Somalia: Come, let us resolve our differences by "using Allah's book [the Koran] and traditional practices of Prophet Muhammad," offers clansman

Which can spell a lot of trouble for a lot of people. "Somali leader’s Clan urges opposition to unite, condemns Ethiopian troops," by Abdi Gulad, for Mareeg, July 28:

The Darod Council for the Implementation of Sharia law has said it is saddened by divisions among members of the Alliance for the Re-liberation of Somalia [ARS] in a press statement issued on Sunday.

Hasan Sheikh Adan who is the Chairman of the Darod Council for the Implementation of Sharia laws said the Alliance members should resolve their differences using Allah's book [the Koran] and traditional practices of Prophet Muhammad and make concessions for the sake of the Somali people.

They also encouraged groups opposed to the Ethiopian troops to continue with their struggle ["jihad"] as they put it.

The council also said they were condemning the massacre and displacement of civilians carried out by Ethiopian troops in Beled Weyne, Hiraan Region, during the past week.

Naturally, since it's the infidel Ethiopians; when it's sharia-promoting Somalis who "massacre and displace civilians", that's ok.

| 17 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

17 Comments

No thanks! You can keep that murdering manual to yourself and those who are awake would be well advised to stay away from the blood thirsty cult of Islam.

I have just discovered or realized there is a new person creating posts for Jihad Watch named Raymond and have read his bio. Welcome Raymond! I'm curious as to which candidate he is supporting this November.

Bonnie

Not "come let us reason together" but "come let us all submit to the will of Allah, as expressed in the Qu'ran and glossed by the Sunnah, and without any need for human understanding or questioning whatsoever." We must together submit, we must together be "slaves of Allah." That's the only way -- for Muslims. Free men think otherwise.

On topic,
http://europenews.dk/en/node/12574
It is commonly understood that the earlier Meccan Surahs are more tolerant, corresponding to the earlier phase of Muhammad's life when his teaching focussed mainly on purely religious issues such as belief in one God and the rejection of pagan idolatry. He hoped to persuade Jews to accept him as the prophet of monotheism in line with the Hebrew prophets of the Old Testament, and for the Christians to accept him as the apostle of God, somewhat analogous to the apostles of the New Testament.

However, there was resistance from both groups who clearly saw that Muhammad's teaching was at odds in major respects with the Scriptures as they knew and understood them - not least, the final and absolute authority Muhammad claimed for himself. The Medinan Surahs become more and more strident, imposing social, political and military imperatives on the Muslim community, until finally, the Qur'an became replete with teaching of hate, destruction, death and servitude to all who resisted Islam, either on the battlefield or in their personal faith. A well-respected authority on Islam, himself a radical, Sheikh Muhammad Ezzat Darwazei, counts between 500 and 700 jihad verses in the Qur'an. It is important to remember that these "sword verses' abrogate earlier verses apparently advocating peace and tolerance.

"... Alliance members should resolve their differences using Allah's book [the Koran] and traditional practices of Prophet Muhammad...."

It seems to me that's just what they are doing. Didn't Mo kill his enemies and opponents (or have them killed) and confiscate their property (including wives and children)? And didn't Allah approve Mo's actions?
So c'mon you Somali factions; forget this guy's call for unity. His clan must be in a weak spot, and only wants time out to re-group. Time to finish him off. Remember, last clan standing takes all. So get to it.

This should be seen by as many people as possible. I am putting it here, and elsewhere, hoping that many will see it, and many will send it on, so it may spread throughout the Internet:

http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1821.htm

traditional practices of Prophet Muhammad ,

ok lets see what these pracices are: thief, rapists and murderers. mmm sounds like the society you would want to copy eh!
to hell with these islamists, send them to their allah moon god.

Hugh, when I clicked on your link above, a got a message from my security that a worm was attempting to access my computer.
I had a similar experience a few days ago when trying to link on one of the threads at the ROP website.
Has anyone else had similar results? Could there be some kind of co-ordinated effort to hack into the various anti-jihad websites?

"This should be seen by as many people as possible. I am putting it here, and elsewhere, hoping that many will see it, and many will send it on, so it may spread throughout the Internet"

I watched the video- of course, for the faithful readers of this site and LGF or others, it's nothing new.

I would add that the guest espousing his plan(s) is far too pessimistic about the difficulties Muslims are or will face in Europe. They don't need to be successful and appealing to Europeans to integrate- in fact integration is obviously the last thing they wish for. What they need are a few, very few, successful nominal Muslims in business/sports, etc. and the rest to be very unsuccessful, unintegrated, poor and rural so they may recapitulate the same lifestyles they had in outer Algeria and now in Paris. In other words, the exact same pattern they have been using for decades.

Never overestimate the ability of a European-left social worker to empathize with "the other" and to see "the other" as "the other" even after the social worker has become "the other."

Not "come let us reason together" but "come let us all submit to the will of Allah, as expressed in the Qu'ran and glossed by the Sunnah, and without any need for human understanding or questioning whatsoever." We must together submit, we must together be "slaves of Allah." That's the only way -- for Muslims. Free men think otherwise.
Posted by: Hugh

In the twisted upside down irrational, blood thirsty malevolent universe of Allah, it all makes sense that they will not “reason together” but demand “submission” to their barbaric primitive 7th century ideology mandated by their ‘perfect man’s’ prime directive to conquer the whole world - for their Mesopotamian moon god Allah, of course. It cannot be otherwise, wherever Islam rules as it is supposed to rule, because human reason, and freedom to think rationally, are highly suspect in the universe of Allah, since they are works of the devil. The only safe haven from the devil is to stop thinking, stop imagining yourself as a free individual, and submit-submit-submit in blind zombie fashion to that vile caricature of a deity – Allah, of course. The “slaves of Allah” are expected to do no less, to “submit together” to the Temple of Doom – Islam, of course – as spelled out in the Qu’ran. Then Allah is satisfied with the sacrifice paid in human blood, as it has been for 1400 years. It all makes sense, as the only way for Islam.

In connection with the differing methods of resolving differences - the Islamic method, versus other methods - here is something fascinating that I found on the Bible Society website, some time ago.

http://www.biblesociety.org/index2.htm

It is the story of a Kurdish scholar in Turkey, originally a nominal and distinctly unhappy Muslim, and what happened to him when he signed up to translate the New Testament into the Kurdish language. He was already heading for apostasy...then he read the New Testament...and found a religion that suited him much, much better.

From the story on the link provided above:

'By the time he was engaged on the project he was of the firm opinion that the Kurds would benefit greatly from having the Bible in their own language. {Note well: Christianity, unlike Islam, generally respects indigenous vernaculars - dda}.

'As he became immersed in reading and translating the New Testament, he found that he was being deeply affected by it.

'He discovered that Christianity’s culture was quite different from that of Islam.

'Certain Bible teachings highlighted the differences strikingly.

“It totally changed me to deal with how you are taught to forgive people, to love people and live with them in peace.

'"The Bible says ‘Love your enemies and your neighbours’ and ‘Treat your neighbour as you would like to be treated.’ This affected me.”

'From then on, while still a Kurdish intellectual, “In my heart,” he says, “I believed in Jesus.”

'“When I recognised the Bible, I learned to be flexible… to listen to people… to forgive them… and to be more patient.

'For example, if you are among Muslims, you would always fight. I don’t want to fight; I always wanted to convince people, to argue with them. … to understand them.”

{In other words: his basic personality was, so to speak, 'un-Islamic' or 'anti-Islamic', and then he encountered, in the Gospels, something that answered to his longing for a different way of relating to people and solving problems - dda}.

'The year after he became a translator he undertook a short course in Christian theology. Since giving his life to Jesus Christ, he has been a vocal advocate of the Christian faith.

“I have spoken with hundreds – maybe thousands – of people on the issue of being Christians and Muslims,” he says.

“And I am always supporting the totally different Christian culture.
“Maybe I am like a missionary, you could say – like 10 missionaries!” (WR 399/13 - 01/02.06)'.

Quotable quote, right from the horse's mouth:

"if you are among Muslims, you would always fight".

Says it all, really. And this guy was a Kurd, brought up in a 'lax' or nominal Muslim family, in an educated milieu, in modern Turkey. Yet his description of the 'atmospherics of Islam', as Hugh would say, the 'default' attitude that it inculcates toward the resolution of conflict or disagreement, applies without alteration to Somalia or Afghanistan or Iraq or...well, anywhere else within the Islamosphere, throughout its entire history.

One more time, from this Kurdish apostate, describing the mindset he chafed against, and then, finally, blessedly, escaped:

"if you are among Muslims, you would always fight".

Conflict resolution is a simple thing for Muslims - annihilate your enemies.

The Muslim winner-take-all/loser-gets-dead zero-sum-game mindset that AtheistAfghan has summed up for us, can also be found very clearly in the words of Ben Bella, then President of Algeria, in 1982, reported by Bat Yeor in 'The Dhimmi', pp 137-38:

“A negative attitude [toward Israel] was expressed in 1982 by Algeria’s first president, in a lapidary formula:

- ‘Ce que nous voulons, nous autres Arabes, c’est *etre*. Or, nous ne pourrons etre que si *l’autre* n’est pas.- ‘What we want, as Arabs, is to *be*. However, we can only be, if *the other* is not’.” [Ben Bella, ‘Tous Contre Israel’, Politique Internationale 16 (Paris, 1982)]

"Ben Bella openly approved the assassination of leaders whose policies he disapproves of – a common practice under the Mamluks – and then went on to justify, after the acquisition of nuclear weapons by Arab states, a nuclear war to destroy Israel:

- ‘If there is no other solution, then let there be a nuclear war, and that will be the end of it, once and for all.'" [art cit. p. 108].
END QUOTE

Now, let's look at Ben Bella's words again - 'What we want, as Arabs (or, 'we Arabs') is to *be". However, we can only be, if *the other* is not'.

All one has to do is realize that when he says 'we Arabs' he might as well have said 'we Muslims'. Similarly, the word 'Arab' in the phrase 'the acquisition of nuclear weapons by Arab states' might also be replaced by the word 'Muslim', since there is in practice an almost perfect overlap between 'being Arab' and 'being Muslim'.

Let's rephrase a little.

"What we want, we Muslims, is to BE. But we can only be, if THE OTHER does not exist."

*That* is how the 'tawheed' principle of absolute unity works out in everyday social and political life: it produces people who - like extreme narcissists - experience the Other, any Other, any thwarting or crossing of their will, as a mortal threat to their existence, an Absolute Evil that must be destroyed or devoured.

And so the Ummah is racked by internecine strife, at all levels, from the familial to the dynastic, even while it also makes war against its kafir neighbours.

Good morning Dumbledoresarmy,

You asked me if there was an equivalent to ACT! for America in Australia. I e-mailed one of my contacts and he said yes there is. It's the Australian Coalition for Truth. Their site is still under construction but you can contact them here:
http://auscoalitionfortruth.org/contact

Good luck!
Isabella

Thanks, Isabella.

I bet you that Gaza has the most koran scientists - those that can read the koran forward os backwrds without making a mistake. This science is good for killing productitive members of their society (workers). So it is no wonder they have the highest jobless rate. They keep killing those that can work.

http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1821.htm

This is a revealing video, these pigs have a grandplan for invation of europe. Well u need to post it everywhere u can, they want to just swamp europe and destroy the freedom you have.