...but is rebuffed, I'm happy to say. "Mich. man: Judge can't be fair because he's Jewish," from AP, June 24 (thanks to all who sent this in):
DETROIT (AP) — A judge rejected a Lebanese-born defendant's request that he remove himself from a case involving terrorism because the judge is Jewish.Fawzi Mustapha Assi, 48, has pleaded guilty to providing support for a terrorist group. He addressed the court Monday against the advice of his attorney, saying he heard rumors that U.S. District Judge Gerald E. Rosen is a Zionist and might have pro-Israel sympathies.
Assi said he was concerned the judge could not be impartial when sentencing him for supporting "one of the most hated enemies of the state of Israel."
Rosen said Assi's request was "a little late" and that the court "has bent over backwards" to ensure fairness.
Assi, a former resident of Dearborn, was arrested in 1998 when he tried to board a plane to Lebanon with visual and navigational equipment for Hezbollah. He pleaded guilty in November 2007....
Yes of course the UMMAH or Muslim Judge would be very impartial. Not to mention a Christian Judge or a Buddhist Judge or for that matter a Hindu Judge will certainly be partial. They are all unbelievers so certainly they will be partial. This pathetic Mohammedan.
There is reason for caution despite this momentary satisfaction . . .
From Debbie Schlussel
read the rest at the link.Hmm...
Maybe the judge should have recused himself, on this one. I think there's a risk of the conviction being overturned on appeal, though the criminal did plead guilty. (He might be able to claim duress, at the notion of being tried by a Jewish jurist.)
The Jew educated himself, learned, adapted and is a productive element of the society.
The Islamic nazi helps terrorrists, and makes racist demands.
i foresee a appeal from this mud-lim based on the judge being jewish but chances are he would only consider a sharia court to be impartial
Every such moment is a potential 'teaching moment' - a moment which informed kafir can use to mention to the uninformed, for example, the fact that serious mainline Muslims, jihad-and-sharia-minded Muslims, do not recognise the validity of any law other than that of Islam, nor do they recognise as valid any kafir judge nor any kafir political or legal authority, period.
However: if the kafir happens to have overwhelming physical force and the Muslim does not, the Muslim will lie low, temporarily, pleading darura, and submit to those irksome kafir laws, temporarily and with a bad grace.
One must expect Muslims brought to trial before a kafir court, for almost any reason, not just 'terror' [jihad] charges, but for just about anything - shoplifting, theft, fraud major and minor, traffic violations, assault, rape, murder - to show "contempt of court" much more often than kafir do. (The other possible response is a grovelling, fawning submission).
Any court reporters, barristers, police persons, journalists reading or posting here, with sufficient experience around the court houses, to be able to offer an opinion on this topic? How do Muslim defendants generally behave in kafir courts?
THERE IS NO SURPRISE THAT THIS WOULD TAKE PLACE IN MICHIGAN,HOME OF DEARBORNISTAN.
THE DETROIT METRO-AREA HAS A LONG HISTORY OF JEW-HATRED AND PRO NAZI,NOW ISLAMONAZI ACTIVITY, GOING BACK TO HENRY FORD AND HIS ACTIVE HATRED OF THE JEWS AND HIS PRO-NAZI/PRO-HITLER SYMPATHIES, FATHER CHARLES COUGHLIN AND HIS PRO NAZI/ANTI-JEWISH HITLERIAN PUBLIC SPEECHES AND ORGANIZING OF AMERICAN NAZI GROUPS (INCLUDING A NATIONWIDE RADIO NETWORK), AND THE CREATION OF THE DETROIT AREA ARAB/MUSLIM JIHADI BASE ,HERE ON U.S. SOIL,BUT SO CLOSE TO FOREIGN SANCTUARY(CANADA)!
SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG IN MICHIGAN,AND IT'S NOT JUST THE PROBLEMS OF THE AUTO INDUSTRY AND OTHER INDUSTRIAL ENTITIES,BUT THE 'ENEMIES WITHIN'!!!