PA's Message: In English – Coexist; In Arabic – Destroy Israel

If they play this double game long enough, the PA will have neither a state, nor peace, nor coexistence, nor triumph, nor advance, nor hope.

If they can say THAT without getting into trouble, then I can say that I want the total destruction af the muslim umma. The total destruction of islam.

So, let's see if there is a response.....

"The PA is telling its Arab audience that there will be no Israel at all, rather one large Arab Palestine will rule the entirety of Israel." Interesting is it not that the Palestinians cannot even govern the territory they have. The walls came down around Gaza and half the population fled to Egypt. If Israel falls, the Palestinians will dismantle it, just as they did Gaza and nothing woth while will be left. It is long past the point were aid to the PA should be dollars zero + euro zero equals zero. Let them base thier economy on what they produce and can market on the world market.

AL-TAQIYA... The Muslim Method Of Conquest
By Professor Walid Phares

In the early years of the Tawheed (Islamic conquest of the Arabian peninsula) and in the Fatah (Arab-Islamic invasion and conquest of the upper Middle East and the outside world), a Muslim concept was devised to achieve success against the enemy, Al-Taqiya..

Al-Taqiya, from the verb Ittaqu, means linguistically dodge the threat. Politically it means simulate whatever status you need in order to win the war against the enemy..

According to Al-Taqiya, Muslims were granted the Shar'iya (legitimacy) to infiltrate the Dar el-Harb (war zone), infiltrate the enemy's cities and forums and plant the seeds of discord and sedition. These agents were acting on behalf of the Muslim authority at war, and therefore were not considered as lying or denouncing the tenants of Islam. They were "legitimate" mujahedeen, whose mission was to undermine the enemy's resistance and level of mobilization. One of their major objectives was to cause a split among the enemy's camp. In many instances, they convinced their targeted audiences that Jihad is not aimed at them, that indigenous people are not targeted, only Bysantium power. They convinced many Jews that they will be protected from Christians, called pagans, and they convinced many Christians that Jews were the mortal enemies, because they killed Issa (Jesus). They convinced the Aramaics, Copts, and Hebrews that the enemy is Greece, and signed peace agreements with the Bysantines Greeks at the expense of Maronite Aramaics, etc.

This Jihadic agency of subversion was one of the most fascinating and efficient arms of the conquest. In less them four decades the MIddle East fell to the Arab-Islamic rule, followed by north Africa and Central Asia.

Al-Taqiya was a formidable weapon, used by the first dynasties and strategists. Today, scholars may identify it as deception. But the Jihadic deception was and still is more powerful than the James Bondian methods of Western classical intelligence tactics, for the simple reason that it has a civilizational, global dimension versus the narrow state interest of the regular Western subversive methods.

Al-Taqiya is still in use today but not necessarily state-organized. One can easily detect Taqiya in the two discourses used by Islamist strategists. On the one hand, one comprehensive Islamist theory is attempting to mobilize Middle East, and sometimes Western Christia leaders and intellectuals, against "evil Jews." We see considerable success on that level. And on the other hand, another Islamist comprehensive theory is attemting -with success also- to mobilize the Jews against "evil and pagan Christians." One can easily detect the sophisticated work of Taqiya, for the strategic objective of Islamists is to destroy the foundations of the Judeo-Christian civilization, as a prelude to the defeat of an isolated Israel.

Taqiya is not a unique phenomenon in History, many strategists from all backgrounds implemented subversion. But the uniqueness of today's Taqiya is its success within advanced and sophisticated societies. Taqiya is winning massively because of the immense lack of knowledge among Western elites, both Jewish and Christian.

For interesting examples of Taqiya methods, visit Christian discussion groups and forums and note the discourse of Islamist visitors, aimed at undermining the Christian perception of Jews, and visit Jewish discussion groups and forums and note the subtle anti-Christian discourse of Islamists visitors. It is really informative and fascinating.

Which is exactly why Israel must not bow to demands of giving up land or allowing the right of return. Anything less than that is signing their death warrant.

And since the current administration can't seem to grasp this concept, which of our presidential front runners do?

That's what I thought.

Keep loading ammo, there's a world war on the horizon.

no Israel at all, rather one large Arab Palestine will rule the entirety of Israel. the problem is the jews of Israel have broken their dhimtti status and under sharia law the penalty is death

"...Western politicians and diplomats seem incapable of catching on to it -- or unwilling to do so."

Mostly, it is neither one of these two explanations.

There is a third explanation, beyond being "incapable", and beyond being "unwilling".

That third explanation is sociological and cultural. When irrationality like this is so common in a culture, we have moved beyond explanations that limit themselves to individual psychology.

Two versions of world-views, and plans, and hopes.

One -- Version A -- is uttered in own's own language, to one's own followers, who need not be deceived.

The other -- Version B -- is uttered in another language, to an audience of Infidel enemies, whose support, nonetheless, is useful, and who therefore need to be manipulated and deceived for as long as possible.

You are a high official in one of those Infidel enemy countries. You have a choice to listen to. to heed, to take seriously, either version.

You choose to ignore, repeatedly, endlessly, Version A, even though it corresponds exactly to the dictates of Islam, and even though it explains perfectly the past behavior of the Arab Muslims involved, and predicts --with great accuracy -- exactly how they will treat any and all "negotiations" and "agreements" and solemn commitments made under "treaties" arrived at.

You choose to believe, repeatedly, endlessly, Version B, even though it is belied entirely by the statements made by the same people, to their own followers, in Versian A, and even though every act by those who utter Version B belies, calls into question, everything that they say using Version B.

Does it really take a Champollion or a Ventris or a Chadwick to decode, to make sense, of what is meant in those speeches using Version B? Or for that matteer, what is meant, so obviously, when they use, among themselves, Version A?

Wouldn't, for god's sake, simple straightforward intelligence, and a modicum of knowledge of Islam, do the trick?