"Benazir Bhutto was totally talking like an infidel. What should be the reaction of jihadis? They should definitely kill her. She is an enemy of Islam. She is an enemy of jihadis. She is an enemy of the country. This is the reaction."

This is getting really good! Perhaps we will not have to exert quite as much energy proving to the world what a self-destructive, dead end death cult Islam is.

Thanks for the help Jihadis!

"Benazir Bhutto was totally talking like an infidel. What should be the reaction of jihadis? They should definitely kill her..."

No surprise here, this is what they have been saying all along, when will the dick head politicians in the west wake up to it.

It is amazing that some one like Bhutto calls it like it is and understands the situation first hand...yet we have screaming imbeciles on the left who keep telling us it's all about poverty and US aggressive foreign policy.

Charles Taylor is one of the best known philosophers today. He has produced major studies on Hegel and Locke, and was instrumental in inspiring the "identity" politics that is subverting the unity of Western Civilization. On that note, he also once ran for office as a member of Canada's New Democratic Party, in the party's extreme left wing. Lately, Taylor places identity politics - yes he influence Edward Said/Talal Asad (and father), etc - in context of philosophical "communitarianism," which denies individualism, and places human "authenticity of self" in a social context.

So what would Taylor think of Spencer-Fitz? He believes they are rigid "block thinkers," who use dogma to falsify claims of Muslim dogma. Thus, Spencer-Fitz are blind to the openness, pluralism, universalism, tolerance and pan-humanism of Islam. Of course, the totalitarianism that is inherent to Islam and its plain and obvious practise by the Muslim enemy is blind to Leftislamos, who seek an alliance against the Lockean liberalism that Taylor has despised since he first learned of it. Needless to say, it was Taylor who brought the early Leftislamos into the New Left Review fold. (In my opinion, the first Leftislamo manifesto appears in a 1968 issue of NLR)

See how the main Leftislamo dhimmi spews unwarranted pejorative on so-called "block" heads:

http://www.qantara.de/webcom/show_article.php/_c-478/_nr-693/i.html?PHPSESSID=d37304fbd972dd0c2cd124034b29ea86

As I write, the first of 2 dhimmi tracts are being produced by Taylor clone, Ian Almond. Within 6 months, Anti-Clash ideologues will be cartooning an inherent West-East unity. Will anyone react to this, or will we continue to defer to morons like the sack of poisonous cliches in human form who pollutes the office of the US President?

Selective memory. They all forget that the Taliban started growing under Benazir: before that, Gen Zia's favorite stooge was Gulbuddin Heqmatyar.

Incidentally, I managed to dig up an archived Taliban web site. Note that this is an archived site - the original Taliban.com, which was under the ummah.net umbrella, no longer exists. It's fascinating reading.

The link again

http://web.archive.org/web/19980623165515/http://www.taliban.com/

"will we continue to defer to morons like the sack of poisonous clichés in human form who pollutes the office of the US President?"
Posted by: supercargo

Wow! “poisonous clichés”

Care to expand on that?

136 Muslims killed and hundreds more injured, but fortunately, there were no Qur'ans burned by the blast, so don't expect any Muslim outrage.

Oh, they only get "outrage"d when infidels burn it.
taqqiyah allows them to do anything they want.

Oh, they only get "outrage"d when infidels burn it.

Posted by: jcom972 at October 20, 2007 3:12 AM

In other words, no amount of good infidel does for the ummah, it isn't enogh. Nay, infidel must be up to something evil, Nay, it is the infidel's fault.....

See how smoothly, Islamic logic flows?

The broth thickens

Retired Brigadier supervising Benazir's security was Osama's handler, says expert
From our ANI Correspondent

Chennai, Oct.19: The retired brigadier who was given the responsibility of securing former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto's car journey through Karachi on Thursday, used to be the handling officer of Osama bin Laden and Taliban chief Mulla Omar when he was attached with the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).

Disclosing this information in an article for the rediff website, former Additional Secretary in the Cabinet Secretariat, B.Raman says that Brigadier (retired) Ejaz Shah, whose resignation is being demanded by Benazir Bhutto, is a close confidante of President General Pervez Musharraf.

Raman says that after Musharraf seized power on October 12, 1999, he had Shah posted as the Home Secretary of Punjab. He also says that Omar Sheikh, who orchestrated the kidnapping and murder of American journalist Daniel Pearl, surrendered before Shah because Omar Sheikh knew him before and was confident that Ejaz Shah would see that he was not tortured.

So close are the links between Shah and Musharraf that when several allegations were filed against him, Musharraf sought to send him as Ambassador to Australia or Indonesia. Both countries reportedly refused to accept him. Musharraf then made him the Director General of the Intelligence Bureau and he saw to it that the death sentence against Omar Sheikh for his role in the Pearl case was not executed.

The courts have been repeatedly postponing hearings on the appeal filed by Omar Sheikh against the death sentence.

Shah, according to Raman, also played an active role in the campaign to discredit Supreme Court Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Caudhury after he started calling for the files of a large number of missing persons who were taken into custody by the police and the intelligence agencies.

Shah is also a close personal friend of many Punjabi leaders of the Pakistan Muslim League (Qaid), which is opposed to Benazir's return.

According to these sources, the suicide bomber or bombers managed to penetrate the security cordon of the police and IB officers without being frisked, but could not penetrate the inner cordon of security guards of the PPP. When stopped on Thursday night, they blew themselves up at a distance from her vehicle. At the time of the explosion, Bhutto had gone inside the vehicle to rest for a while. This seems to have contributed to her miraculous escape. Had she been standing on top she might have been injured, if not killed?

Copyright Dailyindia.com/ANI

Now a little closer to home, and just as scary

http://illustratedpig.blogspot.com/2007/10/paki-pride-paki-pride-is-ma-mind-paki.html

But all of Pakistan's militants share a vision and unshakable beliefs that include a ban on a woman leading the nation....

I suspect this is the jihadis' major problem with
Bhutto.

This is nonsense. Benazir Bhutto was targeted and 100 plus civilians murdered because Muslims are angry that Israel exists (and shouldn't) and because George Bush is an aggressive cowboy fomenting war on Islam. Muslims aren't to blame, we are. Just ask any leftist. They know the truth, the rest of us are idiots.

I hope the ostriches who think we've overreacted to Islamofascism will look at this incident, and try to imagine just how close we are so seeing a nuclear armed Pakistan fall to Al Qaeda.

Of course she is the enemy, most everyone is...

I can't help wondering what Benazir Bhutto's complete motivations were to leave the comforts of her home in New Jersey for the dangerous world of Pakistani Jihadists?

Jihadi was toootaly talking like an infidel. Like.

Re: A highly instructive remark, unlike the exceptionally odd title of the article: "Pakistani militants share deep beliefs."
By Kathy Gannon for the Associated Press....

Yeah, the Nazis shared deep beliefs, too. This mind-set of Kathy Gannon is rooted in a "education"-indocrination that considers any reasoned judgement of the goodness or badness of persons and their behavior as evidence of "intolerance". According to this dogma she must not ("should not") make judgements re good and evil, which is the source of "intolerance". The "militants" ( and Stalinists, Pol-Pot, etc.) have different "values". We need "conflict resolution" and to respect different "values" and not make judgements re the goodness or evil of the beliefs. We must not think.

Flush a book? ...rage & riot

Burn a book? ...rage & riot

Cartoons? ...rage & riot

136 Muslims slaughtered by other Muslims?

all is quiet...

I'm sure the suicide bomber really meant to deliver flowers to the returning former prime minister's motorcade. He probably just picked up the wrong bag.

ITS A MUSLIM THING; WE WOULDNT UNDERSTAND......

Have we fogotten Kathy Gannon already? She was the chief AP flack responsible for Qanagate. She is an award-winning reporter and author who blatantly lied about what happened in Qana:

http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2006/08/part-8-discussion-and-conclusions.html

http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2006/08/part-3-act-1-dead-baby.html

She's a partisan who's married to a Muslim and cannot be trusted.

"Benazir Bhutto was totally talking like an infidel. What should be the reaction of jihadis? They should definitely kill her. She is an enemy of Islam. She is an enemy of jihadis. She is an enemy of the country. This is the reaction," said Al Hasan.

But we're supposed to believe that Muslims don't approve the actions of the jihadists. The jihadists' remarks indicate that his views are the views of all Muslims. Who will renounce him?
He says infidels should be killed. Who will ask him to define the word 'infidel'?

But all of Pakistan's militants share a vision and unshakable beliefs that include a ban on a woman leading the nation and opposition to a close alliance with America.

What will they say about President Hillary Clinton? (if that day ever comes, of course)

[Kathy Gannon] is a partisan who's married to a Muslim and cannot be trusted.

by sonomaca

Same question here. What about President Hillary Clinton? Would Kathy Gannon's reporting be influenced more by her husband, her political beliefs or her sex?

You sow Islam, you reap Jihad.

Note to Bhutto, et al.

The news iswhen she was in power, she was a "commie," she was a tyrant, she was a socialist, she was this, she was that.

But what is the difference betw. how she rant the country and the Arabs? What did she do differently from what their rulers have done before - are doing now?

This a stron, repressive gov. is what they want - what they adhere to - what these islamics need.They are and have been as brutal as anyone else - from the top down - from the islamic grassroots up

Look at the middle-of-the-road Musharif. He's in deep doo-doo. Those people - the Pakis -want a strong man, sort of like Stalin.

The thing with islamics is -THEY NEVER GIVE UP! Terminators that they are!

In fact, they'd be lucky to get a Stalin - who did away with religion. Settle them down!

The news iswhen she was in power, she was a "commie," she was a tyrant, she was a socialist, she was this, she was that.

But what is the difference betw. how she ran the country and the how the other Arabs/islamics do it? What did she do differently from what their rulers have done before - are doing now?

There's a bio of a woman who was the dau. of a high gov. official, eventually, he was considered a traitor to the ruler. I believe he was butchered, then his entire family, incl. minor children and infants were imprisoned in a filthy, vermin infested prison. She, and the rest, spent 7 yrs there. Only getting out when Westn public pressure forced the ruler to release them.

This islamics are vicious, lacking compassion or pity, for women or infants.

A strong, repressive gov. is what they want - what they adhere to - what these islamics need.They are and have been as brutal as anyone else - from the top down - from the islamic grassroots up

Look at the middle-of-the-road Musharif. He's in deep doo-doo. Those people - the Pakis -want a strong man, sort of like Stalin.

The thing with islamics is -THEY NEVER GIVE UP! Terminators that they are!

In fact, they'd be lucky to get a Stalin - who did away with religion. Settle them down!

NASSEEM????

Since this happened in your city, care to weigh in?? I would be interested in your take on this atrocity.

"She is an enemy of Islam. She is an enemy of jihadis. She is an enemy of the country".....

She is a HERO!

From the article

Some are al-Qaida, some are Taliban and others are homegrown.

Is there some important distinction between these groups? Can al-Qaeda members not also be homegrown? What ideological differences are there between the Taliban and al-Qaeda? Is this an attempt to suggest that the "few extremists" are "foreigners" (as always), as opposed to the "vast majority of moderate" homegrown Pakistanis? An attempt to obfuscate the fact that Pakistan is one of the major exporters of Islamic terrorism?

Militants [...] called Thursday's suicide attack revenge for the Pakistani military operations in the area and the support Bhutto and Musharraf have offered the United States

It's always revenge for some perceived slight. There's always an excuse for their mass murders.

A businessman in the northwestern city of Peshawar [...] who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of being arrested by authorities, said there are hundreds of would-be bombers in Pakistan who are ready to blow themselves up in such attacks.

Shhhh. That's Top Secret information there, Mr. Businessman. Next you'll be telling us that you know that OBL, who the Pakistani and U.S. inteligence agencies are unable to find, is located in the northwestern provinces of Pakistan.

Poetic justice for Karachi, where Daniel Pearl was butchered.

If Bhutto takes over Pakistan she'll probably set a new record for the number of times being targeted for death by the Destroyers. That would stick in their craw so much they won't be able to see straight-and they'll stop at nothing to kill her.

NASSEEM????

Since this happened in your city, care to weigh in?? I would be interested in your take on this atrocity.

Posted by: gymgal at October 20, 2007 1:39 PM

Thanks to Naseem's "muslim brothers", Sharia-Lite (Naseem's taquiyya), went out in a flash... no, with a Bang... in this case, two Bangs, or 2 Booms? as in Boom-Boom? Point is that, as these bombings prove, there "Sharia-Lite" , like a "moderate muslim", is a mere fantasy.

See how the main Leftislamo dhimmi spews unwarranted pejorative on so-called "block" heads:
http://www.qantara.de/webcom/show_article.php/_c-478/_nr-693/i.html?PHPSESSID=d37304fbd972dd0c2cd124034b29ea86
Posted by: supercargo

Who cares these "pot" heads call the "block" heads crack-pots? Do these potheads not understand that in their multiculturalism dogma they are dogmatic blockheads themselves? Leftist-islamist theology is so weak it's pathetic. Or am I taking them "out of context" as they always accuse us?

Benazir Bhutto is a courageous woman who gains my admiration for her will to stand down those "block" headed Islamists and bring back some semblance of rationality to her god forsaken country. Her reception with bombs and death only proves she has a very difficult job ahead, if she even survives her countrymen's determination to remain primitives in the dark ages of Mohammed's "block" headed-crackpot theology. I hope she's Thatcher tough for the job.

Davegreybeard, perhaps supercargo was refering to recent (Bush) Presidential cliches like these:

"Islam brings hope and comfort to millions of people in my country, and to more than a billion people worldwide. Ramadan is also an occasion to remember that Islam gave birth to a rich civilization of learning that has benefited mankind."

and

"The Islam that we know is a faith devoted to the worship of one God, as revealed through The Holy Qur'an. It teaches the value and the importance of charity, mercy, and peace."

and of course the chart-topping

"Islam is a Religion of Peace"

Many more here
http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/ramadan/islam.html

One would think that an 'friend and ally against terror', would be more tolerant of a woman leader, than 'non-allies for terror'. However, just across Pakistan's border, India, in all it's imperfect limitations, enjoys the biggest democracy in the world. By targeting a progressive woman, Pakistan ( http://www.cfr.org/publication/9514/ ) has exposed another of Bush's lie: ( http://www.meforum.org/article/528 ), about his 'friends and allies against terror'. Real allies agants terror would be India and Israel, but neither is muslim and/or rich. See how it all works?

This is the leader America needs.. one who calls Jihad what it is and pays tribute to Americans who fought on Normandy beach and flight 93. He believes in honoring the flag, fighting for American identity and taking the country back: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oooNVPDb3dA&eurl=http://www.teamtancredo.typepad.com/

With all due respect, Rudy or Romney cannot come close to Tom's patriotism. As for slimy Hillary, why would she, who has no problem with adultry, care for American values? Here is her cheating husband's contribution to Jihad: http://www.blessedcause.org/proof/Clinton%20Embracing%20Islam%20selling%20out%20children.htm With all due respect, America cannot bear the burden of another Clinton. Again, Tom Tancredo is Amerfican identity: http://www.teamtancredo.typepad.com

the last, most famous person to combine hip lingo and murder was Charles Manson. Luckily, he was not coherent enough to actually start a new religion.

supercargo said:

"the sack of poisonous cliches in human form who pollutes the office of the US President"

Wow! The best invective regarding the Prez I've ever read. The Romans would be proud.

Charles Bogle gave a link to the Whitehouse webpage that lists a few of the times that GWB has proclaimed how wonderful, how peaceful, how noble, Islam is.

I searched in vain for any similar Whitehouse webpages proclaiming how wonderful and peaceful Hinduism, or Buddhism, or Judaism, or Bahai'ism, or Sikhism, or Animism, or Voodoo, are. Or, how about a page listing the virtues of Christianity? Apparently Islam is the only religion that the Administration thinks they must convince us is peaceful. I wonder why that is?

jsla said:

"Jihadi was toootaly talking like an infidel. Like."

My thought too. Like a chattering teenager.
Nice to see American teenage speak cross over into Jihadi mental life. Gives one confidence in the survival of Western culture.

Ms Bhutto is an extremely courageous woman : for this alone she deserves our admiration. Which of our lily livered Politicians would dare to step outside their mansions at hint of a bomb scare let alone venture along a dangerous highway on a TRUCK?? George Bush-Tony Blair-yeah, how many times did they go to the Green Zone in Baghdad,staying 20 mins before fleeing amid a small army of Security Personnel...
Ms Bhutto's tragedy is that she was born a WOMAN
and a MUSLIM . Chances are she will not live long
with Taliban, Al Quaeda determined to kill 'Uppity
Bitch.'Not to mention Musharref & generals.
For bravery & charisma Ms Bhutto is a Warrior Queen with more balls that her would be, cowardly
assassins.

Ms Bhutto is an extremely courageous woman : for this alone she deserves our admiration. Which of our lily livered Politicians would dare to step outside their mansions at hint of a bomb scare let alone venture along a dangerous highway on a TRUCK?? George Bush-Tony Blair-yeah, how many times did they go to the Green Zone in Baghdad,staying 20 mins before fleeing amid a small army of Security Personnel...
Ms Bhutto's tragedy is that she was born a WOMAN
and a MUSLIM . Chances are she will not live long
with Taliban, Al Quaeda determined to kill 'Uppity
Bitch.'Not to mention Musharref & generals.
For bravery & charisma Ms Bhutto is a Warrior Queen with more balls that her would be, cowardly
assassins.

Or, how about a page listing the virtues of Christianity? Apparently Islam is the only religion that the Administration thinks they must convince us is peaceful. I wonder why that is?

Posted by: special_guest at October 20, 2007 4:16 PM

Yes, "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." -William Shakespeare

"Ms Bhutto is an extremely courageous woman : for this alone she deserves our admiration. Which of our lily livered Politicians would dare to step outside their mansions at hint of a bomb scare let alone venture along a dangerous highway on a TRUCK??"

You must be joking. How about she is one of the most corrupt women in politics? She fled the country, a so-called "self-imposed exile" after being indicted for corruption, with millions of dollars in Swiss banks? How courageous was that?
She lived the good life in mansions in the West and in luxury hotels in the Arab Emirates. Her assets have been frozen, and she faces corruption charges in Switzerland too. Now Musharaf promises to to errase all that debt she ows Pakistan, together with her husband, known as "Mr 10%" for the percentage he expected on every deal his wife's government made.

How about her coming from a wealthy, power-hungry clan (read Salman Rushdie, if you have no clue about Pakistan politics and culture) and trying to hold on that clannish/tribal/regional power, to the detriment of the other major tribes in Pakistan? How about her fomenting, in all her speeches, hatred among those very regions/tribes rather than unifying them?
How about her riding in a bullet-proof truck while hundreds of thousands of "supporters" lined up the road, with little protection, just because they had been paid a few rupees for the show?

How about being an ego-maniac, to forgo security concerns (she had been warned about terrosrist threats) for the sake of festivism and power play?

How much more disgusting can this woman be?
How much more naive can you be?

How far are some people willing to compromise with what's right, in every possible way, just because the subject is a woman (and a "Muslim" as well?)

A poster above goes to great lengths to make a case against Bhutto but I see no difference between her and any of the other muslim power slime that rule other islamic sh** holes. Seems to me she is right out of the mold if what the poster says is true. However bad she is they deserve her and worse.

How much more disgusting can this woman be? How much more naive can you be?

How far are some people willing to compromise with what's right, in every possible way, just because the subject is a woman (and a "Muslim" as well?)

Perhaps the world she comes from operates on a moral base far different from what we find acceptable. Put yourself in her shoes, or hijab, for a moment and think about it. How would you operate inside that primitive culture of Islam? Notice how different Pakistan is from India, a mere six decades later, and the difference between a culture based on Mohammed and one of democracy and relative religious freedoms becomes starkly obvious, in a very short time. So don't put down Ms. Bhutto because of the world she comes from. How would you survive in that cesspool of Islam called Pakistan? She's got more balls than any woman out there, except perhaps the 'Iron Lady'. I wish she were still in power, and a lot of this nonsense about Islamic sharia in Britain would be addressed better.

Give people a chance to do better. I think Benazir can, if she gets to power share in Pakistan, and even Pakistan can do better. Not all Pakistani Muslims are sharia insane. In which would you invest, given the choice, in India or Pakistan? Think about that for a moment. Can you understand how far behind the rest of the world Islam puts any nation under its domination? Submission cult of Mohammed is a kiss of death.

Here's to GW.

He may be wrong on inditing islam, but he is right on so many other matters.

Just saw a review of a book on the topic of the takeover of the kaaba in Mecca a few years ago - and the Saudis had to rely on a French mercenary to get the fundamentalists out.

The author touted how exciting and crucial these events were.

Completely forgetting the more important story of what the Saudis have been doing to us in funding Wahhaabism and fundamental islam throughout the West. The source of pure evil.

Here is the true story of the evil and toxic ideology that is islam.

Charles Bogle gave a link to the Whitehouse webpage that lists a few of the times that GWB has proclaimed how wonderful, how peaceful, how noble, Islam is.

I searched in vain for any similar Whitehouse webpages proclaiming how wonderful and peaceful Hinduism, or Buddhism, or Judaism, or Bahai'ism, or Sikhism, or Animism, or Voodoo, are. Or, how about a page listing the virtues of Christianity? Apparently Islam is the only religion that the Administration thinks they must convince us is peaceful. I wonder why that is? - Posted by: special_guest

We know GW was not the brightest kid in class, and it doesn't help his smarts to look like Maxwell Smart, though not half as funny. So when this sitting duck president, who won by a hanging chad, says Islam is 'religion of peace' you have to chuckle. Does he know his Islam? Had he ever cracked a book on the subject, or merely crammed the night before? His advisers are as well ill advised, if they wrote the speech for this Republican party sock-puppet. Or should it be the multiculturalist PC sock-puppet? Not that the other guy saving polar bears would've been any better in standing off against this Islam death cult threat, but we have to give GW some slack. He's doin' the best he can, pardner.

Can he ever really give the same breaks for other religions? Why need to? They're okay they way they are. Only Islam keeps getting negative attention every day, like a a bad child that tries to bully all the other children in the school playground. "Now, Johnny is not a bad child, just troubled," I can hear the PC school teacher trying to reassure concerned parents. That's all GW is doing, trying to pacify the savage Islamist primitives by saying they're a 'religion of piece'. What stupidity!

I agree with ovidius_naso, about this bhutto lady. She is every bit as corrupt and vile as any muslim politician. However she is specially more vile in terms of instigating the kashmiri muslims against their hindu bretherns. She was instrumental in starting the ethnic cleansing of the hindu pandits from kashmir. no knowledgable indian can forget that. Her survival as a person or politician makes no differance to us. I wish mushraff would just throw her in jail to answer for all the corruption in her rule. ( not that I have any love for mushraff, the brown nosing, kashmir invading, terrorist suppporting , oppertunist).

Battle:

Bhutto is a fully westernized politician. She's spent more time in the West than at home. She's a (pitiful, incompetent) graduate of Oxford and Harvard. Perpetual shame on those schools!
She has more real estate holdings in the West than at home.
So your defense of her "otherness" doesn't hold.

She's corrupt to the bone, a puppet politician, and an instigator of ethnic hatred among the Pakistanis.

She's corrupt to the bone, a puppet politician, and an instigator of ethnic hatred among the Pakistanis.

Then I hope she succeeds in exposing the ethnic hatreds in Mohammed's Pakistan. I do not need to judge her morality based on Western values when it concerns Islam. They hate each other regardless, so the more it is exposed the better. Judging it from Mohammed's point, she's brilliant. More power to her. Let Pakistan's Islam face all its shortcomings, as there are many. India shines by comparison.

"Islam is a Religion of Peace"
Posted by: Charles Bogle

Yes I know, Charles Bogle (aware of what’s going on), it was this very comment by GWB that spurred me to read Ibn Warraq’s “Why I am Not a Muslim” – I have not stopped reading since.

W. IS very depressing at times, with his failure to address the menace of Islam – I share your profound disappointment in this.

Thank God he somehow has the insight to resist unrelenting political pressure and not call for an American retreat in Iraq.

Test

"She is an enemy of Islam. She is an enemy of jihadis. She is an enemy of the country".....

She is a HERO!

Posted by: champ

HA HA...finally a muslim hero huh?....LOL

Beware. Little Green Footballs has some good posts to sources, but the people who comment are not necessarily interested in how to counter Jihad.

Hi Dar al-harb,

I have to laugh at myself too, because I posted that comment in haste before reading the entire headline and later realized who I was heralding a hero -- but my heart was in the right place.

I only read part of the story and thought: anyone who is an enemy of Islam MUST be a hero, but I'm glad I made you laugh though :-)

I fully agree with the comments of desidude. Not withstanding her Westernized appearance and education, Benazir is every bit as jehadist as her 'friends' who tried to kill her. People seem to forget that it was Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, Benazir's dad who coined the term "Islamic bomb" and promised to eat grass, if need be, in order to make an Islamic bomb.. and, indeed, he succeeded in his efforts at creating the Islamic atom bomb. Zulfiqar, despite all his jehadist aims, was hanged by Zia-ul-Haq an out-and-out jehadist military ruler himself (here local politics superceded their common jehadist aims). It should not come as a surprise to anyone following the history of Pakistan (or for that matter any Islamic country) that jehadists often try to kill each other. Trying to prop up Benazir or Musharraf as being 'friends of the West' just because there are other jehadists trying to kill them, as many Western leaders seem to be doing, is utterly self-defeating and self-delusional. For my part, I anyday prefer the hate-spewing jehadists who are open about their aims as compared to politicians with forked tongues such as Mush and Benazir.

...hmmmm. the words and actions of the Pakistani militants reenforce my belief that Osama and Al-Zawahiri are indeed in Pakistan.....If Ms Bhutto will all the US to root him out...It will be done....Musharev has coninually opposed US forces snooping around in Pakistan to look for these two trouble makers....makes me wonder about his sincerity or desire to root out the terrorists....

....whatever the case...we should still Ban Muslim Immigration....