The Left won't dare touch this issue; to do so would burn their multiculturalist fingertips. And of course, there are many, many fearless conservative anti-PC types -- and most of the leading ones -- who quail in fear when they see me coming, and don't have the necessities, as Al Campanis might have said, or the intestinal fortitude, to discuss the issues relating to the global jihad and how to defeat it as I set them out, perhaps for fear of appearing to be less than 100% multicultural, or of arousing the ire of some unindicted co-conspirator or other, resulting in their even more fearful and spineless bosses canning their shows.
However, there are also many, many radio talk show hosts who are not so cowardly. I have discussed issues relating to my book Religion of Peace? and above all, why this book is a necessary contribution to the defense against Islamic supremacism, on dozens of shows since the book first came out, and here are three more.
All times PDT:
8:20 AM The Right Balance
8:30 AM Muscle Head Revolution WMCA
11:00 AM Schiffer Report WHK and Righttalk.com
Amazing.
I always thought that being on our side, the right side, is the only side to be on. I could never imagine that we are seen as some kind of fringe group, regarded by many as some kind of looney's, while the MSM sails full steam ahead towards the iceberg, like the Titanic.
Abolishing history lessons in school, the perversion from the Caliphate News Network, the lack of values in today's society and the vilification of all and everything tha'ts good and right is now producing its rotten fruit.
I hope we can find those who still have a spine, who are not so cowardly and who have the ability to walk upright and so speak out.
Time is running out fast.
"Multiculturalism has to be the most ignorant non-seller in the Marx's bankrupt estate, and the stupidest ideology from the red land of wonder."
Read the rest of this great piece!
Mr. Spencer - This link is about Muhammed and plagiarism from the OT and NT.
It's never mentioned, HOW, since he could not read, was he able to plagiarize? Please help, Darcy.
http://answering-islam.org.uk/Responses/Menj/mhd_plagiarizing.htm
"And of course, there are many, many fearless conservative anti-PC types -- and most of the leading ones -- who quail in fear when they see me coming, and don't have the necessities, as Al Campanis might have said, or the intestinal fortitude, to discuss the issues relating to the global jihad and how to defeat it as I set them out, perhaps for fear of appearing to be less than 100% multicultural, or of arousing the ire of some unindicted co-conspirator or other, resulting in their even more fearful and spineless bosses canning their shows." Robert Spencer
"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." Samuel Adams
On Hannity and Combs website on Fox here was their big issue (Yes I know it's TV but still)
"Restroom Romps: How widespread is sex in public restrooms?"
They even have a video...wow did you know people sometimes have sex in public bathrooms and yes somethimes they get arrested! I am shocked! Shocked!
Perhaps this site should change its name to Public Restroom Watch.
However CBN does not have that problem.
http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/215092.aspx
The Brutal Truth about Islam By Dale Hurd with the TV interview provided by CBN of Mr. Spencer interviewed by Gordon Robertson. I disagree with many things that CBN does sometimes (esp. their crusade against evolution) but with that said it appears they get it and are not controlled by PC nonsense. They are on the correct side of the most important issue of our day....Islamic aggression!
Robert, I just listened to your interview with Atlas from the other day and I must say, while you have some excellent points to make, you still don't get why there is a good majority of people in this country who do not accept the christian jihad that would probably like to take over in the U.S., as a valid argument of peace when comparing to Islam.
Your weak mentioning of Bach, etc. as though no art or entertainment might be acquired through some other inspiration other than god, is stupid.
What then of all the music, literature, etc. that has been destroyed because of the christian crusades, the killing of blacks who were enslaved...give me a break. Stop using that argument, it makes you look foolish and it's not a very good one.
I challenge you to discuss this issue publicly with Christopher Hitchens. While Christopher is an advocate for the war he will differ with you significantly regarding the usefulness of ANY religion, including Christianity, which itself is rooted in the imaginary and superstitious rituals.
Scooternyc:
That's not what I said -- and calling something stupid is not a refutation anyway. The fellow was saying that nothing -- nothing -- good had come from Christianity in the West, so I started to mention some art and literature.
I'd like to see you substantiate the claim that any art or music or literature was destroyed because of the Crusades or African slavery. But in any case, Christianity is not anti-art, and has inspired a great deal of great art and music, while Islam proscribes both (although the prohibition of music has frequently been ignored, and is not unanimous).
Clearly you know very little about where I actually stand, as I am not an "advocate for the war." In any case, I will gladly debate Christopher Hitchens, as I have said before.
Cordially
Robert Spencer
All your work will come to nothing, if you align yourself with frothy mouthed shock jocks and their ilk.
You'll be easily pilloried, lampooned and dismissed as just another extreme right-wing "nut", like an embarrassing uncle that’s locked in the attic.
Things are changing you can feel it, albeit slowly.
Big Luke:
I don't know who you have in mind. I've done about 100 radio interviews in the last couple of weeks, but I don't think I've ever met a "frothy mouthed shock jock."
Anyway, I'll go on any show that I'm invited on. There are few enough with the courage to discuss these issues at all.
Cordially
Robert Spencer
"There are few enough with the courage to discuss these issues at all."
This gave me a chill, because you're correct.
However, I think, at least in the UK, people are intuitively beginning to sense something aren't right. The pap we've been fed is beginning to be rejected. Check out Anthony Andrews and Nick Cohens blogs on The Guardian site, people are, slowly, waking up!
Just don't give others such an easy opportunity to undermine the good work.
*turns red*
Subsitute "isn't" for "aren't" above.
Robert,
My apologies to you then if I have misunderstood your position regarding the mentioning of Bach, etc.
Proving a negative such as that of those who have been killed in the name of religion and whose talent we’ll never know the extent of is not possible. Just as the proving of a negative, “you prove to me that god doesn’t exist”. No reasonably minded person would pursue such tosh. It’s a rhetorical statement to begin with.
We agree, obviously as I would defer to your expert analysis of the Quaran, regarding the subject of art, music, etc. and its discrimination of such.
I stand corrected that you are not an advocate of the war, which is disturbing to any human being within this global understanding.
To not wish that all humans have the right to freedom to make personal choice for his/her life and its pursuit, is unfortunate in the very least.
Every person living has a right to freedom. If the United States happens to be the nation to whom the responsibility of supporting such action is at the forefront, then we should do it gladly.
Once again I utilize the analogy: how many times does the woman fall into the street from her husband’s beatings before the neighborhood bands together, steps in and stops it?
To delegate responsibility of “those people” to figure it out for themselves, is racist in its most brutal stated form.
Those who are more able have an obligation toward mankind to assist in areas where others freedom is being transgressed.
To make a statement that it would have been better left unattended to because its made it worse is irresponsible, as well. Why then attend to one’s cancer with chemotherapy then when the process is worse than the disease, and let’s face it, they die anyway.
Everyone has the right to freedom. Everyone has the right to live his/her life as he/she sees fit. Supporting that right is one of the noblest acts a nation can do.
It’s the very same noble act from the country in which you live and are able to pursue your own happiness without restriction or fear.
It is by chance that we all live here in the United States and partake of its freedom.
Robert,
My apologies to you then if I have misunderstood your position regarding the mentioning of Bach, etc.
Proving a negative such as that of those who have been killed in the name of religion and whose talent we’ll never know the extent of is not possible. Just as the proving of a negative, “you prove to me that god doesn’t exist”. No reasonably minded person would pursue such tosh. It’s a rhetorical statement to begin with that refutes the claim of the "almighty inspired".
We agree, obviously as I would defer to your expert analysis of the Quaran, regarding the subject of art, music, etc. and its discrimination of such.
I stand corrected that you are not an advocate of the war, which is disturbing to any human being within this global understanding.
To not wish that all humans have the right to freedom to make personal choice for his/her life and its pursuit, is unfortunate in the very least.
Every person living has a right to freedom. If the United States happens to be the nation to whom the responsibility of supporting such action is at the forefront, then we should do it gladly.
Once again I utilize the analogy: how many times does the woman fall into the street from her husband’s beatings before the neighborhood bands together, steps in and stops it?
To delegate responsibility of “those people” to figure it out for themselves, is racist in its most brutal stated form.
Those who are more able have an obligation toward mankind to assist in areas where others freedom is being transgressed.
To make a statement that it would have been better left unattended to because its made it worse is irresponsible, as well. Why then attend to one’s cancer with chemotherapy then when the process is worse than the disease, and let’s face it, they die anyway.
Everyone has the right to freedom. Everyone has the right to live his/her life as he/she sees fit. Supporting that right is one of the noblest acts a nation can do.
It’s the very same noble act from the country in which you live and are able to pursue your own happiness without restriction or fear.
It is by chance that we all live here in the United States and partake of its freedom.
scooternyc,
Are you in favor of the U.S. (and our allies) being in iraq?
Apologies for the double post, feel free to delete one of them.
To answer the question, yes, I do approve of the U.S. being in Iraq.
From the Public Law 105-338, to the U.N. Resolution 1441 and the other 16 that were not carried out, to the facts of Saddam engaging in genocide of his people, violating the non-proliferation treaty, supporting terrorists and terrorism, and violating U.N. precepts by invading other nations(Iran), all drive the reasonable response of the U.S. to take the lead and be responsible to ALL by taking down the worst WMD there was in Iraq, Saddam himself.
I'm sure many disagree, but my reasons for support have nothing to do with religion and everything to do with humanity, responsibility and accountability.
Just because an Athiest says God does not exhist, does not make it so.
I heard Mr. Spencer on the Steve Malsburg Show.
Very good presentation. Factual, Professional, on Point and to the Point. It is nice to hear the topic without the Chicken Little effect. The Host managed to let complicated concepts come across without undue interuption.
I find it Ironic that Art, Music, Literature, Science... is even an issue. If Islam is so prolific with these subjects then why has so little of it adapted by the "West"???
Even more Ironic is the Athiests only Yapping like Lap Dogs from the "West". Let them go to the Middle East and do their Yapping. Then we can hear about just which Religion they would prefer having as Neighbors.
Some may sucumb to the urge to tell a few they bought an express ticket to Hell. But Hay, we're not going to cut their Heads Off and buy our own ticket on the same ride.
I see that scooternyc has failed to provide any examples of "music, literature, etc that has been destroyed due to the Christian Crusades, the killing of blacks who were enslaved..."
Say what? OK, where's your examples to back up such an outlandish statement?