US company asks Florida court to judge case by Islamic law, not American law

Posted by Robert on June 19, 2008 12:56 PM

The [1] stealth jihad of short-sightedness and expediency.

"U.S. company: crash lawsuit governed by Islamic law," by Joseph Neff and Jay Price for the [2] News & Observer, June 19 (thanks to all who sent this in):

RALEIGH - To defend itself against a lawsuit by the widows of three American soldiers who died on one of its planes in Afghanistan, a sister company of the private military firm Blackwater has asked a federal court to decide the case using the Islamic law known as Shari’a.

The lawsuit “is governed by the law of Afghanistan,” Presidential Airways argued in a Florida federal court. “Afghan law is largely religion-based and evidences a strong concern for ensuring moral responsibility, and deterring violations of obligations within its borders.”

If the judge agrees, it would essentially end the lawsuit over a botched flight supporting the U.S. military. Shari’a law does not hold a company responsible for the actions of employees performed within the course of their work.

Erik Prince, who owns Blackwater and Presidential Airways, briefly discussed the lawsuit in a meeting today with editors and reporters at The News & Observer. Prince was asked to justify having a case involving an American company working for the U.S. government decided by Afghan law.

“Where did the crash occur?” Prince said. “Afghanistan.”...


Article printed from Jihad Watch: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/06/us-company-asks-florida-court-to-judge-case-by-islamic-law-not-american-law.html

URLs in this post:
[1] http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1596985569/002-8167125-3983247?ie=UTF8&tag=robertspencer-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=1789&creativeASIN=1596985569
[2] http://www.newsobserver.com/front/story/1112843.html