Christian leaders ask for Muslim forgiveness

The signers are a veritable who's who of Christian leaders in the United States. And there's nothing essentially wrong with such a gesture: no community has a monopoly on evil, or is entirely free from it. But it is singularly unfortunate in this instance, since Muslim groups worldwide have never, in any context, offered a similar gesture. Where are the apologies for the jihad conquests and dhimmitude? They will, most assuredly, not be forthcoming.

From the Khaleej Times (thanks to all who sent this in):

ABU DHABI—Peaceful relations between Muslims and Christians stand as one of the central challenges of this century, according to leading Christian leaders.

Responding to an open letter in October signed by 138 leading Muslim scholars, clerics, and intellectuals from around the world, the Christian leaders also asked the Muslim world for forgiveness “We want to begin by acknowledging that in the past (e.g. in the Crusades) and in the present (e.g. in excesses of the “war on terror”) many Christians have been guilty of sinning against our Muslim neighbours. Before we “shake your hand” in responding to your letter, we ask forgiveness of the All-Merciful One and of the Muslim community around the world”, they said in the letter which was made available to the press here yesterday.

Following is the full text of the letter:

As members of the worldwide Christian community, we were deeply encouraged and challenged by the recent historic open letter signed by 138 leading Muslim scholars, clerics, and intellectuals from around the world. A Common Word Between Us and You identifies some core common ground between Christianity and Islam which lies at the heart of our respective faiths as well as at the heart of the most ancient Abrahamic faith, Judaism. Jesus Christ’s call to love God and neighbour was rooted in the divine revelation to the people of Israel embodied in the Torah (Deuteronomy 6:5; Leviticus 19:18). We receive the open letter as a Muslim hand of conviviality and cooperation extended to Christians worldwide. In this response we extend our own Christian hand in return, so that together with all other human beings we may live in peace and justice as we seek to love God and our neighbours.

Muslims and Christians have not always shaken hands in friendship; their relations have sometimes been tense, even characterized by outright hostility. Since Jesus Christ says, “First take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your neighbour’s eye” (Matthew 7:5), we want to begin by acknowledging that in the past (e.g. in the Crusades) and in the present (e.g. in excesses of the “war on terror”) many Christians have been guilty of sinning against our Muslim neighbours. Before we “shake your hand” in responding to your letter, we ask forgiveness of the All-Merciful One and of the Muslim community around the world.

Religious Peace-World Peace “Muslims and Christians together make up well over half of the world’s population. Without peace and justice between these two religious communities, there can be no meaningful peace in the world.” We share the sentiment of the Muslim signatories expressed in these opening lines of their open letter. Peaceful relations between Muslims and Christians stand as one of the central challenges of this century, and perhaps of the whole present epoch. Though tensions, conflicts, and even wars in which Christians and Muslims stand against each other are not primarily religious in character, they possess an undeniable religious dimension. If we can achieve religious peace between these two religious communities, peace in the world will clearly be easier to attain. It is therefore no exaggeration to say, as you have in A Common Word Between Us and You, that “the future of the world depends on peace between Muslims and Christians.” Common Ground What is so extraordinary about A Common Word Between Us and You is not that its signatories recognize the critical character of the present moment in relations between Muslims and Christians. It is rather a deep insight and courage with which they have identified the common ground between the Muslim and Christian religious communities.

What is common between us lies not in something marginal nor in something merely important to each. It lies, rather, in something absolutely central to both: love of God and love of neighbour.

Surprisingly for many Christians, your letter considers the dual command of love to be the foundational principle not just of the Christian faith, but of Islam as well. That so much common ground exists-common ground in some of the fundamentals of faith-gives hope that undeniable differences and even the very real external pressures that bear down upon us can not overshadow the common ground upon which we stand together. That this common ground consists in love of God and of neighbour gives hope that deep cooperation between us can be a hallmark of the relations between our two communities.

Love of God We applaud that A Common Word Between Us and You stresses so insistently the unique devotion to one God, indeed the love of God, as the primary duty of every believer. God alone rightly commands our ultimate allegiance. When anyone or anything besides God commands our ultimate allegiance-a ruler, a nation, economic progress, or anything else-we end up serving idols and inevitably get mired in deep and deadly conflicts. We find it equally heartening that the God whom we should love above all things is described as being Love. In the Muslim tradition, God, “the Lord of the worlds,” is “The Infinitely Good and All-Merciful.” And the New Testament states clearly that “God is love” (1 John 4:8). Since God’s goodness is infinite and not bound by anything, God “makes his sun rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous,” according to the words of Jesus Christ recorded in the Gospel (Matthew 5:45). For Christians, humanity’s love of God and God’s love of humanity are intimately linked. As we read in the New Testament: “We love because he [God] first loved us” (1 John 4:19). Our love of God springs from and is nourished by God’s love for us. It cannot be otherwise, since the Creator who has power over all things is infinitely good. Love of Neighbour We find deep affinities with our own Christian faith when A Common Word Between Us and You insists that love is the pinnacle of our duties toward our neighbours. “None of you has faith until you love for your neighbour what you love for yourself,” the Prophet Muhammad said. In the New Testament we similarly read, “whoever does not love [the neighbour] does not know God” (1 John 4:8) and “whoever does not love his brother whom he has seen cannot love God whom he has not seen” (1 John 4:20). God is love, and our highest calling as human beings is to imitate the One whom we worship. We applaud when you state that “justice and freedom of religion are a crucial part” of the love of neighbour. When justice is lacking, neither love of God nor love of the neighbour can be present. When freedom to worship God according to one’s conscience is curtailed, God is dishonoured, the neighbour oppressed, and neither God nor neighbour is loved. Since Muslims seek to love their Christian neighbours, they are not against them, the document encouragingly states. Instead, Muslims are with them. As Christians we resonate deeply with this sentiment. Our faith teaches that we must be with our neighbours-indeed, that we must act in their favor-even when our neighbours turn out to be our enemies. “But I say unto you,” says Jesus Christ, “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be children of your Father in heaven; for he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good” (Matthew 5:44-45). Our love, Jesus Christ says, must imitate the love of the infinitely good Creator; our love must be as unconditional as is God’s-extending to brothers, sisters, neighbours, and even enemies. At the end of his life, Jesus Christ himself prayed for his enemies: “Forgive them; for they do not know what they are doing” (Luke 23:34).

The Prophet Muhammad did similarly when he was violently rejected and stoned by the people of Ta’if. He is known to have said, “The most virtuous behaviour is to engage those who sever relations, to give to those who withhold from you, and to forgive those who wrong you.” (It is perhaps significant that after the Prophet Muhammad was driven out of Ta’if, it was the Christian slave ‘Addas who went out to Muhammad, brought him food, kissed him, and embraced him.) The Task Before Us “Let this common ground”-the dual common ground of love of God and of neighbour-“be the basis of all future interfaith dialogue between us,” your courageous letter urges. Indeed, in the generosity with which the letter is written you embody what you call for. We most heartily agree. Abandoning all “hatred and strife,” we must engage in interfaith dialogue as those who seek each other’s good, for the one God unceasingly seeks our good. Indeed, together with you we believe that we need to move beyond “a polite ecumenical dialogue between selected religious leaders” and work diligently together to reshape relations between our communities and our nations so that they genuinely reflect our common love for God and for one another. Given the deep fissures in the relations between Christians and Muslims today, the task before us is daunting. And the stakes are great. The future of the world depends on our ability as Christians and Muslims to live together in peace. If we fail to make every effort to make peace and come together in harmony you correctly remind us that “our eternal souls” are at stake as well.

We are persuaded that our next step should be for our leaders at every level to meet together and begin the earnest work of determining how God would have us fulfill the requirement that we love God and one another. It is with humility and hope that we receive your generous letter, and we commit ourselves to labor together in heart, soul, mind and strength for the objectives you so appropriately propose.

*Harold W. Attridge, Dean and Lillian Claus Professor of New Testament, Yale Divinity School *Joseph Cumming, Director of the Reconciliation Program, Yale Center for Faith and Culture, Yale Divinity School *Emilie M. Townes, Andrew Mellon Professor of African American Religion and Theology, Yale Divinity School, and President-elect of the American Academy of Religion *Miroslav Volf, Founder and Director of the Yale Center for Faith and Culture, Henry B. Wright Professor of Theology, Yale Divinity School Martin Accad, Academic Dean, Arab Baptist Theological Seminary (Lebanon) Scott C. Alexander, Director, Catholic-Muslim Studies, Catholic Theological Union Roger Allen, Chair, Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, University of Pennsylvania Leith Anderson, President, National Association of Evangelicals Ray Bakke, Convening Chair, Evangelicals for Middle East Understanding Camillo Ballin, Bishop, Vicar Apostolic of Kuwait (Roman Catholic) Barry Beisner, Bishop, Episcopal Diocese of Northern California Federico Bertuzzi, President, PM Internacional, Latin America James A. Beverley, Tyndale Seminary, Canada Jonathan Bonk, Executive Director, Overseas Ministries Study Center Gerhard B?wering, Yale University Joseph Britton, Dean, Berkeley Divinity School at Yale John M. Buchanan, Editor/Publisher, The Christian Century Joe Goodwin Burnett, Bishop, Episcopal Diocese of Nebraska Samuel G. Candler, Dean, Cathedral of St. Philip, Atlanta Juan Carlos C?rdenas, Instituto Iberoamericano de Estudios Transculturales, Spain Joseph Castleberry, President, Northwest University Colin Chapman, Author David Yonggi Cho, Founder and Senior Pastor, Yoido Full Gospel Church, Seoul, Korea Richard Cizik, Vice President, National Association of Evangelicals Corneliu Constantineanu, Dean, Evangelical Theological Seminary, Croatia Robert E. Cooley, President Emeritus, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Harvey Cox, Harvard Divinity School John D’Alton, President, Melbourne Institute for Orthodox Christian Studies, Australia Andr? Delbecq, University of Santa Clara Keith DeRose, Yale University Andr?s Alonso Duncan, CEO, Latinoamerica Global, A.C.

Diana L. Eck, Harvard University Bertil Ekstrom, Executive Director, Mission Commission, World Evangelical Alliance Mark U. Edwards, Jr., Senior Advisor to the Dean, Harvard Divinity School John Esposito, Director Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, Georgetown University David Ford, Regius Professor of Divinity, Cambridge University Timothy George, Dean, Beeson Divinity School, Samford University Roberto S. Goizueta, Boston College Bruce Gordon, University of St. Andrews William A. Graham, Dean, Harvard Divinity School Lynn Green, International Chairman, YWAM Frank Griffel, Yale University Edwin F. Gulick, Jr., Bishop, Episcopal Diocese of Kentucky David P. Gushee, President, Evangelicals for Human Rights Kim B. Gustafson, President, Common Ground Elie Haddad, Provost, Arab Baptist Theological Seminary, Lebanon L. Ann Hallisey, Hallisey Consulting and Counseling Paul D. Hanson, Harvard Divinity School Heidi Hadsell, President, Hartford Seminary David Heim, Executive Editor, The Christian Century Norman A. Hjelm, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA, retired Carl R. Holladay, Candler School of Theology, Emory University Joseph Hough, President, Union Theological Seminary, NY Bill Hybels, Founder and Senior Pastor, Willow Creek Community Church Nabeel T. Jabbour, Consultant, Professor, Colorado Shannon Sherwood Johnston, Bishop Coadjutor, Episcopal Diocese of Virginia David Colin Jones, Bishop Suffragan, Episcopal Diocese of Virginia Stanton L. Jones, Provost, Wheaton College, IL Tony Jones, National Coordinator, Emergent Village Riad A. Kassis, Theologian, Author, Consultant Paul Knitter, Union Theological Seminary, NY Manfred W. Kohl, Vice President of Overseas Council International, USA James A. Kowalski, Dean, Cathedral of Saint John the Divine, NY Sharon Kugler, University Chaplain, Yale University Peter Kuzmic, President, Evangelical Theological Faculty Osijek, Croatia Peter J. Lee, Bishop, Episcopal Diocese of Virginia Linda LeSourd Lader, President, Renaissance Institute Tim Lewis, President, William Carey Int’l University John B.Lindner, Yale Divinity School Duane Litfin, President, Wheaton College Greg Livingstone, Founder, Frontiers Albert C. Lobe, Interim Executive Director, Mennonite Central Committee Rick Love, International Director, Frontiers Douglas Magnuson, Bethel University Peter Maiden, International Coordinator, OM Danut Manastireanu, World Vision International, Iasi, Romania Harold Masback, III, Senior Minister, The Congregational Church of New Canaan, New Canaan, CT Donald M. McCoid, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America C. Douglas McConnell, Dean, School of Intercultural Studies, Fuller Theological Seminary Don McCurry, President, Ministries to Muslims Brian D. McLaren, Author, Speaker, Activist Kathleen E. McVey, Princeton Theological Seminary Judith Mendelsohn Rood, Biola University Steve Moore, President and CEO, The Mission Exchange (formerly EFMA) Douglas Morgan, Director, Adventist Peace Fellowship Richard Mouw, President, Fuller Theological Seminary Salim J. Munayer, Academic Dean, Bethlehem Bible College, Jerusalem Rich Nathan, Senior Pastor, Vineyard Church of Columbus David Neff, Editor in Chief and Vice-President, Christianity Today Media Group Alexander Negrov, President, St. Petersburg Christian University, Russia Richard R. Osmer, Princeton Theological Seminary George E. Packard, Bishop Suffragan for Chaplaincies of the Episcopal Church Greg H. Parsons, General Director, U.S. Center for World Mission Doug Pennoyer, Dean, School of Intercultural Studies, Biola University Douglas Petersen, Vanguard University of Southern California Sally Promey, Yale Divinity School Thomas P. Rausch, S.J., Loyola Marymount University David A. Reed, Wycliffe College, University of Toronto Neil Rees, International Director, World Horizons Cecil M. Robeck, Jr., Fuller Theological Seminary Leonard Rogers, Executive Director, Evangelicals for Middle East Understanding William L. Sachs, Director, Center for Reconciliation and Mission, Richmond Lamin Sanneh, Yale Divinity School Andrew Saperstein, Yale Center for Faith and Culture Robert Schuller, Founder, Crystal Cathedral and Hour of Power Elizabeth Sch?ssler Fiorenza, Harvard Divinity School Francis Sch?ssler Fiorenza, Harvard Divinity School William Schweiker, University of Chicago Donald Senior, C.P., President, Catholic Theological Union, Chicago C. L. Seow, Princeton Theological Seminary Imad Nicola Shehadeh, President, Jordan Evangelical Theological Seminary David W. and K. Grace Shenk, Eastern Mennonite Missions Marguerite Shuster, Fuller Theological Seminary John G. Stackhouse, Jr., Regent College, Vancouver Glen Stassen, Fuller Theological Seminary Andrea Zaki Stephanous, Vice President, Protestant Church in Egypt Wilbur P. Stone, Bethel University, MN John Stott, Rector Emeritus, All Souls Church, London Frederick J. Streets, Yeshiva University William Taylor, Global Ambassador, World Evangelical Alliance John Thomas, President and General Minister, United Church of Christ Iain Torrance, President, Princeton Theological Seminary Michael W. Treneer, International President, The Navigators, CO Geoff Tunnicliffe, International Director, World Evangelical Alliance George Verwer, Founder and former International Director, OM Harold Vogelaar, Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago Berten A. Waggoner, National Director, Association of Vineyard Churches Jim Wallis, President, Sojourners Rick Warren, Founder and Senior Pastor, Saddleback Church, and The Purpose Driven Life, Lake Forest, CA J. Dudley Woodberry, Dean Emeritus, Fuller School of International Studies, Fuller Theological Seminary Christopher J.H. Wright, International Director, Langham Partnership, London Robert R. Wilson, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Yale Divinity School Nicholas Wolterstorff, University of Virginia Godfrey Yogarajah, General Secretary, Evangelical Fellowship in Asia Community Council of the Sisters of the Precious Blood, Dayton, OH.

| 123 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

123 Comments

Never had much interest in interfaith dialogue myself.

I guess if my school was a regular recipient of Islamic dough I might learn to love it.

"... the Christian leaders also asked the Muslim world for forgiveness “We want to begin by acknowledging that in the past (e.g. in the Crusades) and in the present (e.g. in excesses of the “war on terror”) many Christians have been guilty of sinning against our Muslim neighbours ... we ask forgiveness of the All-Merciful One and of the Muslim community around the world”, they said ..."

-----------------------------------------

These Christian leaders had better NOT assume they're speaking for me.

I decline to apologize for ANYTHING as regards Western responses to Islam and the horrors that this false "religion" has been inflicting upon the world for 1400 years.

OK, I'll apologize for occasional rare overreactions to terrorism as soon as the Muslims of the world apologize for the terrorism they are practicing every day.

And I'll apologize for the Crusades as soon as Muslims apologize for the oppressive occupation of my wife's homeland Bulgaria and the killing of its national hero Vasil Levski.

These leaders don't speak for me either. I will not apologize to Islam. They should apologize to us for all atrocities they committed in the name of their moon god...

That and $3 will get you a cup of Starbucks® coffee.

Silly, stupid, naïve, dhimmi WABBITS!

Rick Warren, Founder and Senior Pastor, Saddleback Church, and The Purpose Driven Life
SATAN'S HAND SERVENT HIMSELF

Totally off the rails.

Why are they all so deluded? It won't be long now until Western nations will be required to pay compensation to the ummah Islamiyah for the crusades.

Something like the Indonesians holding their own rainforest for ransom and threaten us to pay up if we want to save it.

I could not help but notice that Pastor Deacon Fred of The Landover Baptist Church did not sign this letter.

In the Christian world, a genuine seeking of forgiveness is a sign of character a sign of strength.

In the Islamic world, it will be seen solely as an admission. Their response to Christian doctrines such as "we are all sinners" is taken as a see---they admit they are wrong.

Asking forgiveness in this way will likely add fuel to Jihad furnace. Although we are all in need of forgiveness, asking for it in this context is not prudent.

As a general matter, conservative Christians are probably better informed on Jihad/Islam than the typical westerner.

As a general matter, less orthodox Christians seem more susceptible to the "all religions are the same" kumbaya delusions.

It's will take six months for someone to write each one of these idiots a letter. They could have helped if they had provided their addresses, inconsiderate little twits.

On the other hand, there is enough information to ferret out their e-mail addresses.

If one cannot be polite, at least act polite.

JSobieski wrote:

In the Christian world, a genuine seeking of forgiveness is a sign of character a sign of strength.

In the Islamic world, it will be seen solely as an admission. Their response to Christian doctrines such as "we are all sinners" is taken as a see---they admit they are wrong.
................................

This is exactly what I was going to mention. Christians see this as an opportunity for admissions of errors on both sides, and a way to open dialogue.

Most Muslims will take this as nothing but an admission of guilt on the part of Christians, as well as a clear indication of weakness.

I don't think we should hold our breath waiting for a similar letter from the Imams admitting any Muslim shortcomings.

Greetings:

A little off-topic but in a similar vein, last week on PBS's "Frontline" program about Darfur (On Our Watch), a talking head described the rebellion in southern Sudan (which preceded Darfur) as being between "Christians and non-Christians." So it goes.

Hopefully, Pope Benedict will have a talk with the Catholic signers.

I have already sent an e-mail to Mr. Harold W. Attridge.

http://www.yale.edu/divinity/Fac.meet.shtml

If I get a reply, I will let y'all know how it went.

Not in my name!

oh, the belligerence and intransigence of these Christians. Nowhere did they forgive their Moslem brothers for their conquest of Christian Egypt, Syria, North Africa, Israel, Jordan, Anatolia, the Balkans, Spain and Portugal, and Sicily; or for the brutal murder and forced conversion of Christians in these lands; or for the centuries of Moslem slave-taking and raiding of Christian lands in the Mediterranean and Balkans; or for the more recent massacres of Christians in Turkey, Nigeria (Biafra), or the Sudan, etc. etc.
By pointedly leaving out this forgiveness, the Christians draw attention to these Moslem crimes. How do they expect to bring Moslems to a peaceful dialogue when they are so unwilling to forgive and forget these Moslem crimes?
O.K., sarcasm off. It is clear that none of these "Christians" has read one page of history; they certainly seem to know nothing of the history of their Church.

Historically absurd, morally unacceptable, geopolitically dangerous.

Apologizing to Moslems for the Crusades is much like apologizing to Nazis for the Normandy invasion! It was a defensive act. Unlike D-Day, however, it was centuries late and not as effective as it should have been.

Admittedly, there were acts of barbarism committed during the crusades, many of which were committed against other Christians as well as Jews and Moslems. But they also need to be seen in relation to those acts committed by Moslems in spreading their violent and barbaric religion throughout the mideast and into Europe and India.

I graduated from a conservative Evangelical seminary, and am disgusted to see the name of one of our former presidents listed above. On the other hand, it does not surprise me too much, as his dhimmitude in relationship to Palestinians was made clear during his tenure there.

One expects this kind of surrender from nominal cultural ("liberal") Christians. But seeing this kind of capitulation coming from supposedly Bible-believing conservatives is repulsive.

These ignorant Dhimmis want to sit around and sing Kumbaya with those who seek to enslave them.

If this is the shape of Christian leadership today, there truely isn't much hope for the world until the Lord's return.

A terminally-longwinded and historically-absurd document.

Why did the Crusades (which these naifs now "apologize" for) happen?

How did Muslim armies end up in Jerusalem, or Persia, or Egypt, or across North Africa, or in control of Spain (al-Andalus)?

Did they chase a butterfly across the continents, and look up in surprise and decide to stay?

Or was it bloodthirsty Islamic imperialism, hegemonically expanding under the shadow of the Sword and slaughtering everyone in their path, rampaging from Arabia outward in a sequence of unholy Terror unmatched until the depredations of Atilla or Hitler?

Where is the Muslim apology for destroying all of Christendom in North Africa and the Middle East and Spain?

For forcibly converting everyone in their path, from Berber pagans to Afghani Buddhists?

And for annihilating any people who denied the Mohammedan offer of an All- Merciful "Allah"?

These "Christian" preachers are lame in brain and spirtuality.

I can just hear them addressing the Moneychangers in the Temple:

"We're so sorry to have to inconvenience you honest businesspeople who have ...turned God's house into a den of... er... entrepreneurs."

Islam doesn't need any more examples of bootlicking airheads (our government is already too full of that genus) from the infidel West.

They need people on our side who understand both their own religious traditions -and texts- as well as Islam's. Especially the Koran and Hadiths.

This batch come across like a roadshow of "The Clouds".

Floating in their own blather.

And heading for a beheading.

Did any of these foolish, naive Useful Idiots take a good, long, hard, close look at the record of the various Muslims who signed off on that 'Muslim Letter to the Christians', which is referred to with such excessive schwaermerei?

Below I list those that, so far, with the aid of google, jihadwatch and MEMRI, I have found to be of particular, sinister, interest.

One of them, Mr Allamah Shaykh Muhammad Sa'id Ramadan al-Buti, of Lebanon, wrote "Jihad in Islam: How to Understand and Practise it" (1995).

Mohamed Bechari of France took part in 'Cartoon Rage', instituting legal proceedings against France Soir for publishing the cartoons.

Mr Nihad Awad, of CAIR, is on record as supporting Hamas and its suicide murder attacks on Israel. Everyone at jihadwatch knows all about HIM.

Mohamed Salim Al-Awa, no. 13 on the list of signatories, was recorded, by MEMRI, in 1998, as declaring that Muslims must use all means possible to obtain WMDs; and that Israel must cease to exist.

Everybody here at dhimmiwatch and jihadwatch knows how 'peaceful' is Mr Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu of Turkey, who wants a reserved Muslim seat on... the Security Council of the UN (can one imagine the Pope seeking such a seat? or the Dalai Lama? or the Chief Rabbi? or a seat for the Hindus qua Hindus?).

Signatory no. 57, Mr Ali Jum'aa or Gomaa, grand mufti of Egypt, issued a fatwa declaring statues un-Islamic (25/4/06), and supports Hezbollah, a terrorist organisation.

No 64, the convert, Nuh Ha Mim Keller, translated The Reliance of the Traveller. One may reflect on what that handy manual of Islamic law has to say about the proper treatment of Jews and Christians...

no. 75, Sayyed al-sadiq al-mahdi, of the Sudan, was PM of the Sudan 1966-67 - read about him, even the Wikipedia entry sounds pretty ominous.

no. 98, Ikrima Said Sabri, of the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, only this year, October 2007, was heard totally denying that there was ever any Jewish temple on the Temple Mount. By the way, he also believes 9/11 was an Inside Job. Scholar? A man like that? If he's a 'scholar', so was Goebbels.

No 108, Mr Seyyed Hasan Shariatmadari, leader of the Iranian Natiional Republical Party...well, among other things, on 18.8.07 he declared "I hate America's crimes...I detest the Zionists, and hope the day will come when the world is free of these germs of corruption and destruction". He also called for 'a bullet in the head' of UK based Iranian exile and TV presenter, Manouchehr Fouladvand [see Dhimmiwatch 30/11/04). He has recently proclaimed Iran's imperial ambitions over Bahrain.

No. 113, Muhammad Haroon Siddiqui, fudges on Aisha's age at marriage and explains what degree of wife-beating is permissible.

No 120, Taissir Rajab Al-Tamimi, has expressed virulently anti-Israel and anti-Jewish sentiments - "the Jews are destined to be persecuted, humiliated, and tortured forever, and it is a Muslim duty to see that they reap their due...where Hitler failed, we must succeed".

No 131, Mufti Muhammad Taqi Usmani, is on record as having taught, in a recent book, that Muslims in countries like the UK should 'live peacefully..only until they gain enough power to engage in battle". He has also called for the death of Salman Rushdie.

Scholars and 'leading intellectuals', eh?

That's what I came up with from just a couple of quiet evenings on the internet.

I wouldn't trust any of these people as far as I could throw them.

As for the 'Christian' leaders who wrote the incredibly naive response - I wasn't at all surprised to see John Esposito among them, but ...deeply disappointed to see John Stott and Miroslav Volf, I would have expected them to have more discernment. Volf especially - his background is Croatian - does he know NOTHING of what the Ottoman Turks did for centuries to his Christian Catholic ancestors?

From Harvard Divinity School, aside from the inevitable and egregious Harvey Cox, there are only the predictable: Diane Eck, ever the Defender of the Faith, and William Graham, another apologist for Islam, for both were eager to do Leila Ahmed's bidding and get Omid Safi a post at the School, but sober consideration by the other faculty members stopped that -- though the sweetly sinister apologist for Islam (Sufism! Rumi! Approaching the Koran: The Lyrical Suras!) Carl Ernst at Chapel Hill, after a so-called "nationwide search," made sure Omid Safi would be hired, and others, not knowing about Islam and therefore not daring to express, or perhaps have, doubts, allowed the appointment to go through. It's a problem -- this deference to the apologists in power, by faculty members who do not teach about Islam, and yet who, in the History or related departments, may have their suspicions but are not quite sure how to express or frame them, and prefer to stay out of the fray. After all, what's giving tenure to someone in a field like Islam matter? (Answer: a great deal. Don't give in. Meddle. Meddle. Meddle.) The Fiorenza Schussler couple is there, but that's about it. Slim pickings, if you go through the Divinity School catalogue. They had much greater success among the naifs at Yale Divinity School, but I don't see Jaroslav Pelikan's name among them.

The list of signatories may even contain the names of the usefully ignorant, as well as the sinisterly apologetic. In any case, it's not much by way of representation. A list of those who didn't sign would be much more impressive. But it doesn't matter. The damage has been done. It will do boffo at the Khaleej Times, and on Al-Jazeera. It will not be taken as the kind of thing that need be responded to in kind -- there will be no similar act of contrition over the 1350-year conquest of Christian (and Jewish, and Zoroastrian, and Hindu, and Buddhist) lands, no apology for the subsequent subjugation of tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of people, Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians, Hindus, Buddhists, and others, no recognition that the Crusades, for which apology has just been made, were limited in time and in space, and were provoked by the acts of Muslims, first by the attempted razing of the Church of the Holy Sepluchre by the Caliph Hakim in Egypt in 1009, and then by many different Muslims, including Seljuk Turks, who harried and murdered Christian pilgrims in the Holy Land, which is what led to the Crusades in the first place. But who's reading Runciman or anyone else to find out about this, when it is so much more fun just to apologize? Who wants to bother finding out what Muslim conquerors did to the Christian lands and peoples of the Middle East (hint: look at what happens to Christians in Iraq today, or at what happens to the Copts in Egypt, or has happened, intermittently, to the Maronites in Lebanon and Syria) when that might get in the way, and stay the potential signer's hand?

A list of the ahistorical, that is the unlearned, who presume to take a stand on something they have insufficiently studied. Print out that list. Keep it for ready reference. It may save time later on, when you are trying to decide if you have to take someone seriously or not. See if he's on the list.

Sickening and foolish, no matter how well-intended. These forays into "let's all just get along" are stupid, naive, and pointless. These idiots don't speak for me. And is it expecting too much for Christian theologians to understand the Crusades; when, why, and where they happened? I hope they included apologies to the Jews for the Crusades. The muslims got what they had coming for what they instigated; the Jews were guilty of nothing.

I don't know about anybody else but I have absolutely NO intentions of forgiving Islam for its 300 MILLION murders of innocent humans over the past 14 centuries.

DO the world's Christian "leaders" think all this homicide will stop anytime by soon by grovelling before Muslim leaders?

This is exactly the wrong thing to do. I see several distinguished evangelical leaders on the list - people whom I respect - but in this, "they know not what they do". As Patrick Sookhdeo has said, this kind of nonsense will merely bring contempt upon Christians in the eyes of Muslims and further imperil Christian minorities living in Muslim contexts. There certainly will not be any reciprocity.

Just got Ray Ibrahim's "Al-Qaeda Reader" and I find on p21 discussion of a letter to the Saudis from Christian leaders after OBL tore into the Ulema over their "prostration" to the west by exploring peaceful relations with Christian leaders...

"When my colleagues and I wrote back to the Saudis ... and [our] second letter was published in Arabic in Al-Ayat, the pan-Arab newspaper based in London, the Saudi authorities censored the letter, preventing that issue of Al-Ayat from even entering the country.

What should this tell us?"

It should tell us that this religion and these people have a wholey different conception of religion, honesty, forgiveness, gratitude and honour than us. How long will Christian leaders continue in their naivety?

"rampaging from Arabia outward in a sequence of unholy Terror unmatched until the depredations of Atilla or Hitler?"
posted by profitsbeard

Ah, actually, Attila was a couple of centuries before Might Mo'. Perhaps you're thinking of Genghis Khan.

Organized religion is filth. I am a Chrsitan who has had more than enough of both Islam and Christianity. One is violent, the other morally stupid. To hell with both of them.

Organized religion is filth. I am a Chrsitan who has had more than enough of both Islam and Christianity. One is violent, the other morally stupid. To hell with both of them.

oops, make that "Mighty Mo'"

Didn't Don Quixote try this approach? Didn't Neville Chamberlain try it, with less deluded nobility?

How many more atrocities? How many more jihadi actions? How many more innocents slaughtered? How many more people and companies forced to defend themselves against legal jihad? How many more people leaving "mainstream" Christian denominations that no longer have any moral grounding for more conservative denominations? Same goes for the liberal Jewish groups that keep hoping against hope. Same goes for Hindus and Buddhists and every other religious or secular group that keeps fantasizing that by being nice and forgiving. How much more before all the dhimmis get it?

Arafat himself made big about his gun in one hand and olive branch in the other. It made him a superstar. He knew the world better than these dhimmis. He played the olive branch for us, while playing the gun for the Arab world (with a nice obvious threat to everyone else to boot). So he could threaten us, and keep up his bona fides with the Arab world, while convincing the brain-dead and knowingly "duped" dhimmis that he really wanted peace. He was a brilliant terrorist.

It's the gun - raw strength - that the Islamic world respects. They view olive branches - peace, or more precisely in this case, unconditional capitulation - as just something to crush or blow up.

We should learn from Arafat's tactics. We should offer an olive branch (and unlike Arafat we can do so sincerely, because that's what we are about), but only if we make it clear that we have a gun on the other hand.

Governments and churches don't speak for me. One thing is those creatures, and another, is the common man/woman, we are the Salt of the Earth.

I'm with We, THE People.

Let's see what happens when the final showdown comes, and We finally stop muttering in the pubs into our beer, and roll up our sleeves, and say, Enough is Enough."

TPTB can NEVER kill us. We are the IMMORTALS. We adhere to Freedom and Liberty!

You can't ask forgiveness from evil.

Islam has proven over and over again it is evil.

"Historically absurd, morally unacceptable, geopolitically dangerous."

Roger that. A more practical bit of theology may be found in Psalm 144.

Dear Islamists and CAIR proxies,

Please don't kill us or sue us. We love you. We have hurt you. We know that. We are bad, evil and weak people. Please conquer us. We deserve it. Just don't kill us. If you enslave our children, please let them serve benign masters. Please don't behead us. We are afraid of pain. If you must kill us, please consider killing anyone but me first. If you must kill me, please do it gently with love - how about a kiss and cyanide capsule. It worked for Himmler and Adolf. We find it hard to love them, but if it will make you happy, we will, and we only ask that you treat us with the same humanity they showed toward others and themselves. No matter how you choose to kill us - and we know we deserve it - please just do it in a caring and loving manner. We don't like pain. Remember, that we love you and believe in you. Please love us enough to destroy us in a loving way.

Lovingly yours,

Christian Dhimmis

ebonystone-

Right you are about timelines.

Was thinking of Genghis (whose heirs converted to Islam, ironically, after his hordes humbled the Muslim power structure), not his earlier model in mayhem, Atilla.

the cusades never would have happen but for MUSLIMS raiding pillgram caravans for booty and slaves so the ones that should be apologizing are the muslims and these church leaders should be demanding the muslims apologize

"love of God and love of neighbour"

.. is the christian tenet. Full stop.

The islamic tenets are submission and zakat. The latter mainly is used to finance jihad.

Love of God is totally different from submission to a god. Love of neighbour is not exactly the same as killing him.

No, there is no common ground.

Christians are obliged to study the world as the world itself is a revelation of God - this directly leads to science and art. Muslims are obliged to call a sword a plough. This leads nowhere.

(btw I am an atheist)

Battle_of_Tours

I don't think Islam is evil. I rather think that Islam is a lie. It is the lie that says that evil is good.

Easy to identify the apostate Christian churches with this letter.

Nice to see all the leftists, weak tea Christians, new agers and other assorted ignoramuses supplicate themselves before the religion of death.

Fools. Muslims are not like us and never will be.

These ministers and priests have had too many years of living the good life. Too many years of isolation from reality and a arrogance born of intellectual laziness. Perhaps they believe the pablum they've fed their students and congragations as well.

Whatever the cause these people are morally bankrupt and intellectually deficient.

The devil does indeed wear the clerics collar.

The letter is a disgusting spectacle.

What Christians consider muslim apologists Diana Eck and John Esposito to be "Christian leaders"?

Unfortunately, there are many sanctimonious fools on that list, who are, more or less, "Christian leaders", (e.g. Robert Schuller). Current and former products (e.g Frederick Streets) of Yale Divinity School would bring shame on that institution, except that "it" is shameless. I wonder what the readers of Khaleej Times make of the signature of Frederick Streets, (currently a chaplain) of Yeshiva University (!) ?

When I read the New Testament, I find that the Jews were trying to kill the Christians. The Christian reponse was:

* They prayed for boldness
* They tried even harder to convert the Jews
* They forgave the Jews

However, there was NEVER an instance of the Christians trying to find common ground with the Jews, unless it was around faith in Jesus Christ as the Messiah.

Today, it is the Muslims who are killing the Christians. Therefore, it is quite strange that so many Christian leaders are coming, hat in hand, to find common ground with the enemies of the faith.

One wonders if these Christian leaders have ever really studied the New Testament; and if so, why don't they obey it?

“Forgive them; for they do not know what they are doing.

In the War of Ideas: Jihadism vs Democracy, Walid Phares shows how the west has been subjected to a process of 'delegitimization' at the hands of its self-loathing left-wing academics and wahhabi-funded schools of middle east studies. This letter demonstates just how successful this process has been.

well in one sense they (the christian leaders) have cleared the way for the muslims to be exactly like they are. chances are the islamic world will show their true colors when they spit in the christian leaders' collective faces by demanding more than the apology that was so not deserved in this case.

i know that kumbaya attitudes will only get you killed when dealing with an ideology that believes "war is deceit", so I truly hope this token gesture does not facilitate false hopes in what is left of western clergy.

islam, the loud mouthed bully of religions... apologize for me saying that, too!

one way of looking at this letter could be from a "don't blame us, we did our part" perspective? christian-bashing being all the rage just about everywhere on earth right now, possibly the people involved want to clear their spiritual ledgers, although they are sure to not get any positive feedback from it. apologize first, its doesnt cost a thing... but after you apologize, after you attempt to emulate the Christ, prepare for all out war!

for the record, apologies do not end wars. especially not 1400 year old wars with extremely ignorant and violent misanthropes.

To ease evaluation of list here is the list of signers in alphabetical order of surnames (surnames first):

Accad Martin, Academic Dean, Arab Baptist Theological Seminary (Lebanon)

Alexander Scott C., Director, Catholic-Muslim Studies, Catholic Theological Union

Allen Roger, Chair, Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, University of Pennsylvania

Anderson Leith, President, National Association of Evangelicals

Attridge *Harold W., Dean and Lillian Claus Professor of New Testament, Yale Divinity School

B?wering Gerhard, Yale University

Bakke Ray, Convening Chair, Evangelicals for Middle East Understanding

Ballin Camillo, Bishop, Vicar Apostolic of Kuwait (Roman Catholic)

Beisner Barry, Bishop, Episcopal Diocese of Northern California

Bertuzzi Federico, President, PM Internacional, Latin America

Beverley James A., Tyndale Seminary, Canada

Bonk Jonathan, Executive Director, Overseas Ministries Study Center

Britton Joseph, Dean, Berkeley Divinity School at Yale

Buchanan John M., Editor/Publisher, The Christian Century

Burnett Joe Goodwin, Bishop, Episcopal Diocese of Nebraska

C?rdenas Juan Carlos, Instituto Iberoamericano de Estudios Transculturales, Spain

Candler Samuel G., Dean, Cathedral of St. Philip, Atlanta

Castleberry Joseph, President, Northwest University Colin Chapman, Author

Cizik Richard, Vice President, National Association of Evangelicals

Constantineanu Corneliu, Dean, Evangelical Theological Seminary, Croatia

Cooley Robert E., President Emeritus, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Harvey Cox, Harvard Divinity School

Cumming *Joseph, Director of the Reconciliation Program, Yale Center for Faith and Culture, Yale Divinity School

D’Alton John, President, Melbourne Institute for Orthodox Christian Studies, Australia

Delbecq Andr?, University of Santa Clara Keith DeRose, Yale University

Duncan Andr?s Alonso, CEO, Latinoamerica Global, A.C.

Eck Diana L., Harvard University

Edwards Mark U., Jr., Senior Advisor to the Dean, Harvard Divinity School

Ekstrom Bertil, Executive Director, Mission Commission, World Evangelical Alliance

Esposito John, Director Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian
Understanding, Georgetown University

Fiorenza Elizabeth Sch?ssler, Harvard Divinity School

Fiorenza Francis Sch?ssler, Harvard Divinity School

Ford David, Regius Professor of Divinity, Cambridge University

George Timothy, Dean, Beeson Divinity School, Samford University

Goizueta Roberto S., Boston College Bruce Gordon, University of St. Andrews

Graham William A., Dean, Harvard Divinity School

Green Lynn, International Chairman, YWAM

Griffel Frank, Yale University

Gulick Edwin F., Jr., Bishop, Episcopal Diocese of Kentucky

Gushee David P., President, Evangelicals for Human Rights

Gustafson Kim B., President, Common Ground

Haddad Elie, Provost, Arab Baptist Theological Seminary, Lebanon

Hadsell Heidi, President, Hartford Seminary

Hallisey L. Ann, Hallisey Consulting and Counseling

Hanson Paul D., Harvard Divinity School

Heim David, Executive Editor, The Christian Century

Hjelm Norman A., National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA, retired

Holladay Carl R., Candler School of Theology, Emory University

Hough Joseph, President, Union Theological Seminary, NY

Hybels Bill, Founder and Senior Pastor, Willow Creek Community Church

Jabbour Nabeel T., Consultant, Professor, Colorado

Johnston Shannon Sherwood, Bishop Coadjutor, Episcopal Diocese of Virginia

Jones David Colin, Bishop Suffragan, Episcopal Diocese of Virginia

Jones Stanton L., Provost, Wheaton College, IL

Jones Tony, National Coordinator, Emergent Village

Kassis Riad A., Theologian, Author, Consultant

Knitter Paul, Union Theological Seminary, NY

Kohl Manfred W., Vice President of Overseas Council International, USA

Kowalski James A., Dean, Cathedral of Saint John the Divine, NY

Kugler Sharon, University Chaplain, Yale University

Kuzmic Peter, President, Evangelical Theological Faculty Osijek, Croatia

Lader Linda LeSourd, President, Renaissance Institute

Lee Peter J., Bishop, Episcopal Diocese of Virginia

Lewis Tim, President, William Carey Int’l University

Lindner John B., Yale Divinity School

Litfin Duane, President, Wheaton College

Livingstone Greg, Founder, Frontiers

Lobe Albert C., Interim Executive Director, Mennonite Central Committee

Love Rick, International Director, Frontiers

Magnuson Douglas, Bethel University

Maiden Peter, International Coordinator, OM

Manastireanu Danut, World Vision International, Iasi, Romania

Masback Harold, III, Senior Minister, The Congregational Church of New Canaan, New Canaan, CT

McCoid Donald M., Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

McConnell C. Douglas, Dean, School of Intercultural Studies, Fuller Theological Seminary

McCurry Don, President, Ministries to Muslims

McLaren Brian D., Author, Speaker, Activist

McVey Kathleen E., Princeton Theological Seminary

Moore Steve, President and CEO, The Mission Exchange (formerly EFMA)

Morgan Douglas, Director, Adventist Peace Fellowship

Mouw Richard, President, Fuller Theological Seminary

Munayer Salim J., Academic Dean, Bethlehem Bible College, Jerusalem

Nathan Rich, Senior Pastor, Vineyard Church of Columbus

Neff David, Editor in Chief and Vice-President, Christianity Today Media Group

Negrov Alexander, President, St. Petersburg Christian University, Russia

Osmer Richard R., Princeton Theological Seminary

Packard George E., Bishop Suffragan for Chaplaincies of the Episcopal Church

Parsons Greg H., General Director, U.S. Center for World Mission

Pennoyer Doug, Dean, School of Intercultural Studies, Biola University

Petersen Douglas, Vanguard University of Southern California

Promey Sally, Yale Divinity School

Rausch Thomas P., S.J., Loyola Marymount University

Reed David A., Wycliffe College, University of Toronto

Rees Neil, International Director, World Horizons

Robeck Cecil M., Jr., Fuller Theological Seminary

Rogers Leonard, Executive Director, Evangelicals for Middle East Understanding

Rood Judith Mendelsohn, Biola University

Sachs William L., Director, Center for Reconciliation and Mission, Richmond

Sanneh Lamin, Yale Divinity School

Saperstein Andrew, Yale Center for Faith and Culture

Schuller Robert, Founder, Crystal Cathedral and Hour of Power

Schweiker William, University of Chicago

Senior Donald, C.P., President, Catholic Theological Union, Chicago

Seow C. L., Princeton Theological Seminary

Shehadeh Imad Nicola, President, Jordan Evangelical Theological Seminary

Shenk David W. and K. Grace, Eastern Mennonite Missions

Shuster Marguerite, Fuller Theological Seminary

Stackhouse John G., Jr., Regent College, Vancouver

Stassen Glen, Fuller Theological Seminary

Stephanous Andrea Zaki, Vice President, Protestant Church in Egypt

Stone Wilbur P., Bethel University, MN

Stott John, Rector Emeritus, All Souls Church, London

Streets Frederick J., Yeshiva University

Taylor William, Global Ambassador, World Evangelical Alliance

Thomas John, President and General Minister, United Church of Christ

Torrance Iain, President, Princeton Theological Seminary

Townes *Emilie M., Andrew Mellon Professor of African American Religion and Theology, Yale Divinity School, and President-elect of the American Academy of Religion

Treneer Michael W., International President, The Navigators, CO

Tunnicliffe Geoff, International Director, World Evangelical Alliance

Verwer George, Founder and former International Director, OM

Vogelaar Harold, Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago

Volf *Miroslav, Founder and Director of the Yale Center for Faith and Culture
,
Waggoner Berten A., National Director, Association of Vineyard Churches

Wallis Jim, President, Sojourners

Warren Rick, Founder and Senior Pastor, Saddleback Church, and The Purpose Driven Life, Lake Forest, CA J.

Wilson Robert R., Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Yale Divinity School Nicholas Wolterstorff, University of Virginia

Woodberry Dudley, Dean Emeritus, Fuller School of International Studies, Fuller Theological Seminary Christopher

Wright Henry B. Professor of Theology, Yale Divinity School

Wright J.H., International Director, Langham Partnership, London

Yogarajah Godfrey, General Secretary, Evangelical Fellowship in Asia Community Council of the Sisters of the Precious Blood, Dayton, OH.

Yonggi Cho David, Founder and Senior Pastor, Yoido Full Gospel Church, Seoul, Korea

“Forgive them; for they do not know what they are doing.

Posted by: Joe Schmoe USA at November 27, 2007 3:02 AM

Don't forgive them. They know what they are doing.
It's called treason.

Whats to stop these islamic recepients of this christian letter from rearranging the wording and taking it to the people of their countries to incite even more hatred of christians.

Let’s look at the timeline:

630 Two years before Muhammad’s death of a fever, he launches the Tabuk Crusades, in which he led 30,000 jihadists against the Byzantine Christians. He had heard a report that a huge army had amassed to attack Arabia, but the report turned out to be a false rumor. The Byzantine army never materialized. He turned around and went home, but not before extracting ‘agreements’ from northern tribes. They could enjoy the ‘privilege’ of living under Islamic ‘protection’ (read: not be attacked by Islam), if they paid a tax (jizya).

This tax sets the stage for Muhammad’s and the later Caliphs’ policies. If the attacked city or region did not want to convert to Islam, then they paid a jizya tax. If they converted, then they paid a zakat tax. Either way, money flowed back to the Islamic treasury in Arabia or to the local Muslim governor.

632—634 Under the Caliphate of Abu Bakr the Muslim Crusaders reconquer and sometimes conquer for the first time the polytheists of Arabia. These Arab polytheists had to convert to Islam or die. They did not have the choice of remaining in their faith and paying a tax. Islam does not allow for religious freedom.

633 The Muslim Crusaders, led by Khalid al—Walid, a superior but bloodthirsty military commander, whom Muhammad nicknamed the Sword of Allah for his ferocity in battle (Tabari, 8:158 / 1616—17), conquer the city of Ullays along the Euphrates River (in today’s Iraq). Khalid captures and beheads so many that a nearby canal, into which the blood flowed, was called Blood Canal (Tabari 11:24 / 2034—35).

634 At the Battle of Yarmuk in Syria the Muslim Crusaders defeat the Byzantines. Today Osama bin Laden draws inspiration from the defeat, and especially from an anecdote about Khalid al—Walid. An unnamed Muslim remarks: ‘The Romans are so numerous and the Muslims so few.’ To this Khalid retorts: ‘How few are the Romans, and how many the Muslims! Armies become numerous only with victory and few only with defeat, not by the number of men. By God, I would love it . . . if the enemy were twice as many’ (Tabari, 11:94 / 2095). Osama bin Ladin quotes Khalid and says that his fighters love death more than we in the West love life. This philosophy of death probably comes from a verse like Sura 2:96. Muhammad assesses the Jews: ‘[Prophet], you are sure to find them [the Jews] clinging to life more eagerly than any other people, even polytheists’ (MAS Abdel Haleem, The Qur’an, Oxford UP, 2004; first insertion in brackets is Haleem’s; the second mine).

634—644 The Caliphate of Umar ibn al—Khattab, who is regarded as particularly brutal.

635 Muslim Crusaders besiege and conquer of Damascus

636 Muslim Crusaders defeat Byzantines decisively at Battle of Yarmuk.

637 Muslim Crusaders conquer Iraq at the Battle of al—Qadisiyyah (some date it in 635 or 636)

638 Muslim Crusaders conquer and annex Jerusalem, taking it from the Byzantines.

638—650 Muslim Crusaders conquer Iran, except along Caspian Sea.

639—642 Muslim Crusaders conquer Egypt.

641 Muslim Crusaders control Syria and Palestine.

643—707 Muslim Crusaders conquer North Africa.

644 Caliph Umar is assassinated by a Persian prisoner of war; Uthman ibn Affan is elected third Caliph, who is regarded by many Muslims as gentler than Umar.

644—650 Muslim Crusaders conquer Cyprus, Tripoli in North Africa, and establish Islamic rule in Iran, Afghanistan, and Sind.

656 Caliph Uthman is assassinated by disgruntled Muslim soldiers; Ali ibn Abi Talib, son—in—law and cousin to Muhammad, who married the prophet’s daughter Fatima through his first wife Khadija, is set up as Caliph.

656 Battle of the Camel, in which Aisha, Muhammad’s wife, leads a rebellion against Ali for not avenging Uthman’s assassination. Ali’s partisans win.

657 Battle of Siffin between Ali and Muslim governor of Jerusalem, arbitration goes against Ali

661 Murder of Ali by an extremist; Ali’s supporters acclaim his son Hasan as next Caliph, but he comes to an agreement with Muawiyyah I and retires to Medina.

661—680 the Caliphate of Muawiyyah I. He founds Umayyid dynasty and moves capital from Medina to Damascus

673—678 Arabs besiege Constantinople, capital of Byzantine Empire

680 Massacre of Hussein (Muhammad’s grandson), his family, and his supporters in Karbala, Iraq.

691 Dome of the Rock is completed in Jerusalem, only six decades after Muhammad’s death.

705 Abd al—Malik restores Umayyad rule.

710—713 Muslim Crusaders conquer the lower Indus Valley.

711—713 Muslim Crusaders conquer Spain and impose the kingdom of Andalus. This article recounts how Muslims today still grieve over their expulsion 700 years later. They seem to believe that the land belonged to them in the first place.

719 Cordova, Spain, becomes seat of Arab governor

732 The Muslim Crusaders stopped at the Battle of Poitiers; that is, Franks (France) halt Arab advance

749 The Abbasids conquer Kufah and overthrow Umayyids

756 Foundation of Umayyid amirate in Cordova, Spain, setting up an independent kingdom from Abbasids

762 Foundation of Baghdad

785 Foundation of the Great Mosque of Cordova

789 Rise of Idrisid amirs (Muslim Crusaders) in Morocco; foundation of Fez; Christoforos, a Muslim who converted to Christianity, is executed.

800 Autonomous Aghlabid dynasty (Muslim Crusaders) in Tunisia

807 Caliph Harun al—Rashid orders the destruction of non—Muslim prayer houses and of the church of Mary Magdalene in Jerusalem

809 Aghlabids (Muslim Crusaders) conquer Sardinia, Italy

813 Christians in Palestine are attacked; many flee the country

831 Muslim Crusaders capture Palermo, Italy; raids in Southern Italy

850 Caliph al—Matawakkil orders the destruction of non—Muslim houses of prayer

855 Revolt of the Christians of Hims (Syria)

837—901 Aghlabids (Muslim Crusaders) conquer Sicily, raid Corsica, Italy, France

869—883 Revolt of black slaves in Iraq

909 Rise of the Fatimid Caliphate in Tunisia; these Muslim Crusaders occupy Sicily, Sardinia

928—969 Byzantine military revival, they retake old territories, such as Cyprus (964) and Tarsus (969)

937 The Ikhshid, a particularly harsh Muslim ruler, writes to Emperor Romanus, boasting of his control over the holy places

937 The Church of the Resurrection (known as Church of Holy Sepulcher in Latin West) is burned down by Muslims; more churches in Jerusalem are attacked

960 Conversion of Qarakhanid Turks to Islam

966 Anti—Christian riots in Jerusalem

969 Fatimids (Muslim Crusaders) conquer Egypt and found Cairo

c. 970 Seljuks enter conquered Islamic territories from the East

973 Israel and southern Syria are again conquered by the Fatimids

1003 First persecutions by al—Hakim; the Church of St. Mark in Fustat, Egypt, is destroyed

1009 Destruction of the Church of the Resurrection by al—Hakim (see 937)

1012 Beginning of al—Hakim’s oppressive decrees against Jews and Christians

1015 Earthquake in Palestine; the dome of the Dome of the Rock collapses

1031 Collapse of Umayyid Caliphate and establishment of 15 minor independent dynasties throughout Muslim Andalus

1048 Reconstruction of the Church of the Resurrection completed

1050 Creation of Almoravid (Muslim Crusaders) movement in Mauretania; Almoravids (aka Murabitun) are coalition of western Saharan Berbers; followers of Islam, focusing on the Quran, the hadith, and Maliki law.

1055 Seljuk Prince Tughrul enters Baghdad, consolidation of the Seljuk Sultanate

1055 Confiscation of property of Church of the Resurrection

1071 Battle of Manzikert, Seljuk Turks (Muslim Crusaders) defeat Byzantines and occupy much of Anatolia

1071 Turks (Muslim Crusaders) invade Palestine

1073 Conquest of Jerusalem by Turks (Muslim Crusaders)

1075 Seljuks (Muslim Crusaders) capture Nicea (Iznik) and make it their capital in Anatolia

1076 Almoravids (Muslim Crusaders) (see 1050) conquer western Ghana

1085 Toledo is taken back by Christian armies

1086 Almoravids (Muslim Crusaders) (see 1050) send help to Andalus, Battle of Zallaca

1090—1091 Almoravids (Muslim Crusaders) occupy all of Andalus except Saragossa and Balearic Islands

1094 Byzantine emperor Alexius Comnenus I asks western Christendom for help against Seljuk invasions of his territory; Seljuks are Muslim Turkish family of eastern origins; see 970

1095 Pope Urban II preaches first Crusade; they capture Jerusalem in 1099

So it is only after all of the Islamic aggressive invasions that Western Christendom launches its first Crusades.
=============================

According to K.S. Lal, the Muslims slaughtered 80 million Hindus and Buddhists when Islam invaded India.

http://www.bharatvani.org/books/tlmr/

(the following paragraph was more or less copied from a post by a proud Hindu on Jihad Watch)

“Islam had an enormous cultural effect on India. Not many realize the origins of the Hindu practice of “Johar” or “Sacrifice” started in medieval times, when Muslim armies were
conquering Hindu India. The Muslims would lay siege to forts/cities and when the worn out Hindu soldiers came out to surrender - they would all be brutally massacred, followed by the mass rape & forcible conversion to Islam of all remaining Hindu women.
This may have been customary Islamic tradition, which they practiced in all lands they conquered.
However, physical violence against and denigration of womanhood in this manner was considered the most intolerable of all insults in Hindu civilization.
Therefore, the Hindu women would pray to God & commit collective suicide before their men left for battle - to avoid the humiliation of rape and forcible conversion to Islam.
But, why burn themselves, you may ask?
Why not just kill oneself in a less gruesome fashion, such as consuming poison or something similar?
Well, the Hindus discovered to their horror that the Muslims were such perverts that they even
indulged in necrophilia. Therefore, the supreme sacrifice was to be undertaken to protect chastity and honor at all costs.
This tradition was still relevant for the protection of Hindu widows as long as Muslim rule lasted in India, i.e. until the establishment of British rule, who were quite barbaric themselves, but infinitely better than the Muslims.”

Add to the toll in India the enormous number of people slaughtered in Egpypt, North Africa, Spain, Turkey, Armenia, the Balkans, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran and Iraq (in fact virtually everywhere Islam has spread), I’ve seen estimates that 250,000,000 or more people have been killed in accordance with the precepts laid out in the Qur’an.

The borders of Islam are constantly bloody

They forgot to apologize for the Reconquista of Spain, Lepanto, Victory in the Battle of Vienna 1683, US Navy's action against Barbary Pirates, 1948 UN's resolution recogizing Israel, tsunami, global warming and the recent Liverpool soccer team's 8:0 victory over Turks.

Please, feel free to add to the list if I forgot something.

Christianity has much in common with both Marxism and Islam...particularly its utopian ideal. But this ideal in the Christian ethos expresses itself not in the supremacism of the latter two, but in a kind of moral masochism...where one's own sins are to be emphasized at the expense of all else.

It's very similar to the arguments of American Leftists reciting the litany of historical sins perpetrated by their country...who - when confronted with the comparable sins of other peoples - reply that their own quest for moral redemption begins and ends with the behavior of America and that besides, they're in no position to judge others.

It might sound philosophically reasonable; an extension of the concept of personal responsibility. But we're not talking about individuals here, we're talking about nation-states. In the end, consciously or not, these folks are waging war upon their own country, holding it up to standards they don't apply to others, and arbitrarily confining their pursuit of "morality" - a concept which in its essence should always have universal application.

America has perpetrated its share of historical sins. We should engage in their honest exposition (and our universities do so, with zeal). But giving other nations and cultures a pass under the guise of "inclusiveness" is a form of moral evasion that will inevitably result in a convoluted vision of self-hatred against one's own country.

Thanks but no thanks.

Is an email campaign in order?

"...we ask forgiveness of the All-Merciful One..."

Notice how they didn't say "God".

It sounds like these "Christians" start their letter by asking for Allah's forgiveness.

This tells me all I need to know about the letter and its writers.

Christians don't go to Allah to seek forgiveness.

"We applaud that A Common Word Between Us and You stresses so insistently the unique devotion to one God, indeed the love of God, as the primary duty of every believer."

Don't they understand that the Muslim "one god" excludes the Christian trinity? Don't they know what "Allah" said about people who believe that God has a Son?

They're building this "peace" on "shifting sand".

Gee, we Jews never got such a letter of apology from Christians!!

What a stupid, stupid, stupid thing for these 'Christian leaders' to have done!! They have taken the first step towards dhimmitude!!

When I read the New Testament, I find that the Jews were trying to kill the Christians.

Posted by: PersonOfTheBook at November 27, 2007 2:29 AM


Whoa! Other than Jesus and Stephen, who were both Jewish BTW, what are you referring to?
The Christian reponse was:

* They prayed for boldness
* They tried even harder to convert the Jews
* They forgave the Jews


Just add boiling oil.

Correction to my previous email: as much as a crowd of Jews had no pity on Jesus, it was the Roman authorities who killed him.

They do not speak for the everyday Joe or Mary Christian or for me.

I have noticed that most of the Christian leaders who signed this doucument are not conservitive or of traditional Christian backround. Those Christians know FULL WELL the truth about how Christian believers were and still are treated under Muslim rule.

bigcatgirl13106:

"They do not speak for the everyday Joe or Mary Christian or for me."

Nor do these useful idiots speak for Christ Himself as He never ever once pandered to evil as these disgusting appeasers seem so adapt at doing.

Here is a full page ad with the same names of these so-called Christian leaders. I cannot help but think in these last days of the Christian liturgical calander year, the new liturgical calander year starts this Sunday with Advent, what Our Blessed Lord said about the coming of false prophets.

http://www.acommonword.com/lib/downloads/fullpageadbold18.pdf

descendantofacrusader,

"Nor do these useful idiots speak for Christ Himself as He never ever once pandered to evil as these disgusting appeasers seem so adapt at doing."

These leaders forget about the warnings given by Jesus about false prophets coming, claiming to do things in His name.

Shy Guy

"As much as a crowd of Jews had no pity on Jesus, it was the Roman authorities who killed him."

True, but it was a pragmatic political act. The Jews could not execute anyone without clearing it with the Roman governor. Pilate is supposed to have said, "I am innocent of the blood of this just man"

Anyway what the hell does it matter now when our muslim citizens are aiming to blow the a--- off the lot of us?

As for this apology why don’t they just have every kuffur buy tee shirts saying “Sorry Mohammed, please take my country and crap on my head”. To show true repentance they could donate to proceeds to OBL.

Christian leaders ask for Muslim forgiveness

And there's nothing essentially wrong with such a gesture. . .

I had to walk away from the computer after reading those words - written by the author of this website and several books like "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam )and the Crusades)" as well as "The Truth about Muhammed, Founder of the World's most Intolerant Religion" and "Religion of Peace? Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn't".


Nothing essentially wrong with such a gesture??

I'll need something far stronger than what is offered at the bar to swallow that.

These confused ignorant dhimmified souls need to keep their contrition solemn and personal and spare us this circus act.

They don't, cannot and will never speak for me.

Those of you who put your money into the collection plate on Sunday are financing your own destruction.

Is an email campaign in order?

Posted by: Elric66

-----------------------

Do what you think is right. As for me, I'll never -never again ask approval from someone - nor go to a leader. That's a mistake that's been done in the past. Look the Chinese under Mao, the Rus under Stalin, the Afr.-Amers. were left high and dry when they depended on MLK.

And the lesson is...WE ARE OUR OWN LEADERS!

Pelayo:
“Those of you who put your money into the collection plate on Sunday are financing your own destruction.”

Novel idea that except for one thing: these signing appeasers are ‘Christian’ in name only otherwise they would not equate islam with either ‘Abrahamic faith” or the “All-Merciful One”. Not the same at all, therefore: I am not in the least concerned about my churches ‘collection plate’ or what it may finance.

Calling all Lutherans, Episcpalians, and Church of Christ Members. These are your guys:

Gulick Edwin F., Jr., Bishop, Episcopal Diocese of Kentucky
Hjelm Norman A., National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA, retired
Johnston Shannon Sherwood, Bishop Coadjutor, Episcopal Diocese of Virginia
Jones David Colin, Bishop Suffragan, Episcopal Diocese of Virginia
Lee Peter J., Bishop, Episcopal Diocese of Virginia
McCoid Donald M., Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
Packard George E., Bishop Suffragan for Chaplaincies of the Episcopal Church
Thomas John, President and General Minister, United Church of Christ
Vogelaar Harold, Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago

This is stupid. These "Christian" "leaders" do not speak for me. I didn't get a letter or a phone call or an email asking me what I thought of this insipid surrender missive.

Among the several offenses is the assertion that there have been excesses in the war on terror. The only excess in the war on terror is we've given them waaaay too much time and been waaaay too nice in not having killed enough Islamist thugs.

Some "Christian" "leader" went to all the trouble to create the stupid 'art' at the link below.

http://www.thinkchristian.net/index.php/2007/11/15/feet-washing/#comment-26301

All these surrender monkeys need to pack up their good will and groveling and waddle on over to the Middle East and there capitulate in their double-knit cowardice.

Descendantofacrusader, what a coincidence; while I was preparing that short list, you made your comment.

I don't care what they are in name only, they are leaders, self appointed or otherwise, and they have delivered a very serious message of surrender.

"I am not in the least concerned about my churches ‘collection plate’ or what it may finance." Really?

Ironic, considering that the Christian churches that are growing are those churches that DO NOT COMPRIMISE WITH THE WORLD, not the so-called progressive churches.

Pelayo:
It seems obvious to me that your ‘objection’ is based more on your skepticism of‘ ‘Christianity’ as a whole rather than those who may, in this particular case, hide beneath its mantle no matter what they chose call themselves. I simply was trying to make that distinction and thus I can tithe with a clear conscience where as you apparently are not able to. Am I wrong, my friend? Better to change ‘the dirty water’ rather than ‘throw the whole baby out’ – a big distinction indeed!

Hmmm. Aren't Christians supposed to pray for peace, not pay for peace? This letter will soon be shown to be cheap currency indeed.

BTW TeachESL, the last pope, John Paul II, in his trip to Israel publicly apologized for Catholic persecutions of the Jews through the centuries and placed a letter in the West Wall requesting forgiveness for such deeds.

Apparently, in their rush to appear morally superior and "evolved", these "Christian" leaders and academics did not have enough common sense to wonder to themselves why Pope Benedict and the Orthodox leaders didn't respond to this letter.

Maybe because it's a ruse and not a legitimate action to respond to earnestly?

However, the Islamic scholars will get as much out of this as they can knowing that the big fish that they addressed the letter to aren't biting. They will use it to sow dissent amongst the Christians in the West and try to divide us between those who want to "work" with Islam as 2 of the (BS!) Abrahaimic faiths for peace in the world and those Christian leaders who are hell bent on creating a global religious war between Christians and Muslims.

Remember all, we live in a strange time where white is black and black is white. Those who want war and submission will be perceived as those who are fighting for peace. And those who believe in peace with your fellow man will be seen as angling for war.

Best to put on your thinking caps, people.

GuardianofPeaceandJustice,

"Apparently, in their rush to appear morally superior and "evolved", these "Christian" leaders and academics did not have enough common sense to wonder to themselves why Pope Benedict and the Orthodox leaders didn't respond to this letter.

Maybe because it's a ruse and not a legitimate action to respond to earnestly?"

It could be because the leaders of the larger churches know in TRUTH what is going on in the countries in which Muslims are in majority with their Christian minorities.

Descendantofacrusader, I am pleased that you can call these signatories "Christians in name only" and absolve yourself of all responsibility. I don't believe it's that easy.

You don't care what you demomination does with that money; even if they use it to prepare letters such as the subject of this thread?

I do not believe that one has to give money to a church to be a good Christian; there are other deserving charities. The last church I attended had a full time music director who was paid more than my hard-working father earned. My aversion is not to Christianity; it is to these mega-churches that have budgets larger than some municipalities.

what a betrayal of all things Christian

these people are sick

There has to be some significance to the fact that most of the signatories were not denominational leaders. Most of those who signed were academics or people involved in fellowships or some kind of other non-denominational religious endeavor. (The pointy headed types)

As I posted earlier, there were only nine people whom I could clearly associate with a single Christian denomination.

What would be interesting to know is the names of those who were invited to participate but refused.

the signifigance of this, is the demonstration of the profound ignorance of the signatories

the arabs/bedouin from Arabia conquered Israel, Babylon, Assyria and Persia, displaced the indiginous Jews, Christinans and Zoroastrians

and somehow, have convinced history that the arabs and muslim culture BELONGS in the middle east, to the exclusion of all others

the Crusades were an attempt to protect the Christians from the oppressive violence and brutality of the muslim/arab conquerers

what the hell are these people apologizing for?

I think the letter is a good thing. Certainly many Christians have hurt many Muslims. People who say they don't sin are liars. The same statement that many Christians have hurt many Hindus is also correct. The letter does not specify which hurts and which Muslims.

I think the letter is also in keeping with Christian ethics and ideals. We must attempt offers of real peace and real reconciliation, since the God of the Jews has reconciled with us through the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross.

I hope the letter works, however I doubt it because Islam is a false religion and Muslims are, like most of humanity, "in love with the darkness". Muslims have submitted to a false god and a false prophet, and therefore their view of reality is extremely distorted. Sure, there is still some goodness expressed in Islam, but its false teachings will constantly and frustratingly lead Muslims into violence and futility. This is seen throughout the globe and through history. Islam is a dead end for humanity.

What I would also hope that would follow this letter is a challenge to the evil committed by Islam. Both actively through support for Jihad, but more importantly for what is being "left undone". Muslims around the world are not condemning Jihadism or fighting the underlying theology. Will Christian leaders have the courage to confront Islam. This too is a form of love, since Jesus said he came to bring a sword. Not the sword of violence (all commentaries agree on this), but rather the sword of truth (In Revelation, the sword comes from his mouth). Blessings on Mr. Spencer for being one of the few, who peaceably is using the sword of truth to slay the legions of Muslim lies.

In time, Christian leaders will understand what Islam is, and so will secularists around the world. It is then globally humanity will answer the evil that is Islam.

the cusades never would have happen but for MUSLIMS raiding pillgram caravans for booty and slaves so the ones that should be apologizing are the muslims and these church leaders should be demanding the muslims apologize BUT THEY ARE BEING USEFULL DHIMMI

There should be no apologizing from any Christians until the Muslims start first, since it was from the Muslim side that the troubles started.

Pelayo,

I’m sorry that you seem to resent the fact the song leader of the Christian church you once attended made more money than your father but that, unfortunately, has absolutely nothing to do with anything. What are you trying to say: that your father worked harder that the song leader and therefore deserved more money? What? That’s a tenuous analogy to at the very least and certainly does not absolve a sincere Christian church member from tithing which, by the way, is biblically ordained. No matter as I don’t think you want to be confused with such subtleties’ I just think it is unfair to make generalizations about all Christians and cynical notions of just how tithes are used. Respectfully: those are my opinions on your initial generalization and, other than that, I suppose that you can make things as difficult or complicated as you wish.

I pray that the time will come soon when these sorry clowns will have a reason to apologize for our having removed the Mohammedans from the West.

I don't resent that music director's salary; I am a firm believer in supply and demand determining pay rates. I do believe that organized churches are becoming businesses instead of places of worship. Do you think a church should attract members by advertising the hiring of a new music director in a half page ad in the newspaper? My former church did. The part about the director's pay was just part of the story that caused several members to leave.

Cynical? You bet - read that letter again.

As I was reading through this who's who list of mostly liberal Protestant ministers (I could find only two Catholics and one self-labelled "Orthodox") I wondered what qualified any of them to speak on this subject.

For instance, they referred to Muhammed as a "prophet" thus separating themselves from Christianity altogether. If you recognize Mo as a prophet then by definition you are no longer Christian.

As for the First Crusade, this was an activity embarked on by Roman Catholics at the request of the Orthodox Emperor Alexius I Comnenus. It was declared during the Council of Clermont called by Pope Urban II with the approval of the delegates sent by the Emperor.

Therefore, according to Roman Catholic doctrine, acceptance of this decaration of holy war against the Muslims was binding on all Catholics as infallible. For a Catholic Bishop like Camillo Ballin, Bishop, Vicar Apostolic of Kuwait to apoligize for an infallible act of the Church in a properly called ecumenical council, means that he has placed himself in formal schism.

As for all the protestants on this list, since protestantism did not exist at the time of the Crusades, they have no more right to apologize for an act of the Catholic Church than they do for actions by Hindus, Wiccans, or any other non-Catholic faith. Only the proper teaching authorities of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches are qualified to issue such a statement and they are not likely to do so.

Pelayo:
"Cynical? You bet - read that letter again."

I did and you are. Perhaps you might look into changing churches, my friend!

"I think the letter is a good thing. Certainly many Christians have hurt many Muslims. People who say they don't sin are liars."

Individuals apologizing to individuals is one thing. This is a group of people apologizing collectively as Christians, implying that Christans organized together as Christians or Westerners collectively did somthing to Muslims that requires apology.

If the Crusades were defensive, if the war on terror is defensive, these are not things to apologize for.

So what are they apologizing for?

The way this will be interpreted in the Middle East is as an admission, in a moment of honesty our of love of God, by leanred people of the book, that the Crusades were NOT defensive, and that the war on terror is NOT defensive.

It will be seen as an admission that the West (being Christian based historically) are in fact interested in subjugating Muslims and Islam.

THIS IS NOT TRUE.

Furthermore, it has reprocussions like Muslims burning food aid from the West, in the belief that we couldn't possibly be trying to help people suffering from natural disasters.

It also means that when, for example, a Middle Eastern government wants to frame innocent European nurses to cover up the governments' own incompetence in preventing the spreak of AIDS in its hospitals, the populace will readily believe, say, evil Bulgarian nurses were intentionally giving kids AIDS.

This is what these imbicile academics and religious leaders are furthering - things like burned food aid and jailed Bulgarian nurses. Not peace and understanding. If they cared a bit about others they would see this, but they're more interested in this masochistic holier-than-thou feeling they get by apologizing excessively.

Apologizing for things you didn't do is not honest and it doesn't fix anything, it makes things worse.

Knowing what I do about the ivy league divinity schools, I'm guessing many if not most of the signatories aren't actually Christians. I do recognize some of the Protestant leaders: Yonggi Cho's church is an Assembly of God in S. Korea and probably one of the world's largest congregations, for instance.

Would it be too much to ask to have one of the resident scholars go through the letter and pick out how islam-speak does not have the same meaning in the Western tradition?

I agree that for the letter to legitimize anything pertaining to islam and mohammed is a grave error.

Descendantofacrusader, I freely admit to my deep rooted and apparently irreversible cynicism. As far as changing churches, the last regular church service I attended was in 1970, or maybe 1972.

One thing strikes me about the letter: if mohammed is called the prophet, how come Jesus isn't called the Messiah...I mean the writers are all Christians.

Also, don't these people know that the one god in islam is not the God of Abraham, Isaac (specifically not Ishmael) and Jacob of the Bible?

Finally, as I've learned here on JW the peace and justice in islam is living in accordance and/or under islam not what peace (the absence of war and strife) and justice means to us in the West.

Bakke Ray, Convening Chair, Evangelicals for Middle East Understanding

Bonk Jonathan, Executive Director, Overseas Ministries Study Center

Ekstrom Bertil, Executive Director, Mission Commission, World Evangelical
Alliance

Hybels Bill, Founder and Senior Pastor, Willow Creek Community Church

Love Rick, International Director, Frontiers

McCurry Don, President, Ministries to Muslims

Mouw Richard, President, Fuller Theological Seminary

Sanneh Lamin, Yale Divinity School

Schuller Robert, Founder, Crystal Cathedral and Hour of Power

Stott John, Rector Emeritus, All Souls Church, London

Taylor William, Global Ambassador, World Evangelical Alliance

Woodberry Dudley, Dean Emeritus, Fuller School of International Studies,
Fuller Theological Seminary

Christopher Wright Henry B. Professor of Theology, Yale Divinity School

Yonggi Cho David, Founder and Senior Pastor, Yoido Full Gospel Church,
Seoul, Korea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I'm sure I've missed others but these guys are good guys. Among them are no Liberal socialist appeasers. Stott is perhaps the leading evangelical in the world. I've studied Lamin Sanneh, Don McCurry, Dudley Woodberry and Christopher Wright - these 4 guys are very well educated in Islam. I've sat in a Masters course taught by Jon Bonk on the place of money and Mission in the church.

Its wrong to paint these blokes as liberals or dhimmis (there are plenty on the list though). What they are, are people trying to reach out to Islam in response to what they perceive as Islam reaching out to them through the "Common word". They may have added their names in order to be able to at least say that they have responded.

HOWEVER what they have failed to do is to accurately read the "Common word" and understand the signatories (among whom are indeed some reprehensible characters).

They have failed to see the mindset behind the wording of the CW.

They have failed to take into account Islamic attitudes.

They have failed to clearly understand that Allah and Yahweh are NOT the same (Ozzie Mark Durie has written a brilliant little book on this "Revelation?" - well worth buying.)

They have failed to listen to other specialist Islamicists who wouldn't touch such a letter with the proverbial barge-pole. As I said earlier, this will just appear as weakness and confirm the emnity of the infidels. It will increase persecution of Christian minorities in Islamic contexts. It is in fact counter-productive. One only has to read Habib Malik, Patrick Sookhdeo and RObert Spencer ;) to realise this.

Their well-meaning gesture is muddle-headed on this occasion and will only make matters worse in future.

Any Christians here should pray for them.

Bakke Ray, Convening Chair, Evangelicals for Middle East Understanding

Bonk Jonathan, Executive Director, Overseas Ministries Study Center

Ekstrom Bertil, Executive Director, Mission Commission, World Evangelical
Alliance

Hybels Bill, Founder and Senior Pastor, Willow Creek Community Church

Love Rick, International Director, Frontiers

McCurry Don, President, Ministries to Muslims

Mouw Richard, President, Fuller Theological Seminary

Sanneh Lamin, Yale Divinity School

Schuller Robert, Founder, Crystal Cathedral and Hour of Power

Stott John, Rector Emeritus, All Souls Church, London

Taylor William, Global Ambassador, World Evangelical Alliance

Woodberry Dudley, Dean Emeritus, Fuller School of International Studies,
Fuller Theological Seminary

Christopher Wright Henry B. Professor of Theology, Yale Divinity School

Yonggi Cho David, Founder and Senior Pastor, Yoido Full Gospel Church,
Seoul, Korea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I'm sure I've missed others but these guys are good guys. Among them are no Liberal socialist appeasers. Stott is perhaps the leading evangelical in the world. I've studied Lamin Sanneh, Don McCurry, Dudley Woodberry and Christopher Wright - these 4 guys are very well educated in Islam. I've sat in a Masters course taught by Jon Bonk on the place of money and Mission in the church.

Its wrong to paint these blokes as liberals or dhimmis (there are plenty on the list though). What they are, are people trying to reach out to Islam in response to what they perceive as Islam reaching out to them through the "Common word". They may have added their names in order to be able to at least say that they have responded.

HOWEVER what they have failed to do is to accurately read the "Common word" and understand the signatories (among whom are indeed some reprehensible characters).

They have failed to see the mindset behind the wording of the CW.

They have failed to take into account Islamic attitudes.

They have failed to clearly understand that Allah and Yahweh are NOT the same (Ozzie Mark Durie has written a brilliant little book on this "Revelation?" - well worth buying.)

They have failed to listen to other specialist Islamicists who wouldn't touch such a letter with the proverbial barge-pole. As I said earlier, this will just appear as weakness and confirm the emnity of the infidels. It will increase persecution of Christian minorities in Islamic contexts. It is in fact counter-productive. One only has to read Habib Malik, Patrick Sookhdeo, Walid Phares and Robert Spencer ;) to realise this.

Their well-meaning gesture is muddle-headed on this occasion and will only make matters worse in future.

Any Christians here should pray for them.

Apologies for the double post - new fangled technology!

These people cannot possibly be Christians. No true Christian believer could say that; "... many Christians have been guilty of sinning against our Muslim neighbours."

There is no way a Christian can "sin against a Muslim neighbour" without having replaced God with this Muslim neighbour, or holding the Muslim neighbour to be a commandment given by God. This is simply a pagan provocation which must have been cooked up by a Muslim.

Liam1304, you provide a list of modern religious personalities and then add their apparent failures. Will you allow me to include the placement of their names on this scatological letter as a failure?

Well smart people to make mistakes every now and then. They may not be liberal-socialist appeasers, but they do seem to be plain, ordinary appeasers in this instance.

bigcatgirl13106:

I have no doubt that Pope Benedict, the Vatican and the Orthodox leadership are fully aware of what is happening to Christians in Muslim-controlled lands. I also respect the fact that because they are purely spiritual leaders and not political leaders, that their words and actions MUST be much more carefully constructed than a Western politicians because of the nature of their mission.

The state of Orthodox (theologically -- which includes the Catholic Church) Christianity in the West is a bit tenuous and if any one of them comes out and describes Islam as we all would want them to, I fear that the reaction around the world would not be positive at all for the Church or the West and would lead to whole new round of calls for apologies of everything said and not said (with the usual moments of violence).

Also, regarding these signees, I think the neglected to study a key aspect of the Islamic mindset. Muslims back down to strength and power; Muslims become much more aggressive in the face of PERCEIVED weakness.

How can any Muslim view this letter as anything other than a sign of weakness?

N A U S E A T I N G.

Fine. I'll add my name when we see a similar list of prominent Muslims ready to apologize for all their aggressions against Christian lands since they attacked the Fertile Crescent and put forth the Covenant of 'Umar (that Hell-spawned Father of the Desert).

One of the signatories is the bishop of our Diocese of Nebraska, Joe Burnett. Actions like this are why I do all I can to assure that not a dime of my contribution leaves our local parish.

It's pathetic that Christian leaders think that Allah and the Christian God and the G-d of Judaism are the same. Some differences:

God can't both have, and not possible have, a Son.

Jesus can't have died on a cross, and at the same time not have died on a cross (because it was only a Jewish trick that made it LOOK like he died on a cross).

If the Musselmen are correct about the above, then we all owe it to the truth to join them.

As for me, I will follow the Lord. That means resisting the lies and distortions of Islam. Be ready, people, if we keep giving away the store some of us may be martyred.

W@nkers like these are a large part of why I left the Episcopal Church. WWPD? (What would Patton do?)

It seems a bit insincere when one group apologizes to another group for evils that others did to somebody else, its just plain stupid.

( e.g. white Americans always apologizing to black Americans for things that other Americans did a long time ago.)

I believe Jesus spoke about preachers and "Reverend" (I have a real problem referring to men as reverend)
in this verse of Matthew 7 .
21"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' 23Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!'

"A Common Word" was not, of course, addressed to any of these self-styled Christian leaders, but to the real leaders of the institutional Church-- the ones who actually have episcopal authority over and spiritual responsibility for the worldwide Christian faithful--including His Holiness Benedict XVI and virtually every Orthodox patriarch and primate of the Eastern rites. A small handful of Protestant leaders was also formally addressed, notably the Archbishop of Canterbury and figureheads of the Lutherans, Methodists, and Baptists.

In a thoroughly Muslim effort to slight no one whom they intend to victimize through taqiyaa, the Muslim authors of "A Common Word" opened the door to the nonsense that is the subject of this thread by inclusively saluting in summary "leaders of Christian churches everywhere."

I can only surmise acute consternation as Muslims peruse this obscure list of signatories--a Who's Who, as Robert has it, indeed! Who in the hell are they? In the case of the familiar names, like Esposito, it certainly took a mental stretch on their part to consider themselves Christian leaders at all, much less to speak for the likes of the patriarchs of the Syrian, Greek, Armenian or Roman Churches.

It will not go unnoticed by the Mohammedans that, among the signatories, Papa Ratzinger and the Patriarchs of Constantinople and Jerusalem and Antioch are nowhere to be found. In other words, the signatories take themselves much more seriously than the Muslims will.

This used to be a lawyer story -

A Baptist Preacher from Alabama, Reverend Smith, died and went to Heaven. St. Peter was showing him the facilities and introducing him to as many souls as he could in the time allotted. After a while, they came upon a little one bedroom house whereupon St Peter informed the preacher that here was where he would spend eternity. The preacher was indignant at this little place. It was inconvenient, the view was lousy, and his neighbor was an Auburn graduate. He pleaded that in his estimation he had saved thousands and thousands of souls during his sixty year ministry and he should have better accommodations. He asked about the multistory mansion on the hill he saw earlier and asked who in heaven could deserve that. St Peter reminded the preacher that he was just one of over five hundred thousand Baptist preachers in heaven and the little house in the middle of the block was all he could have according the allotment rules, and the mansion belonged to the only imam they had, and that was his reward.

LOL, Pelayo. It also used to be a Yankees/Red Sox joke.

Regards,

HAID

...and his neighbor was an Auburn graduate. LOL.

Haid Dasalami, I would have really liked to have been in on the meetings and correspondence during the time this little missive was put together.

As I wrote earlier I would also like to see who was invited but declined to participate. That would be a list worth seeing.

Also, I have not yet gotten a reply to my e-mail to Harold W. Attridge, and I probably won't get one.

True enough, Pelayo. As Hugh said, "A list of those who didn't sign would be much more impressive."

HAID

BTW, Provo, although I appreciate your sentiments and concur with the thrust of your argument, I cannot agree that Pope Urban's calling for crusade should be considered in any way an infallible magisterial declaration. Yes, it was done in solemn council, but it did not concern matters of faith at all. Although Urban clearly expressed the undertaking as a Christian duty, then and now we should be free to disagree. As for your assertion that only the Catholic Church can apologize for the crusades, you may be right, but His Holiness John Paul II more or less already did that anyway, and kissed the Koran to boot. As a traditionalist Catholic, I am still more ashamed of that than of the response by these buffoons to "A Common Word."

Regards,

HAID

Seems like everyone's asking for apologies nowdays.

From above: "(It is perhaps significant that after the Prophet Muhammad was driven out of Ta’if, it was the Christian slave ‘Addas who went out to Muhammad, brought him food, kissed him, and embraced him.")

As a Christian, with a deep love of God and my faith (and all of God's blessings Christians have brought to this world that adorn our civilization with many of the accoutrements of paradise, while most Muslims live in sh!t), I am absolutely offended by the reference made to 'Addas, who converted to Islam, while many (most unknown) Saints and Martyrs held to their faith under sword or worse.

Do these so-called Christian leaders suppose that the example of 'Addas is a good one? Would they follow his example and be among the first to convert to Islam is it satisfied their love of peace and lust for religous hegemony and organization?

I categorically reject this statement and pray that those who signed it will re-embrace their faith.

Liam1304,

You mentioned a book by Ozzie Mark Durie -- "Revelation?" which argues that Allah and God are not the same. I cannot find it listed anywhere. Can you please provide more information?
Thanks.

Dear Muslim Leaders,

I reject the apology made by the Christian Leaders in my and Christians' names, as we did not start the bloody conflicts...you did.

Those who apologized are Dhimmies, much like 'Addas. They will live, but not well. I will live too, despite your best efforts. Depend on it.

Dear Christian Leaders,

You are exactly the reason I left the church, and why I'm sure others leave. Your ineptitude in your attempt to appear evolved is reprehensible, and triggers my gag reflexes.

You hardly understand your own religion, let alone the History of our religions, our sovereign nations, or the religion of those who seek to do us harm. This apology is viewed as a weakness...and nothing else.

Shame on you for your capitulation, for it could - no, will - lead to our ultimate destruction.

CHRIS,

My apologies for being so long...

Durie, Mark. "Revelation?", Upper Mount Gravatt: City Harvest, 2007, 2nd Ed.

ISBN 0-9755905-9-7

Publishers website:
www.cityharvest.org.au

You might also like to read

Robinson, Stuart. "Mosques and miracles: Revealing Islam and God’s grace", Upper Mt. Gravatt: CityHarvest, 2003, 2nd Ed.

ISBN 0-957-79055-4
Same website.

Mark Durie is an evangelical Anglican PhD in linguistics at a Melbourne University whose book is subtitled:
"Do we worship the same God? Jesus, Holy Spirit and God in Christianity and Islam."

I encountered Mark's book at a "Mosques and Miracles" seminar here in New Zealand where he also led us through parts of the Shafi'i "Reliance of the traveller" (pointing out an interesting instance of Taqiyya where Al-Azhar had somehow mis-translated that part pertaining to Female Genital Mutilation, offerring several alternatives to what the text literally states - cutting out of the clitoris is obligatory) and Jiahd and Dhimmitude.

Robinson is a career Baptist missionary PhD in a Muslim country. I overheard an Egyptian Christian convert say that he was amazed that Islam could be so well understood this far fromt he Middle East. Another North African I talked to mentioned that Muslims will be nice until they get into a position of strength "then you will see their real colours". An excellent seminar which the media naturally lambasted as "Islamophobic" - duely failing to note the constant death threats most of the contributors suffer from.

Personally I first found out about Xn/Mus dialogue when a PhD lecturer mentioned how, when travelling, he overheard 2 Muslim gentlemen laughing at the ignorance of Christians as they discussed in Tamil (a language he knew) how they were keeping the Christians preoccupied with "dialogue" while working at their dawa unimpeded.

All the best,

Durie's 'Revelation?' should be in the back pocket of every Christian priest and pastor in the world, and in the library of every Christian RE teacher, and in the library of every non-Muslim high school, especially but not only the 'Christian' schools.

Bat Yeor - who is Jewish - approves of it and gave it a very positive review.

Like Robert Spencer's The Truth About Muhammad, it rests on rock-solid scholarship, but is brief, clear and readable, keeping technical jargon to an absolute minimum. It could be understood by any intelligent high school child, with a little help from an informed adult to look up the Biblical and Quranic texts cited. It should be in the 'working library' of student Christian groups on campuses, and university chaplains.

In fact, high school children and university students, from Christian families, should be equipped with this book by their parents, so they will know how to handle the Muslim daawa and spin they will inevitably encounter, from Muslim classmates and even from some of their teachers.

It is, in essence, a handbook. At the end it even sets out in tabular form the key differences between the Biblical and Islamic visions of the divine, so the task of comparing and contrasting is as easy as possible. it could be of use to any Christian - Catholic and Orthodox as well as Protestants.

It should be translated, as soon as possible, into Malay, Chinese,
Russian, French (for use in Francophone Africa), Spanish (to head off Muslim daawa in Latin America) and Swahili (for the Christians in East Africa). Arabic wouldn't hurt, either...

During the twentieth century Muslim-instigated progroms across the globe (not all in Islamic countries either) resulted in the massacres of at least 50 million Christians in the name of al-lah.

Why on earth would we ask THESE PEOPLE then for their "forgiveness"? Shouldn't it be the other way around? Did I miss something? Isn't 50 million murders an attempt at 'genocide' (or what ever -cide you wish to use). Doesn't Christianity classify this type of activity as "evil"?

What's wrong with these people?

On second thought, don't answer that. Maybe we don't want to know.

Who really cares why some folks insist on putting lipstick on a pig?

How funny the Christians (the second most oppressive religion in the world) apologize to the the most oppressive religion in the world.
'the muslims killed 50 mil but we only killed 25 mil so why should we apologize?'
You guys are funny. Its like choosing between the lesser of the two evils.
All your religion does is get you in trouble. You seem rational but when you get on your Christian moral high horse you shoot all the other reasonable arguments down.

To use an often quoted line:
"The truth, you can't handle the truth...."(please supply your own flying spit)
Well, as long as the "faithful" refuse to openly discuss the fallacies of islam, I guess we will have to continue using argument methods 5.56, 7.62, .50, 105, 155, 120, 20, 30, 500, 1000, well you get the point.

hehe:

We thought you would have attacked Judaism as being the most repressive of religions! which is funny as Islam has never STOPPED trying to exterminate Jews...

Still, you are an outright liar of the worst order there is (which of course is always the last word in Islamic ethics). You are so brainwashed in fact, you wouldn't know the truth about anything even if it ran you over with a mack truck.

You demonstrate absolutely NO capacity whatever to interpret data. (Great education they have over there in the Islamic nations, huh?).

Islam murdered well over 300 million people around the world and actively plots to murder hundreds of millions more. Islam ISN'T oppressive, you say?Islam exterminated at least ten major civilizations, and actively denies people everywhere ALL basic human rights, as well as denying people everywhere the rights to decide their religion or government, denying women the rights to literally see the light of day and more. All Christians live in free and pluralistic societies. Women have rights in Christian nations--not in islamic ones (we don't force. NO Muslims do unless they live in a western democracy based on Christian principles.

This will never change by the way. YOU are locked into something that cannot be changed EVER in any way. Christians on the other had are free to evolve and make all the changes they see necessary. That's oppression? Check your dictionary pal.

And by the way, Islam is NOT religion anyway. Islam is government from Babylon NOT Saudi Arabia and is based on the pagan practice of human sacrifice.And al-lah is the moon-god and requires killings of humans. Christians forbid killings except in self-defense. That's oppression of course. Muslims HAVE to keep on killing--the Kuran even commands mosque congreagations to prey on each other and lie about it. That's non-oppression!

hehe: How much human blood have YOU drunk at the mosques?? I am sure you will have to apologize for not having drank enough!

give to caesar what is caesars. islam is not caesar. we owe them nothing certainly not an apology. real christains do not compromise their faith. maybe the church should apoligise for the apology. although they have made their submission clear. now who will say they are sorry to mankind by allowing the cancer of islam to grow unchecked and spout their hate and carry out their terror attacks.

Pythagoras,

Why do you bother with that hehe thing?
I think the very choice of moniker ”hehe” tells everything about a person.
A silly, sniggering, eternal adolescent, forever emitting a million times disgraced “information”, dying to be noticed - even at the cost of appearing ridiculous.

hehe is a kookoo is a ninny.
Ignore that Trinity of Inanity.

Why should Christian leaders apologise to the leaders of Islam? I don't recall Islam ever apologising to India for the 60 million plus Hindus slaughtered in the name of Allah or for the murders of the Armenians and Pontian Greeks in Turkey or for two thirds of the Christian world being put to the sword and conquered by Muslim armies.Why should ANY Christian have to apologise for the Crusades? If it wasn't for the Crusades the entire world would be bowing down to Allah now.I've never heard Islam apologise for having enslaved over one million Christian Europeans and many,many more Africans.I've never heard Islam apologise for the forced conversions of millions of Christians over the course of the last 1350 years or for forcing Christians and Jews to live in the abject humiliation of dhimmitude.Why hasn't Islam apologised for the hundreds of thousands of Christian churches and Jewish and Hindu temples it has systematically razed to build their mosques on the very same spot? When the pope was in Istanbul (Constantinople) recently and stood in the Hagia Sophia he should have openly asked for Islam and Turkey to return the church to Christendom.How many people even realise that it was once a Christian church? How many Muslims living in lands other than Saudi Arabia realise that their ancestors were forced under pain of death or pressured through dhimmitude and sharia law to convert to Islam? These Christian "leaders" do all non-muslims a disservice by groveling in humility to an entity who by the very words of it's "sacred" texts and tenets is bent on the destruction of all other religions and governments.It's all voiced very unambiguosly in the Koran,Hadiths and Sunna.I suppose these Christian leaders will also apologise for their sins against Islam when its adherents are about to cut their heads off.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter