
Pirates running wild
Piracy as a jihadist activity has a pedigree at least as old as the Barbary conflicts with Europe and the new United States, and the Islamic slave raiding pirates vividly described in Giles Milton's book White Gold. "Somali pirates seize 8 ships," from News24.com, August 25 (thanks to Jeffrey Imm):
Nairobi - Around eight ships have been seized by pirates off the lawless Somali coast with gunfire being reported during one of the hijackings, an official said on Monday."Around eight ships have been seized, but we believe there were no fatalities," Andrew Mwangura, the head of the Kenya-based East African Seafarers' Assistance Programme told Deutsche Presse-Agentur dpa.
"There was a shoot-out at one of the ships, but it was a quarrel between the gunmen," he continued. "We understand there were no injuries."
Earlier reports had suggested three sailors had been killed.
Mwangura said it was too early to give full details on all of the seized craft, but said that they were a mix of tankers and cargo ships.
Piracy off Somalia's lawless coast has surged in the last three months.
A total of four ships - from Germany, Japan, Iran and Malaysia - were seized last week alone....
Pirates, armed with rocket-propelled grenades and automatic weapons, use speedboats to pursue their targets....
Given the history of this area, why aren't these ships armed with small arms at least?
If you go into a bad neighborhood looking like a potential mugging victim, you're probably going to get mugged. If you look like you can defend yourself, chances are pretty good that the thugs will let you pass.
At least display a couple of 50s on the stern.
Hang the scurvy dogs from the yardarm matey.
WWII type convoys complete with destroyer and submarine escort not far away...
At least display a couple of 50s on the stern.
Posted by: walterc
No good, unless they're permitted to fire in self-defense and not face war crimes or other charges afterward. They also have to be WILLING to shoot to kill. Sink those speedboats and not listen to the wailings later about the "innocent fishermen" who were killed.
Where's Thomas Jefferson?
With ships from Iran and Malaysia seized, it begs the question how Islamic sharia would punish these pirates. Maybe Ahmedinejad and Mahathir could suspend their vitriol against Israel and Jews for a moment and comment on this?
Lots of the time the Governmental people are involved in pirating ships. There are also many known Insurance frauds. I still think sinking any number of pirate ships will put a stop to all of this. Till then, pirating should be no news, it is business as normal.
Question: What is the most idiotic statement written about Islam in recent times?
Answer: Perhaps the following statement by Robert Fisk.
“Shakespeare lived at a time when the largely Muslim Ottoman Empire – then at the zenith of it’s power, remained an existential if not a real threat for Europeans.”
This comes from his latest book, “The Age of the Warrior,” the piece on Shakespeare, “Cry havoc and let loose the dogs of war, ” which contains this stunning factual inaccuracy.
It is estimated that Barbary Pirates kidnapped 1.5 million Europeans from their homes to act as slaves. They raided coastal settlements on the North side of the Mediterranean and even conducted raids on places like Cornwall. It is said that from 1609 to 1616, England lost 466 merchant ships to Barbary pirates. In fact, one of the first acts of the newly independent American Republic was to engage in a war with the Barbary Pirates. Thomas Jefferson said
“It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once.”
Perhaps he should read up on the Barbary Pirates.
http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/2007_03.html
Don't worry, the United Nations Security Council is on top of the situation. They've asked the Somali government to start prosecuting these people.
A poster above quoted the following idiotic statement by Robert Fisk:
“Shakespeare lived at a time when the largely Muslim Ottoman Empire – then at the zenith of its power, remained an existential if not a real threat for Europeans.”
Not a real threat???
Hey-ey-ey-ey, Robert Fisk.
Get yourself a copy of Ernle Bradford's "The Great Siege". Here's someone's review.
http://www.cloggie.org/books/great-siege.html
Or read James Jacksons' popular novel, 'Blood Rock', inspired by the Siege of Malta, 1565.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=466818&in_page_id=1770
And reflect on the date - summer 1565. Shakespeare was born in 1564.
The Knights Hospitallers of St John held Malta, by the skin of their teeth, against a massive Ottoman fleet. Had they fallen - had strategic Malta become an Ottoman-controlled forward naval base for seaborne jihadists - one shudders to think what would have happened to High Renaissance Europe, all the way from Italy to Scotland.
Behind that gate which the Knights of St John held with such incandescent courage, not so very far behind as the pirate ship sails, lay...among so many other wonderful things, the infant Shakespeare in his cradle, just one year old.
The Knights, had they but known it, were not only fighting for what northwest European Christendom had created, so far; they were ALSO fighting, had they but known it, for what would be.
Queen Elizabeth I of England had a much better grasp of geopolitics than Fisk! When the news reached her, that against all hope the Knights had held the Mediterranean gate, and the Ottoman Fleet, badly mauled, had retreated, she ordered all the church bells in Britain rung in celebration, and a special prayer of thanksgiving to be written and recited in every church. (It might be interesting for some historian of Renaissance England to do a little digging and see whether the text of this prayer is preserved somewhere).
The bells in the church in Stratford-on-Avon would have rung with all the others all over England.
Another one of bush's massive failings. It seems to me this problem could have been dealt with rather easily without convoys, escorts, or other naval deployments that would tie up our resources. Why couldn't the Navy buy a used (excuse me, pre-owned) cruise ship, equip it w/ sophisticated electronic gear, arm it to the hilt w/ our best weapons, man it w/ a Navy crew dressed in civvies, and then cruise the pirate-infested waters until they take the bait? Once an approaching boat is identified as pirates, jam the hell out of their communications so they can't warn anybody, and then blast away. No quarter, no prisoners. Back to Happy Hour. Repeat as necessary.
>>If you go into a bad neighborhood looking like a potential mugging victim, you're probably going to get mugged. If you look like you can defend yourself, chances are pretty good that the thugs will let you pass.
Walterc, I think sheik yer booty has it right. Like their 'prophet', these are above all, consummate cowards. If they perceive someone ready to defend themselves, they will leave them alone. If one takes on the appearance of a defenseless commercial vessel, they will attack. The trick is to look like a lamb, and then bare the fangs of a lion. You want to kill them, not let them attack someone else. I agree that the heavily-armed commercial vessel in disguise is the best approach. Take no prisoners.
sheik yer booty the ACLU lawyers would prol find and they would have a field day that these poor innocent terrorists,, oops muslims were tricked. but a GREAT idea!
As regards the Iranian and Malaysian ships - tough bikkies if they can't deal with their 'brother' Muslims.
Kafir-owned shipping fleets, on the other hand - I note that ships owned by Japan, and Germany, were attacked - could indeed do as 'infidel' and 'zena' have suggested above. Anyone who has watched the final third of the Peter Weir film, 'Master and Commander" will understand what 'infidel33' is talking about.
Basic unarmed and armed combat training for all kafir seamen wouldn't be a bad idea, either. Greeks, Filipinos, Pacific Islanders are all heavily represented on oceangoing vessels.
Memo to any kafir reading this who may happen to work in, or has relatives or friends employed with, the merchant fleet of your kafir country or of another kafir country - for all I know, you may be a ship's captain, an engineer, hey, even chief cook - if your ship sails near coasts inhabited by Mohammedans, particularly in the South China sea and in the regions off north-east Africa, BE WARNED. And be prepared!
Furthermore: if you have any Mohammedans anywhere amongst your crew...WATCH YOUR BACK. Perhaps hiring practices should be reviewed.
the non muslim world is in deep denial
I wonder what it will take before we do something to stop the muslims
I hazard a guess that those ships that fall victims to the pirates belong to the cheap bastards who don't want to spend a penny on security and prefer insurance benefits.
I don't know how many square miles of water we are speaking about. Our naval brass has a good idea of what aproaches are practical. I would expect a number of options exist that greatly depend upon how much diversion of naval effort we are willing to make. It is worth every effort. We have fought a number of wars over freedom of the seas.
And lets not forget the sea battle of Lepanto in 1571, and the massacre of Christians at Famagusta after being tricked by promises to spare their lives in 1570 - both during Shakespeare's lifetime. This just shows how history has been rewritten and in many cases, selectively erased in the craven apologist Fiskie mind. And it is the Fisks who do so much damage to the West.
George Orwell had the perfect quote for pseudo-intellectuals like Fisk: "You must be an intellectual. Only an intellectual could say something so stupid." How right Orwell was, and still is.
Canada to escort food ships into Somalia
Aug 06, 2008 08:34 AM
The Canadian Press
HALIFAX–Defence Minister Peter MacKay says Canada will send the Halifax-based frigate HMCS Ville de Quebec to waters off the horn of Africa to stop pirates from attacking food shipments bound for Somalia.
At a news conference in Halifax today, MacKay said the frigate will be diverted from a NATO mission to the Mediterranean.
He said the warship will provide escort for U.N. world food program vessels travelling into "designated Somali ports."
MacKay said the population of Somalia is facing serious food shortages and could run out of food stocks by mid-August, so Canada has agreed to become part of an effort to avoid a more serious crisis.
He said the Ville de Quebec is currently en route. The vessel, which had been at sea since July, is expected to return to Halifax by December.
I hope sending the Ville de Quebec will help, and that her officers have the balls to fire on these pirates. Blow them out of the water!
The Royal Navy stopped arresting pirates because of 'Human Rights' issues. The Foreign Office allows pirates to claim asylum because they might face bloody Islamic justice when returned to Somalia. So the Navy has been advised just not to bother. What a joke.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3736239.ece
Pirates from the Somali Coast. Would that be the same place that Somali immigrants come from, the ones who work at the Tyson's Chicken plant and are demanding the Eid holiday replace Labor day in Shelbyville, Tennessee? Just wondering.
I guess beef is what's for dinner.
Felton - you told us - "The Royal Navy stopped arresting pirates because of 'Human Rights' issues. The Foreign Office allows pirates to claim asylum because they might face bloody Islamic justice when returned to Somalia. So the Navy has been advised just not to bother. "
Weeell: for the truly military-minded, there *are* alternatives to "arrest and Return to Sender", or 'catch and keep as POW', when the Enemy consists of ever-increasing swarms of ethics-free murderous thugs who are, according to their 'religion', permanently at war on everybody else who doesn't belong to their Gang nor wishes to join, ever.
And when you're conducting your wholly justified War of Self-Defence at sea, protecting civilian shipping, and your boat and your guns are big, and the pirates' boats and guns are small...
Davey Jones's Locker is awfully commodious, and right there on the spot.
Time to re-read C S Forester and Patrick O'Brian and think about how the captains who fought in the Napoleonic Wars would have dealt with Somali Muslim pirates, had they been attacked by them.
And why are the Canadians sending these barbarians food?
If they weren't so busy praying five times a day to their pagan moon g-d with their tuchuses in the air in whqat looks more like a bad yoga class for gaymale extreme fashion victims in need of a straight eye then perhaps they might be able to grow their own.
In this world it's getting more and more like this: If you don't want to do for yourself others will find it their required duty to give you everything you want.
Perfect fo mopslems who aren't much good at anything except jihad.
It gets even more absurd that Canada has to send warships to deliver THEM food for free while they attack our Western shipping interests.
OH, and if you encounter pirates shoot to sink! All this leftist aylum garbage must be avoided like the plague.