Bostom: "When I put together the Koranic verses on the Jews, they read like an indictment, prosecution and conviction"

LegacyAntisemitism.jpg

In the course of this interview about his book, Andy Bostom says: "As I was putting the first book together, I came across Ahmad Sirhindi. He was an Indian Sufi who was enraged by the reforms of Moghul Akbar, who abolished the jizya [poll tax]. This enraged the orthodox ulema [scholars], one of the chief representatives of whom was Sirhindi. Amongst his virulent tracts against the moghul he says, 'Whenever a Jew is killed, it is for the benefit of Islam.' Now, this is a 16th-17th century anti-Hindu ideologue, and there's no evidence that he ever had contact with a Jew. So I was like, 'Where on earth did this come from?'"

It certainly did not come and could not have come from Christianity, although the common charge is that Islamic antisemitism was imported from Christian Europe. But a "16th-17th century anti-Hindu ideologue" is unlikely to have had extensive contact with Europe.

"'Anti-Semitism inherent in Islam can only be eradicated,'" by Sam Ser in the Jerusalem Post, June 19 (thanks to Sylvia):

[...] In his writing, Bostom tries to chase away a different kind of demon: the pervasive belief that the anti-Semitism common to so many Muslims today is a modern, and alien, influence on what more than 1 billion people call "the religion of peace."

One look at the cover art of The Legacy of Islamic Anti-Semitism is all it takes to discern what Bostom thinks of that. Alfred Dehodencq's vividly colorful but starkly ominous painting "Execution of a Moroccan Jewess" is a recreation of the actual public execution, in Tangier in the 1830s, of 17-year-old Sol Hachuel, who was falsely accused of converting to, and then renouncing, Islam. In an introductory note on the painting and on the heartbreaking tale, Bostom asserts that Sol's cruel fate was shared by countless Jews over more than a dozen centuries, wherever Muslims ruled. Then, in the several hundred pages that follow, he proves it.

The Legacy of Islamic Anti-Semitism calls to mind the work of Bat Yeor, who over the past 20 years has practically single-handedly forced recognition of the oppression inherent in what she calls dhimmitude - the institution of inferiority, humiliation and obedience that Muslims demand of non-Muslims under their control.

But Bostom, who considers Bat Yeor a mentor, goes a step further. He provides an extraordinarily thorough look at the history of Islamic anti-Semitism in practice, from the dawn of the religion until today and in every place where Muslims predominated, using first-hand accounts of renowned Muslim scholars and historians as well as Western observers. The questions facing Muslims today - Will they deny this religiously motivated hatred? Excuse it? Use it for political gain? Reject it and reform Islam? - all require an in-depth examination of the Koran, the hadith (sayings and deeds of Muhammad and his companions), and the sira (the biography of Muhammad) as the textual roots of this hatred. And that is what Bostom provides in The Legacy of Islamic Anti-Semitism.

What makes this work truly unique, though, is that Bostom had virtually no knowledge of Islam prior to the September 11 terrorist attacks. He is an epidemiologist and clinical nutritionist from New England who spends the vast majority of his time researching renal diseases.

"I wanted to know what had motivated the terrorists," says Bostom, who grew up in New York. So, on the afternoon of September 11, "I grabbed a couple of books at a bookstore on the way home and read them that night. But they were so treacle-y and so transparently apologetic." The contradiction between the Islam espoused by the terrorists and the religion described in the books, he says, "just didn't make any sense."

In search of deeper analyses of Islam, Bostom began exhausting the resources of local libraries.

"I was quite interested in learning more about the history and the theology of jihad," he says. (The Legacy of Islamic Anti-Semitism is essentially the continuation of his 2005 book The Legacy of Jihad in Islam.) "The model for me was to go back and look at essays written by great Orientalists and materials that I felt had fallen by the wayside. Of special interest were materials that were not available in English, for which I sought out Arabic and Farsi translators. Almost all my primary sources were Muslim scholars."

WHILE SEARCHING for the roots of jihad, Bostom found the roots of Islam's Jew-hatred. More often than not, they were intertwined.

"As I was putting the first book together, I came across Ahmad Sirhindi," he explains. "He was an Indian Sufi who was enraged by the reforms of Moghul Akbar, who abolished the jizya [poll tax]. This enraged the orthodox ulema [scholars], one of the chief representatives of whom was Sirhindi. Amongst his virulent tracts against the moghul he says, 'Whenever a Jew is killed, it is for the benefit of Islam.' Now, this is a 16th-17th century anti-Hindu ideologue, and there's no evidence that he ever had contact with a Jew. So I was like, 'Where on earth did this come from?'"

Bostom looked first to the Koran for an explanation.

"When I put together the Koranic verses on the Jews," he continues, "they read like an indictment, prosecution and conviction. It was virulently anti-Semitic. Going into the hadith and the histories of Muhammad - where his assassination is attributed to a Khybar Jewess, for example - only strengthened this conviction.

"So when I juxtaposed that with the notion that there was no theological anti-Semitism in Islam, it was stunning. It's just so in-your-face that to claim that the foundational sources don't create anti-Semitism or aren't inherently anti-Semitic... it's absurd."

Indeed. Read it all.

| 8 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

8 Comments

Someone posted an article a few days ago entitled Is Allah God? (Not the Daniel Pipes one) My machine crashed and I lost it. Could you please re-post?
Thanks,CGW

One look at the cover art of The Legacy of Islamic Anti-Semitism is all it takes to discern what Bostom thinks of that. Alfred Dehodencq's vividly colorful but starkly ominous painting "Execution of a Moroccan Jewess" is a recreation of the actual public execution, in Tangier in the 1830s, of 17-year-old Sol Hachuel, who was falsely accused of converting to, and then renouncing, Islam. In an introductory note on the painting and on the heartbreaking tale, Bostom asserts that Sol's cruel fate was shared by countless Jews over more than a dozen centuries, wherever Muslims ruled.

I would have liked to have had this Image in my files, so as to use at a later date, but after much surfing the net, it proved to be impossible to find. What I did find was that the original painting was destroyed in Dehodencqs studio by an indignant mob

After more searching I found a different story about Sol Hachuel, and it states that she was 12 years of age, not 17

http://illustratedpig.blogspot.com/2007/05/cover-art-is-reproduction-of-alfred.html

I don't think Islam will give up Jew hatred.
Mohammad never gave it up, he was blaming Jews on his death bed. Modern muslims make up gruesome stories about Jews, making them seem like something out of a horror movie. All that makes for a great movie script for leftist's, and various muslims to put on youtube.
Hatred of Jews and their child Israel, is ingrained into the collective consciousness of Islam, and perpetuated by individuals within, and others outside it. The idea of a Jewess poisoning Mohammad, and other Jews held responsible for The Prophet Jesus murder, do not help the image of Jews being evil, and in need of stamping out.
Israel is stuck with this and can only protect itself and present a strong front. If it does not, it will be over run by people who will have no mercy...

The white wash of Islam in the public realm is sickening. 'The Truth about Mohammad' was the key book for me. It alowd me to conect Muslims blood lust today to the blood drenched example of Mohammad.

Good, Fjordman. Thank you.

The hatred of Jews is one of the most interesting (and despicable) aspects of human history.

I really don't know what peculiar significance, if any, the current explosion of Jew-hatred has. Is there an odder form of non-organic mental illness?

Equally odd is the self-hatred of so many Jews, who are on the front lines of defending those who hate them, and of attacking those who understand the grave implications of Jew-hatred for every civilized person.

The fact that Jew-hatred is central to mohammed-worship confirms the centrality of mental illness to that total belief system.

But why will most Jews in America vote for Obama, a man who, every intuitive fiber screams, is not a friend of Jews?

It is enough to make this agnostic almost consider some metaphysical explanation.

From the interview of And Bostom:
And ultimately, when asked what he expects people - Muslims and non-Muslims - to do with the information in The Legacy of Jihad in Islam and The Legacy of Islamic Anti-Semitism, Bostom answers: "I want them to understand the magnitude and the depth of the problem. And I want them to understand that this problem will not go away without discussion, without a mea culpa on the part of the Muslims, and that it's the obligation on the part of the non-Muslims to encourage these reforms to take place.

I think he's missed it. It seems after putting together this great piece of scholarly research, that he believes his book will be effective in convincing Muslims to participate in discussion and plead mea culpa. Come on. It's my obligation as a non-Muslim to encourage reforms in what? Muslim idealogy?

Rather than expecting to reform Muslim views on Jews, I think this book is effective at portraying Islam for what it is. I say, don't strive to reform Islam, expose it for the ugly it is.

Richard

did you read this paragraph - the last one in the interview?

"I think that it can't be left up to Muslims themselves, because that hasn't worked. Of course, in the long term, it will have to come from within.

"But in the meantime," Bostom concludes, "non-Muslims are going to have to defend themselves and to demand a change."

Bostom says plainly that 'it [reform] can't be left up to Muslims themselves, because that hasn't worked'.

And note that he says - "non-Muslims {which, of course, includes Jews, and the Jewish state of Israel} ARE GOING TO HAVE TO DEFEND THEMSELVES."

I think what Bostom has in mind is a double effort. People like Ali Sina, or Wafa Sultan, or Ibn Warraq, or the Christian evangelists like Fr Zakarias Botros with his 'Life TV' show, hammer away on one front.

But they can only keep on doing that if we kafir also resolutely defend ourselves in every way.

I didn't make myself entirely clear above. The second half of the 'double effort' I referred to, is the resolute self-defence of the kafir.