Blast from the Past: Ibrahim Hooper accuses Dennis Prager of Islamophobia

And asks Prager if "he is now ready to repudiate Robert Spencer and Jihad Watch?" This was originally covered here, but since Europe News just republished it, and for all you new JW followers out there, here it is again. Besides, as Muhammad always counseled, fa-in 'adu, fa-'uwd: "If they do it again, you too do it." Incidentally, Prager interviewed me about a month after this causing, no doubt, more accusations of "Islamophobia" to be hurled his way (though now I know why he seemed to be playing the role of devil's advocate -- I mean, apologist).

| 20 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

20 Comments

Huh? Prager is playing the role of Devil's - that is, Islam's - apologist? Since when?

*confused*

I have never seen a genocidal post here.
If there was one, it was a plant, and was deleted.
I have a right to hate a religion that has orders to kill me and my family as dogma.

Doug Hooper gets his feewings hurt by posters who insist immigrants become Americanized instead of "balkanizing" America.
We are resisting Islamization, Hooper.
We have the right to resist an invading ideology.

Hooper is so clueless. False premise, my ass! Mr. Prager's premise was sound and correct. Dougie, I hope you're reading this!

Look up "phobia" in a dictionary, Dougie.

I, for on am not phobic of Muslims.

I fear Muslims because they fly airplanes into buildings, chanting "Allahu Akbar" as they do so. I fear Muslims because they treat women like dirt. I fear Muslims, because they set off nail-bombs on buses. I fear Muslims because they kidnap and rape women and children then force them to "convert" to Islam.

Do all Muslims do these things? No, indeed, they do not.

Is anyone else in the world, besides Muslims doing these these things? NO! So, of course I'm afraid of Muslims. One can't tell, by looking, whether a particular Muslim is a person, or a monster, or a person with a monster lurking inside.

So far, Dougie, you're the only Muslim I don't fear. Ask yourself why.

again we have these WEstern converts aka Hooper, who if remained non muslim would be a non person. but bring on a brian washed egocentric person and anti Semite to boot you have Hooper.
We the people are not allowed to identify those who want to kill us, take our freedoms away especially if your a women and non muslim. Well we need to point out to stupid elites that they are first on the hit parade of the islamists!

Islam could be feared. It should be considered as a sickness. A sickness must be fought in order to save the people contaminated by it.

Muslims must be loved; the best way to love Muslims is to cure them from their sickness: islam.

In the movie "I am a Legend", Will Smith is wrong when he kills the contaminated guys; however, he is right when he cures them.

One must love the sinner in order to save him one must and hate the sin (which hinders the person to have a normal and holy life); so one must love the Muslim in order to save him and one must hate islam (which hinders the person to have a normal and holy life).

Is the Muslim Mr. Hooper ready, without waffling, to repudiate Sura 9, which specifies, among other nasty things, that infidels must submit to Islam, pay tribute to the Muslims, or die? And verse 33:21--that the murdering, raping, looting pirate Mohammed is the Perfect Man and perfect model of upright behavior for all time?

If not, he has no valid warrant to opine on the subject of "Islamophobia."

Bravo Dennis! You are a true crusader for freedom.

And beware of finger waggers! Other famous finger waggers from recent history? Tyrants all. It's give-away body language...leakage. Your finger wagging betrays you Mr Hooper. It's called haranguing.

Is one expected to feel shame at being an islamophobe.

It is a badge of honour.

Is one expected to feel shame at being an islamophobe?

It is a badge of honour.

..."so one must love the Muslim in order to save him and one must hate islam (which hinders the person to have a normal and holy life)."

Coaltaxopeuh,

That's a pretty tall order. I don't disagree with you, but I'm not equal to such pursuits.

Muslims weren't even on my radar, until 9/ll gave me more than 3000 reasons not to love them.

The ensuing seven years have not altered my feelings, except to increase my dislike.

In every Christian sense, what you say is absolutely right. However, "love" is a profound emotion, and it isn't turned on by a switch.

If you're able to find love for Muslims, within yourself, God Bless you and your endeavors to "cure" them.

I won't be joining you, any time soon.

Muslims must be loved; the best way to love Muslims is to cure them from their sickness: islam.

I am sorry, but this illustrates the problems with considering Christianity as a bullwark against Islam. We shouldn't love our enemies - it's morally sick to do so. We should destroy them.

The most satisfying parts of that clip was when Hitchens or Prager replied to hooper's lies with terms such as 'nonsense'. We (the people who truly understand islam and its evil) are the only hope for the West. I have come to the conclusion that islam must be resisted head on morally in order to wake up our fellow citizens. I think that only by laying our reputations in direct opposition to the islamists and their apologists, can we begin to open the eyes of society here among our ignorant brothers. We have to be in effect as outrageous as islam itself, thus forcing those who hear us to decide whether we are the extremests, or whether islam is. This undoubtedly can and will cost us, but even in the most successful of wars blood is lost. I have personally vowed to stand and resist islam in any and every instance that I come into contact with it on a personal basis. This may very well cost me my reputation as a tolerant,understanding, and 'good' person among other costs which aren't yet apparent. This EVIL must be resisted one person at a time.

While other religions treat human beings, regardless of which faith they follow, with warmth, compassion and humanity, Islam, a political ideology masquarading as a religion, professes loot, rape, and death for other believers (no, muslims are not the only believers, but you would not know that). If that is not enough to scare away a follower of faith, what is? Also, when will you acknowledge that while all faiths give a human being the freedom to choose and follow any faith, Islam puts those who leave, to sword? Oh that's right, Dar-al-Islam knows only other, Dar-al-Harb!
See why Islam is dangerous for humanity, Doughie?

As a Christian, I find no contradiction in loving your enemy, muslims and destroying islam. Islam falls apart under criticism. Obviously the term islamophobia was designed to stop all criticism and is used to label critics as racist or worse, this is also illogical. I think it is a wasted effort to love your enemy without destroying the ‘thing’ that makes him your enemy.

Loving your enemy doesn’t mean tolerating the fact he wants to destroy you and it doesn't mean, being nice. Christ never told anyone that, he said to be as harmless as doves but as wise as serpents. A poisonous snake’s bite is designed to paralyze and kill. My own attacks against Mohammad’s insanity, humanities’ most idiotic ideology may be vicious but Christian. Doing good to an enemy doesn’t come with a toleration for his belief in the capricious ramblings of a very disturbed cult leader. Love your enemy, expose islam's stupidity, backwardness, injustice and founder.

That Ibrahim Hooper sure is talented.

He was talking out of so many different sides of his mouth, you'da thought the guy was having a seizure.

I wonder if he and Mr. Obama are related...

Ibriham gives me the creeps. Besides that, he never shuts up and is always interrupting. He has no manners whatsoever...along with his past lies.

How can Robert be responsible for what someone writes on his website? Certainly, Ibriham doesn’t support his people that spread hate and terror towards us infidels, right? Maybe he does and that is why he sees a connection with one post????

Am I the only one who noticed Ibrahim Hooper saying that "islam is not a race, islam is an ideology"(starting at 4:27)? Wonder if that would make it ok with CAIR to categorize islam as something other than a religion?

My comment from last year still stands.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/017601.php#c430451

"islam is not a race, islam is an ideology" is a classic. That makes that vid so special. The 'kill all Muslims' post on JW was done by a CAIR agit prop that very same morning. Hooper conveniently used it to smear Spencer, but it doesn't stick.

Why Prager disagrees with Fitzgeralds suggestion to make it more difficult for Muslims to engage in subversion and infiltation puzzles me, perhaps he did't give it much thought.

Other than that, Prager is a clear thinker and invaluable contributor to the counter jihad.