Blogging the Qur’an: Sura 14, “Abraham”

This is yet another late Meccan sura. Its name comes from v. 35, where Abraham appears and prays, but following the convention of the naming of Qur’an chapters, this name has little to do with the content of this sura; more is said about Abraham elsewhere in the Qur’an.

Verses 1-4 celebrate the “Book which We have revealed unto thee” (v. 1) — which is, of course, the Qur’an that was delivered to Muhammad. In the words of Ibn Kathir, it is “the most honored Book, that Allah sent down from heaven to the most honored Messenger of Allah sent to all the people of the earth, Arabs and non-Arabs alike.”

With this Book, Muhammad can “lead mankind out of the depths of darkness into light” (v. 1) – the light of Allah – but of course for the unbelievers there is a terrible penalty in store (v. 2): “woe to them on the Day of Judgment because they defied you, O Muhammad, and rejected you,” says Ibn Kathir. For they dared to prefer this world to the next and to keep people from the path of Allah, and they “seek therein something crooked” (v. 3) – that is, they are, in the words of Maulana Bulandshahri, “ever vigilant to expose any defect that they hope to find in the religion (D’in) of Islam.” Yet Allah has sent messengers to people speaking in their own language so they can understand the message clearly (v. 4), but after that, says the Tafsir al-Jalalayn, “God then sends astray whomever He will and He guides whomever He will.”

Then verses 5-15 return to the stories of Moses (vv. 5-8) and some of the other prophets (v. 9). The unbelievers “thrust their hands into their mouths” (v. 9) on hearing the messengers’ clear proofs. “It is said,” explains Ibn Kathir, “that they pointed to the Messengers’ mouths asking them to stop calling them to Allah, the Exalted and Most Honored. It is also said that it means, they placed their hands on their mouths in denial of the Messengers. It was also said that it means that they did not answer the call of the Messengers, or they were biting their hands in rage.” Then comes a dialogue between the unbelievers and the messengers (vv. 10-15) that appears to be meant to apply to all the experiences of all the prophets Allah has sent to the world, but which once again, as we have seen in other late Meccan suras, closely traces and universalizes Muhammad’s dealings with his own people, the pagan Quraysh of Mecca. Maulana Maududi makes this clear when he explains that v. 13, “The disbelievers warned their Messengers, ‘You shall have to return to our community or we will assuredly expel you from our land,’” is a reference to a threat the Quraysh had issued to Muhammad: the verse “clearly indicates,” he says, “that the persecution of the Muslims was at its worst at the time of the revelation of this Surah, and the people of Makkah were bent on expelling the Believers from there like the disbelievers of the former Prophets.”

But Allah will turn the tables on the unbelievers: “Verily we shall destroy the wrong-doers, and verily We shall make you” – that is, Muhammad and the Muslims – “to dwell in the land after them” (vv. 13-14).

This leads to more warnings for the unbeliever in verses 16-23: “In front of such a one is Hell, and he is given, for drink, boiling fetid water” (v. 16). They will suffer “chastisement unrelenting” (v. 17) and their work in this world will come to nothing (v. 18). Allah can even replace the entire creation if he wishes (v. 20). On Judgment Day, the weak will blame the arrogant (v. 21), and Satan will acknowledge that while both he and Allah made promises to people, he – Satan – proved to be a betrayer (v. 22). According to Ibn Jarir, Satan will tell the unbelievers at that point, when it’s too late: “I deny being a partner with Allah, the Exalted and Most Honored.” And “Iblis [Satan],” says Ibn Kathir, “may Allah curse him, will stand and address” those whom he led astray, “in order to add depression to their depression, sorrow to their sorrow and grief to their grief.” No mention is made, however, of the conundrum created by Allah’s leading people astray. The righteous, in any case, will enter “gardens beneath which rivers flow” (v. 23).

Verses 24-27 compare the word of Allah to a strong tree and the “evil Word” to a tree without roots, reminiscent of Jesus’ parable in Matthew 7:17-19 (see also 7:24-27). Muhammad once told his companions, “There is a tree among the trees which is as blessed as a Muslim,” and explained, “It is the datepalm tree.” This may have been because of the spiritual powers of dates. Muhammad also said: “He who eats seven ‘Ajwa dates every morning, will not be affected by poison or magic on the day he eats them.” Allah will strengthen the believers in this world and the next (v. 27); Muhammad explained: “When a Muslim is questioned in his grave, he will testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and that is what is meant by Allah’s statement” in v. 27.

Verses 28-34 again warn the unbelievers of hellfire and remind them of Allah’s blessings. In a hadith, Muhammad identifies “those who have changed the favor of Allah into blasphemy” (v. 28) as “the disbelieving pagans of Mecca,” thus reinforcing Maududi’s impression of this sura as a warning to the Quraysh when tensions between them and the Muslims were high.

In verses 35-41 Abraham prays that Allah will make Mecca a city of “peace and security” (v. 35) and for his children, some of whom he has made to “dwell in a valley without cultivation, by Thy Sacred House” – that is, the Ka’aba, which Abraham built, according to Islamic tradition. That the land is barren makes them dependent upon the good will of those in the area: Abraham asks Allah to “fill the hearts of some among men with love towards them, and feed them with fruits” (v. 37). However, according to Ibn ‘Abbas, Mujahid and Sa‘id bin Jubayr, this is restricted to Muslims only: “Had Ibrahim said, ‘The hearts of mankind’, Persians, Romans, the Jews, the Christians and all other people would have gathered around” the Ka’aba. But Abraham, they explain, said “some among men,” thus “making it exclusive to Muslims only.”

According to one of Muhammad’s companions, Abdullah bin Amr, Muhammad recited part of Abraham’s prayer here – “They have indeed led astray many among mankind” (v. 36) – and wept, crying out three times: “O Allah, Save my Ummah [community]!” In another indication of the importance of Muhammad to Allah, he sent Gabriel to the prophet with these instructions: “Go to Muhammad and tell him this; ‘We will make you pleased with your Ummah, O Muhammad, and will not treat them in a way you dislike.’”

Verses 42-52 repeat that the sinners who remain heedless of Allah’s truth will nonetheless face his dreadful judgment.

(Here you can find links to all the earlier "Blogging the Qur'an" segments. Here is a good Arabic Qur’an, with English translations available; here are two popular Muslim translations, those of Abdullah Yusuf Ali and Mohammed Marmaduke Pickthall, along with a third by M. H. Shakir. Here is another popular translation, that of Muhammad Asad. And here is an omnibus of ten Qur’an translations.)

| 17 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

17 Comments

"...sent down from heaven to the most honored Messenger of Allah..."

Why do I always cringe when I read something like this about the profiteer Muhammad?

Most 'honored' for stealing from those who earned their wealth? Most 'honored' for killing opponents and those who simply disagreed? Most 'honored' for enslaving women and children? Most 'honored' for raping women, including a 9 year old child? Most 'honored' for molesting a little girl (and no telling how many others)?

I don't think Muslims really know what the word "honor" means. They should look it up, along with "compassion" and "peace".

"...that is, they are, in the words of Maulana Bulandshahri, “ever vigilant to expose any defect that they hope to find in the religion (D’in) of Islam.”

It's not hard to do that if one uses reason.

For example, where is the proof of this?(below)- except in the sick mind of Muhammad.


".....mainstream Islamic tradition regards the Jewish and Christian Scriptures as corrupted: they don’t, after all, confirm what is in the Qur’an, and so Jews and Christians must have dared to alter them – and now “their forgeries deceive them as to their own religion” (v. 24). Asad therefore emphasizes that “it is to be borne in mind that the Gospel frequently mentioned in the Qur’an is not identical with what is known today as the Four Gospels, but refers to an original, since lost, revelation bestowed upon Jesus and known to his contemporaries under its Greek name of Evangelion (‘Good Tiding’), on which the Arabicized form Injil is based. It was probably the source from which the Synoptic Gospels derived much of their material and some of the teachings attributed to Jesus. The fact of its having been lost and forgotten is alluded to in the Qur’an in 5:14.”-Robert Spencer

BTW, Muslim deception is a topic of conversation among many now....

The phrase "uswa hasana" is used three times in the Qur'an, once for Muhammad, and twice for Abraham. Does it appear in this sura twice, or only once, or not at all?

Hugh:

Not at all. It appears in 33:21, referring to Muhammad, and 60:4 and 60:6, referring to Abraham.

Yrs
Robert

I guess I better start eating dates everyday.

"but of course for the unbelievers there is a terrible penalty in store (v. 2): “woe to them on the Day of Judgment because they defied you, O Muhammad,"

But of course!

What a beautiful book.

Thank you.

Youth wanted to know.

“none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle..."

You see, that sums it up, for me. I could say there was no God but God, but I could never say with any belief that Muhammed was his Messenger.

Muhammed is the worm in the apple of Islam. One cannot declare himself a Muslim, unless he embraces Muhammed, and I'd sooner embrace a puffer fish (and come away from the experience with less harm).

Guess I'm destined to be beheaded...

Too bad the Qur'an cannot be extricated from Muhammed. Islam might have more converts, if it could. It would certainly be a less violent work of "literature". Shorter, too.

'Verses 1-4 celebrate the “Book which We have revealed unto thee” (v. 1) — which is, of course, the Qur’an that was delivered to Muhammad. In the words of Ibn Kathir, it is “the most honored Book, that Allah sent down from heaven to the most honored Messenger of Allah sent to all the people of the earth, Arabs and non-Arabs alike.”"


This would be a handy set of verses to keep in mind to answer the inevitable "do you speak Arabic?" argument of the Muslims.

Absecdere -

I've always wondered why an omnipotent being would "choose" to communicate in only one language.

Robert,

I have a question regarding Qur'anic translations.

You've written before that the Qur'an should traditionally be read and recited in Arabic, and this is one reason why many Western Muslims have little knowledge of what is actually in the book.

And yet we have numerous translations in English and other languages. So doesn't that make men like Pickthall and Ali kind of heretical? And yet these men seem to be highly respected, and as far as I know English translations of the Qur'an aren't being denounced by Muslims. Why is this?

tanstaafl:
Full omnipotence means one doesn´t obey reason or anything else.

Early Islamic thinkers complained that the Jews falsely believed that God was "fettered" by law. According to Muslims, Allah is so omnipotent that He is not fettered in any way. Allah obeys no one and no law, not even the laws of reason. His omnipotence means He obeys only himself. That is perhaps the chief reason the scientific revolution did not take place in the Islamic world. The cosmos, in the usual Islamic view, does not obey laws, it at each moment obeys Allah alone. There is thus little strong sense of an orderly consistency that human beings could investigate according to the laws of reason.

The concept of omnipotence is one of the areas where the Judeo-Christian tradition differs profoundly from the Islamic. Some -- like the American logician and process philosopher Charles Hartshorne -- have argued that the concepts of divine omnipotence and omniscience are not really present in the Bible, but were later introduced into Judeo-Christian theology by medieval theologians or from other sources. Hartshorne held that God was neither omnipotent nor omniscient (for one thing, because human freedom is real), and that a rehabilitation of Anselm´s failed proof of God´s existence yields a number of successful logical proofs of God´s existence. But today few people clearly realize one can conceive of God without the concepts of omniscience and omnipotence. God is superlative in a number of ways, but without those two qualities. And God is in some sense evolving, it seems.

The Christian philosopher Berdyaev also argued that omnipotence was not a part of true Christianity but rather a mere human projection onto God of a concept derived from the experience of earthly dictators. Islam in particular seems to model its theology after the experience of extreme tyrannies.

(v. 35) and for his children, some of whom he has made to “dwell in a valley without cultivation, by Thy Sacred House” – that is, the Ka’aba, which Abraham built, according to Islamic tradition. That the land is barren makes them dependent upon the good will of those in the area: Abraham asks Allah to “fill the hearts of some among men with love towards them, and feed them with fruits”

Well the land around Ka'aba is not barren anymore, it has been cultivated with buildings...Google maps..."and feed them with fruits”...If you look closely you can see a 7/11 store on one corner of town, and a Mekka burger joint on another.

Addendum on Islamic logic:

Warner over at Center for the Study of Political Islam argues that to understand the Qur'an as Muslim experts understand it, one must approach it with a different attitude to logic than a Western non-Muslim might typically employ. Where there are contradictions in the Qur'an or Hadith or Sira, both sides of the contradiction must be taken as true. Allah trumps logic. This relates to my earlier comment on this thread.

So instead of trying to resolve the contradictions in the "Trilogy" (that´s how Warner refers to the Qur'an, Hadith, Sira), Warner takes a statistical approach. Thus 3%, say, of statements in the Hadith that refer to jihad refer to peaceful inner struggle, and 97% of jihad statements refer to warlike outward jihad. So Warner concludes that in Islamic theology, 3% of jihad is non-violent.

And Warner acknowledges the reality of abrogation (the Qur'an verses that tell us that if a later verse contradicts an earlier, the later is better), yet at the same time Warner says that both the Mecca and Medina stages of Islam are understood as true and valid examples, as far as Islamic thinkers are concerned.

I'm oversimplifying Warner´s approach, but that´s part of the gist as I understand it.

Muhammad can “lead mankind out of the depths of darkness into light
I think this should read Muhammad can “lead mankind out of the depths of light into darkness and has done this for over a billion people

During the Jerusalem (al-Quds) qibla (prayer direction), Muhammad had sought recognition as the last prophet of the Jews. It was later, after their rejection of him, that he changed the qibla. Try to apply god-logic to the narrative. You can't, because said narrative is ground in the phony prophet's personal revenge-power motivation. Islamic history would be comedy, if hundreds of millions had not been slaughtered in the name of allah's enslavers.

Reminder to those deluded by belief in a deity: Abraham was a Chaldean. Chaldean artifacts reveal a social structure in which magic was pervasive, and magicians ruled. Good magic is good deception. It was the Muse, and not the Wizard Divines, who guided the Greco-Roman heros and scholars. Plato did all his writing in a shrine to the Muses.

supercargo

I do not agree with your contention that the Biblical Abraham was a Chaldean magician, peddling the same god-delusions as everyone else..(I presume you also subscribe to the idea that Moses was just one more Egyptian magician?)

Read Tom Cahill "The Gifts of the Jews". Read, too, Franz Rosenzweig, "The Star of Redemption". You will find that the Hebrews turned their backs, implacably, upon the world of god-king magicians.

It was not for nothing that the Greco-Romans – yes, those noble philosophic Greeks and Romans - accused first the Jews, and then, later, the Christians, of being "atheists". The Roman general was, I suspect, horrified when he broke into the Holy of Holies of the Jewish temple and found there …emptiness, the appurtenances of worship, but nothing recognisable as a statue of a god. Christians, of course, equally horrifyingly (to refined and noble pagan sensibilities) exalt as the ultimate Revelation a Jewish carpenter who had been publicly executed by an obscenely humiliating form of death reserved for slaves and rebels.

Cahill and Rosenzweig will teach you that what divides the Pentateuch (and every other part of the Hebrew Bible, and then, later, rooted in Judaism, the Christian Scriptures) from the world in which it was written – and, indeed, from every other system of thought, including that of Plato or Aristotle, is a bottomless gulf.

Islam, which Jacques Ellul sees as a monotheistic paganism, is seamlessly continuous with the world from which Abraham, and Moses, escaped; whereas the Hebrew scriptures record a radical DIScontinuity. Cahill in his book refers to two Great Escapes: the Escape from Ur of the Chaldees, and the Escape from Egypt; both of which represent the Escape from "The World of the Wheel".

Abraham is told "Lech lecha"! GET OUT!! And he goes, turning his back upon Ur, up and out of the world of the Wheel, into the world of History, ‘to a land that I will show you’, a world of linear time rather than perpetual repetition.

Moses is told to tell Pharaoh: "LET MY PEOPLE GO!" And when Pharaoh won't, YHWH simply...takes them. It's a prison break. I have read Plato and Aristotle; I tell you that neither of them could ever have imagined anything like the Exodus.

The New Testament simply extends the story by claiming that YHWH the Liberator crowns this history of Escapes by a third, the most stunning of all - The Resurrection. Get hold of David Bentley Hart’s "The Beauty of the Infinite": read the sections entitled "The Will to Power", "The Covenant of Light", and - best of all - "The Consolations of Tragedy, the Terrors of Easter".

Hart argues, very cogently, that even the greatest of the pagan philosophers could not in the end escape the limits of the world within which they arose. Nietzsche’s great project was to attempt to annihilate the Jewish and Christian ‘interruption’ – which he regarded as contemptible - in order to re-found the world of the pagan Hero. The logical outcome of Nietzsche’s project was Hitler’s attempt to physically annihilate the Jews, to burn them, and all their works; to obliterate the scandal.

Hart, p. 130: “There was, within the history of Western philosophy, in the midst of its achievements and failures, a singular interruption, the arrival of a discourse of truth in which every principle of necessity became subordinate to the higher principle of gratuity [i.e. grace, or gift]. Christian thought, and its long history of metaphysical speculation, did not occur as just another episode in the genealogy of nihilism; it was in fact so profound a disruption of many of the most basic premises of philosophy, and so audacious a rescue of many of philosophy’s truths from the impotent embrace of mere metaphysical ambition, that it is doubtful yet that philosophy understands what happened to it, or why now it cannot be anything but an ever more self-tormenting denial of that interruption.”

Back to ‘magic’. The classic magical cults depend on secrecy, gnosis, illumination, obfuscation, the Occult, the esoteric/ exoteric distinction between the Wise Few who Know and the Contemptible Many, who do not and cannot Know (Islam reproduces this paradigm exactly, in its bizarre insistence on the untranslatability of the Arabic Quran, and its belief that Islam = Knowledge and Non-Islam = Ignorance). The Torah and the Gospels are the diametrical opposite: they are public and relentlessly transparent, WYSIWYG.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter