The hacker spoke about "Jews" and "Muslims," and said that Jerusalem (Al-Quds) belonged to the Muslims. Now why would he frame as a religious conflict something that everyone knows is a nationalist struggle over land?
"'Muslims' hack into Bank of Israel site," from the Jerusalem Post (thanks to the Constantinopolitan Irredentist):
The Bank of Israel took down its Web site on Friday night after it was sabotaged by hackers, apparently from Algeria."Listen to me Jews - you are a nation whose fate has been decreed and sooner or later you will lose the war," read a message posted by the hackers on the bank's home page.
"The victory will come Inshallah, the Chechnya scenario will be repeated and we will kick you out," it continued. "Millions of young Muslims are ready to die for the sake of Al-Quds that belongs to us." (Al-Quds is Jerusalem in Arabic.)
The hacking constitutes a severe security breach, and it marks the first time in some time that an Israeli national information Web site has fallen victim to such a practice.
In addition, the hackers deleted Bank of Israel notices that were posted on the site up to last October. The hacker called himself "The Moorish," apparently in reference to the Islamic conquers of the Middle Ages....
"...sooner or later you will lose the war"
notice how the Muslims always refer to being at war and then you notice Israel rarely attacks those who claim to be at war...and when Isreael does attact (as in last years summer event in Lebanon), every blames Israel..
there is no doubt in my mind that the Muslims will attack Israel militarily soon..Maybe then, Israel will unleash the dogs of war..and the losers will not be the Jews..
"Millions of young Muslims are ready to die for the sake of Al-Quds that belongs to us."
These guys are not smart.
Patton said that no one ever won a war by dying for his country; instead he won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country.
So since millions of young Muslims are "ready to die", and have been clearly willing to, then they are definitely going to lose.
Jews hating Jews.
Muslim Arab Heritage from Abraham make them Jews.
Abraham/Ishmael/Adnan = Muslim Heritage
Pure Arabs per Genesis 10:26 = Ebner/Joktan & Kahtan.
Ironic that the Muslims who hate Jewish Heritage are descendants of Jews i.e. they in effect hate themselves. Is it any wonder why Muslims teach hate to their ignorant followers.
"The hacker called himself "The Moorish," apparently in reference to the Islamic conquers of the Middle Ages...."
I remember studying "Othello" in college, and Othello was described as being a Moor, specifically the "Moor of Venice." The question was asked, "What is a Moor?" Well, "Spanish" or "from Spain or North Africa" were replies, but never was the word "Islamic" uttered. No one even thought of that word, including, apparently, the Professor! (An excellent Shakespeare Prof, btw).
The boorish!
"Millions of young Muslims are ready to die for the sake of Al-Quds that belongs to us."
This begs the question: Who owns Jerusalem?
It all depends on who you ask, and who you choose to believe. As for me, since the Arab Muslims have shown themselves to be inveterate self-serving liars, in keeping with their religious duty per Mohammad's perfect example of duplicity, I'll believe the Jewish answer over theirs, thank you, like this one
Excerpt:
Source: Gov't Press Office
How many wars over Jerusalem have the moslems started and lost now?
You got your a$$es kicked over and over.
Jerusalem was a Jewish city thousands of years ago, has always had a Jewish population. Mecca is the place of your progeny, have fun running around your meteorite and leave humanity alone. Do the world a favor and just go away.
""Millions of young Muslims are ready to die for the sake of Al-Quds..."
OK. Your 72 virgins are all gussied up and ready for you, so what are you waiting for?
Now why would he frame as a religious conflict something that everyone knows is a nationalist struggle over land?"
The next time you hear Saeb Erekat, or some other superannuated PLO propagandist (I mean the ones who are still over there, beavering away at their jobs, and not those who were propagandists years ago in Beirut and then managed to get degrees from what was under Albert Hourani a virtual diploma mill at St. Antony's, and then become that appetizing thing, full professors of Middle Eastern omethingorother at Columbia)describe the "Palestinian" cause as one of "national rights" etc. ask aloud why it is that Musliims all over the world, who are not "Palestinian" Arabs, and not even Arabs, nonetheless seem to make the "cause of 'Palestine'" their very own. Was is it that exercvises those viciously anti-Israel mobs in Pakistan, or for that matter in parts of London? It can't be "Palestinian nationalism." It must be Islam.
Please explain.
"Millions of young Muslims are ready to die for the sake of Al-Quds that belongs to us."
== == == == ==
Actually, I don't have a problem with the first part of the sentence. (Buh-bye!) It's the sentiment that "all your al-Quds are belong us" that I totally, totally disagree with.
A thought just struck me: What would happen to Islam if Mecca and the Ka'aba were to just vanish in a big puff of smoke? The holy eternal perfect Quran doesn't make any allowance for "no Mecca", does it? If Mecca were gone, would the true believers still have to face the direction of a smoking crater to pray? If there were no black rock to go visit, if there were no pillars to circle three times and throw stones at, could Islam survive?