D. C. Watson, a friend of Jihad Watch since its inception (as well as an occasional contributor -- see, for example, his illuminating list here), has started a new website, Watson37.com. D. C. explains:
The 1400-year-old running Islamic jihad is here, right in our back yard, and in both terrorist and political forms. Watson37.com is dedicated to compiling statements made and tactics used by the self-appointed leaders of the Islamic community in the United States. While it is clear that not all Muslims in America are on board with them, too many of them are.Through many years, we have been able to combine military prowess with diplomacy to achieve peace. Islamic jihadists view a willingness to talk with them as weakness, and an opportunity to regroup to fight another day. Their mindset needs to continue to be exposed and confronted at every turn.
It is apparent that we cannot rely on politicians or the mainstream press. We can, however, rely on each other for the information we need to stay ready for the storm that is currently underway around the world. Watson37.com hopes to contribute to this.
The more contributors to this effort, the better. Thanks, D. C., for your courage and your efforts on behalf of our imperiled civilization.
Do give his website a visit, and another, and another.
Looking forward to something from Holmes as well ;-)
Watson
Seriously speaking, good site - and I like your rogues' gallery quotes - all from Mohammedans who feature prominently on the MSM.
Only nitpick - your claim on your page that 'While the majority of Muslims living in America have shown to be decent, mind their own business and don't cause problems' - do you have any evidence to back that one up? If not, how about losing such disclaimers in future?
Great Site Big Guy!
I have already posted your website into my favorites.
DC. Does an excellent job of developing numerous profiles of Muslims, and Muslim Groups in the US who demonstrate anti-American attitudes.
Keep up the good work
Mackie
He should be aware that the government is tasked to "provide for the common defense and promoting domestic tranquility" , acting as if every ware Islam goes it doesn’t bring chaos and violence is an act of abandoning the fundamental tenants of the nation.
That being said , we are the government and all Americas should have an Islam awareness site. Once the people know the government will act.
Congratulations, bro!
Lets link up...
D.C. Watson,
I've enjoyed reading your comments on Jihad Watch and would like to suggest that you incorporate more of your own commentary/analysis on your new site as well. Keep up the good fight.
Hello Big Guy, DC Watson, Congratulations. Flex your muscle against those mussalmen. the amount of taqqiya these mussalmen perform is just unbelievable. every time there is a bomb, jihadist attack, these guys are on tv and everywhere telling us a different story. just sick and tired of this.
i will be a regular visitor. and please, enable comments. we like to wish you directly on your website. have some more pics of you punching jihad to a pulp.
human decency, reason and logic should be respected. mussalmen cannot do that. their religion tells them 'allah, says. go do it.'
mohammad had sex with a 6 year old. raped, pillaged, murdered, tortured, vandalized. corrupted the beauty of monotheism. raised indecency, pedophilia, violence, murder to the level of holy doctrines. all because 'allah said so'. my my my.
please continue the fight. God Bless America. Stand up infidels. it is time to put behind our squabbles and face the real enemy. Our civilization is under attack. May God Bless our troops and keep them safe from harms way. May He bring our troops victoriously back home in safety and good health, back to the arms of their loved ones.
A toast to Big Mac Watson.
One of the sites I got to through D. C. Watson's webstite has a link to a critique of the movie "Fitna". Unlike many of the hysterical, incoherent and ignorant anti-"Fitna" commentaries, this one is well argued and coherent.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DAerxKYipU
I would be grateful if some of the experts on this site, esp Robert, Hugh or Raymond, would comment on this rebuttal and the points it makes. I'm worried to think that the movie may indeed quote selectively, tendentiously and inaccurately... In short, is there a rebuttal to the rebuttal?
Visited the website and it's great. Wanted to express my appreciation directly but can't find a way to do so on the website. If that's by design, OK; if not, the site may want to consider that option.
Why 37? I'm intrigued. On a personal note, I liked the Bastien brothers. Maybe different era, different style.