Anglican cleric in UK: No more mosques, or Britain risks becoming an Islamic state

Is the British mainstream beginning to realize the magnitude of what threatens them? "'No more mosques' says Synod member: Alison Ruoff claims that building mega-mosques could help turn Britian into an Islamic state," by Ruth Gledhill for the Times (thanks to all who sent this in):

A prominent evangelical member of the Church of England’s General Synod has called for a ban on the building of any more mosques in Britain.

Alison Ruoff also claimed that Sharia law is inevitable in this country if mosques continue to be built here.

Mrs Ruoff, a former magistrate, said in an interview with London’s Premier Christian Radio that no more mosques should be built in Britain until all persecution of Christians in Muslim nations had ceased.

She said: “No more mosques in the UK. We are constantly building new mosques, which are paid for by the money that comes from oil states.

“We have only in this country as far as we know, 3.5 to four million Muslims. There are enough mosques for Muslims in this country, they don’t need anymore.

“We don’t need to have Sharia law which would come with more mosques imposed upon our nation, if we don’t watch out, that would happen. If we want to become an Islamic state, this is the way to go.

“You build a mosque and then what happens? You have Muslim people moving into that area, all the shops will then become Islamic, all the housing will then become Islamic and as the Bishop of Rochester has so wisely pointed out, that will be a no-go area for anyone else.

“They will bring in Islamic law. We cannot allow that to happen.”

Indeed. For the sake of human rights, for the sake of British culture, for the sake of Western civilization.

| 17 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

17 Comments

I suppose we can expect the usual character assasination of Mrs. Ruoff from the Eurodhimmi press for daring to speak out. How soon until they brand her a "right winger" or / and an "Islamophobe" in order to discredit her?

First course of action by western countries is to ask Pakistan to remove 'Pakistan Penal Code 295C' which is the infamous 'Blasphemy Law' used against Christians in Pakistan. Basically law says anyone who is found insulting islam and mohammad will face death penalty. Currently 1500 Christians are in jails under this law. Worst thing about this law is that there is no need for witnesses. Any muslim can put blame on a Christian and police will take him or her away.

Somewhat signs that eyes and brains still function in the UK. Let us hope that when the tide turns, and it eventually must, that it happens with such force and such magnitude that the tsunami of revulsion for the infection afflicting them debrides its filth forever.

It can't happen soon enough.

Fear for your life woman! Who authorized that truth serum in your afternoon tea? Strength and steadfastness...

There will always be an England.

Of course, things are a lot darker than they have been in the history of Great Britain.

"Rule, Britannia, Britannia rules the waves......."

The recent report on the impact of immigration, produced by the House of Lords, suggests things might be changing.

Ordinary people can see with their own eyes what's happening in the UK, even if the politicians can't.

However, people are still uncertain how to articulate their concerns for fear of (wrongfully) being labelled a racist.

The dhimmis are beginning to wake up...

Proud Infidel

Not long I would guess. The Government funded anti-fascist "charity” “Searchlight” is probably infiltrating her Parish Council at this moment.

Alison Ruoff also claimed that Sharia law is inevitable in this country if mosques continue to be built here.

Is it constitutionally possible for sharia law to be put into place in the U.K. and/or the U.S.?

If not, we need to explain very explicitly and precisely why that is not possible. It may have some slowing effect on rates of immigration by Muslims.

If it is possible, we need to explain that to the kufirs. We need to understand what the risk is that we are facing.

3.5 million?

But but but...!

Where are the official numbers? Don't they always tell us the Britain has no more than 2 million infil-traitors?

She will be something between ignored and vilified, with the ease of an otter slipping between ice floes, with the predictability of sunset, with the certitude of a fatwa.

"3.5 to four million Muslims".

This is the first time I have seen that figure quoted in the MSM.
My guesstimate would be nearer to 5 million, but whatever the true figure it is not something this government will admit to until it believes that all hope of change is lost. So maybe they will let it slip after they have won the next election.... 8-(

"Britain risks becoming an Islamic state"

No kidding.

A mosque is more than just a religious building. It is a political proclamation that the surrounding area is Muslim land

Mosques per se don't make Muslims, but immigration, missionaries and personal contacts do. If it's not mosques it will be cultural centers and recruiting headquarters. Let them overbuild and drain their purses supporting empty pews!

The talk has started and the Brits may be closer to hitting the panic button than some think. The British National Party is small but growing fast. Against the odds of general opinion, the Brits will start taking action.

The recent House of Lords Select Committee on Economic Affairs, which Big Luke mentioned, has called for a cap on numbers of immigrants to the UK and concluded that mass immigration has had "little or no" impact on people's economic well-being. Indeed, competition for jobs from immigrants has had a negative impact on the low paid.

In other words, immigration is great for immigrants but is of no use or is actually detrimental to the existing population.

The House of Lords Committee comprised several respected economists from across the political spectrum, yet Gordon Al-Broon has rejected their findings.

Why? Because immigrants vote Labour. Al-Broon is simply following the first rule of government:

Stay in power at all costs