Thug-In-Chief: Iran expects "different approach" from next President

"We are ready for dialogue with anyone,"

He is gaining respect from American liberals...

"except with the Zionist regime,"

Even more respect from American liberals...

"in relations based on mutual respect and fairness."

He is now sending American liberals scrambling for their dictionaries.

The enemy's even more out of touch with reality than our leaders are, which will be the clincher in the end.

Obama will win in November. The NYTimes will be vindicated in every word it prints. Muslims will flock to our shores and there will be a mosque on every corner. Oil will top $200 a barrel. Polygamy will be legalized, and Sharia courts will spring up like mushrooms. The Islamic Republic of America.

Obama will win in November. The NYTimes will be vindicated in every word it prints. Muslims will flock to our shores and there will be a mosque on every corner. Oil will top $200 a barrel. Polygamy will be legalized, and Sharia courts will spring up like mushrooms. The Islamic Republic of America.

Posted by: jewdog at June 4, 2008 9:26 AM

jewdog - I must say your optimism is overwhelming!

Actually, I think McCain will win. Didn't you see the video of Manhattanite Harriet Christian who called Obama an "Inadequate black male?" She's a Dem, but will vote for McCain. I think there's many more Dems who will do the same!

Is Adjamaflabamajab quoting Pelosi again? Did he receive his Democratic talking points? hmm, he says the EXACT thing Obama was saying ...
hmmm... I wonder.... could they be "secretly communicating"... Pelosi did credit IRAN with lowering the violence in Iraq...hmmmm

It's real hard to tell whether Adjamaflabamajab was reading these from his "talking points" or if he was quoting Barack Osama from heart.
[a "different approach"

"Whoever wins the elections, I'm sure that the United States will change, it will have a different approach,"

"The United States will have a reduced sphere of influence in the world," "The new president will have to respond to the real demands of the American people: 40 million American citizens do not have health insurance, the victims of the New Orleans hurricane still have no homes."

"will have to withdraw the soldiers from Iraq (since) the American people will not tolerate continued spending of billions of dollars on weapons," ]

"The United States will have a reduced sphere of influence in the world,"

And if we're smart about it, we'll spend less on foreign aid in the process. Tell all those third world dictators to go ask the Iranians for foreign aid.

Oh wait, we're not that smart, we'll give them even more of my money hoping to buy more influence.

For once I'm with Ahmanutjob, let's take care of ourselves and let someone else take care of the world.

From article: 40 million American citizens do not have health insurance,

Isn't that sweet...
I had no idea that Beasty Boy Ahmadenijad, was concerned about US health insurance. When he has a face to face with prez Obama, I wonder if US health insurance will be on the top of the agenda.
Obama can talk about bombs, and Beasty can talk about bringing health insurance to 40 million deprived Americans...A true meeting of the minds...

Give this guy his answer: "nuts"

Or give him the finger: up yours.

Why are so many ideologue dictators (Napoleon, der fuhrer, and monkey man) shorties ? (with apologies otherwise to short people).

An object worthy of ridicule.

"Iran expects "different approach" from next President"

For sure. Bush resisted dealing with you, Iran, in any substantial way. The next President will eventually realize that you are such of an out of control threat, he'll have to bomb you into the stone ages and that will be the difference.

The clown has adopted Obama's talking points. Interesting. So, with farahkahn, wright, phleger, nasrallah, meshall, and other luminaries supporting him, I assume he has the jew-hater vote locked up?

We need Iranian Islamic-style universal health insurance--also known as jizya--NOW!

Iran expects a "different approach" from the next US president, whoever wins the November elections

Careful what you wish for, Mahmoud. You just might get it. That different approach could just mean confronting you or even bombing sites that even remotely appear to be engaged in nuclear weapons research.

You might get a president who isn't nearly as diffident as our current "leader" and is less worried about offending "peaceful" Muslims who don't live up to their own words.

I, too, am afraid that Obama will be our next president. Read this article from The Jewish News and you'll see why the muslims are so excited about this prospect.

http://www.thejewishweek.com/viewArticle/c36_a9376/News/New_York.html

Don't worry about Obama getting elected. While it is true that the swooning liberal children got him the nomination, when the real election happens, 'adults' will vote McCain into office. Not because they like him so much, but to an adult, he is the lesser of two evils. Of course, the lesser of two evils is still evil. At least McCain is partially predictable, Obama is an unknown waters guy, there is no telling where he will lead us. Down the primrose path most likely. I predict that the same people who elected him, will be howling for his impeachment within a year of taking office...

about "this guy," neville chamberlain:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26791

(i have no idea if buchanan's interpretation has merit.)

I too believe Obama will win in November. There are enough stupid and irresponsible people that vote. And McCain, I believe, does not have a chance. He does not inspire anyone. He is a
"has been". And up to now, he has no idea what he is up against with his opponent. McCain will lose. I am not for either one of them. They do not impress me at all. With either one, the same problems will continue with no improvement in anything, only worse. I may have to eat my words but that is how I see it at this time.

I'm for McCain all the way, but let's get real. The economy is in the tank...amidst an unpopular war. It's hard to imagine the party in power being re-elected.

Obama will win in October...and woe be to those who can't imagine that things could get much, much worse than they are.

...er...November.

Ironically, our last best hope to defeat Obama (barring another huge bombshell) is Hillary. Yep, Hillary. And I think she and Bubba are in the process of doing just that as we speak. Think about it. Hillary all of a sudden announces that she would be interested in the VP slot the same day that Bill explodes and calls Obama all kinds of nasty names, making it virtually impossible for Obama to do, even if he had wanted to in the first place, which he most assuredly didn't. Now he's caught between a rock and a hard place because if he doesn't tap her for the VP slot, her minions will be FURIOUS and most probably won't vote for him. Which gets McCain elected and sets her up for 2012. In the meantime she gets to boss around the (soon to be) huge majority in the Senate to make sure that McCain can accomplish nothing for the next four years. Fait accompli.

Stand up for England, Arthur...

I think that McCain is more likely to win in November, but what difference will it make?

Basically we get to chose between an old, white cringing dhimmi or a younger, black cringing dhimmi.

Can't tell you how excited that makes me.

stillbreathing,
Buchanan contradicts himself. He tries to put greater emphasis on what happened in Poland but he himself admits that Poland came after Munich. Would Hitler have tried to take back Danzig were it not for the concessions he received from Chamberlain at Munich? Hitler's goal was to reverse everything that a defeated Germany had agreed to at Versailles. It almost worked.

"Whoever wins the elections, I'm sure that the United States will change, it will have a different approach,"

I see that Hockmad has been paying very close attention to Obama's "CHANGE" campaign. Sure, it's CHANGE that we cannot afford to believe in, since giving up our freedoms could very easily become the trade-off.

Obama a year from now:

"Hey, I warned you that CHANGE was on the horizon, weren't you listening?"

Before there could be Chamberlain, there had to be a climate of opinion. All kinds of people refused to see what Hitler was all about. It seems, from the vantage point of 2008, or V-E ?Day, or even of September 22, 1939, that so many people did not recognize what Hitler had laid out in "Mein Kampf," did not wish to see the re-arming of Germany, did not want to focus on the violation of the Versailles Treaty with the re-miilitarizaation of the Rhineland, did not want to notice what had been happening to the Jews, not only at Kristallnacht, but beginning long before, when Hitler came to power and immediately had all Jewish professors fired.

And there was a diplomatic mission before Chamberlain, designed to solve, once and for all, the problem caused by those poor oppressed ethnic Germans - so cleverly exploited by Hitler and the Nazis, to whip up anti-Czech attitudes, not least in the press of London and Paris. Anti-Czech agitation was increased in the Sudetenland, a strip all around Czechoslovakia's northern frontier. When the Czech police attempted to deal with the agitators and the mobs, that attempt was depicted as practically Cossack-like. Hitler more and more talked about the "legitimate rights" of the Sudeteners -- oh, and in some of the same speeches, he also mentioned one other group and their "legitimate rights" -- the "Arabs of Palestine." Yes, he was greatly concerned with them as well.

And so the Runciman Mission, headed by that dimwit Sir Basil Runciman, went off to see what could be done with the Sudeteners, and pressuring the Czechs, in order to establish -- Sir Basil Runciman's exact words -- a "comprehensive and lasting peace." The same phrase, of course, was used again and again four and five decades later, beginning with Jimmy Carter, prating about how to pressure Israel and establish "peace" between the Israelis and the recently-invented "Palestinian people."

Peace could only have been kept in Europe had there been not one Churchill, but a hundred all over chanceries of the West, who would have answered Hitler with force -- the French should have moved in then, while their army was still a match for the Germans, at the time of the remilitarization of the Rhineland. Louis Berthou, the first Frenchman who grasped the full menace of Hitler, was unfortunately killed in an attack on King Alexander II of Yugoslavia, in Marseilles, in October 1937. The King, and Berthou, were both killed.

There is now no excuse not to know what the Iranian government is doing in its attempt to manufacture nuclear weapons, and no excuse, either, to believe that once those weapons are acquired, they will not be used against Israel, and perhaps others as well.

The question is: does one wait until September 22, 1939, or does one act so as to insure that when September 22, 1939 -- or its updated equivalent in the future, comes round, nothing much happens?

Hopefully Obamas promise to Israel does not become one of those situations where, with friends like US, who needs enemies.

I think Iran is planing their own version of the Tet Offensive. Islamic style.

The language Ineedajob expresses himself with is extremely bellicose. Throw in his meddling, along with the Who and how much money he has thrown about. Not to mention what the recipients are buying with it.

Dropped this one over at the Breitbart forum:

"Dinnerjacket should stick to those topics he knows best,ie hanging teenage girls on accusations of "adultery",having his religious stormtroopers cart of women for wearing mascara,running arms,that "peaceful" nuclear program,buzzing US warships,and weekly(or is it almost daily?) commenting on the "inevitable" annihilation of Israel.(with little thought as to what the consequences would be for the other states of the region)

This would allow him to keep his foot out of the mouth when speaking from ignorance on the New Orleans situation. As one cruises through the garden district along St.Charles Ave,Old Metairie,even the current restoration of the dreaded Lakeview area,with that three weeks of standing water,one cannot help but be impressed by the rate of progress which is in many ways unprecedented for a disaster of this magnitude. The entire nation has a hand in this ongoing process,right down to various out of state plates(one noted for every state in the union)which have been evident all over town since November '05. Yes there are neighborhood(much of Gentilly,St. Bernard Parish,the ninth ward)which will forever be changed,and a shift in demographics has occurred as well,but the reaction to this tragedy has been much more of a feather in the cap for this nation than any propaganda spiel to the contrary could ever hope to achieve. Maybe dinnerjacket should consult the illustrious mayor Nagin for the real scoop. That would be two peas in a pod."

It's not surprising that Ahmadenijad is seeking a different approach from the US. During the current administration, US troops have appeared en masse on Iran's western and eastern borders, support of Baluchi independence groups has been stepped up, and resistance to Iran's nuclear ambitions have increased. Even if you don't think that the Bush administration has done enough to curb Iran (IMHO, a justifiable statement) the next administration will have to work hard to maintain, let alone increase, the level of pressure on the Iranian government.