Spencer on radio tomorrow

The truth will set the listeners to wonder. Is it wise to turn our backs on the Christian and Enlightenment bases of Western politics? Is it wise to accept a continued Islamic immigration? Is it wise to extend civil rights protection to a political creed that is incompatible with democracy and prosperity?

Busy man Robert. Is it me or are you getting more air time? I hope so, you are needed on the airwaves, not just the internet.

You're on Michael Medved tomorrow? Set him straight. He's been too busy claiming of late that a majority of Muslims aren't on the same page as the Jihadis, and that there is a difference between Islam and Islamism. Educate the ignoramus, even if you do agree with him on Tancredo's comments.

I miss Bill Handel - enjoyed him when I lived in the Southlands. But John & Ken is the show you'd be ideal for.

Maybe an easier format - you host a marathon program, and have each of the above in as your guest for the given time slot.

And look forward to the callers - You don't know Arabic, You are cherry-picking (ransacking if the caller is D'Souza) the bad verses and taking them out of context, etc. Also, on any of these shows, address why the policy of bringing democracy to Islamic countries (e.g. Iraq and Afghanistan) is unlikely to result in positive developments for the US due to the Islamic influences in these countries (e.g. PA, Lebanon, Turkey, et al)

Can't wait to hear you, Mr. Spencer. I'll be listening to Allman and Crane in the Morning.

Wonder if they'll bring up the proposed mosque expansion that was voted down by the St. Louis County Council. More people around here need to know why this was the only choice. Plese tell them. It's not like having another Methodist church.

Robert,

Excellent coverage and performance! I just watched you on hot air, and am currently reading the book. Thank you so much for what you do. I don't know who would be doing this if you weren't.

Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed, by so many, to one individual.

Limbaugh
Hannity
O'Reilly

Boy it is so over for them and they don't realize it. Mr. Spencer has caught the wave of history and they are still stuck on stupid.

Oh well...lead a horse to water...

My bet is 20 years from now Mr. Spencer will have a bigger impact on history then all three combined. Limbaugh and his golden microphone included.

The better wake up soon or get the hell out of the way.

That's 17 shows in fourteen hours. The ordinary man could not do it. Are you jogging from studio to studio, or driving the Maxwell?

Limbaugh
Hannity
O'Reilly

[..]
The better wake up soon or get the hell out of the way.
Posted by: greatcometof1577

Well, noone can say that Savage and Levin don't get it! Only too bad they're on competing time slots here in New York. Laura Ingraham gets it too.

Hannity is a smarmy hoakey cheesy dude and of limited intelligence. He's got the worst music EVER! Chriswtian Rock is more entertaining than that garbage Hannity has. He is hard to listen to a lot of the time. Even Bloatbaugh has better music on his show.

Allahfanculo

Hey, "your either with us or against us"...or something like that.

Its time the Triumvirate of Timidity figure out which way the wind is blowing.

:)

I hope you can make the islmophile medved understand Islam has not been hijacked.

Mr. Spencer,
What a schedule! Tomorrow will be a long day, but hopefully a very productive and informative one. Your popularity and name recognition are expanding rapidly, and I know your new book will be a smashing success. I hope to have my copy by Friday.

Limbaugh
Hannity
O'Reilly

[..]
The better wake up soon or get the hell out of the way.
Posted by: greatcometof1577

Hannity probably "gets" it but chooses to pretend that there are moderate muslims. I'm not sure about O'Reilly. It's hard to believe that he hasn't taken the time to do his own research on islam. I think there are definitely constraints imposed by Fox News on what they can say and reveal about islam on their programs.

Limbaugh is a good political analyst and he understands the Democrat/leftist ethos, but I don't think he has a clue that religion, islam, is the driving force behind jihad terrorists. If he does get that connection, I believe he sees it as an anomaly or fanaticism. He seems to be one of those people who dismisses religion as a viable motive for terrorism/war and I don't think he has even a superficial understanding of the doctrine of islam. I could be wrong, but that's the impression I get.

Neal Boortz, on the other hand, has slowly but surely evolved on the subject of islam. I don't know how or why, but I do know that he has come a long way in just a few years. If nothing else, he understands the severity of the islamic threat, the cognitive dissonance surrounding muslims and islam, and the culture of victimhood that enables muslims to claim persecuted minority status in the West. He has become a strong and indignant voice in the fight against islamist fascism.

Robert, you've just justified my subscription to XM satellite radio:
Laura Ingraham, Spencer Hughes, Michael Reagan: all broadcast on XM.

Dang. That's alot of airtime. That's alot of listeners who are going to be exposed to the truth, if only briefly.

Susanp

I think you can put a check mark for the "Big O" in the "Big NO" column.

O'Reilly was for charging Stanislav Shmulevich with a felony for hate crimes for putting a Koran in a toilet. It seemed he is for thought-crime which does not supprise me for he was also for the UAE port deal.

see:

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/oreilly022706.asp

He states...

"But for now, the cold truth is that the U.S.A. will not win the war on terror without the help of nations like the United Arab Emirates. We simply cannot afford to fire that nation. If we lose these people, we'll lose the war"

For some reason I don't think he gets it. He admits the UAE is a conservative jihadist supporting nation yet still calls them an ally. Really how the hell do you get jobs like he has with that kind of hard hitting analysis?

But remember he is a "culture warrior"!

Woooooooooooooooo Impressive is it not!

"Well, noone can say that Savage and Levin don't get it! Only too bad they're on competing time slots here in New York. Laura Ingraham gets it too.

Hannity is a smarmy hoakey cheesy dude and of limited intelligence. He's got the worst music EVER! Chriswtian Rock is more entertaining than that garbage Hannity has. He is hard to listen to a lot of the time. Even Bloatbaugh has better music on his show."

The local guys in Houston get it and although some question him, Glenn Beck gets it more than Limbaugh and Hannity do. More people are waking up on the airwaves, thankfully, but we need more.

Thanks Robert for all the hard work you do and good luck tomorrow!

Robert,
The lawyers at CAIR must be feverishly working overtime tonight preparing 17 letters to 17 radio stations to protest the appearance of such a "well known purveyor of hatred and bigotry against Muslims (with a) history of false and defamatory statements." /sarc.

In reality, you so totally KICKED CAIR'S ASS by your recent appearance at the Young America's Foundation, I believe CAIR's silence tomorrow will be deafening. Rock-on.

ts time the Triumvirate of Timidity figure out which way the wind is blowing.

Great Comet.. LOL

They're too busy smelling their own farts from all the bloviating they do. That is why they can't figure out the way the wind is blowing.

On a more serious note.. TRUST NOONE.. Bush and his cronies are getting paid by the SOWdis so there's ample reason to wonder if this might also apply to his sycophants.

I should've said Great comment, Greatcomet LOL

I don't think that Glenn Beck quite gets it just yet. He is very careful to distinguish between Islam and what he calls "Islamists". Also he believes that Islam has been hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists.

He also seems to have bought into some popular myths about islam. For example he stated that pre-islamic Arabia was a brutal place before Islam changed it.

At the risk of being called a bigot, I believe his Mormon faith is why he is reluctant to criticize Islam.

Because his faith is constantly stereotyped and criticized, he is reluctant to risk doing the same thing to another faith.

I'm so sorry I saw this entry so late in the day (10:30 PM here) because I really want Robert to see it. Robert, you probably know this already, but as others above have mentioned, Medved is totally cranio-rectally impacted with regards to islam, believes in the "tiny minority of extremists", and in my opinion is a full-blown dhimmi. And his call screeners are of the same mold. If I may use up some of your bandwidth, allow me to paste in here a post I made on LGF back in December of 2006:

[I apologize in advance for the foul language in this post but I was furious when I wrote it, as I'm sure you will all understand]

-----------------------------------------------

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=23545#c0270

#270 Tasty Beverage 12/04/2006 12:14:27 pm PST

OT

May I vent for a moment? Coming home about thirty minutes ago I was listening to Medved and he's got Jeff Siddiqi and Victor Mordechai on arguing about jihad and islam, and Mordechai was saying that the little kids in Israel would say that at the day of judgement the rocks and the trees would tell them to kill the Jews (we all know that hadith). And Mordechai had it wrong and was saying that it's in the koran, and Siddiqi kept insisting that it isn't, which is correct, except he was playing kitman and not telling them the fact that it's from the hadith, he was acting like Mordechai was just making it up.

So I called the show -- it took me twenty fucking minutes to get through, and when I finally did, I told the call screener that the statement is REAL, it's in the hadiths, I have the exact name and number and text of the hadith right here, etc. The screener said that they didn't want to get into specifics, that they want more general questions, and I said, "But this guy is lying to us, pretending that it doesn't exist and it does exist, he knows it, all devout muslims know this hadith." And the guy said, "Well I'll pass it along" and the fucker HUNG UP ON ME!

If this is the state of "conservative radio", in which they bring on a muslim spokesperson and allow him to lie repeatedly to the national audience, and not call him on it when an educated caller lets them know that he's lying, we've got bigger problems.

-------------------------------------------

So, that was back in December 2006. I doubt Medved's changed his ways, so you've got your work cut out for you with him Robert. His call screener deliberately protected that liar Jeff Siddiqi and prevented a knowledgeable caller from educating the public about what islam really teaches its adherents.

I'm sure you'll be great though, listening to you cut through people's BS is a pleasure. And just as an addendum to my story above, I emailed Victor Mordecai and let him know about the hadiths in Muslim and Bukhari about the rocks and the trees, and the practice of kitman, and he thanked me for filling him in, as he had never heard of kitman.

I should've said Great comment, Greatcomet LOL

good luck and stay strong Mr. Spencer, and be sure not to overload on suger

A fabulous day tomorrow on the radio.

I guess Regnery somehow contrived to get all these different stations to agree to do the interview on the same day. Whoever did that scheduling, it's pretty impressive. Of course if you didn't have a winning horse of a book, the best agent in the world wouldn't be able to do much...

good luck and keep up the good work.

I think that there is a growing acceptance of Robert's views for two reasons:
1) They're correct.
2) Muslims comprise about 20% of humanity and they're finally pissing off the other 80%.

Tasty Beverage

You are right - Medved, who formerly seemed wise to the issue of Islam, is one of those pro-'religious' retards who views Islam as a religion superior to Atheism, Scientology and what he calls 'Sciencism' (presumably science). On the issue of Islam, a few days back, while discussing the Tancredo issue, he kept stating that the vast majority of Muslims, who aren't Jihadists, would become precisely that if Mecca got leveled, and that only 15% of them are Jihadists now (a figure pulled out of his hiney). As for Jaffar Siddique, the last time he crossed swords with Robert, he came up with the strawman that if anything in the Hadith contradicted the Quran, the Quran won. That act of kitman clearly sidestepped 2:106 (abrogation) which addresses the issue of contradictory verses, as well as that of the sahih hadith that explain which verses trump which. Robert at the time pointed out how he only used the hadiths of Bukhari and Muslim, and none of the voided hadiths that carry less weight.

One Muslim caller that he had - a convert to boot - stated how he loved America, followed the Quran and didn't believe in beheadings, 72 virgins or amputations. Luckily for him, the omniscient ignoramus from the Ukraine didn't remember 47:4, 9:111 or 5:33 - all in the Quran!

One of his last callers made the glaring point in the dying minutes of the show that there isn't a difference between Islamism and Islam. Medved just brushed it off using the example of his previous caller, and as luck would have it, time ran out.

Medved should be made a hostage and dispatched to Mecca, where he can learn for himself how many Muslims really don't want war with people like himself. Or he can accompany 'Jeff' Siddique the next time the latter visits Fuckistan, and visit that lovely girls school in Islamabad called Jamia Hafsa, which I'm sure he'd prefer to any US public school.

Tasty Beverage

Those interviews are tomorrow

Man thats a huge schedule in one day. Hope some will be repeats of other interviews.

Medved's a partial and unpredictable conservative, and doesn't get it on the muslim conquest (and that they ALL have the same goal, unless they're MINO's).

Rush says 'islamofascists' sometimes but just doesnt't much care about the issue; he's mainly a "conservative vs. lib" fighter, which we certainly need!

Savage gets it 100% and even comes extremely close sometimes to saying so outright.

Glenn Beck is a good conservative who I believe doesn't quite get it yet. Although he's read 'America Alone' and loves it (says it's one of the most important books ever), he still seems to think islam has been hijacked. He may come around soon, though.

Mark Levin is superb at explaining conservatism and the dangers of the libs, but either doesn't get it on islam or is too afraid to say too much that would confirm he knows the truth.

Dennis Prager is wonderful! A great conservative (which is now a former JFK liberal), a superb thinker, clear reasoning and arguing, and he does get it on islam!

Check out Chris Plante on WMAL. He does a local show for the DC area. Very bold and he gets it, and often says stuff that makes you cheer out loud!

Dennis Miller does a very entertaining show and gets it.

O'Reilly does good work exposing the corrupt biased media and judges who let off child molesters and illegal alien criminals, but is an unpredictable conservative, and does NOT get it on islam.

Hannity helps the conservative cause, but his radio show is too mild mannered, he's too spineless, and it's boring.

Posted by: Infidel Pride at August 15, 2007 4:46 AM

Those interviews are tomorrow

Oh I knew that, I was sorry that I saw this thread so late last night because I was hoping Robert would see my post but was probably already in bed.

Thanks for letting me know that Robert has already encountered that BS-artist Jeff Siddiqi. I'm listening to Robert right now on Laura Ingraham over the streaming audio at http://www.wysl1040.com/ . Esam Omeish just tried to bring up the Catholic-Protestant battle in the UK to compare with the 300,000 suicide bombing supporters in the US and Laura wouldn't let him get away with his diversion. Hahaha.

Well that sucks, Robert's segment on Ingraham with Omeish was only 20 minutes long. Omeish openly admitted he'd like to see shari'a laws implemented in the US "if enough people voted for it".

You did good in the sixty seconds you had explaining what that would mean for women and non-Muslims, Robert. Bravo.

Listening to Medved now.

Marcus is just the kind of caller needed to expose the ridiculous nature of the 'moral equivelance' arguments so often tossed about as fact.

Chew 'em up and spit 'em out, Robert.

Marcus, and the last caller Tom, were plain morons. Marcus ignored the fact that unlike their Muslim predecessors and unlike the Portugese, the Brits didn't try to Christianize India. As for Tom, he would have done well to note that Imams worldwide, along with Islamic texts, already spread that kind of hate about Infidels, and in their case, unlike Robert's, the complaints are fictitious.

Also, Medved was better this time than he normally is.