Pakistani Minister tells Parliament: Jews behind 9/11, Qur'an says Jews and Christians can never be friends of Muslims

Friend and Ally Alert: "Minister blasts pro-US foreign policy," from Dawn (thanks to South Asian):

ISLAMABAD, Aug 21: Federal Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Dr Sher Afgan Niazi on Tuesday stunned both the treasury and opposition senators when he roundly criticised the foreign policy, describing it as one of appeasement at the cost of national interests, sovereignty and honour.

He also condemned recently-passed US legislation and the derogatory statements about Pakistan made by some American presidential candidates.

Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal’s Prof Khurshid Ahmed immediately stood up to endorse most of the views expressed by the minister, and welcomed the “change of heart,” describing it as part of the change that had taken place in the wake of the July 20 landmark Supreme Court judgment....

Dr Niazi said in his speech that the key role Pakistan played in bringing about the downfall of the former Soviet Union was a blunder. It resulted in the emergence of a unipolar world and gave the US a licence to attack any country it wished, he said.

He said that American presidential candidates’ statements threatening Pakistan’s internal security were a reflection of the jaundiced thinking of US leaders who had forgotten lessons of history and the glorious past of Muslims.

Lashing out at the recent US law attaching strings to financial assistance to Pakistan, Dr Niazi described it as insulting and demanded that “we must return and refuse to accept such assistance”.

Hey, that's a good idea, Dr. Niazi.

He said the country should learn to stand on its own feet by rejecting all foreign assistance as a proud Muslim nation....

The minister said that events which followed the 9/11 incident proved that it was the brainchild of Jews. He said that according to holy Quran, Jews and Christians could never be friends of Muslims....

If Dr. Niazi said that on an American radio show in the presence of someone like Ibrahim Hooper or Salam Al-Marayati, he would be roundly denounced as a racist Islamophobe. Do you even know Arabic, Dr. Niazi? Where did you get your degree in Islamic studies? Well?

But if Dr. Niazi were on his toes, he might be ready with these Qur'an passages:

"Never will the Jews or the Christians be satisfied with thee unless thou follow their form of religion." (2:120)

"O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust." (5:51)

| 54 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

54 Comments

WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE BUSH DOCTRINE?


Didn't Bush say after 9/11 that if you harbor terrorists then you are considered a terrorist nation? Pakistan is harboring no less than super terrorist himself, yet we can resist the chance to voluntarily give those apes our hard earned cash?

"Lashing out at the recent US law attaching strings to financial assistance to Pakistan, Dr Niazi described it as insulting and demanded that “we must return and refuse to accept such assistance”."

Ummm. good idea. can we have our money back please?

He said the country should learn to stand on its own feet by rejecting all foreign assistance as a proud Muslim nation....

there is no such thing as a "proud muslim nation" these words do not belong together.. would that statement come true, the West would truly be richer! muslims are like fat little snarly trained seals always begging for food, aka money and assistance. islam cannot stand on its own that is why they need to take over other nations and demand poll tax from non muslims. yeah no such thing as a "proud muslim nation"!

I'll do him one better:

All muslim nations should reject foreign assistance from non-muslim nations and our nations' leadership should stop doling out our money to those who hold such ill will against us.

The second half of his thesis is actually correct: Muslims by definition are enemies of ALL non-Muslim peoples without exception (including Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Gypsies, et al). And this will eventually prove Islam's undoing as most of the world of course is NON-MUSLIM.

As for this Islamozoid killer-zombies's other assertion that the Jews were behind 9-11 let it be known that the Commandment (from Yahweh) "Thou shalt NOT commit murder" is part of the Judaic religion and practicing Jews are bound by it (Muslims aren't--so guess who is the more likely to have been behind such an attack).

Clearly, attacking other countries is just fine with this guy as long as it is MUSLIMS doing the attacking and not the United States (which he says in not so many words, but, nonetheless that is what he is unmistakably saying).

As usual, a Muslim opens mouth and it isn't worth bothering to listen. Who cares what this creep says? We knew what he was going to say before he said it. (But if America pulled Pakistan from its list of countries receiving US aid he would be whistling a different tune--fast).

Several points here to consider:

Para 1: "...criticised the foreign policy, describing it as one of appeasement at the cost of national interests, sovereignty and honour." Sound familiar to everyone. But only when such appeasement makes Islam look bad. The West is doing such appeasement in spades, and continue to fall over backward to "accomodate" these slime-balls.

Para 4: "...the downfall of the former Soviet Union was a blunder. It resulted in the emergence of a unipolar world and gave the US a licence to attack any country it wished." So? The Soviets would have kicked your ass just as quick as we will (if necessary.) Keep talkin', Dr. Nazi!

The rest of his diatribe about making friends with the Infidels...You have may full support with this one, dude!

Oh, and one final piece of advice to Dr Nazi and all his ilk in the government: The next time Pakistan has a major earthquake and thousands of people die due the government's incompetence, do NOT come a knocking at our door.

Thank you and have a wonderful, beautiful, peaceful life under Sharia. And stay on your f&*$%^^ side of the planet!!!!!

The "Truthers" know that Bush, not the Jews, were behind 9/11.

I suggest we let the Muslims and the 9/11 Truthers fight to the death for their respective theories.

At least the world will be a few idiots lighter, whatever is decided.

The predictable responses we'd get after telling our congressmen to cut off aid to these baboons would be, "Things would be much worse."

I can take it. In case congress hasn't noticed, things can't get much worse in these countries. What are they doing with the billions of dollars we hand out like mardi-gras beads?

It the only leverage we have left.

Oh, I forgot one..

Last Paragraph: "The minister said that events which followed the 9/11 incident proved that it was the brainchild of Jews."

Oh, yes, that old canard again. Just because of some dubious rumor that no "joooooz" showed for work at the WTC on September 11th.

Hey, everybody ("It's Dr. Nick!"), let start a whole new rumor to spread on the Net on all pro-Islam sites. It goes something like this...

"Mo-HAM-med was a seizure-having, pedophile-raping, caravan-robbing, head-severing, hand-chopping, ankle -severing, Jew/Christian-killing, cave-dwelling, delusional, illiterate piece of human shit ever to grace the surface of this planet."

oops..scratch that..that's all FACT.

My bad.

"Never will the Jews or the Christians be satisfied with thee unless thou follow their form of religion." (2:120)

"O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust." (5:51)
-- Qur'anic passages, quoted by Robert Spencer above

Cut-and-paste. Print out. Copy many times. One copy for the refrigerator, under the magnet. One for the wallet, to be taken out during conversations about Islam. Others to be distributed, as part of a Starter Learning Kit, in the New Infidel Teaching Company's special unit -- the only unit in fact -- about Islam.

Dr Niazi: “we must return and refuse to accept such assistance”.

Robert Spencer: "Hey, that's a good idea, Dr. Niazi."

Ok a show of hands...

Ok the motion passes 10,000-1 (Georgie voted no).

No more aide to the "Muslim occupied Indian territories".

Hey, I didn't know Osama Ben Laden was a Jew! Is he part of the Luminaty also. Or maybe a Knights Tembler. No, no he works for the CIA.

Prov 29:12
If a ruler (Niazi) honors liars, all his advisers will be wicked.

مقاطعة 29:12
اذا كان الحاكم 'نيازي' يكرم كذابين جميع مستشاريه ستكون الشرس.

Qur'an says Jews and Christians can never be friends of Muslims
from a speech by federal minister Sheer Afghan Nazi

Well he's right, of course. How can I be a friend of someone who believes his god tells him it's o.k. for him to kill or enslave me and my family, or that it's o.k. for him to rape my wife and daughters, or that it's o.k. for him to lie to me, cheat me, spit on me, or steal from me.

The Pakistani minister, and many other Muslims, who simultaneously accuse "the Jews" or "the American Crusaders" of staging the 9.11.2001 attacks, and also express great delight at those very attacks, demonstrate how, in Islam, the capacity for reason and logic is impaired. The credulous acceptance of a Total System, with its Complete Regulation of Life and Explanation of the Universe (at no extra cost), the belief that one should never question Allah, never dare to recognize the contradictions in the Qur'an itself (but be satisfied with "naskh" or "abrogation"), never notice the 20% of the text that makes no real sense (see Christoph Luxenberg on that 20% that makes no sense), the ability to believe one thing and its opposite at the same time, or to find behind every failure of Muslim states and societies not the real reason for that failure, but the machinations of Infidels, the alacrity with which every crazy charge against those Infidels becomes deeply and truly believed, the incapacity for any degree of skepticism or lonely critical thought, the willingness to subject oneself to, or enroll oneself in, some collevist enterprise, as if fearful of remaining an individual and eager for instruction and direction at every turn so as to be relieved of the need for thought or independent moral judgment, all this characterizes Islam.

And one example, of the sheer craziness that Islam encourages is that of the Pakistani minister above. But it is really no different with any of those who refuse to think for themselves and smilingly, brightly, like the young Muslim woman on the Islam segment of Amanpour's dreadfully misleading CNN thing who tell us how happy they are to return to the full faith, by which they mean those Rules To Live By which make it all so very simple, don't they, if we all wish to be simpletons in our existence, and take a seventh-century Arab-language Guide, fabricated out of many strands -- the pagan Arab lore, the bits and pieces of characters and stories lifted and distorted from Judaism and Christianity -- which then becomes, and supposedly applicable for all time, merely a Guide to Seventh-Century Arabian Life, the relevance and application of which is held to be eternal.

Those who are still capable of thought will be the most offended, to the precise degree that they are capable of that thought. About others, though, I'm not so sure. Some may like the idea of being zombies, directed in what they dress and eat and think and do, every single step of the way. Some may find it positively comforting.

@Im.mad.as.HELL!

Easily constructed as...

Prov 29:12
If a ruler (GWB) honors liars, all his advisers will be wicked.

Now, let's see which of the our Presidential wanna-bes follow this very appropriate insight..

Robert has shown that there really is no such thing as a moderate Muslim and there can't be because all the lack of moderation is in the Koran.

Therefore, I disagree that we should try to induce the Muslims to change in order to solve our problems with them because the vast majority of them are unchangeable and a program such as this would not be feasible in real time.

Our only solution is to control the Muslim population at all levels and deny them access to anything sensitive or dangerous. They must also be closely monitored and the ones that are not moderate must be deported or otherwise removed.

Latest Message to United States citizen jihad watchers:

We are near the end of the ninth day of posting this request at Jihad Watch, and we are up to 54 volunteers in 29 states.

I'm looking for at least two people in every state of the Union who would be willing to purchase a copy of Robert Spencer's Religion of Peace? Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn't and mail it to one of the senators in your state. I'm organizing an effort to get the book simultaneously to all 100 senators, in order to send a strong message.
If we get more than two people per state, books can also be sent to the House of Representatives.

If you’d like to be involved, please write to me at traehnam@yahoo.com under the subject heading “Senate,” and tell me the state your senator represents, an email address where I can reach you, and a nickname. No need for your real name. And I will never share your email address with anyone, not even with other volunteers for this project.

And visit www.jihadawareness.blogspot.com to get more info on this project and to leave comments other volunteers can read. You can also see there the growing list of participants in this project, and the states their senators represent. I’ll try to update the list at least once a day. I've also designed a graphic that might amuse. Scroll down when you get to the site.

Once we have at least two people from every state, we can agree on a mailing date and then each of us can mail a copy of the book on that date.

Right before each of us mails the book, we can issue a press release to various media outlets in every state, and in that way announce and explain the mailing. And perhaps we can come up with some other ways of maximizing the effectiveness of this project and gaining as much positive attention as possible.

One of the project's volunteers suggested contacting Rep. Sue Myrick, who started the anti-Jihad caucus in Congress. I'll try to coordinate this project with Rep. Myrick to maximize its effectiveness. I've also been calling various congressional offices to get advice on how best to go about this. And I'll soon contact Regnery, Robert Spencer's publisher, to ask their advice and to see if we can coordinate with them in some way.

@boneshack

I guess you could put any world leader's name in the verse with todays politics. Sad really, but I would say the world of Islam is better and been doing more of it and longer that others. Remember who the enemy is.

Hugh, good evening!

Thank you, once again, for a most excellent summary of the topic at hand.

Although I will not able to watch the Crescent News Network's airing of this series this week, I look forward to catching up if the do re-runs. (I spend a lot of my time away from home.)

I, much like all other readers of JW/DW, are still capable of intelligent thought. If and when it might be possible to post snippets of this series for critical response, then be it.

But I digress off topic. This Paki minister is just one of many in the past several months to come forward and make these completely absurd, unsubstantiated remarks.

When President Pervez Musharraf is deposed, and Sharia is installed in Pakistan, will Western leaders get the clarion call to STOP supporting them?

That, my dear colleague, is my burning question of the month.

Amendment I

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."


You know maybe I am off base but if my tax money is going to Pakistian am I not violating the 1st?

"no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting free exercise thereof"

Are all religions free to exercise their faith in Islamic lands? I know our Founding Fathers did realize that their idiotic descendants would be throwing money around the world like fools but just wondering?

I know a stretch...but it sounds good!

"No free religion, No tax money!"

@Im.mad.as.HELL!

You were reading my mind! I did consider the variable of:

"If a ruler (insert name of any Western leader here) honors liars,..."

Don't worry, I know the TRUE enemy, and it is that soul-sucking leech of Islam.

I wasn't thinking clearly because I was practicing my speach for the Aug' 2008 nomination for President .

Oh, what I'm thinking...I don't have $500m...

Should say...

"No Freedom of Religion, No Tax Money"

or

"No Freedom of Religion, No Foreign Aid"

Sounds better...I want people to pay their taxes still...ok...if IRS is reading this...:)

I am sure somebody could come up with something better...oh well its a thought.

O yes Raseed that video tape of bin laden stating 911 was such a success, a better then expected success, well that was just a jew who was impersonating him to frame you poor peaceful muslims.

Balagoon, was the Bali bombing about Israel? Is the continued jihad against India, and against Thailand, because of Israel? Is Islamic persecution of Christians in Egypt, in Indonesia, in Iraq and indeed in Palestine because of Israel? Are the avowed aims of jihadists to take over Europe and North America and turn them into Islamic states because of Israel?

Or do you honestly believe that the September 11 hijackers were motivated by a different ideology than all these jihadists?


Good job equating circumcision to FGM, by the way. You just lost all credibility you had.
Posted by: Audacity [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 16, 2007 2:58 AM

True...you are the Audacious type...
I didn't equate circumcision with female genital mutilation...
Circumcision IS male genital mutilation...any idiot knows that .

And sure...Islamic fundamentalists will try to conquer anywhere and anyone...but Osama BinLadin clearly stated that 9/11 was revenge for the Lebonese sky skyraper destruction.
Yet it is just common sense to know that if we keep out of other people's business...they will tend to keep out of ours.

But you are missing so much common sense...you MUST BE A JEW.
Posted by: Balagooon [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 16, 2007 3:50 AM

What about Talmud...Mossad... Goy...and infant blood sacrifice genital mutilation.. don't some ignorant people comprehend ?
Posted by: Balagooon [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 16, 2007 3:51 AM

Look...don't get me wrong...there are good and evil among BOTH Jews and Muslims...as well as the Gentiles and Christians and ALL PEOPLES.

PLEASE LOOK AT THIS EXCELLENT WEBSITE:

http://www.jewsagainstcircumcision.org/

SO...YOU SEE THERE IS HOPE AFTER ALL.

I have been refering to the evil ones on this web log...or what you call it...posting thread...is all.

There were those movies: "The Invasion of the Body Snatchers" (1956), and "The Blob" (1958), that seemed intended, to some extent, as allegories about the threat of communism. The Body Snatchers was simultaneously tongue-in-cheek fun and yet dead-serious scary. Are there any famous popular movies or books that are allegories for the threat of Islam? (For various reasons, I'd say Tolkien and C.S. Lewis don't quite fit the bill.)

The Body Snatchers could only allegorize Islam if one made a number of adjustments to the plot. Suggestions?

Re: God's Warriors (part 2, Islam)

Amanpour tried her best, but common sense, based on recent historical fact, could not sway her from the inevitable...Islam is corrupt and needs to be buried, or at the very least reformed. Her scholarship lies solely on her mention of Qutb as the father of modern Jihadism.

She did not care for Iran's fashion police at all. Wave after wave of well-documented Islamic violence, supported by random Mullahs, painted an abyssmal portrait of Islam, in my opinion, with at least four useless Armstrong sound bytes notwithstanding. I actually forgot her anti-semitic rant from part 1, halfway through part 2. Islam has a tendency to do that.

There's only so much lipstick available when it comes to Islam, if you know what I am getting at. She will be doubly hard-pressed to portray Christianity in a "religiously moral equivalent" negative light, tomorrow, I estimate.

My apologies, my post warrants an OT preface.

Bush is courting disaster. What, is he trying for a nuclear Al-Queda? The solution is not to support Musharraf, or to stop supoprting Musharraf. The solution is to support Pakistan's democratic grassroots. Go, Musharraf, Go!

I would just like to point out that Orthodox Judaism, too, has a "complete system" such that you are preoccupied with God's commandments all your waking hours. Just something to think about.

By the way, I know all this because I AM an Orthodox Jew. For your information, circumcision is a fundamental part of cementing the human connection to God. It is absolutely not open to debate. Furthermore, it has no documented ill health effects, and in fact research shows that it might reduce the risk of HIV/AIDS.

I have lots more to say, but will reserve comment until I finish reading those sources Hugh was kind enough to give me.

A good honest Muslim is hard to come by.

Now that we found one, who will believe him?

traeh-

"Suggestions?"

"The Day of the al-Triffids"?

The Earth is threatened by mobile, semi-sentient plants (with poisonous stingers) which appear from God-knows-where, and seem likely to over-run the planet.

Niazi might want to check with those of his countrymen who thought that 9/11 was a good thing, and then decide whether he really wants to give the credit for that to the Jooooooooos.

Hugh is right about their ability to believe contradictory things at the same time. As for Robert's question about whether Niazi knows Arabic, answer may well be yes, since it's one of the languages actively taught in Pakistan in order to make that country even more different from India than it already is.

O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust." (5:51)
-- Qur'anic passages, quoted by Robert Spencer above
-------------------------------------------------
Since the Muslims are not suppose to be friends with Christians or Jews..why did they move to a Christain Nation? Why are they still here? Why do we let them stay here? They are no good for this nation. They no good for anything...so why are they here? They hate us with a passion...they have a religon that is all evil and it has no place in our country. I do not plan to let them replace the Holy Bible with their Satanic book (Koran). Their children in their schools are learning Mein Kampf...how many Muslims in school here or college have this book learning from it?
Do we have the will to let our government's know we will not tolerate such a religion in our nation from people who are not American's. And to all those who were born here and has given their life and soul to Muhammed and allah..they need to move to Middle East (Mecca/Medina)..where they can worship the moongod!
We talk alot but where is action! Move Islam ..out of my country! I do not want you here. Call me a racist, call me a pig...I really do not care. You not welcome in my land...Good Riddance all Muslims!

I agree with that one actually! Put Hindus and Buddhists on that list and I am 100% agreed!

islam can NEVER be friends with ANYONE... not even amongst themselves..

pitiful really.. wish we could confine them in THEIR lands so they can hash it out AMONGST THEMSELVES!

I'D JUST LIKE TO WATCH THE RESULTS ON YOUTUBE.

trainwreck, I hear ya coming....

I have to add that until the hate kill madrassahs are all shut down...the Jihad will continue...no question.
The billionaire sheiks want large harums of Islamic wives for themselves and their sons too...
Thus...they MUST eliminate as many middle and lower class I muslim young males from all around to make the young single muslim female population available to them and their polygamous addiction.

Don't forget this !!...God did NOT create man...Man created GOD in order to control and use other men.

OK...
And not all the Jews are angels either...for they too mutilate the genitals of males in their blood sacrifice circumcision ritual....and have Mussad too.

But there is hope...

Go here and see:

http://www.jewsagainstcircumcision.org/

Keep well
Balagooon

Thank-you Hugh, for so aptly describing the "Islamo-zombies". "Life" must be oh so bliss, when one can forego logic, reason, and critical thought in favor of repetitive, regulated, ritual.

I don't get it. Pakistanis cheered when 9/11 happened, yet it's the fault of the Jews?

At least Dr. Niazi's quotations of the Qur'an is showing the West that our culture is incompatible with Islam. The question is - who's listening?

Dear Dr Sher Afgan Niazi,

I was saddened to read your statements (21st August) regarding the foreign aid to your wonderful country. Like all Ozi tax payers, and the tax payers of all western countries, we are guilty of a dreadful mistake in believing that western aid was appreciated and useful to your wonderful nation.

Thank you for bringing to our attention that it is neither needed nor useful. I will ensure that, to the best of my ability, no further aid money shall come from me.

To show my sincerity in this matter, I will accept a cheque, representing my contribution, from you.

With humble Kuffar apologies,
Ozi Bloke

PS. These Jews are clever people aren't they. Just imagine, OBL is a Jew.

Another thought - Dr Sher Afgan Niazi must be the Mahdi. Only the Mahdi will end the Jizyah, or "foreign aid" as we know it in kuffar land.

Did Dr. Nazi come out of a well?

Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Egypt pretend that they are friends of America and, at the same time, stab America on the back. America knows that and, yet, still treat them as friends and give them too much jezyah!! Why? Is America scared from the intimidating sword of Islam? Can any one answer me?
Abbas Shaker

"Lashing out at the recent US law attaching strings to financial assistance to Pakistan, Dr Niazi described it as insulting and demanded that “we must return and refuse to accept such assistance”.

....and when you return the money, how about returning all those fighter jets and other weapons we gave/sold to you....you obviously will will not need them against India or China. We will gladly give you back your ambassador and other government agents you have in our country...they probably share your thoughts about the generosity of the western governments....


....Hey Niazi, show the Pakistani concern for people in need, like the victims of the disaster in Peru, or the victims of natural storms across the globe, or donate some Pakistani money towards AIDS research, or to the growing number of orphans in Muslim countries (the growing number of Muslim orphans is directly attributable to a lot of lead slinging Muslims)...

....however, Pakistan must be doing something right....when I see film clips of Pakistani protestors burning the American flag and burning Bush effigies..I do not see any obese Pakistanis, or maybe that is because the people get a lot of exercise running from one place to the other trying to avoid the religious police, or running from one place to the next trying to run away from their relatives who are intent on an honor killing (and they know they are the intended victim)....or maybe it is because there is little food....instead of growing food, the farmers grow opium....


...I agree with Niazi...the things given to his country by us must be returned.....

Goes to show that the ONLY true friend America has in the Middle East is Isreal.

Give Glen Beck credit last night, he said the TRUTH of who should be responsible for 9/11, Osama Bin Ladin.

Just doing what the Koran tells him to do.

Niasi aptly represents Crapistan.

His words are a ringing endorsement of the failure of the intellect in the face of a totalitarian ideology like Mohammedanism, and the hate in the koran.

More public readings from this awful book required.

More exposure.

He said the country should learn to stand on its own feet by rejecting all foreign assistance as a proud Muslim nation....

I am all for that one...stop aiding them.

Male circumcision...It's amazing to me that those who think foreskin removal is a covenant with God,
can't see the wierdness of this ritual. It's loaded with sex symbolism to begin with because it is the de-hooding of the sexual organ. Why would 'God all mighty', even have an interest in this? If one believes that circumcision is a covenant with God, thats fine, I am not commenting on covenants, but wierdness. What is this facination with foreskins?
David of the Bible collected 200 Philistine
foreskins for a dowery. I always wondered just how one goes about collecting 200 Phillistine foreskins. How many terrorists does that take? Attacking an infants genitals with a knife, is a strange way of establishing a covenant with God.
That those participants who don't see this as a little strange, is strange in itself.

duh_swami, you're missing the fact that Abraham was in his 90's when he was circumcised.

duh_swami-

It was a hygiene thing. All that sand and dust....

Recent AIDS research proves that the HIV virus is more likely to strike men with foreskins, since the folds catch and incubate the disease.

I guess the only way the folks back then could explain such a bizarre rite was to ascribe it to the will of God.

The ancient Egyptians started it.

The Hebrews likely got the idea from them.

More sand...

As a swordwielder of some experience, one can comment that it is not the Phillistine variety that the ladies prefer.

(Abraham might be of the same view)

(lol)

"Do you even know Arabic, Dr. Niazi? Where did you get your degree in Islamic studies? Well?"

This aptly and ironically points us to the question, is a person killed by those who believe Islam commanded their death in those circumstances just as dead even if the killer was mistaken about Islam?

In a sense, this is one of the fundamental points of Jihad Watch and Robert Spencer. It doesn't matter to those killed or subjugated what Islam "really" "means", they are just as dead or subjugated, even if those doing it don't read Arabic, and don't have a degree in Islamic studies from Harvard or Yale.

Furthermore, when the same idea is stated in many places in the Quran, and the many translations translate them as roughly the same, then its difficult to claim "out of context". Subjugating the infidel nations is one of those commands that is in many places in the Quran.

"...the capacity for reason and logic is impaired... a Total System, with its Complete Regulation of Life and Explanation of the Universe... the ability to believe one thing and its opposite at the same time... as if fearful of remaining an individual and eager for instruction and direction at every turn so as to be relieved of the need for thought or independent moral judgment..." Posted by: Hugh

Many years ago, I did a lot of reading about cults and religious sects. I wish I had kept those books because I am often reminded of them when I read about Islam.

The aspects of Islam mentioned by Hugh (above) were all included in the literature's descriptions of cults.

How do you tell a religion from a cult?

The main difference the books discussed was that, in a cult, the leader is alive, so Islam would not qualify in that case. However, there are many cult-like aspects of Islam.

Are there rules for everything? Do they control what you wear, the hours you sleep, the food you eat?

Some might say, well, other religions have rules about food. That's true. But think about the many rules contained in Islam surrounding everything. So, not just food, and the way animals are killed, but what hand the person is supposed to use when eating and whether or not utensils are permitted.

As we learned in a recent thread, Islam has hundreds of rules about voiding and some imams dictate the colour of underwear Muslims must wear.

Think of the ritual ablutions and shaving that must be done for Islamic prayer to be valid.

People are so busy making sure they are following all the rules that they have little time and energy left over for independent thought.

That's usually the point of so many rules: control. And, also, self-perpetuation of the religious mindset. Actions set off certain thought patterns. Believers can't be in their house of worship 24/7, so they must be trained to self-perpetuate the religious mind.

One of the books I read talked about the emotional and mental process that a person experiences when being brainwashed.

First, the newbie is welcomed into the group and "love-bombed": showered with approval and never left alone. He is only told the positive aspects of the religion. He makes new friends and has an emotional investment in the social group. Gradually, he is turned away from his family and former friends, until he is completely reliant on his new religious friends. At some point, a total break is required.

The newbie's sleep, diet and clothing are influenced or controlled by the cult. This isn't a personal choice as in, say, a vegetarian's decision to eat a certain way for his health and the sake of the planet. These changes are required for the sake of conformity to group norms and, ultimately, for the person's salvation.

The newbie is brought to god in "love" but, coupled with the love, is always fear. God loves you and doesn't want you to burn in hell. God loves you and the devil is doing everything in his evil power to steal your soul and send you to hell.

Sure, Christians believe this too, but to what extent are their lives ruled by fear? To what extent does the preacher emphasize the devil and demons, etc., all controlling the scary, evil world? To what extent is the believer convinced that the world is filled with demons out to get him and destroy his eternal soul? How much fear is required to control the believer?

The believer is brought to salvation through love and fear and kept there through fear of anything that is not part of the religion.

There comes a point when the newbie has a great deal of emotional investment in his salvation. He loves god, he is afraid of satan, unbelievers and hell.

But maybe he is still able to use his intellect: he hasn't yet lost his ability to use logic and reason. So far, almost everything he has been told could be understood with the rational mind if a liberal helping of faith and fear was added.

Given his emotional investment, there is a strong incentive to keep believing what he has avowed. This is about god and sin and eternal life. These people are not just his new friends but his new family in god: they are his true brothers and sisters, better than the ones he grew up with who were always fighting over toys and competing for mommy's love. They are all shining examples of purity and holiness. They are the chosen and, thanks to their love, he is also one of the chosen.

So when he reads something in the holy book that doesn't make sense, he files it away for future reference. Surely he must be misunderstanding this. He would forget about it but then something else is said that doesn't add up. Perhaps he asks another believer about it and is told: "It's not for you to judge. You don't understand."

Perhaps he is naive enough to ask the preacher. How does the preacher explain away the inconsistencies or ridiculousness of some scriptures or practices? Does he encourage study? Does he bring it up at the next scripture study class and ask everyone for their input? Does he promise to pray and consult his seminary textbooks? Or does the preacher tell him: "God said it, it's all true, you must believe it all". If the newbie insists on questioning, does the preacher shame him? Does the preacher tell him that the devil is whispering in his ear, tempting him away from the one true faith?

This is the point at which the newbie makes an unconscious choice.

If he rejects the intellectual dishonesty of the preacher or the religion and insists on using his powers of reasoning, he will seek answers until he finds them, and will likely leave the religion.

If there is too much at stake emotionally, the newbie makes an unconscious decision to believe it all. Since it is impossible for a rational mind to believe in two opposing things at once, he must turn off his rational mind and just believe. He must accept, without thinking, every tenet of his faith, every word in the holy book, every word from the preacher's mouth. He must stop himself from using logic: god is always right and who is he to judge?

One book I read called this "splitting". Former cult members have reported having similar types of vivid dreams at this stage.

From then on, the believer will work very hard to believe without using his intellect, but he won't realize it. He might think he is being logical but he will just keep repeating certain things (self-perpetuating the religious mind), convinced that the unbeliever doesn't get because he is being blinded by satan or, worse, is a tool of satan sent to steal his salvation.

Here is some information about cults:
http://www.factnet.org/singer.htm

Again, Islam does not qualify as a cult, but it shares many characteristics.

This is not about observing some dietary rules or keeping the Sabbath: this is about control. How much control does a religion have over your day-to-day existence? How many petty rules control your physical actions? How much intellectual inquiry does your god permit? How much does your religion control your mind? How many opposite things are you required to accept as mutually true (if A is true, then B cannot also be true vs. A and B are both equally true because god said so)?

Niazi seems to have one too many "i" in his name.

So then one is supposed to mutilate the penis...and let the glans dry out and get calloused or keritinized so it can hardly feel a percentage of the pleasure it normally does...just to prevent aids ...?
An aides study which is also highly questionable in results...and biased by people who condone and profit off genital mutilation...

No thanks...I choose to keep my foreskin and glands in comfort and it's sensitivity at it's highest level...
And I'll be careful...very careful where I stick it...thanks very much.

So then one is supposed to mutilate the penis...and let the glans dry out and get calloused or keritinized so it can hardly feel a percentage of the pleasure it normally does...just to prevent aids ...?
An aides study which is also highly questionable in results...and biased by people who condone and profit off genital mutilation...

No thanks...I choose to keep my foreskin and glands in comfort and it's sensitivity at it's highest level...
And I'll be careful...very careful where I stick it...thanks very much.

Traeh,

You say

“Are there any famous popular movies or books that are allegories for the threat of Islam? (For various reasons, I'd say Tolkien and C.S. Lewis don't quite fit the bill.)”

Try reading “The Last Battle” by C.S. Lewis.

Yes- seconding Odyessus. That and 'The Horse and His Boy'.

Although Lewis's fictional 'Calormenes' are idol-worshippers they are in every other respect the Saracens/ Moors/ Turks of collective European cultural memory that has been so recently suppressed/ repressed. And let us remember that Islam can be called a monotheistic paganism.

The chief god of the Calormenes is something called 'Tash'. And frankly, if one were to create a symbolic visualisation of the 'allah' the jihadists worship, one could hardly better Lewis's description of the apparition of 'Tash' in 'The Last Battle':

"In the shadow of the trees on the far side of the clearing something was moving. It was gliding very slowly Northward. At first glance you might have mistaken it for smoke, for it was grey and you could see things through it. But the deathly smell was not the smell of smoke. Also, this thing kept its shape instead of billowing and curling as smoke would have done. It was roughly the shape of a man but it had the head of a bird; some bird of prey with a cruel, curved beak. It had four arms which it held high above its head, stretching them out Northwards as if it wanted to snatch all Narnia in its grip; and its fingers, all twenty of them, were curved like its beak and had long, pointed bird-like claws instead of nails. It floated on the grass instead of walking, and the grass seemed to wither beneath it...'What was it?' said Eustace in a whisper. 'I have seen it once before,' said Tirian. 'But that time it was carved in stone and overlaid with gold and had solid diamonds for eyes. It was when I was no older than thou, and had gone as a guest to The Tisroc's court in Tashbaan. He took me into the great Temple of Tash. There I saw it, carved above the altar.'"

In 'The Last Battle' (published in 1956) the Calormenes who are orchestrating a takeover of Narnia (beginning with bribery and corruption and deceit) make a big deal of conflating Tash and Aslan by referring to 'Tashlan'. It reminds me horribly of the way we are all being earnestly told that the Muslims 'worship the same God' as do Jews and Christians, or of that foolish Dutch bishop who thought it would be a good idea for Dutch Christians to start calling the Biblical God 'allah'.