Blogging the Qur’an: Sura 24, “The Light,” verses 21-64

islam_will_dominate.jpg

That imperialist headline is Qur'an 24:55, discussed below.

Verses 21-26 of sura 24 warn the believers not to imitate Satan (v. 21) by committing sins – such as the sin of not aiding those who have left their homes “in Allah’s cause” (v. 22). This refers to the early Muslims who left Mecca and settled in Medina with Muhammad – it is a call to the new Muslims of Medina to ease their transition. Another sin to avoid is that around which this entire sura revolves: the sin of accusing chaste women of adultery, which will get the false accuser Allah’s curse in both this world and the next (v. 23). Allah will pay them back on the Day of Judgment (v. 25).

All this refers, of course, to the accusation of adultery made against Muhammad’s wife Aisha — as does the phrase “Evil women are for evil men and evil men are for evil women, and good women are for good men and good men are for good women” from v. 26, which Abdur-Rahman bin Zayd bin Aslam explains thusly: “Allah would not have made ‘A’ishah the wife of His Messenger unless she had been good, because he is the best of the best of mankind. If she had been evil, she would not have been a suitable partner either according to His Laws or His decree.”

Verses 27-29 lay down rules for the etiquette of visiting someone else’s house: don’t just barge in. This leads in verses 30-31 to rules for modesty. Men should “lower their gaze” (v. 30): says Ibn Kathir, “They should look only at what is permissible for them to look at, and lower their gaze from forbidden things. If it so happens that a person’s gaze unintentionally falls upon something forbidden, he should quickly look away.”

Women, meanwhile, should cover their “adornment” (v. 31). Contrary to what some Islamic apologists in the West claim today, this is not a matter of choice, but a divine commandment. Ibn Kathir explains: “This is a command from Allah to the believing women, and jealousy on His part over the wives of His believing servants. It is also to distinguish the believing women from the women of the Jahiliyyah [the society of unbelievers] and the deeds of the pagan women.”

What should they cover? In a hadith, Aisha recounts that Muhammad said that “when a woman reaches the age of menstruation, it does not suit her that she displays her parts of body except this and this, and he pointed to her face and hands.” Even today some Muslims use this hadith to justify mandating the hijab, or headscarf, for women. In another hadith, a woman with a veil over her face came to see Muhammad; she was looking for her son, who had been killed in battle. Muhammad asked her: “You have come here asking for your son while veiling your face?” She responded: “If I am afflicted with the loss of my son, I shall not suffer the loss of my modesty.” Pleased, Muhammad told her: “You will get the reward of two martyrs for your son,” because “the people of the Book have killed him.” The Tafsir al-Jalalayn agrees that v. 31 means that when in public women should cover “all that is other than the face and the hands.”

V. 31 also says: “And let them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their adornment.” Ibn Kathir continues: “During Jahiliyyah, when women walked in the street wearing anklets and no one could hear them, they would stamp their feet so that men could hear their anklets ringing. Allah forbade the believing women to do this.” And: “women are also prohibited from wearing scent and perfume when they are going outside the home, lest men should smell their perfume.”

Verses 32-34 contain laws for marriage and direct Muslims to free their slaves upon their request (v. 33), “provided,” says Ibn Kathir, “that the servant has some skill and means of earning so that he can pay his master the money that is stipulated in the contract.” Muslims should not force their slave girls to become prostitutes and live off the profits, if the slave girls want to remain chaste (v. 33).

Then verses 35-45 celebrate Allah. He is the light of the heavens and the earth (v. 35, the verse that gives this sura its name), and of the homes of the believers who pray and gives alms (vv. 36-37) – while the unbelievers live in darkness (vv. 39-40). All beings praise him in their own way (v. 41); he rules the natural world (vv. 43-44); he created every animal from water (v. 45).

But still there are those who don’t believe or only pretend to believe, and these are excoriated again, while the believers are praised, in verse 46-57. Allah has sent down signs (ayat, revelations or verses of the Qur’an, v. 46), but some only pretend to believe in Allah and Muhammad: they are not really believers (v. 47). Some of them don’t even come when Muhammad summons them (v. 48); if they were right, they would have come to him obediently (v. 49). They are wrongdoers (v. 50), while the believers, when Muhammad summons them, answer “We hear and obey” (v. 51). Those who obey Allah and Muhammad will be victorious in the end (v. 52) – a conviction that sustains many a jihadist today through setbacks and defeats.

The Hypocrites swear they’ll leave their homes if Muhammad commanded it, but rather than swearing mighty oaths, they should just obey (v. 53). Ibn Kathir explains: “Allah says about the hypocrites who had promised the Messenger and sworn that if he were to command them to go out for battle, they would go.” However, of the Hypocrites “it is known that your obedience is merely verbal and is not accompanied by action. Every time you swear an oath you lie.” If they turn away from Muhammad’s message, they will bear the responsibility; he has done his duty by calling them to Islam (v. 54).

Then comes a momentous promise: Allah will establish the believers as rulers of the earth (v. 55). “This is a promise,” says Ibn Kathir, “from Allah to His Messenger that He would cause his Ummah [community] to become successors on earth, i.e., they would become the leaders and rulers of mankind, through whom He would reform the world and to whom people would submit, so that they would have in exchange a safe security after their fear.” Ibn Kathir then says “this is what Allah did indeed do,” and recounts some of the early Islamic conquests.

Verses 58-64 lay down instructions for when the believers’ slaves and children must ask permission before coming in Muhammad’s presence (vv. 58-59); allow elderly women to go uncovered in public (although modesty is better) (v. 60); and greetings and eating together (v. 61), as well as direct the believers to ask permission before leaving Muhammad’s presence (v. 62), for Muhammad’s summons is not like that of an ordinary man (v. 63).

Next week: Sura 25, “The Criterion.” Muhammad’s detractors say of the Qur’an: “Tales of the ancients, which he has caused to be written: and they are dictated before him morning and evening.”

(Here you can find links to all the earlier "Blogging the Qur'an" segments. Here is a good Arabic Qur’an, with English translations available; here are two popular Muslim translations, those of Abdullah Yusuf Ali and Mohammed Marmaduke Pickthall, along with a third by M. H. Shakir. Here is another popular translation, that of Muhammad Asad. And here is an omnibus of ten Qur’an translations.)

| 21 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

21 Comments

There are also a few discussions in the comments field at Hot Air that you may find interesting -- notably one with an indignant Catholic

Indignant . . .Catholic . . .hmmmm, Karen Armstrong reads Hot Air?

. . .// couldn't help myself, I'll finish reading the article now.

Robert - I hope you are planning to release the entire "Blogging the Quran" either in book form or on CDs.

I'd love to have the series available for offline reading. :)

Robert,

I'm amazed at how much you write everyday. I'm not sure how you keep up with it - I even have problems just trying to read everything you put online.

As always, well done and I love your work.

Robert,

In the "Hot Air" comments you discuss "returns ever diminishing". Were you aware that Hot Air appear to have closed registration and so you will get no new commentators there?

I'll comment on the Blog here, but only to point out that your "Blogging the Qur'an" series is prviding me with valuable *answers*. I've now realised your care in answering comments in "Hot Air" adds much value, so thanls also for those.

Robert -

As James Brown once sang -

"Baby, please, please, please - don't go."

The public needs to know. I have a dear friend who feels that because her Muslim friends are "nice", we should not be critical of the Qur'an or Islam. "Every religious text has violent passages...."

This is wishful thinking at the best and ostrich ignorance at the worst.

Please continue "Blogging the Qur'an."

"It is better to light a candle, than curse the dark."

This extraordinary series is valuable and should continue to it's natural conclusion - the completion of the entire qur'an, and eventually made available on book or CD or even a syndicated column. (I'll happily report sightings of pigs flying)


I read your Blogging the Qur’an regularly without comment for a couple of reasons. First, I'm a regular reader of this site and post my questions/comments here since I'm not a registered user of Hot Air.

Jihadwatch, dhimmiwatch and 'Blogging the Qur'an' archives provide a treasure trove of material that is discovered by new audiences - young and old regularly. I suppose you might be surprised to see your series featured in high school aged students MySpace pages - a twist on syndication, if you will - not necessarily at the time of featured release, but tied in with specific current events.

As for the comment at Hot Air equivocating the bible with the qur'an, the commenter has a blog of their own. It should be encouraging that this blogger visited your 'Blogging the koran' series and has demonstrated a willingness to explore outside the limiting comfort of familiar diametrics.

We must lose our religious and cultural arrogance and get on board with what we have to deal with today, not thousands of years ago.

She obviously hasn't been reading Jihad Watch. The koran is for all times.

Hasn't been reading the bible much either is she is just studying Genesis and Exodus.

And I suspect that her husband will think that western culture is better than islamic culture after serving in the middle east or afghanistan. Our arrogance? I have no intention of losing my cultural arrogance. Thanks, but no thanks. Our culture is better. Maybe your religion isn't? You don't sound like you have much faith.

If you don't think the west is better, go live with the muslims for a while.

That is, billions of people who are rejecting terrorism under the name of their religion (we Christians might want to remind ourselves of our darker days and the Crusades when pointing fingers) who are ready to move ahead. This is clearly evidenced by the plethora of Muslim groups like “Terrorism is not Us” and “Terrorism has no Religion”, etc., Muslim scholars reaching out to the pope…..

~Amy Proctor

"Billions of people rejecting terrorism?" There's only 1 billion muslims and 40% to 90% of them think murdering apostates is fine. Where do you get your numbers?

Again with the crusades, blah, blah blah Karen Armstrong says.... blah, blah, blah.

Muslims scholars reaching out to the pope? To tell him that we need dialoge so that we can ALL understand that islam is tolerant, ~ until it gets strong enough to take over that is.

Your faith had darker days...and then there was a reformation. Islam will have NO reformation. The koran is for ALL times and for ALL people and for the WHOLE world.

Doesn't Christianity FOLLOW the teachings of Christ? Not the Old Testament? Why do supposed Christians keep bringing up the Old Testament to prove they are not worthy? Maybe if they would stop doing that there would still be a thriving Christian population in Bethleham, land of their saviours birth, instead of a few cowering Christians, who are afraid to raise their heads.

Ann~
Keep turning your other cheek. Maybe if it gets slapped enough you'll wake up. Before your children are forced to become muslims. But if you don't think your faith is any better, maybe it won't matter to you?

Robert - Keep up the good work please. You are read by more people than you know about. There are lots of lurkers who never post. And many others who read your works that are copied into other places.

I am not registered to comment at Hot Air, but I really wanted to respond to Amy's comments.
I myself have read the Bible. You know what happens? I come across something that is opaque and I find myself asking, "Well, what is that all about?" For example, "Why is the sacrifice of Abel accepted but not Cain's?" "Lot's daughter's did what with him?" "Why is Jacob's treachery rewarded?" and those are just off the top of my head recalling questions from Genesis.
So what do I do with these questions? I don't just give a dumb, happy grin and say, "Well it's in the Bible so it must be okey-dokely!" Instead I try to find out how Jews and Christians throughout the ages have considered these passages. What do the Fathers of the Church say, what do Biblical scholars say, what do Jewish rabbis say?
I could go on at length about interpreting each of the points you raised, but that would deprive you of the useful exercise of researching something. On the other hand, I am not sure you would. It seems to me from your criticism of David's behavior that you must have flung the Bible from your hand in mid-verse. Otherwise you might have noticed the second part of 2 Sam 11:27, "But the LORD was displeased with what David had done." Hello??? That's a clue in the text itself about how to view the behavior, and it is fundamentally dishonest of you to present this as a problem of Biblical morality. You are simply taking refuge in willful ignorance of both the Bible and the Koran.
Robert is in fact providing context about each and every part of the Koran. He is systematically, week-by-week going through the Koran and showing how Muslim commenters view the passage.
Comments at Hot Air are closed, but Jihad Watch is open, and anyone with an alternative commentary is entirely welcome to post it.
Most people are too lazy to wonder why adulterers are not stoned to death in Jewish or Christian societies, and why they are in Muslim societies. They buy into a watered down historical determinism that says, "Ah yes! Islam is such a young religion, and we used to stone adulterers back in the day, and I am sure Muslims will grow out of it." I suppose that if you turn your head and pretend you don’t see what is going on in Muslim societies and even Muslim communities in the west that you think that you will have nobody’s blood on your hands. Countless women can be put in prison or murdered for the crime of being raped, and you can ignore it, and feel ever-so-good about yourself for being tolerant and respectful of other religions.
Perhaps Robert could post this at Hot Air where Amy commented. If so, thanks.

and another thing...
Amy asked, "Are we prepared to condemn Judaism?" My answer, "Yes, of course. And I am prepared to condemn Christianity, and Islam and any other religion that walks through the room." It is up to the religion to convince ME that it should be treated respectfully, and not MY job to put on a Stepford wife smile whenever anyone talks about religion.

That ~Ann~ should have been to ~Amy~. Who probably won't read any of this anyway and is just trying to link her blog.

The Tafsir al-Jalalayn agrees that v. 31 means that when in public women should cover “all that is other than the face and the hands.”


So what is the idea behind the burkha or even the cover that shows only the eyes? It can't be anywhere in the Quran if numerous sources say Mohammed said to cover all but the FACE and hands. Where did the Taliban (or anyone else in Islamdom) get that from?

PMK ~ It seems like the original order was to cover all but the face and hands. The adornments could be shown by stamping the foot (meaning adornments were jewelry and ankle bracelets) but that became the veil, which because woman are all 'vagina's, the whole body should be unrecognizable. Some say that veils were common, but then only Mo's wives wore the veil so they could be told from the unbelievers. Later all the believers women wore the veil, which then turned into the all encompasing sheet. Including gloves and un-needed glasses to hide the face.

This was started by one of Mo's friends, which he convieniently got a matching revelation about shortly after his friends request.

The one or two eyes part is in parenthesis so I don't think they were original to the koran. Instead they are a commentary which has become part of the standard printing.

I could be wrong. See these links to muslim sites for explanations.

http://www.searchtruth.com/search.php?keyword=tell+your+wives&translator=5&search=1&start=0

http://www.inter-islam.org/Actions/Hijbdu.html

http://www.allaahuakbar.net/womens/niqaab.htm

And to anyone reading this that thinks the literal interpretation of the koran is in the past, try reading Sheik Osama bin Ladin's Letter to America. He quotes the koran multiple times and lists the verse so you can check it. The same out of context way that we do here. Did muslims complain? Isn't he being a "Sheik" a koran expert? Muslims the world over adore him. He says islam will conquer the world. Why do 90% of muslims polled adore him?

It's not the past for muslims.

It is the present.

And the future.

Borg,
Great links. I had to laugh out loud at the following segment from the second link. These Muslims really have projection problems. They're so busy trying to prove how great they are they can't see just how badly they treat others.

The kuffaar say that Islam has enslaved its women by enforcing them to stay in their homes and cover themselves when they come out. How very wrong they are! What have the kuffaar given their women; prizes for displaying their bodies and exposing them to the risk of rape and molestation. Insecurity of losing their husbands to beautiful mistresses. Constant battle with nature to look young and pretty enough to keep your man with you! On the contrary, Islam elevates its women to the peak of respect and saves a woman from disgrace and humiliation, giving her a chance to be treated like an honourable human being and not a mere sex object for the lustful desires of bestial miscreants.

Treating women as honourable human beings when they can divorce a woman for the "sin" of being infertile?

Western women have the insecurity of losing their husbands to beautiful mistresses when Islam gives men four wives and countless mistresses?

Islam elevates its women to the peak of respect? So THAT'S why they have to walk behind their men and subject themselves to the control of the eldest son! A child can tell them what to do if that child is male! That must also be why an Iraqi killed his only daughter for the sin of "TALKING" to an infidel. His sons joined him in the act of stomping her throat and afterward they were congratulated(!) by the local police.

I never understood just how gallant Islam was until today!

A few words about those dastardly Crusaders, mentioned above.
In historical times, the land called variously Palestina (Gk), Israel, Judea-Galilee-Samaria, Syria, Lesser Syria, and several other names (the Levant, for example), originally was settled by Philistines and Cannanites. It was taken from them by the Israelites. It was taken from them by the Assyrians and Babylonians. Jews (Judeans) were restored to residency, but not rule, by Persia. Independent Jewish rule was reestablished by the Macabbees for about 200 years, beginning in about 150 B.C. Then, the Romans took over and directly or indirectly ruled the region for about 600 years, the last 250 or 300 years from Constantinople. Jews and Christians lived in the area at that time.

In the 7th century, Muslims invaded and took the land by force, imposing Islam or servitude (dhimmi status) on the inhabitants.

The crusades were simply an attempt by Christians to retake (liberate, if you will) the region from the most recent imperialist conquerors, the Muslims. They were briefly and only locally successful in the effort, and finally, Muslims reestablished hegemony over the land -- until the 20th century, when Jews once again wrested a measure of control of a part of the territory from its Ottoman (specifically Syrian) hegemons, rulers, imperial dictators.

Whine, whine, moan, moan... The process is called history. There are winners and losers, and it's sometimes difficult to tell which is which without a program.

Another sin to avoid is that around which this entire sura revolves: the sin of accusing chaste women of adultery, which will get the false accuser Allah’s curse in both this world and the next (v. 23). Allah will pay them back on the Day of Judgment (v. 25).

Does this mean that the father who kills his daugher, or the brother who kills his sister, just because of an unsubstantiated suspicion of adultery, is cursed? If so, then why are such people cheered on in the islamic-occupied world? And if not, what then does it mean?

and another thing...Amy asked, "Are we prepared to condemn Judaism?" My answer, "Yes, of course. And I am prepared to condemn Christianity, and Islam and any other religion that walks through the room." It is up to the religion to convince ME that it should be treated respectfully, and not MY job to put on a Stepford wife smile whenever anyone talks about religion.

Posted by: AnneCrockett at May 12, 2008 10:14 AM
-----------------------------------------------
That is a great answer, AnneCrockett.

I am a Christian, and I want more than anything for you, too, to be a Christian. However, if I want your conversion to Christianity to be sincere and real, and not phony (e.g. just to get rid of me), then the only thing I can do is gentle persuasion with my words and my actions. I.e., I can "love" you into becoming a Christian: by helping you when you need it, or by perhaps doing something good for you in response to something bad you do to me (this is only a hypothetical example).

Also, I can secretly pray that God would convince you.

You see, if Christianity (or any other religion, for that matter) is really genuine, and if our God really is the real God, then I don't have to force you to do anything; I merely have to live in such a way that you see Jesus in me; and then, from time to time, say a word or two about Jesus.

This is one of the biggest reasons that Islam is a phony religion: they have to force people to believe; they can't leave the convincing part up to their god. If their god was real, then they wouldn't have to force a thing.

Mr Spencer

keep going! Finish it out, and then get it published.

I read BOTH your 'Blogging the Quran' over at Hot Air (and ALL the comments!) and the discussion here as well.

I don't comment at 'Hot Air' as I am reluctant to register on too many sites - there, I simply sit quietly in the corner with my coffee and 'eavesdrop'. But add me to the roll of 'readers'.

The people who comment there are a different bunch, overall, from those who comment here, which makes it interesting to compare. I enjoy watching your dialogue with the questioners.

I recommended 'Blogging the Quran' to a fellow-parishioner who had just borrowed, and read, my copy of the Quran (N Dawood translation) - I said if she wanted some useful insights, that was *the* place to go.

From Above:-
“Women, meanwhile, should cover their “adornment” (v. 31). Contrary to what some Islamic apologists in the West claim today, this is not a matter of choice, but a divine commandment. Ibn Kathir explains: “This is a command from Allah to the believing women, and jealousy on His part over the wives of His believing servants. It is also to distinguish the believing women from the women of the Jahiliyyah [the society of unbelievers] and the deeds of the pagan women.”

Comments:-
To translate Jahilliyyah as [the society of unbelievers] may not be correct as the word ‘Unbeliever’ denotes that one is all out in defiance and does not wants to believe in view of the vested interests; like the Christian or Jews that they have evolved certain myths like the monopoly about God (of owning Him), where as, even the last superseding commandment of God, in shape of Quran is very much here with us but they insist (in defiance) that peoples salvation rests with the Christianity only. While envying the Last Commandments; Christian may like to indulge in maligning it but may not be ready to take any heed.

Where as 'Jahilliyah' can be described as a society which is deprived of knowledge, civility and education; they followed the primitive customs of their ancestors and were stuck with the old rut of traditions found in their culture. They were void of any comprehension to grasp and evaluate the subject delicate matters, like covering of women bodies etc in public; and that they were in need of strenuous painstaking efforts to educate and groom them to attain the required civility level that Quran describes.
-------------
Adabarez

"and that they were in need of strenuous painstaking efforts to educate and groom them to attain the required civility level that Quran describes.

Posted by: Adabarez"

I have seen imitaters of uswa-hasana, al insan, al kamil who have spent a lifetime making strenuous painstaking efforts grooming themselves to attain the required civility level that quran describes and I must say that I cannot use the word "civil" to describe them. "Sub-animal", "Barbarians"(with apology to barbarians), "Zombies"(this is about perfect) are the words that one can safely employ in describing these people. But then, I am a kaffir, and a jahil of the jahillya as well and I obviously cannot understand the perfection of the quran. OTOH, I think I do understand it very well.

Arjun Savak,

When every thing is viewed with prejudice; wearing the tinted glasses and coloured then every thing will certainly look stained, with smears and smudgy.

Savak; there are many more pleasant things in this world to do other than goose chasing.
--------







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
Crucified Again by Raymond IbrahimDavid LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter