Ahmadinejad warns the West about its insolence. "U.S., allies should 'apologize' for sanctions on Iran: Ahmadinejad," from CBC News (thanks to Hot Air):
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called on the U.S. and its allies Saturday to "apologize" to Iran for accusing it of seeking nuclear weapons, and said no amount of sanctions would deter his country from pursuing its uranium enrichment program."If they want to continue with that path of sanctions, we will not be harmed," Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying Saturday during a television address. "They can issue resolutions for 100 years."
It comes a day after a report by the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency found Iran has increased transparency in its atomic program, but still has not shown enough evidence to demonstrate its goals are peaceful.
But Ahmadinejad said the report vindicated Iran and warned that his country would take unspecified "reciprocal measures" against any country that imposed additional sanctions against it.
The best way for the U.S. and its allies to "compensate for their mistakes" is to "apologize and pay compensation," he added....
My God. How have we let things go so far where some insane, murderous Mohammedan can demand that we "apologize?"
Right. There will be WW3 in a few years, the West v Islam, a continuation from 732 and 1683.
So was he standing on a chair when he said this?
What I think is really funny is that he thinks that we don't know what he's up to. I guess perpetual lying causes lack of reality.
He knows no apology is coming, and he also knows that none is deserved. This is just a stage show, a little song and dance routine for the folks. He
frequently answers questions that no one asks.
Does he ever actually 'say' anything? He reminds me of Barack, talk a lot...say nothing...shades of Erwin Corey. Talking a lot, without saying anything does not come naturally to many people. You have to learn to do it, and it takes practice. Anyone can say something that has no meaning, but try making a one hour speech like that. Of course Corey was not a politician, but a stage actor. His nonsensical speech was meant to entertain, not to warp perspectives. Politicians came up with many variations. Corey probably got his ideas of double/triple/backward, speaking from them.The idea, is not to just change your perspective, but to warp it, and place it in a condition of permanent ruin. The purpose of this routine #5, is control. The clever are very clever, and their tricks work. The way to get over being tricked, is to get over being tricked...Ahmadinijad (Beasty Boy to me), tries hard in his word magick (taqiyya) but more and more people are getting on to him. The more he talks, the less sense he makes...
"If they want to continue with that path of sanctions, we will not be harmed," Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying Saturday during a television address.
imanutjob
Hey nut job,
So you haven't been harmed. What's to apologize for? You make me think the US is more powerful than Allah. How have US sanctions harmed Iran? There's a whole world ready and eager to sell you whatever you need. Our demand for oil makes your commodity quite valuable and more than enough to finance anything you want to buy, even a nuclear bomb. Anyone who believed what you claim to believe would hold his head high and go on about his business. You would be wise to follow the example of Fidel Castro. Make friends elsewhere. Prove that you don't need the US. If you're still hung up on winning over Americans then there's a book you might want to buy. It's probably still on Amazon: How to Win Friends and Influence People, by Dale Carnegie.
What if we issue resolutions for 101 years? What are you going to do then, huh?
Darcy wrote:
... There will be WW3 in a few years, the West v Islam, a continuation from 732 and 1683.
WW3 started in 2001 (or 1983 depending on your view), the West has yet to acknowledge it -- except Bush, who most of the world thinks is off his rocker.
In a crazy world like this, sometimes I think having Barrack Hussein in office to bomb Pakistan and sit down with Ahmidinejad sans preconditions may stir things up at least ...
The best way for the U.S. and its allies to "compensate for their mistakes" is to "apologize and pay compensation," he added....
----------------
the apologies are coming....... flights of stealth bombers will deliver apology leaflets across iran.
In a crazy world like this, sometimes I think having Barrack Hussein in office to bomb Pakistan and sit down with Ahmidinejad sans preconditions may stir things up at least ...
Posted by: blues4allah at February 24, 2008 11:19 AM
the non-patriotic hussien obama making hay with the enemy........
the president and congress serve at the forbearance of the US military.
it will be an interesting the next 12 months.....
???
"WW3 started in 2001 (or 1983 depending on your view)" -bluesforallah
I have to disagree, bluesforallah. Because we did not retaliate in kind. Instead, we got a load of "rop" bullshit from our dhimmi President who didn't and still doesn't know what's contained in the Qur'an.
I see WW3 as "declared" and with copious military activity on both sides. It's going to be huge. It could begin because the Mohammedans finally manage to pull off a "9/11" somewhere in Western Europe - and that's going to be the end for them. No one is going to take their sh** anymore, anywhere.
WW3 started in 2001 (or 1983 depending on your view), the West has yet to acknowledge it -- except Bush, who most of the world thinks is off his rocker.
blues4allah
WW3 hasn't begun. (Some say WW4 - that WW3 was Communism's war against the West.) When it does, you'll know it, and so will the world's Muslims. On the other hand, the latest incarnation of Islam's war against the world began in 1979 - courtesy of Ayatollah Khomeini. The Sunnis then joined in.
To this day, it remains a one-sided war. The day the West joins in, everyone will know it. You can't consider Iraq and Afghanistan battles in this war for one reason - we are not out to destroy them as they are us. We never set out to destroy Afghanistan or wage war on all its inhabitants or vanquish Islam, unlike the Muslims who threaten us with death everytime we say something they find offensive. What American ever held a rally and loudly proclaimed: death to [fill in a Muslim country]?
Oh brother! He wants us to apologize & cough up some cash - that's rich! Ahmad is a total fruit loop. Every time he speaks, I laugh....ha ha ha.
Once again the little nutjob reinforces our theory that he's crazy.
On the other hand, the latest incarnation of Islam's war against the world began in 1979 - courtesy of Ayatollah Khomeini. The Sunnis then joined in.
posted by PMK
I watched "Nice Dreams" Chech & Chong last night.
On the wall behind the pot-smoking Stacey Keach (who is turning into a lizard) there is a chalkboard and on it is written 'F*** Iran'.
To tell the truth, I had forgotten how many Americans who were so angry about the Embassy and the Hostages.
Ah, the good old days. When Americans had pride in their country.
Gee Andy, Mayberry is quiet tonight.
Ineedajob never seems to have anything nice to say.
The nerve of some Pan Handlers.
The best way for the U.S. and its allies to "compensate for their mistakes" is to "apologize and pay compensation," he added....
---------------------------------
Actually, the best way is to "Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran..."
Thank you, Dhimmi Carter, for creating this mess.
The German Press reports of individual threats leveled against Germany in an attempt to break off members of the "coalition".
Has anyone heard of specific threats against any of the other countries?
The German anti-jihad blogs are saying bring it on.. at least then our government will HAVE to defend against islam instead of this never-ending appeasement.
I'd rather duke it out than continue the soft jihad unopposed.
We all have more than a fighting chance if they attack us and can be tied to whatever attack they perpetrate.
iran has already attacked US servicemen and their own dissidents in Germany and many of us are dismayed that the government never saw fit to retaliate in any way.
Hopefully Iran will go just a bit too far this time.. and the public will demand action..
Let's use the money we waste on the "pals" on more constructive efforts..
Shouldn't it be the Muslims on their knees apologizing to the entire world for being the spoilers of everything everywhere? Aren't they the ones whose "religion" has proven so brutal and corrupt and backward and perverse that it is an embarrassment for all eternity. Where do Muslims derive the arrogance to lecture the non-Muslims, (that is the civilized people) of earth?
The best way for the U.S. and its allies to "compensate for their mistakes" is to "apologize and pay compensation," he added..
in other words, you want to see good little dhimmi
paying jizha a.k.a. protection money to the Muslims from non-Muslims for protection from the Muslims, the Mafia, would love the system, and I do not personally feel. Given how Iran has used kitman and taqiyyah to conceal its atomic research. Iran is the one that should be apologizing in my opinion. I'manutjob is making these outlandish statements, simply because he knows that the West has caught him lying. And he wants to look good for the slaves of àllha that just might get the balls to vote him out of office
I remember not too long ago that Saddam was making threats and demands too.
I agree with Borat, that sanctions are not the way to go. Already we've wasted too much time with watered down sanctions from the Useless Nations. It's time to blow up Iran. It would only take a couple days to destroy all the nuclear sites, all the suspected nuclear sites, and all the unsuspected nuclear sites. But just do that, don't invade or try to democratize or institute an Iraqi-style welfare program. And while we're at it, we should sieze their oil fields. Now there's a plan.
Seems the New York City ISP's have blocked my browser from accessing YouTube.com.
Wow.
Anyone else in the tri-borough having this klunker?
Isabellathecrusader said,
"So was he [Ahmadinejad] standing on a chair when he said this?......"
MUST VIEW image Isabella....
http://www.challenging-islam.org/Only%20a%20Bit%20Short.jpg
:)))))
If it's "apology" this creature seeks, he can find it in the dictionary -- between "anthropoid" and "***hole."
Ahmadinejad...Have you all heard of a "Napolean complex?"Fits to a tee......seeing him yell and foam at the mouth makes me think of those old Bugs Bunny cartoons(of Bugs w/Napi, and occasionally Yosemite Sam. This wacko is straight out of "1001 Rabbit Tales" btw did the Muslims protest THAT btw?!?
KittyBootz
Ah, the good old days. When Americans had pride in their country.
Gee Andy, Mayberry is quiet tonight.
Aunt Bea,
A lot's happened since then. Cultural relativism and multiculturalism combined to make pride in our country politically incorrect. Then there was the neutralization of Europe by the PLO, the birth of Hamas and Hezbollah, and more. Not even Ronald Reagan could help us now.
Allow me to offer a suggestion to the "Honorable" President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
The U.S. will apologize to Iran and pay compensation for its part in securing sanctions on Iran just as soon as Iran apologizes to the U.S. Embassy personnel (90 initially, and 52 for the duration) that it held hostage for 444 days during the Carter Malaise, AND pays compensation for the U.S. Embassy building, which it stole, not to mention compensating/apologizing to the families of the 8 U.S. military personnel who died during the abortive rescue attempt, AND the damage sustained by 3 helicopters, at least.
Oh, right, Iran should also apologize to Israel for expressing the desire that it should be wiped off the face of the planet, AND should compensate ALL of the residents of Israel, Jews and Arabs alike, for the many losses that they have sustained through attacks by Iran's main proxies, Hezbollah and Hamas.
Sincerely,
Lex, totally for apologies.
P.S. Weren't you involved in storming the Embassy, Mahmoud? How appropriate that YOU especially should apologize, but then again, what would Mohammad, the perfect man, do in your shoes? Did he EVER apologize for anything?
Lex,
Yes absolutely. But remember that in Islam, up is down, in is out, black is white and Ahmadinejad is Wilt Chamberlain.
Ezekiel2012,
LOL!! Here's our buddy after he's assumed room temperature.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aCGiN6b2Ow&feature=related
Where do Muslims derive the arrogance to lecture the non-Muslims, (that is the civilized people) of earth?
Posted by: jsla at February 24, 2008 2:03 PM
Where? It's called "Mohammed." The most evil man who ever lived, equivalent to Hitler. That's where.
Let me say it first: REPARATIONS IS THE OBAMA AGENDA.
Our elites are morally blind if they insist on detaching Obama from the BLACK CHURCH ethos. Major African scholars, as BA Ogot and JF Ade Ajayi have settled continental opinion on the nature of the Islamic and Christian conversions in Africa. They are treated as syncretistic, or incorporations of an alien - colonial - into local tradition. And the Roman Catholic church backed that up with the culturally sensitive provisions of Vatican 2.
Pundits - assuming that some visit Jihad Watch - need to get a copy of the following book: "Between Cross and Crescent: Christian and Muslim Perspectives on Malcolm and Martin" by Lewis V Baldwin and Amiri Yasin al-Hadid. The book - an ACTUAL source of Obama policy and speech-text - is full of errors, the most significant being ignorance of Malcolm X's repeated final days' statements of his conversion to "Shiite Islam." However, it concludes with a perspective that is central to Oprah-Cult-Think. Anyone with literacy should have long disavowed the notion of Abrahamic unity among Jews-Christians-Muslims. Belief in that rubbish is dogmatic, and stands in face of Muslim arguments that the "ahl-Kitab" (Jews and Christians) use text that was distorted by Satan. The relations between non-muslims and the slaves of allah can be only accurately characterized by one word: ENEMY. Either we crush them, or they crush us. Either we get leaders who disavow Bush's "islam is peace" self-interested deceit, or the piecemeal surrender continues.
Please read the following Obamist BS, and determine if this mindset would qualify someone to serve as President of the United States. Obama didn't say it; OBAMA LIVES IT, and it echoes through his own syncretistic, Afro-Centrist church of Minoritarianism, which has is sustained solely by the search for reparations, and the salient of white guilt on which Obamism is flourishing:
"Malcolm and Martin never surrendered their respect for the fundamental values of democratic society. They wanted a world of shared commitments
centered around the principles of power-sharing, individual choice, mutual respect and obligation, interpersonal and intergroup living, and a healthy
respect for human rights. They sought to function on all fronts—cultural, economic, political, psychological, spiritual, social, intellectual, and otherwise— with the goal of striking down all obstacles to human community. They reminded us in dynamic and even subtle ways that humans have
believed perfectly only when they wish for themselves what they desire for other humans. Although Malcolm was assassinated before his growing world vision could be concretized into specific goals and objectives, he and Martin
remain central characters in our seemingly never-ending quest to discover our legitimate, moral selves..."
"The vicious attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, serve as yet another reminder of the abysmal failure of humans to create strong bridges of understanding, cooperation, and community. Sadly, many commentators are highlighting these tragedies, which claimed the lives of almost 3,000 in New York, Washington, D.C, and Pennsylvania, as another chapter in the long conflict between the cross and the crescent, between the Christianity of America and the West and the Islam of the East. Christians and Muslims in parts of the world are using their religions to solidify loyalty to their causes, and political leaders on both sides are
calling the conflict a case of good versus evil. Muslims in Afghanistan, Indonesia, and other countries are raising the banner of anti-Americanism and are clamoring for a “holy war” or “jihad” against the United States; Christians in this country are evoking images of the Crusades as they urge the political leadership to bomb Islamic nations allegedly associated with violent attacks on U.S. interests here and abroad. All this can only exacerbate the threat to
world peace and community. Moreover, these developments suggest that the problem of the twenty-first century will remain not only what W.E.B. Du Bois would call “the problem of the color line” but also the problem of the religion divide. In this global context of heightened tensions and hostility, we are compelled to revisit the ideas of Malcolm and Martin, particularly in terms of their relevance for addressing both race and religion as barriers to
world community.
Malcolm and Martin warned us that America, due to years of arrogant and misguided foreign policy, would one day face judgment and the wrath of God. Both would see these attacks of September 2001, as largely a consequence of U.S. colonialist and imperialist policies and practices. Moreover, both would call upon America not only to take bold and positive diplomatic steps to eliminate terrorism but also to change its image in the eyes of the world. If we are to be true to the legacies of Malcolm and Martin, we must realize that it is not ultimately about blame and retaliation but about accountability and responsibility. America must not only face the irony of its complicity in the historic problems that led to the attacks but must also devise better ways of relating to a world in which there are many different religions, ideologies, value systems, and ways of thinking and living. Malcolm and Martin were not obsessed with a desire to Islamize or Christianize the world, but they consistently pointed to the need to humanize it and to rid it of the threats posed by the military mentality and weapons of mass destruction. Both men challenged this country to commit itself to moral leadership in the struggle against violence and oppression on a global scale. This invariably means replacing the culture of arrogance and imperialism with one that respects
the dignity and worth of persons and the rights of nations to share fully in the fruits of freedom, peace, and self-determination. This is Malcolm’s and Martin’s message to the contemporary world."
----------------------------------
Reality dictates: muslims are self-described abdullahs or slaves-of-allah. Freedom is as anathema to a muslim, as is respect for human dignity and self-determination of peoples who chose free exercise of conscience over muslim tyranny.
Isabellathecrusader,
Ahmadinejad is Wilt Chamberlain? Shoot! He could have at least kept the 'fro!
Achmed the Dead Terrorist should do a stint on Palestinian TV It seriously needs some comic relief!
supercargo,
Obama wrote this detritus?
So, Malcolm and Martin would see the events of 9/11 as "largely a consequence of U.S. colonialist and imperialist policies and practices." Like what? Supporting Israel in the face of threats of utter annihilation from the surrounding Arab world? Kicking Saddam out of Kuwait?
Well, 9/11 certainly did change U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. It made it exceedingly more direct and lethal.
NO SANCTIONS- ACTIONS... before too late and the mushroom clouds start blossoming over the middle east
Lex:
The authors of that 2002 book have endorsed the Obama campaign, but he wasn't an author. However, he is of the activist tradition.
Obama has yet to be queried on his mentors and political debts. However, I will soon offer proof that some of his rhetoric and speeches are playouts of Afrocentrist scripts that exploit white guilt. It is that mentality that allows the Crusades to be aggressive campaigns.
Do you think that America needs to be "changed...
block by block"? Obama does and he said so yesterday in a Corpus Christi speech.
supercargo,
I believe in changing my underwear every day, but that's probably not what Obama has in mind. I also believe in block parties as a way to cultivate good neighborliness. Is that what he means?
What is this with the white guilt trip crap? It gave us the Welfare state, thank you very little!
Some time ago, I read a blog entry where someone wondered about the reparations for slavery argument that was raging at the time, and whether or not he should pay himself something because he was biracial...
FYI, it wasn't Rush Limbaugh who came up with Obama the 'Magic Negro'
Lex,
Not even an afro could help that guy.
Supercargo, you should go over to Atlas Shrugs and let Pamela Gellar hear what you have to say. she's been following Obama's radical ties for some time now and would probably appreciate this information. If you listen to his wifes speeches also they are drenched with this same kind of garbage. She said something this past week about Obama making changes and everybody being expected to do their part to make it happen. Shades of Animal Farm.
Lex,
Not even an afro could help that guy.
Supercargo, you should go over to Atlas Shrugs and let Pamela Gellar hear what you have to say. She's been following Obama's radical ties for some time now and would probably appreciate this information. If you listen to his wife's speeches also they are drenched with this same kind of garbage. She said something this past week about Obama making changes and everybody being expected to do their part to make it happen. Shades of Animal Farm.
I think we SHOULD apologize. My apology would go something like this:
Dear President Tom,
I'm dearly sorry we haven't managed to blow you worthless rear end off the face of this planet. Please accept this JDAM as a token of my good will and friendship.
Truly Yours,
Live Free or Die!
The note can be taped to the side of a JDAM and delivered by F/A-18.
Back in the late 60's early 70's, Jean Dixon perdicted a war in the middle east to start around the year 1998, maybe she was off a few years, but if they build a nuke, the desert will be like green glass everywhere....i.e. Trinity site, White Sands Missle Range, NM.