islam and forced to marry

Islamic Tolerance and Little Aisha Alerts: "Two Christian girls of 11 and 16 kidnapped, converted to Islam and forced to marry," by Qaiser Felix for Asia News (thanks to Nicolei):

Faisalabad (AsiaNews) – Two Christian girls, little more than children, were kidnapped from their families recently, forcibly converted to Islam and then married off to strangers. Both of the kidnaps took place in Faisalabad, the third largest city in Pakistan, and both were completely ignored by the police. The phenomenon is not a new one however, underlined numerous human rights activist, but it is dangerously on the increase.

On August 5 Muhammad Adnan, a Muslim from Zulfiqar colony Faisalabad and his sister kidnapped Zunaira, an eleven years old Christian girl from her home in Warispura. After the kidnap, they forced her to convert to Islam and marry her kidnaper Muhammad.

The small girl’s mother, Abida, told AsiaNews: “When I was roaming in streets in search of my daughter two Muslim men of the area told me that they saw Adnan and his sister taking my daughter”. Abida decided to go to the kidnapper’s house, from which however she is thrown out. Returning home, she was contacted by two men who revealed the kidnappers identity and offer to act as negotiators for her daughters release in exchange for money.

| 40 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

40 Comments

Naseem

Any comment?

Obviously, little Muslimahs ain't enough - they now have to rape little infidel girls.

What's the minimum legal marriage age in Pakistan? 9? 6?

The words 'marriage' and 'rape' are synonomous. And the muslim din't want a wife, he wanted a child to sexually abuse while waiting for the ransom money.

Naseem

Any comment?

From the article

After the kidnap, they forced her to convert to Islam and marry her kidnaper Muhammad.

Sounds like a typical hadith.

From the article

After the kidnap, they forced her to convert to Islam and marry her kidnaper Muhammad.

Sounds like a typical hadith.

...SOON , they will force them to commit suicide....


Ban Muslim immigration.

...Hey Pakistani Christians...here is a new word for you:......vigilante.....

Ban Islam

Hey bigots, they are following the Prophet's examle ,back off.

At only 11 years old, the best years of her life are already behind her. How very, very sad.

Little girls....they aren't safe in this world of men.

Standard modus operandi for muhammadans.

They emulate the fiend muhammad.

...legalized Islamic slavery.....

I can't understand why the police don't go after these men. This is kidnapping and rape, impure and simple. Pity the poor girls, wrenched from their homes and families and forced to become islamic sex slaves. And the police don't give a damn.

"I can't understand why the police don't go after these men."

....the policemen and the Islamic thugs go to the same mosque and are in aggreement....NO NON MUSLIMS.....


....just another reason why we should BAN MUSLIM IMMIGRATION....

Smart Muslims. Probably caught on that inbreeding isn't a good thing, and went looking for new DNA.

Ban Muslim immigration, and cut off US aid to Crapistan and Cespoolia.

Someone has to get video cameras to these folks so this practice can be documented. Once the ignorant in the West see the barbarism that is tolerated against Christians and other non-Muslims, their anger will be fierce. People just don't believe that things are that bad. It is like when the Jews were being murdered by the German Nazis; people just did not believe the depravity of the Germans against the Jews. Today people do not believe the depravity of Muslims against Christians, until they see it with their own eyes and can not deny it anymore.

Dhimmiwatch: npr/BBC:


They're holding a CONTEST which city is the most "multicultural"!!!!

Unbefreaking-lievable!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/worldhaveyoursay/2007/08/is_london_the_best_role_model_1.html

Mohammad's example lives one.

Pedophile, rapist, slavemonger and terrorist.

Pakistani law, Pak culture and Islamic 'law' all sanction crime against Christians and other non-Muslims.

How many stories has this site featured which prove these people justify acts of savagery and inhumanity because of their religious superiority to other religions?

Paying the ransom to free this child from sexual enslavement to this barbarian will only reward this barbarian for doing the unthinkable to an innocent child; how can any amount of money restore this child to her former self? The fact that the Pak government won't protect victims and prosecute criminals speaks to depth of filth and depravity that they will sanction in the name of male dominance and Sharia.

We don't need more criminals or pedophiles practicing a religion that sanctions criminal behavior. The only difference between schizlamic peds and Nambla peds is that the nambla peds don't invoke MO. But, import enough schizlamic peds and you can bet the nambla peds will find a new religion to embrace. Then, we'll have a bunch of peds lobbying for legalized marriage to underage children because their holy book condones and encourages this practice.

"...Hey Pakistani Christians...here is a new word for you:......vigilante....."
by Exsgtbrown

It's tough to be a vigilante when you are in a minority, the government hates you, and the majority has you out-gunned. The only way that I can see the survival of Christians caught in a Muslim majority country is to leave.

The US, and Britian could provide a safe haven for the soon to be eliminated Christians. Our leaders could if they would.

Pelayo,
Don't you know the UK and US only accept Muslims refugees?

In Ayaan Hirsi Ali's book she tells how when she was very little, 5 or so if I remember correctly, her grandmother taught her and her sister how to fight off men (so that they wouldn't be abducted by the men for the men's sexual gratification).

Yeah all cultures are alike don't cha know. Though I don't remember having been taught that or having to teach my children that either.

What sort of behaviour do you expect from people who adulate a seventh century child molester?

How long would a man in the U.S. go to jail for kidnapping an 11 year-old and forcing her to "marry" him? 30 years? Life? And the Pakistan government does nothing about it?

I don't know what is more amazing: the truly unbelievable evil Islam permits, or the fact that so many Westerners act like business as usual in the face of that evil.

Part of the problem is that where Islam is sufficiently pervasive and established, the individual, private, conscience is suppressed in favor of Islamic law, the Qur'an and Muhammad's life. One often hears Muslims speaking with derision of "man-made" laws and governments, as opposed to "Allah's" laws. With such a view, no respect is given to the inner judge and conscience of human beings, because Muslims are deluded into thinking they have direct access, via the Qur'an, to Allah. So what happens in a society where individual conscience is suppressed when not dormant, and dormant when not suppressed? As this story illustrates, unimaginable abominations happen. Sure, Western societies have the occasional abomination -- the serial killer, say. But Western police do not sit back and treat serial killing as "normal." But that is basically what Pakistan police are doing.

"she was contacted by two men who revealed the kidnappers identity and offer to act as negotiators for her daughters release in exchange for money."

Such Good Samaritans!

Good Analysis Traeh.

"It's tough to be a vigilante when you are in a minority, the government hates you, and the majority has you out-gunned. The only way that I can see the survival of Christians caught in a Muslim majority country is to leave. "


....."they" don't want to leave....if that is their choice they then have no alternative to fighting back if they are to survive....they surely realize by now they are doomed if they stay....you would think they would object to the Muslim harrassment, the Muslim intimidation, the Muslim kidnapping,rape,torture,and forced marriages of their children...you would think they object to being forced to cower in dark secretive concaves in order to say a prayer....you would think they would like to freely walk the streets without fear of never coming home alive....

....I believe their only choice for survival (if they intend to stay, which they do)..is to fight back....it is better fighting for your freedom than to die a fearful timid slave of Islam....either way,. the Muslims want you dead....

...it is time the NonMuslims began to reclaim their world...

...it is also time to Ban Muslim Immigration...

Information = Enlightenment = Knowledge = Power to change one's life.
This is why muslima are at the bottom of the food chain in ickslam. muzzy males want to keep them there, so they don't challenge their absolute authority. It's also why they kidnap and marry babies.

Ban muzzy immigration!!!!!

Damn Straight, Exsgtbrown -

If you have no option to leave, and your life is "theirs" (according to their laws/beliefs), it's INFINITELY BETTER to die fighting for your life/freedom than to die like a dog.

Bring it on, Muslim Jihadist Bastards!

Yet US embassy and consulates in Pakistan still do not issue visas to Christians. Staff in the embassy and consulates is all muslim.

Recently two Christian priests from Karachi were invited by Christian community in MD to attend a convention, and they were refused.

Muslims should be treated the way they treat non muslims in their countries.

Yeah where is ol' Naseem?

PICTURE AN EMPTY CHAIR AND COMPUTER CHAIR. AND IN THE BACKGROUND CRICKETS ARE CHIRPING.

ah well Nasmeem Im sure she'll be back when Islams easier to defend. You cant expect the poor girl to defend the forcibly taking of an innocent 11 and 16 year old nonmulim girls forced into muslim marriages~ why no that would be downright cruel.

/sarcasm off

Embassy staff serve at the pleasure of the President.

The only reason these Islamatards represent us abroad is because of inaction at the oval office. This one is easy to fix, no imput from congress is needed.

Polygamy causes a shortage of available females. If the men can't be sent off to war, what do they do for wives? Kidnap locals or go to other lands.

First of all it is necessary to point out that Pakistan is not an Islamic State. Second neither the Quran nor the Hadiths sanction the kidnapping of girls, in fact it expressly forbids forced conversion. These two pakistani people have perpetrated a crime and should be punished rightfully so in what it a corrupt country, however, to blame Islam is tantamount to blaming Christianity for the SPanish Inquisition, The horrific inhuman acts perpetrated by the Chrsitian Crusaders, who were surpisingly taught how to treat prisoners of war humanely by the Muslims (read any unbiased account of history).

Stop hating Islam, open your mind and study it. Compared to the bible, in particular the old testament which is unbelievably violent (just read about what happened to the inhabitants of Jericho when the wall was breached, very disturbing)the Quran is bereft of filthy sexual acts attributed to its holy men.

Peace

To jansenkudo -

Take your lies - taqiyya and kitman and tu quoque - somewhere else.

What happened to these girls in heavily Islamised Muslim-majority Pakistan - which is becoming more Islamised every day - has also been happening for ages to Coptic Christian girls in Egypt. Note: the men who did it identified themselves as Muslims, and declared that the girls had been 'converted' to Islam. So THEY think they're acting in accord with Islam...if you think they're not, your job is to educate THEM, not us.

I have read the Qur'an. There is no peace in it except the false peace of slavery and death. It is from beginning to end a book of war. And I know about the traditional theological distinction that Islam draws between dar al-islam and dar-al-harb. And the abundantly documented history of Islam is FULL of forced conversions.

What has been done to these young Christian girls in Pakistan (and it has been done to Hindu girls there, too) is merely what Muslims have frequently done to non-Muslim girls in every country where Muslims either possess power, or have been in process of seizing power, from the 7th century to the 21st. Given that remarkable consistency in practice over time, one must conclude that this pattern of behaviour has something to do with Islam, even if 'pure' sharia law is not currently officially in force in either Pakistan or Egypt. (I assume you would regard Saudi Arabia and Iran as 'Islamic' states? - and in those countries the persecution of Christians is absolutely dreadful).

As for 'filthy sexual acts attributed to its holy men'...how would YOU describe Mohammed's marriage to a six-year-old girl, and consummation of that marriage when she was nine?

Mohammed was a rapist, more than once. The Hadith and the Sira make that quite, quite clear. He raped two Jewish women on the same day that their husbands had been killed trying to fight off his army of murderous bandits. And none of those acts of rape, or murder, or assassination of political opponents, or lying, or treaty breaking, are EVER condemned, in the Hadith of the Sira, as immoral. He is represented as the 'perfect man', to be slavishly emulated in every regard.

The violence described in the Hebrew scriptures is limited in both space and time (book of Joshua = conquest of Canaan; book of Judges = period between conquest and acquiring a king - a period clearly viewed by its recorders as being a time of moral disorder and of disobedience to God). The Jews are given ONLY Canaan, that is, the Land of Israel - a very, very small country. And there it ends, within the boundaries of Canaan, eretz Israel. God does NOT send them out to conquer the whole world. The Bible does NOT ever envision anything even remotely resembling the Muslim Caliphate. There is NOTHING in the Bible that is at all like Surah 9 of the Quran; the Bible contains no 'verse of the sword'.

After the conquest of Canaan, all Israel's later wars are defensive in nature: frequently they are struggling against the rapacious intent of the superpowers of their time, such as Assyria, Egypt, Babylon, Persia. Acts of violence among Israelites during the period of the kings and prophets are mostly framed as events to be deplored, rather than imitated.

In the New Testament Jesus tells Pilate, the Roman Governor, that "my kingdom is not of this world". After the resurrection Jesus tells his [Jewish] disciples to "go and teach the nations". Teach - NOT 'conquer, dispossess, and dominate'. For the first four hundred years of its existence Christianity spread ENTIRELY by peaceful persuasion and preaching; and that has always been its normal and proper mode of propagation. Wherever 'christian' nations sought to create empires by conquest and violence, as in the Americas, it can be seen that they were DISOBEYING the clear and explicit teaching of Jesus (and while they were doing it, plenty of Christians spoke up and criticised them, quoting the Bible to condemn the sins of the empire builders).

But: the Quran COMMANDED Muslims to fight and conquer the 'unbelievers'. Islamic warfare and imperialism - and kidnappings and rape of non-Muslim women - all flow directly from the teachings and example of Mohammed. I don't believe any Muslim at the time of the Muslim conquests ever spoke up to condemn the killing, enslavement and dispossession of non-Muslims, as being 'un-Islamic'. There has never been a Muslim William Wilberforce, campaigning to end slavery.

If one looks at the entire history of Islam from the 7th century to the 21st it is an unrelenting catalogue of sickening, extreme, political violence, both among Muslims themselves, and against all their non-Muslim neighbours and non-Muslim dhimmi subjects. Islam has not just one Jericho in its history, but thousands upon thousands; and it is drenched with the blood of hundreds of millions of victims slaughtered in jihad, or raped, or enslaved. And its historians unanimously glorify that violence, that conquest.

Muslims teaching Crusaders how to treat prisoners of war humanely?!!! Pull the other leg, it's got bells on! I'm not sure whether to laugh, or to vomit, at the magnitude and brazenness of your lies.

How about the 600 Jewish captives beheaded in one day by Mohammed's orders? How about the sack of Constantinople - unarmed worshippers, the elderly, women and children, slaughtered en masse by the thousand in the great church of Hagia Sophia?

How about the siege of Malta? The Muslim Turks cut off the heads of the Knights they had captured and nailed them to crosses and set them afloat to wash ashore on the shores of Malta . Humane treatment, eh? Check out a book called 'White Gold', which describes the inhuman cruelty inflicted upon Europeans captured by the Muslim Barbary pirates. And, oh yes, those three Jewish IDF soldiers - their Muslim captors won't even let the Red Cross pay them a visit.

"There is so much talk nowadays of the tolerance and fundamental pacifism of Islam, that it is necessary to recall its nature, WHICH IS FUNDAMENTALLY WARLIKE": French sociologist, Jacques Ellul.

And the more I learn about the texts, the history and the mainstream historic theology of Islam, together with the acts of many, many professing Muslims across the world today, the more I am convinced that Ellul was right.

"Khalil Tahir, chairman of a free legal aid organization “Adal Trust” and a well known Christian lawyer confirms this: “the growing number of attacks against Christians is worrying."

Does anyone know how to contact this organisation to make a donation?

"The horrific inhuman acts perpetrated by the Chrsitian Crusaders, who were surpisingly taught how to treat prisoners of war humanely by the Muslims (read any unbiased account of history). ..."
Posted by: jansenkudo


....In case you have not read any history other than than what your Islamic slavemasters teach you, I give you this tidbit....

"By the rules that Muslims claim for themselves, the Crusades were perfectly justified, and the excesses (though beneath Christian standards) pale in comparison with the historical treatment of conquered populations at the hands of Muslims.

Here are some quick facts…

The first Crusade began in 1095… 460 years after the first Christian city was overrun by Muslim armies, 457 years after Jerusalem was conquered by Muslim armies, 453 years after Egypt was taken by Muslim armies, 443 after Muslims first plundered Italy, 427 years after Muslim armies first laid siege to the Christian capital of Constantinople, 380 years after Spain was conquered by Muslim armies, 363 years after France was first attacked by Muslim armies, 249 years after Rome itself was sacked by a Muslim army, and only after centuries of church burnings, killings, enslavement and forced conversions of Christians.

By the time the Crusades finally began, Muslim armies had conquered two-thirds of the Christian world.

Europe had been harassed by Muslims since the first few years following Muhammad’s death. As early as 652, Muhammad’s followers launched raids on the island of Sicily, waging a full-scale occupation 200 years later that lasted well over two centuries and was punctuated by massacres, such as that at the town of Castrogiovanni, in which 8,000 Christians were put to death. In 1084, ten years before the first crusade, Muslims staged another devastating Sicilian raid, burning churches in Reggio, enslaving monks and raping an abbey of nuns before carrying them into captivity.

In theory, the Crusades were provoked by the harassment of Christian pilgrims from Europe to the Holy Land, in which many were kidnapped, molested, forcibly converted to Islam or even killed. (Compare this to Islam’s justification for slaughter on the basis of Muslims being denied access to the Meccan pilgrimage in Muhammad’s time).

The Crusaders only invaded lands that were Christian. They never attacked Saudi Arabia or sacked Mecca as the Muslims had done (and continued doing) to Italy and Constantinople.

The period of Crusader “occupation” (of its own former land) was stretched over less than two centuries. The Muslim occupation is in its 1,372nd year.

The period of Crusader “aggression” compresses to about 20 years of actual military campaign, much of which was spent on organization and travel. (They were from 1098-1099, 1146-1148, 1188-1192, 1201-1204, 1218-1221, 1228-1229, and 1248-1250). By comparison, the Muslim Jihad against the island of Sicily alone lasted 75 grinding years.

Unlike Jihad, the Crusades were never justified on the basis of New Testament teachings. This is why they are an anomaly, the punctuation of fourteen centuries of relentless Jihad that began long before the Crusades and continued well after they were over.

The greatest crime of the Crusaders was the sacking of Jerusalem, in which 30,000 people were said to have been massacred. This number is dwarfed by the number of Jihad victims, from India to Constantinople and Narbonne, but Muslims have never apologized for their crimes and never will.

What is called 'sin and excess' by other religions, is what Islam refers to as the will of Allah."