1938 Alert. “Search Is Urged for Syrian Nuclear Sites,” by Joby Warrick and Robin Wright for the Washington Post, May 29:
The Bush administration is pressing U.N. inspectors to broaden their search for possible secret nuclear facilities in Syria, hinting that Damascus’s nuclear program might be bigger than the single alleged reactor destroyed by Israeli warplanes last year.
At least three sites have been identified by U.S. officials and passed along to the International Atomic Energy Agency, which is negotiating with Syria for permission to conduct inspections in the country, according to U.S. government officials and Western diplomats. U.S. officials want to know if the suspect sites may have been support facilities for the alleged Al Kibar reactor destroyed in an Israeli air raid Sept. 6, the sources said.
The U.N. nuclear watchdog, which has been seeking access to the Al Kibar site since shortly after the bombing, has acknowledged receiving requests to expand the scope of its inspections, but provided no details.
U.S. government officials declined to describe the specific sites that have drawn interest, or to discuss how they were identified. However, the United States and other Western governments have long been interested in identifying possible locations for a facility in Syria that might have supplied nuclear fuel rods for a Syrian reactor. Although the Al Kibar site was described as nearly operational at the time of the Sept. 6 bombing, it had no clear source of the uranium fuel necessary for operation, according to U.S. intelligence officials and diplomats familiar with the site.
Syria, which has denied having a nuclear weapons program, has not yet responded to IAEA requests for a firm date for inspections.
U.S. intelligence officials contend that the Al Kibar facility was built with North Korean assistance, to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons. CIA Director Michael V. Hayden said in an interview that the intelligence community’s insight into Syria’s nuclear ambitions has deepened since the Israeli raid.
“Do not assume that Al Kibar exhausted our knowledge of Syrian efforts with regard to nuclear weapons,” Hayden said. “I am very comfortable — certainly with Al Kibar and what was there, and what the intent was. It was the highest confidence level. And nothing since the attack last September has changed our mind. In fact, events since the attack give us even greater confidence as to what it was.”
He predicted that Syria would “almost certainly attempt to delay and deceive” the IAEA. But he added: “We know what they did.”…
Will Syria claim the facilities in question are part of Iranian-style projects toward the “peaceful generation of electricity?” Or will the Syrians also suddenly embark on a “space program?”
“Missile-related shipment to Syria stopped, U.S. says,” by Arshad Mohammed for Reuters, May 29:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Four countries last year prevented Syria from receiving equipment that could be used to test ballistic missile components, a senior U.S. official said on Wednesday.
U.S. national security adviser Stephen Hadley described the previously undisclosed incident in a speech to members of the Proliferation Security Initiative, a network of countries that seeks to stop illicit weapons of mass destruction shipments.
The Bush administration has portrayed the PSI effort, which was launched five years ago and has more than 90 nations as members, as a significant success in its drive to prevent biological, chemical or nuclear terrorism.
Analysts say it is hard to judge its effectiveness because members are reluctant to disclose successes to avoid betraying sources that provide intelligence needed to stop shipments.
“One example of its success occurred in February 2007, when four nations represented in this room worked together to interdict equipment bound for Syria — equipment that could have been used to test ballistic missile components,” Hadley said at a conference to mark PSI’s fifth anniversary.
“Interdictions like this one have been successful all over the world — and have stopped many shipments of sensitive materials destined for Iran, North Korea, and Syria,” he said, providing no further details…