Swedish Embassy in Pakistan plays the dhimmi, "regrets" Muhammad cartoon

And to hell with free speech. A New Order is coming to Europe, and the Swedes are on board.

"Sweden 'regrets' Prophet cartoon," from the BBC (thanks to all who sent this in):

Sweden's embassy in Pakistan has expressed regret over the publication of a cartoon depicting the Prophet Muhammad in a Swedish newspaper.

Pakistan had complained about the cartoon, which depicted the head of the Prophet on the body of a dog.

Sweden's government said it regretted any hurt but could not apologise as it was not responsible for the drawing and could not prevent its publication....

The new drawing depicting the Prophet's head on the body of a dog was published in the Swedish newspaper Nerikes Allehanda on Sunday.

The cartoon's creator, Lars Vilks, told the Associated Press news agency the drawing was art.

"I'm not against Islam. Everybody knows that," he is quoted as saying.

The publication prompted the Iranian government to complain to Swedish diplomats earlier this week....

A Swedish foreign ministry spokeswoman said the government had "expressed regret that the publication of the cartoons had hurt the feelings of Muslims".

"We can't apologise for the cartoons because we did not publish them," spokeswoman Sofia Karlberg told the BBC News website.

Ms Karlberg said the government could not influence the publication of such cartoons because of rules concerning media freedom in the country....

The Pakistani foreign ministry expressed sorrow at what it described as a growing tendency "among some Europeans to mix the freedom of expression with an outright and deliberate insult to 1.3 billion Muslims worldwide".

"Such acts deeply undermine the efforts of those who seek to promote respect and understanding among religions and civilisations," a foreign ministry statement said.

According to the Pakistani statement, the Swedish diplomat had said his government "fully shared the views of the Muslim community and termed the publication as unfortunate"....

A Swedish Islamic centre has planned a demonstration outside the paper's offices in the town of Orebro, the AP news agency says.

An umbrella body representing 57 Muslim nations, the Organisation of Islamic Conference, condemned the latest cartoon and urged the Swedish government to punish those responsible.

The chairman of the body also urged Muslims to remain calm and exercise restraint.

Good luck with that.

| 38 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

38 Comments

I'd like to hear some regret from the Mohammedan over their co-religionist using Islam to slay Kafur.

Because, frankly, I'd rather have some silly cartoons drawn then carbombs detonated any day.

In fact, I find their carbombs an extreme offense.

And I am speaking of the tactical form of offense.

How about some of those peaceniks wearing T-shirts with the slogan

“Make Cartoons, Not Carbombs!”

...Muslims are arousing the anger in the infidels...the backlash will be nasty....

Has any muslim country or leader apologized for the violent behavior of muslims living in Malmo, Sweden, which has become NO GO AREA for police and fire department.

I am Pakistani Christian and advise Pakistani muslim to boycott immigrating to Europe. Why do Porkistanis always love to immigrate to Infidel countries. Is that because arab countries do not give other muslims immigration and treat them like dogs and slaves if they chose to work in any arab country?

Free speech and freedom of expression works really well until you begin to realize that a certain ideology does not allow such expressions and its adherants will threaten you for displaying it.

It always amazes me how some individuals on the planet are willing to stand up against these threats and yet an entire country is to afraid to do the same. No doubt the the Swedish Embassy became fearful that they would be attacked in Pakistan.

Note that the OIC that represents pretty much all Islamic countries wants Sweden to prosecute the cartoonists-- Yep! Freedom of speech be dammed when it comes to Islam.

An umbrella body representing 57 Muslim nations, the Organisation of Islamic Conference, condemned the latest cartoon and urged the Swedish government to punish those responsible.
Punished for what crime? Islam is an idea. Muhammed is an historical figure, in the modern context, an idea. Muhammed has no rights. He is dead. He is an idea. It is not possible to commit a crime against him. His ideology is a collection of ideas. In the West, ideas have no rights. People have rights. And people have the right to express ideas, discuss ideas, insult ideas, denigrate ideas, burn ideas, defecate on ideas, spit on ideas, and do whatever else one can think about doing to ideas with absolute impunity. Ideas have no rights. All religions are ideas. Religions have no rights.

When ideas are granted human rights, democracy and freedom die. Slavery and oppression naturally follow. Those who would even obliquely agree that ideas, any ideas, are above criticism and that any criticism of those ideas is proscribed as a crime, are tacitly aiding and abetting the haters of the freedom of conscience, the mortal enemies of our civilization who have declared war upon us, desire to subjugate or kill us, our families, neighbors, and fellow citizens, and who aspire to plunder our property and burn our books.

The Pakistani foreign ministry expressed sorrow at what it described as a growing tendency "among some Europeans to mix the freedom of expression with an outright and deliberate insult to 1.3 billion Muslims worldwide".

Exaggerated and inflamatory statement, making it look like ALL 1.3 billion Moslems would be 'insulted'. If 80% of the Islamic world is non-Arab, but the victims of Arab imperialist conquests, perhaps some percentage would NOT be insulted? Not all are as brainwashed by their 'religion of war' as this Pakistani minister would want us to believe. Perhaps a much larger percentage of Moslems rather like the European mix of free speech and humor, and would say so were not their 'religion of peace' so damned violent in response. Say you agree with the Europeans, you even moved your whole family to Europe, and get a night call from your local imam and his death-fatwa goons for saying so. So they stay silent. They should take a poll of all those conquered Moslems to see if they all agree with the minister, or with humorous cartoons. We may discover much larger numbers in Islam who are actually human privately than they want to admit publicly, imams and ministers be damned. Take a poll where anonimity is safe, and see.

I vote that we have a "cartoon of the day."

No matter how badly things are, I vow to do 2 things daily: perform at least 1 kind deed and have a laugh (even at my own expense).

JW/DWers could submit the cartoons for posting. Or use photos from the press with new captions.
Example:

Al-Sadr and Ahmadihnajad are in adjacent men's room stalls. Al-Sadr taps his foot, asserts his wide stance and ....

I don't know, I just think it's great to get a laugh at things these people go nuts over.

So, is it 1.2 billion, 1.3 billion, 1.5 billion, or what?

And, how many are outraged?

2% 10% 40% 75%? All?

The Swedes are being "diplomatic", and were not apologizing.

Which is about what foreign personnel do in situations like this.

They should have added, if they wanted to add a little spice:

"However, the quality of the artwork is not up to regular Swedish standards, so, for that, we do apologize."

This has absolutely nothing to do with this particular post, but I thought someone here might be able to answer a question for me.

Is this site completely on the up and up? http://www.homa.org/

If so, then can I be assured that this quote by the Ayatollah Khomeini is accurate?

Ayatollah Khomeini's Religious Teachings on Marriage, Divorce and Relationships:
"A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual act such as forplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not comitted a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man's four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl's sister."

This is the leader that brought about the revolution in Iran to bring Iran back to true Islam, right? So his words aren't to be dismissed as those of some errant scholar, no?

This advocates pedophilia....EWWW


Thank you. Again sorry.

Muslim nations want Sweden to institute and enforce Sharia law.

The Pakistani foreign ministry expressed sorrow at what it described as a growing tendency "among some Europeans to mix the freedom of expression with an outright and deliberate insult to 1.3 billion Muslims worldwide".


hey, Pakiscumistan! BUZZ OFF!! u useless asspimple beggar of a rageboy-country.. I HOPE and I PRAY for a GIANT TSuNAMI and MANY EARTHQUAKES so that Mankind may be RID of you!

pakicrappistan and SOWdi Barbaria are the WORST of the WORST!!

ready.. aim...

exsgtbrown:
Muslims are arousing the anger in the infidels... the backlash will be nasty

Will it though, Sarge? I'm not so sure. The more dhimmitude we see from our leaders, our national bodies, our so-called seats of learning, then the less likely I feel that the West will triumph in the battle of ideas with Islam.

I've just finished a book called The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History by Peter Heather. In it, the author claims that the Western Roman Empire fell not because of defeat in battle, or hedonism, or newly-found Christian passivity, or any of the other ideas put forward by Gibbon et al.

It fell, he states, because of the mass migration of barbarian peoples (initially as refugees, ironically enough) into the Western Empire. Their occupation of Roman territory - much of it given to them to assauge the threat of violence from them - eventually denuded the Roman tax base to such an extent that it could no longer finance its own protection.

You might have expected the landowning classes, who formed the governing elites of the Western Empire's provinces, to resist the challenge of the barbarians. Not a bit of it. In order to keep their lands, they came to an arrangement with their new masters, until, eventually, they died out along with all vestige of their "Roman-ness".

This is exactly what we are seeing today. The price of mass Muslim migration - in terms of lost tax revenue, welfare payments and security costs -is putting a huge burden on the finances of Western European states. In addition, we are seeing our elites - politicians, media corporations, the liberal "intelligentsia" - increasingly comprimising their views and attitudes to accommodate the Muslim street.

I would like to think that there will be an eventual backlash, but increasingly I fear that our way of life will disappear not with a bang, but with a whimper.

The cartoon's creator, Lars Vilks, told the Associated Press news agency the drawing was art.

"I'm not against Islam. Everybody knows that," he is quoted as saying.

He admits he is not against islam, but this creep is very anti-Swedish, which every body seems to overlook.

He has had a crusade against Sweden for a least the last twenty years

Ladonia is a micronation, proclaimed in 1996 as the result of a years-long court battle between artist Lars Vilks and local authorities over three sculptures. The claimed territory is located in (its proponents prefer to say "next to") southern Sweden. It contains two sculptures, and was created in protest of Swedish authorities who wished to remove them. Ladonia is not recognized by any other state, and there is no legal basis for calling it a state.

August 12, 2007
Michael Moore Honorary Citizen of Ladonia
Filed under: Citizens and Guests, Breaking News — Lars Vilks @ 7:05 pm

The Cabinet’s majority has voted for the conference of Honorary Citizenship and Honorary Knighthood upon American film maker Michael Moore for his humanitarian work through the production of the film “Sicko.”

PLEASE FEEL FREE TO POST THIS ANNOUNCEMENT AT OTHER WEBSITES

The U.S. Senate Project (an initiative to increase congressional awareness of the nature and goals of jihad) currently has 67 volunteers in 35 states.

WE ARE STILL SEEKING ADDITIONAL CITIZEN VOLUNTEERS FROM ALL 50 STATES, ESPECIALLY THE FOLLOWING 15:

Alabama
Connecticut
Delaware
Hawaii
Kansas
Louisiana
Mississippi
Montana
North Dakota
Oklahoma
South Dakota
Utah
Vermont
West Virginia
Wyoming

The Project: We're looking for at least two people in every state of the Union who would be willing to purchase, from Amazon or any other source, a copy of Robert Spencer's Religion of Peace? Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn't and mail it, on an agreed upon date, to one of the senators in your state. We want to get the book simultaneously to all 100 senators, in order to send a strong message. If we get more than two people per state, books can also be sent to the U.S. House of Representatives.

If you’d like to be involved, please write to me at traehnam@yahoo.com under the subject heading “Senate,” and tell me the state your senator represents, an email address where I can reach you, and a nickname. No need for your real name. And I will never share your email address with anyone, not even with other volunteers for this project.

And visit www.jihadawareness.blogspot.com to get more info on this project and to leave comments other volunteers can read. You can also see there the growing list of participants in this project, and the states their senators represent. I've also designed a graphic that might amuse. Scroll down when you get to the site.

Once we have at least two people from every state, we can agree on a mailing date and then each of us can mail a copy of the book on that date.

Right before each of us mails the book, we can issue a press release to various media outlets in every state, and in that way announce and explain the mailing. And perhaps we can come up with some other ways of maximizing the effectiveness of this project and gaining as much positive attention as possible.

Congress is in recess until after Labor Day. But one of the project's volunteers suggested contacting Rep. Sue Myrick, who started the Anti-Jihad Caucus in Congress. I'll try to coordinate this project with Rep. Myrick to maximize its effectiveness. I've also been calling various congressional offices to get advice on how best to go about the project.

"I would like to think that there will be an eventual backlash, but increasingly I fear that our way of life will disappear not with a bang, but with a whimper.


Posted by: Matamoros"

...The wheels of the reactionary wagon are slowly beginning to turn...once rolling you will certainly witness a great revival of civil decency...and the wagon is on a downhill slope...and it is the Muslims who have given it a push....

"A Swedish foreign ministry spokeswoman said the government had "expressed regret that the publication of the cartoons had hurt the feelings of Muslims"."

This is absolutely not true according to the Swedish foreign ministry here in Stockholm.

"According to the Pakistani statement, the Swedish diplomat had said his government "fully shared the views of the Muslim community and termed the publication as unfortunate"...."

This is a fabrication from the Pakistani government. I have contacts in the Swedish foreign ministry and this is just nonsense.

This is even printed in Swedish newspapers today.

Don't count out Sweden just yet.

Anna, it is true that Khomeini wrote this. Evil and vile, it comes from following a pedophile.

Anna Venger:
That or a very similar quote from Khomeini is posted at thereligionofpeace.com. You could email the site owner (his email is thereligionofpeace@yahoo.com) and ask him for the source of the quote and tell him you are seeking verification Khomeini really said that.

Anna Venger -

Welcome, and congratulations. You are beginning to know the truth about islam.

The www.homa.org site is run by the sister of Homa Darabi, one of the many victims of the Khomeini regime. That quote from Khomeini is real. And so is the one that you can find on-line about to whom it is licit, and to whom it is prohibited, to serve the meat from animals you have killed, and then cooked, animals with whom you have had sexual intercourse.

The www.homa.org site is run by the sister of Homa Darabi, one of the many victims of the Khomeini regime. That quote from Khomeini is real. And so is the one that you can find on-line about to whom it is licit, and to whom it is prohibited, to serve the meat from animals you have killed, and then cooked, animals with whom you have had sexual intercourse.

exsgtbrown,

"...Muslims are arousing the anger in the infidels...the backlash will be nasty...."

Exactly. Another terrorist attack in America and cartoons are going to be the least of their worries. Same with all the other countries. I think everybody has had quite enough of muslim BS.

This has absolutely nothing to do with this particular post, but I thought someone here might be able to answer a question for me.

Hope this can help

It stared with a kiss

http://illustratedpig.blogspot.com/2007/03/ccccccccc.html

Scratch my last post. We are surrounded by liberals, who don't even think we are in a war. We could have a dozen terrorist attacks and they will still not wake up...

RE: Roman Empire and the West:

“Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke vowed Friday to do all that is necessary to protect the national economy from the ill effects of a global credit crunch.”

The difference between this and the Fed printing money is what?

There are parallels with the Fall of the Roman Empire but there are big differences:

1. There are probably one hundred million independent American citizens who own most of the 270 million firearms currently in the hands of private citizens.
2. If there has been a time in history when so many people have been so absolutely dependent on the government, I can’t think of it.
3. Modern airlift capacity makes it possible to move entire populations anywhere in the world in a few weeks.

Things will change when the money runs out. The nature of democracy will make the changes sudden and massive. Big Brother had Goldstein, Napoleon had Snowball, Hitler had the Jews, guess who’s next.

"Such acts deeply undermine the efforts of those who seek to promote respect and understanding among religions and civilisations," a foreign ministry statement said.

Really? Then I ask, why is Islam the ONLY "religion of peace"(sarc)who take offense at a cartoon? No other belief system threatens (with canonical exortations)acts of violence expect Islam. No other religion takes personal affront at someone poking fun at them. As my dear old Dad says, "Joke 'em if the can't take a f#@k" Luv ya, Dad!

"Apostates of the world, Unite!"
"Stop Muslim immigration now!"
"Islam, abusing women since 622AD"

Amid the predictable knee-jerk regret voiced by Swedish officialdom after yet another Muslim angerfest over a drawing, the photograph linked below encouraged me mightily. No, more than that - it made my whole day.

According to the Reuters caption, it shows liberals protesting outside the office of the Nerikes Allehandasite newspaper in Orebro, Sweden.

What's new about that, I hear you ask. Everyone knows they are hand-in-hand with the Muslims. But these liberals are staging a counter-protest against Iranian and Pakistani demands for the Swedish government to arrest the artist. Their placards are unclear, but the tape symbolically gagging their mouths says everything about what they clearly view as another attack by Muslims on free speech.

Look at the protestors. They are young, blonde, pretty Scandinavian women - one of the groups most threatened by the Islamising of their society, and one of the groups most vital to the anti-Islamist cause.

I could hug every one of them. Especially when you look at the other photos of the Muslim hate mob on the main protest brandishing their Korans and placards.

It's an encouraging sign, no?

http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news?ei=UTF-8&p=lars+vilks&c=&fr=&c=images

Re: my above post about the Modoggie drawing demo. Gates of Vienna has a little more on the counter protest.

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2007/08/new-modoggie-protest-in-rebro.html#readfurther

"The Islamic Cultural Centre was not the only group protesting outside Nerikes Allehanda‘s offices. An hour earlier, representatives from the Liberal Party’s youth wing showed for a demonstration in support of freedom of expression.

"'We are doing this to protect freedom of expression and freedom of the press. It has come to our attention that there are people don’t think people should be able to say what they want and that makes us angry. Freedom of expression is absolutely central,' spokeswoman Hannah Ström told TT."

Note to any "liberal" visitors: These young people are real liberals. Note their cleanliness and general lack of keffiyahs, Hezbollah flags, Che Guevara T-shirts, and all the other fashion items sported by the so-called "liberals" we normally see on demos. They are standing up for their freedom and their way of life against an oppressive fascistic belief system. What are you doing to help them?

I'm not against Islam. Everybody knows that,"-

But if yer not dead or forcibly converted you are committing the heinous crime of living the life of an infidel, and that is oppression to Muslims, and the cure for it is jihad......

http://sheikyermami.com/2007/08/31/savitch-sez-you-can-have-any-freedom-of-expression-as-long-as-its-islamic/

I keep saying it.. this enemy knows NO compassion. This enemy CANNOT be reasoned with. This enemy cannot be talked to. It is programmed to KILL. That is ALL it knows, That is what it does. Either it kills you or you kill IT before it kills you. It will NEVER EVER STOP!

Let us be quite clear about one thing - the EU has, at its core, a desire to avoid the type of conflict which has plagued the continent of Europe for centuries. Almost every European 'civil servant' sees, as his or her brief, the resolution of differences in a civilised fashion - and that is a laudable aim and one worthy of our support.

It doesn't take a great imagination to realise that it is better to avoid armed European conflict, better to avoid dragging the British Commonwealth into war, better to avoid dragging the USA into some stupid stance, than to make avoidable war upon our putative enemies.

That stated, however, let us be clear, quite clear, about one thing - one terribly important thing. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (and its dependant territories) joined the EU when it was a mere formal assemblage of states. In other words we joined a Union of Sovereign States only to find ourselves in a Sovereign Union of States.

I, and many of my fellow Brits, and Swedes, and Germans, and Frenchmen, and Italians and all the others, would so much rather be free, sovereign and able to control our own destiny, no matter what the costs might be, than to stay in a Union which denies us, purposively and deliberately, our identity and our hard won freedoms.

Europe is NOT a country. Europe is NOT a homologous entity. Europe is a diverse collection of small and free, and I stress the free, States. I, and many others in Europe today, would rather starve in our free countries than wax fat and overfed in a politically correct dictatorship. Freedom and democracy is indivisible. Under the current EU structure there is not one country, one people, that is and who are, free. I, and many others, would rather starve in our mud huts than sacrifice one iota, one jot or tittle, of our freedoms. I know that you in the USA might find that hard to believe for you look at Europe in a very different way from the way that we do. Believe it - you are not the sole possessors or guardians of freedom! Actually, you came rather late to the game of freedom. Ben Franklin simply followed our lead. But that is by the by. Nowwe have to assert our freedom and we are hampered and hindered by your government's erroneous belief in a united europe. It ain't ever going to happen, folks. We are free and sovereign countries and once again the UK is debating where and what its role ought to be and today it is questioning its membership of the leftist, pro-Islamic, arrogant EU.

Europe's inability to acknowledge its past, its struggle against the absolutist tendencies of its enemies - Islam, not least amongst them - is the greatest weakness that the continent possesses. Europe, as a continent has lost not only its direction but also its impetus towards freedom - not just freedom for the artist, not just freedom for the businessman but, and most essential of all, freedom for the individual. Europe, today, has no concept of robust freedom.

All of Europe, and this idiot, failed Union, has, is a concept, a negative and retrograde concept, of 'rights'. But those 'rights' are not expressed as what the individual can and should do but, and this is most telling and most damning, they are expressed as what the individual must NOT do - or say or think. 'Rights', today, in Europe, are expressed as things that a human being must not do - they are not expressed, as all our enlightenment philosophy tells us they must be, as things that we ought to positively uphold and do but as actions we must not undertake or commit.

Of course Islam, that most ultimately negative of all religions, finds fertile ground in Europe. Given the negative actions that current European political correctness breeds it is small wonder that Islam makes its unwarranted gains in Europe today. We Europeans have been educated over many decades to see ourselves as unworthy, as failures, as fruitless offspring of failed imerpial experiments - and here the USA must bear its culpable share. Islam, of course, will take advantage of such negative viewpoints, for that is what it is good at, but we must see ourselves as equally blameworthy. We have failed to resist those who have told us, repeatedly, that we have no value. We have failed to assert the values which we know, and we have and failed to strongly assert the millenia of spiritual journeying and values which we have accumulated.

Many of us have, simply, forgotten - or failed to learn, about our heritances. Worse, many of us have failed to even see that we have value, heritances, history and culture. In our rush to embrace the new we have, literally, failed to embrace ourselves, failed to see ourselves and failed to value our experiences and our past.

So, some small minded Islamists and some narrow minded Swedes urged the Swedish government to punish those responsible for merely exercising their freedom, not a freedom that Islam can comprehend or live with, to differ; for theirs is an absolute faith and they have the hubris, the arrogance, the bare-faced certainty to assert, in the face of our heritage, that they have the right of it and that we are wrong. Worse, they fail to comprehend our concept of liberty and of religious freedom and they seek to use the laws about religious freedom, designed, quite rightly, to protect the individual Christian belief (particularly in Sweden), against us in such a way as to make a mockery of our freedoms. They, the Islamists in our midst, seek only to pervert our laws in their favour and this case is an ample demonstration, for all who can think, of precisely what I mean.

There is, in all things, a moment when truth stands out starkly against the lie. This is it! England is confused as to the basic precepts of freedom and has failed to to become a free and fair society thus far. Sweden now stands on the brink! Will it fail?

Yes, in my opinion, for the cancer of Mohammedanism is already knawing at its vitals and it will, as it has done in England, destroy Sweden and Swedish freedoms.

The moderm revistion view of the Fall of the Western Toman Empire is very much wrong. 1) milirary defeast did play than role when around 410 ACE(after common erea) the roman in the west was able to enploy only 20,000 men against40,000 to 60,000 Goths while the Western Roman Empire have 160,000 man in North Africe whynot recall some men back. The resean given for why they couldnot recall any North Africa was they where need to protect the city of Roman Weat supply from raider from deep inside North Africa. The 20,000 man where from the total recall of all legion from Gaul which allow other Germany to cross the frozen Rhine river unoppose. 100,000's of Germany cross the river into Gaul.

Defender -

Ever heard of spellcheck? On the off chance that you might actually be saying something important (what are the odds?) it would be a lot easier to read your posts if they weren't so terribly garbled.

"These young people are real liberals. Note their cleanliness and general lack of keffiyahs, Hezbollah flags, Che Guevara T-shirts, and all the other fashion items sported by the so-called "liberals" we normally see on demos. They are standing up for their freedom and their way of life against an oppressive fascistic belief system."
Posted by: Matamoros

Well said! We need to see more of these liberals!

OliverPCamford -- Very interesting post. Thank you.

On the subject of Ayatolla Khomeni’s sexual teaching.


It has been stated several times that married a ten year old.
Robert Spencer stated this in a lecture he gave at the heritage foundation.
Can anyone provide more evidence to back this claim?

This the sort of thing where journalists need to do their homework.
For instance, Yasser Arafat claimed that he was born in Jerusalem.
Others said this was very strange because he spoke Arabic with a strong Cairo accent.
Others claimed was actually born in Cairo and so spent most of his life posing as a Palestinian refugee.
Various journalists, even BBC ones, decided to check up on this. They went to a Government records office in Eygpt and found that there was indeed a birth certificate proving Yasser Arafat’s birthplace was Cairo.
This is surely about as solid and objective as the discipline of history actually gets.

But on the Atatolla Khomeni
It does seem that he reduced the age of consent of girls in Iran to nine.
If you check the relevant penal code for Iran it does, I believe, confirm that.

I have also heard it stated several times, by Robert Spencer among others that he married a ten year old.
Has anyone seen the marriage certificate?
What proof is their of a ten year old wife?

Josephine -

You're welcome and thank-you for your interest.