Khamenei: U.S. won't bring Iran to its knees

But there's no need to be concerned about his saber-rattling. He also said that "building or using nuclear weapons is against" Sharia. Relax!

By Parisa Hafezi for Reuters (thanks to Sr. Soph):

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Saturday the United States would not be able to bring Iran to its knees in a row over sensitive nuclear work the West suspects is aimed at making bombs.

Khamenei also told the visiting head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog that Iran's nuclear file should be handled by the International Atomic Energy Agency not the U.N. Security Council, which has imposed two rounds of sanctions on Tehran.

"There is no justification for Iran's case to remain at the U.N. Security Council," official media quoted Iran's most powerful figure as telling IAEA head Mohamed ElBaradei.

ElBaradei met Khamenei and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during a two-day visit to Tehran to push for more cooperation in resolving questions about Iran's atomic activity, which the United States fears will be used to make warheads.

[...]

"America's problem with Iran is beyond the nuclear issue," state television quoted Khamenei as saying.

"Americans are mistaken by thinking that by pressuring Iran over the nuclear issue they can break Iran. By bringing this and other issues to the fore, they cannot bring the Iranian nation to its knees," he said.

The IAEA has sought to verify that Iran's uranium enrichment program is geared solely to producing civilian energy.

Khamenei said that "building or using nuclear weapons is against" Islamic sharia law.

| 21 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

21 Comments

Khamenei said that "building or using nuclear weapons is against" Islamic sharia law.

Someone needs to put this guy in touch with Musharraf. The government in Pakistan has gone against Islamic law for over a decade.

By Khamenei's lights, A.Q. Khan is an apostate.

Good point, PMK.

I guess it's different when you're building national treasures, as Naseem calls the Pakistani nukes.

Regards,

HAID

"America's problem with Iran is beyond the nuclear issue," state television quoted Khamenei as saying.
form the article

He's right there, we live a long time here, and most of us have not forgotten that you guys kidnapped and tortured our people from the US Embassy.

We will never forget.
Your knees are not what I have in mind.

"America's problem with Iran is beyond the nuclear issue."

Well, I certainly can't argue with him there.

It's bad enough, Aunt Bea, that we posted the same idea almost simultaneously, it seems, but then the frumious multiple posting syndrome rears its ugly head. Oy.

And then the multiple postings disappear. Maybe it's me. I think I'm going back to bed.

To prevent multiple posting just think about baseball as you press the button.

Also helpfull with premature posting.

".....using nuclear weapons is against sharia......."

What a crock. I'm sure some of their islamic scholars could find numerous excuses for it somewhere in their religious books. They always do.

Maybe the ayatollah is just giving us another dose of deception........?

"Maybe the ayatollah is just giving us another dose of deception........?"

No doubt - since lying to the infidel IS permissable & encouraged. This point is proven by many incidences in the life of Mohammed. He often lied and instructed his followers to do the same. He rationalized that the prospect of success in missions to extend Islam's influence overrode Allah's initial prohibitions against lying.

Given the Fundamentalist roots of the Iranian Leadership. I think they are Lying. ElBaradei, Being of them himself, Should know the level of untruth being spoken. Praise from a somber look will spread its ill will.

Back to sleep now my Children, It is just a Shadow from a Terrible Swift Sword. Nothing to worry about, you won't feel a thing.

Yeah and I'm the president of China.

'Its against sharia'- that's why they all want nukes, right.

Are they better Muslims than the Paki's?

Someone should inform the ole ayatolla that America doesn't want to bring
iran to its knees, we plan to put them in a bodybag.

Yeah - more like 6 feet & 12 inches below the knee.

I'd prefer to bring Pres. Tom and Khamenei to the graveyard, not to their knees.

Just a matter of time before the storm breaks with Iran...

Exactly where in Shari'a is the use of nuclear weapons discussed? Allah did not mention them. Had Mohammad had them, he certainly would have used them. I don't see any mention of nuclear weapons in The Quran or any hadith I have read. Of course I have not read all hadith. Then there is the whole issue of a nuke fireball. Muslims are not supposed to burn anyone, that is Allahs punishment as confirmed by Abu Abbas:

'Ikrimah said: 'Ali burned some people who retreated from Islam. When Ibn 'Abbas was informed of it, he said: If it had been I, I would not have them burned, for the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Do not inflict Allah's punishment on anyone, but would have had killed them on account of the statement of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him). The Apostle said: Kill those who change their religion.

According to that, it's against Islam to blow up people in Iraq or anywhere if fire (Allah's Punishments) is involved. It's fine to cut or shoot, but don't burn. Allah gets to do all the burning. So to get really picky, it is an act of apostasy for a suicide bomber, to explode in fire, it is also an act of apostasy to set off a nuke.
In this case the Ayatollah might be right.
Gad, I am getting so good at spotting apostates, that I may land a job in the Pentagon, working right alongside Mr Islam. I wonder how much the job of apostate spotter pays?

Every time Iran's Islamic Revolution falters, they pick a fight with the USA to revive it.

Since we've never properly paid them back for the hostage taking, I wouldn't object if a future, less obtuse POTUS drops tactical nukes on their nuclear project to terminate this huge threat.

How about I call it the way i sees it.

There will be no livable area in Iranian Cities in 50 years. Israel is going to unleash, outwardly, one of these days. It will be settled pretty quickly so don't dispair all you herein. Bin Laden can only fantasize about the power that little Israel holds over his brethren.

Unfortuneately I think that Israel will be hit too much until they have no choice but to react.

The real question is who will TAKE the Saudi Oil... that is really all that matters. So, who will take it?

Ya, everything else about the Problem that the west faces is very real today, but, at some point the West will elect a President that doesn't hold hands with the Sharia Leader in Saudi, then, it will be settled.

So keep voting for Immigrant loving Dems and Reps that don't get it, some day, a new leader will emerge that does, then it will be done.

Vote Rudy! or not and watch the west decline.com

Best of luck America!

As early as 1993, Osama bin Laden offered $1.5M to buy uranium for building a nuclear device. When he was asked in 1998 if he had nuclear or chemical weapons, he responded: "Acquiring weapons for the defense of Muslims is a religious duty. If I have indeed acquired these weapons, then I thank God for enabling me to do so."

So which is it: a religious duty, or a violation of Sharia law?

I guess Osama Bin Laden does not follow the Khamenei non-nuclear outlook on Sharia either, as he and his minions seek the atomic material.
Do you think he's considered apostate by referendum?
Heh.