Perhaps this will move British officials to crack down on the Islamic activities of imprisoned jihadists. But, of course, perhaps not.
"Islamist threat to behead prison officer," by Graham Tibbetts for the Telegraph, August 11 (thanks to Writer Mom):
Prison authorities have compiled an action plan for dealing with a kidnap plot involving radicalised Muslim convicts inside Britain's jails.The dossier has been compiled in the past few months following rising tension in the prison system.
Intelligence gathered from Britain's eight top-security prisons indicate that specific threats to kidnap and decapitate an officer first emerged at Whitemoor prison in Cambridgeshire six months ago.
However, a senior prison source said that the risk went beyond one jail.
"This is a threat faced by officers in prisons from across the country. This is why the prison service is preparing direct intervention if ever a prison officer is taken hostage," he told the Daily Mail.
Threats to kidnap and execute a warder also surfaced at Frankland prison in Co Durham last weekend.
Muslim prisoners were said to have been involved in a hour-hour riot, causing £20,000 worth of damage while demanding a transfer to another prison.
In a written statement on the incident, one inmate reportedly said: "They were shouting that they were going to cut off the head of one of the officers and film it on their phones. They have been bragging since they came to the segregation unit how they are going to do it."...
I believe they are making sport of us!
Whose phones? The beheaded officers or . . .gasp . ..do high security prisoners have their own cell phones???
Did I read that correctly?
Oy!
I hate to say it but if rioting, kidnapping, etc., does occur, the order should be "shoot on sight". That ought to quell the "unrest" in short order.
Sources at the prison have described it as a "powder keg" and in June inmates fought running battles after the cell of a convicted al-Qa'eda terrorist who killed a police officer was set ablaze.
Last year Dhiren Barot, serving 30 years for a dirty-bomb plot, had boiling water poured over his head.
i guess we need to speak with the felons of GB, they're the only ones who see muslims as a threat.
and do something about it
heroyalwhyness wrote:
"They were shouting that they were going to cut off the head of one of the officers and film it on their phones.
Whose phones? The beheaded officers or . . .gasp . ..do high security prisoners have their own cell phones???
Did I read that correctly?
................................
Just what I was thinking--the prisoners have their own *cellphones*? Here in the US, prisoners have to use phones bolted to the wall, all calls are collect (the callee has to agree to pay for the call), and--most importantly--all call are recorded.
It would seem that giving prisoners cellphones--besides being a huge expense for the taxpayer (hey--I don't have a cellphone yet)--is an enormous security risk. The chances of the prisoners plotting criminal actions and even terrorist attacks would be huge.
Many prisoners are violent, but the fact that they were screaming about *decapitating* one of the guards is a uniquely Muslim form of barbarity. I hope that these prisoners not only miss whatever transfer they were looking for, but also have their sentences extended.
Knowing today's Britain, though, it is as likely that the prison system will be scrutinized for "human rights violations" that may have sparked the riots.
I cannot comment on US state prisons, but in the Federal system, only non-legal calls are recorded and inmates can make three-way phone calls to circumvent the system. And no, not all inmates recorded phone calls are monitored - not enough staff, etc.
Last time I checked, no cell phones were allowed to be possessed by federal inmates.
As to the UK prison system, these inmates will probably be assigned to their own prison and so will begin the Islamization/ghettoization in some vain attemtpt to appease them.
Diminishing the dawa quotient isn't necessarily a bad thing.
theygottago-
Are you taking the Arthur Bliss?
Let me see if I can go over that again.... You're saying that the criminals we lock up are the only ones who see Muslims as a threat?
Either you're mucking about and the punchline just slipped by me, or you're serious and, by extension, seriously deranged.
The crims in those prisons represent a good proportion of the problem with modern day Britain and you're painting them as anti jihad heroes?
I hope it's your day off if we ever get an IQ audit around here.
HOV Dummy wrote:
I cannot comment on US state prisons, but in the Federal system, only non-legal calls are recorded and inmates can make three-way phone calls to circumvent the system. And no, not all inmates recorded phone calls are monitored - not enough staff, etc.
.................................
You're quite right--calls to lawyers are not recorded. That's why--very rarely, thank goodness--you find credulous or unscrupulous lawyers in trouble for serving as go-betweens for incarcerated criminals and gang members or terrorist cells--because such calls are--by law--not recorded because of lawyer/client privilege.
All other calls are recorded--but you are right--not every recorded call is monitored--there simply isn't the staff for such an undertaking. Still, the very fact that such calls are recorded deters prisoners from trying to use the phones for criminal plotting. Also, if a suspicious call is monitored, staff can go back and review a prisoner's previous calls for criminal content. Also, prisoners considered high risk--gang leaders, terrorists, etc--do have their calls monitored on a regular basis.
I admit, I'm not familiar with the three-way call work around.
It isn't perfect, but it is overall a pretty effective safeguard. Certainly, safer than prisoners having individual cellphones, if this is indeed the case.
I hate to say it but if rioting, kidnapping, etc., does occur, the order should be "shoot on sight". That ought to quell the "unrest" in short order.
Posted by: eve_anne_gelical
I totally agree with these sentiments. My additional remedy for these green slimes would be: after the "shoot on sight", cremate them with pig blood. That double insult would cure the rest very fast. A US General had tried it in Phillipines and it worked!
How about a little solitary confinement, in cells with no light and with no arrows pointing the way to Mecca? Where's Alcatraz when you need it?
We need a paradigm shift.
Muslim prisoners, especially those who are doing time for engaging in violent jihad plots, are not random criminals.
They are precisely equivalent to what Nazi spies, fifth columnists and POWs were in WWII; indeed, some are similar to the type one found as officers and paid-up members of the SS and Gestapo.
Would such prisoners have been allowed to listen to Hitler speeches on tape, or provided with their own personal copies of Mein Kampf to read in jail? Would they have been treated with exaggerated sensitivity and deference? Would their demands have been grovellingly catered to?
To those in charge of UK prisons: assume that your Muslim jihadist prisoners are equivalent to the most dangerous type of Nazi German POW during WWII. Adjust your security procedures accordingly.
Solitary.
If there are too many to put in solitary (too expensive?) then lay down the law: riots will be dealt with by overwhelming force: tear gas, water cannon, and finally, if required, live ammunition.
Bring back the rope, find the riot leaders, segregate them for years and transfer them between prisions, find the ones calling for beheadings and send them do the air walk. Its the only way this behavior will be contained. Anyone worried about 'Umma' rights violations should be sent on national service policing those animals.
while demanding a transfer to another prison.
Since when do prisoners get to demand anything and expect to get it?
Course if they want a change, you could "transfer" them to a prison in a former soviet country. Like maybe Romania, or Ukraine. Some place where prisoners are treated like criminals instead of being coddled like children.
But this is a member of the EU where they can't deport a muslim criminal to a muslim country because they might be tortured.
So just wait for them to take a warden hostage and then murder him on you tube, then fret over offending the muslim population. That'll teach them.
MILF? Are they serious? You couldn't make this shit up.
But being the UK, governed by socialist idiots they will not recognise this organised "resistance" for what it is. They will probably try and "reach out" to these people. They'll probably bow to their demands.
No deals with terrorists? Not in my country.
I haven't worked in a federal prison since 1996 so cannot comment on the current state of affairs, but even back then, the religious services for Muslim Inmates was basically a kill whitey/infidel service. The Native Americans have their sweat lodges, but at least back in 1996, Muslim Inmates were not slaughtering their own animals, but they do get halal meat. Think about the Muslim Jihadists we have in federal custody right now and then think about the US Supreme Court granting Constitutinal protections to the likes down in Gitmo. The federal prison system is large but not that large...