Jerusalem: 15 hurt as East Jerusalem Muslim drives car into crowd of soldiers

The bulldozer rampage in July has introduced a new variety of suicide attack for the jihadist seeking to "slay and be slain" for the Qur'an's promise of paradise (9:111). "15 wounded in terror attack at busy Jerusalem intersection," by Etgar Lefkovits and Shelly Paz for the Jerusalem Post, September 22:

An Arab resident of east Jerusalem rammed his vehicle into a group of soldiers at a central Jerusalem thoroughfare late Monday night, wounding fifteen people, before being shot dead by an off-duty IDF officer, police and rescue officials said.
It was the third such attack in the city in as many months.
The attack took place at the city's Kikar Tzahal near Jaffa Gate. Two of the casualties were in moderate condition, the rest were lightly hurt.
The assailant, who was driving a BMW, crashed into a group of off-duty soldiers on the sidewalk, where his car came to a grinding halt.
Jerusalem police chief Aharon Franco said that the attacker was shot dead "within seconds" by an off-duty IDF officer who was touring the city with his unit.
He added that there was no intelligence information ahead of the attack, but noted that Jerusalem was under heavy security alert due to Ramadan.
The city's police chief said that the lone attacker was an Arab resident of east Jerusalem.
The pedestrians wounded in the attack were rushed to Jerusalem's Hadassah-University Hospital at Ein Kerem, Hadassah-University Hospital on Mount Scopus and the city's Sha'are Tzedek Hospital.
The attack comes after two back-to-back bulldozer attacks in Jerusalem in July which left three Israelis dead and dozens wounded.
| 28 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

28 Comments

behold, the "HOLY" month of ramadan.

Only able to afford a BMW? See what poverty drives jihadis to do!

"under heavy security alert due to Ramadan"

Boy doesn't that phrase say it all?

Just as well there are armed off duty soldiers around when these attacks occur. The casualties could have been far worse.

the attacker was shot dead "within seconds" by an off-duty IDF officer who was touring the city with his unit.
Quick, clean, extermination. Behold the efficiency of the IDF... or, as the Islamo-supremicists will surely claim, "disproportionate response" to a traffic mishap.

Something like this happened before - not in Jerusalem, but in the USA, two years ago, on March 3 2006, when one Mohammed Reza Taheri-Azar decided to take 'revenge' for what he perceived as the Infidel-inflicted sufferings of Muslims abroad, and rented an SUV and drove it right into a crowd of Infidel students on the campus of the University of North Carolina.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/010479.php#comments

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/010501.php

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/010506.php

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/010512.php

http://www.nysun.com/opinion/voldemort-award/29025/

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=730A921C-1FED-4DCD-9949-D28A3390317D

An eyewitness of the attack at North Carolina Uni came to the jihadwatch comments floor and described the attack as follows:

"I was there on Friday [that's interesting - that it was a FRIDAY]. One of my two offices is located in Lenoir Hall a.k.a. the dining hall (In front of the Bookstore and across The Pit).

'He slowly drove his Cherokee on the south side of Lenoir Hall and turned left. His vehicle was idling and pointed towards the Pit.

'He then accelerated so quickly that he spun his back wheels and roared toward well over 500 to 1000 innocent students.

'He later calmly called 911 and stated his reasons for this "act of violence." Once he uttered his reason it became terrorism.

'His sole purpose was to "avenge the treatment of Muslims" kill and strike fear. That is terrorism as we know it today.

'If I drive my SUV through a crowded park because I see my wife embracing another man...that is a spontaneous act of violence.
' This was planned."
- Posted by: Bill at March 8, 2006 10:56 AM

'This was planned' - eyewitness of Hitting People With Car Jihad at Uni of NC, 2006.

In 2006 there was another case of a Muslim taking a vehicle and deliberately running people over, in the streets of San Francisco; it was pretty fully described and discussed here at the time -

http://jihadwatch.org/archives/012926.php

- handy summary and some discussion and commentary, after the guy was ruled insane:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/022032.php

And now we have Hitting People With Car Jihad in Jerusalem, Israel, 2008, hot on the heels of Running Over People With Earthmover Jihad, also in Jerusalem, 2008.

Come on guys, stop trashing the poor driver's name!
he is not a terrorist - it was just posted in ynet that his family said it was not a terror attack - he lost control of his car because his beloved cousin didn't agree to marry him...

now it's all understood. didn't it ever happened to you that your cousin didn't want to marry you so you ran into a group of infidels??

people!! have some sympathy!!

hebrew link: http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3600759,00.html

they didn't put the article in the english edition yet... sorry.

Jewcat, your comment made me laugh. Thank you very much. Indeed, all of that poverty. It's interesting that they can still afford BMWs.

It's clear the Palestinians haven't heard of driving lessons. But they sure get a heavy dose of Jew-hatred lessons.

such a coward to attack while sitting in his lofty
BMW! but the ending served him well, and he will certainly be surpised that his virgins all look like albright or clinton (either one).

TSK TSK you guys are not being pc in other words your all racists against the one true religion.
One can no longer practise there religion without people like you finding fault in it.
Do muslims tell jews not to bow when praying or christians not to drink wine the blood of christ.
But noooo you guys have to make racist comments when all the poor muslim was doing was practiseing his religion "hence running over the
infidel"i for one am ashamed and disgusted with
with everyone of ya.

A short, instructive and moving film about Israel, which some may not have seen before:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC_60b2NR1I

To the list of occuptations that may be dangerous for Muslims to have -- airline pilot or member of the crew, railroad engineer or member of the crew, schoolbus or regular bus driver, worker at any train station, airport, or bus station, water plant enginner, nuclear plant engineer or any member of the staff, and a thousand others -- must of course be added that of taxi driver. Think of someone veering into a crowd, at a Salute to Israel rally or a Fourth of July Parade, or any other occasion.

Come to think of it, what will Israel do now? Can it ban Arabs from driving? And if not, what are the Israelis to do? And since copy-cat terrorist acts are all the rage, what will the Infidel inhabitants of London, Paris, Amsterdam, Delhi, Bangkok, Manila, and a thousand other cities do, if Muslims decide to engage in their individual violent Jihads not merely by stabbing one or two people, as has happened, but by using their cars to smash into crowds?

What then?

In Saudi Arabia they don't let the ladies drive because Mohammed didn't let any of his wives drive cars.

Wait, they only had camels back then.

Maybe Saudi women can't drive because the temptation to run over a Muslim man is just too great.

We could use this reason to ban driving for Muslims in this country. The temptation to run over infidels is just too great. And we should not lead anyone into temptation.

Jerusalem was under heavy security alert due to Ramadan.

In most religions, a holy day or month would mean a cessation, or at least a lessening, of hostilities. Only in Islam does it mean killing others. Israelis have to worry about being attacked on Yom Kippur.

So why ISN"T the West willing to attack Muslim countries on Friday, when they are at prayer? What goes around comes around.

The excuse -proffered by the wannabe jihadi assassin's family - namely, that he was out of his mind because of frustrated love -

the JPost article also mentions this (not citing the family as source)

"The 19-year-old had wanted to marry his cousin, and when she refused his offer, he decided to carry out a terror attack, Jerusalem police spokesman Shmuel Ben-Ruby said"


http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1222017359506&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

is eerily similar to the excuse proffered by the family of the second of the San Francisco Running People Over With Cars jihadist, as you will find if you follow the links I provided.

There's also this one:

http://jihadwatch.org/archives/012933.php

linking to an article which provides this choice little attempt at explaining things away in a manner that Infidels will understand: "Other family members say he [Popal] may have been anxious because of his recent marriage arranged by his family."

So in Jerusalem 2008 a Muslim family has claimed that their poor darling was refused by his sweetheart and this was what made him ram his four-wheel-drive into a crowd of off-duty Jewish soldiers. Hmmmm.

And in San Francisco in 2006 a Muslim goes zooming around in a 4-wheel-drive attempting to bump off Infidels left right and centre, and some of his family claim it was because his new marriage (arranged) had put him under stress....

Seems to me that the overwhelming majority of kafir lads, refused by their girls, or experiencing anxieties in or about their nuptials (heard of any anxious Hindu drivers lately, running strangers over in the street, because of an arranged marriage?), somehow do not seem to feel an immediate overwhelming urge to go and bump off perfect strangers, using a large heavy vehicle. They *might* if sufficiently unhinged, get drunk and drive dangerously and go wrap *themselves* and their car around a tree, suicide for love/ despair and all that, but one just does not see them driving down a lighted street deliberately playing Skittle The Pedestrian.

The love life of the young Arab Muslim in Jerusalem is, to my mind, pretty much irrelevant, given the interesting fact that the JPost, sensibly, used as the basis for their headline - 'Palestinian Media: Jerusalem terrorist was a member of Hamas".

"The terrorist who rammed his BMW into a group of soldiers at a central Jerusalem thoroughfare late Monday, Qassem Mughrabi, 19, from Jebl Mukaber in east Jerusalem, was a member of Hamas, according to the Palestinian Ma'an news agency."

This noble Islamic tradition, soon coming to a street near you (and technically, one doesn't really need a street, either; cf., The Pit at UNC), is known as Jihad al-Beemer.

A Muslima refused an "offer" of marriage?
Progress!

An armed American can handle such a situation just as well as any IDF soldier.

http://freemendo.typepad.com/undaunted/2008/07/good-thing-we-1.html

Dumblesdore...

It is easy to dismiss the 'explanations' of a young man not getting the woman of his dreams and going Jihad. Personally, I BELIEVE them. I think Islam is so sexually retarded that these frustrated 'youths' consciously decide to go out 'in a blaze of Jihad glory' and on to Allah's great whorehouse in the sky. Of course, we in the West rule it 'insanity' because we haven't worked hard enough to 'understand' Islam.

Being able to return fire is a wonderful thing. Let's hope that the upholstery in that Bimmer did not get all bloody.

dumbledoresarmy, Just what I was thinking.
The jihad in the US is not getting any press.
Every instance is looked at as a lone nut, not jihad.

The main culprit in this attack is not the Mohamedan who carried it out, but the weak, corrupt, insane, dhimmi Israeli government that allows these Mohamedans to stay on the land, as a demonstration of its tolerance and multiculturalism to maintain trade and diplomatic relations with the U.S. and the Eurabian Union. It is the nature of snakes to bite, wasps --- to sting, and Mohamedans --- to wage jihad for Allah, so there is no reason to be angry when each of these creatures does exactly what it is supposed to do. Infidel anger, frustration and outrage should be directed, instead, at Israeli and Western "leaders" who allow Mohamedan presence on kuffar lands.

The jihad in the US is not getting any press.
Every instance is looked at as a lone nut, not jihad.

Posted by: interestinconundrum

There are two reasons for that.

-The government can't call this jihad and still say that we have not been attacked since 9/11

-The press can't call it jihad because that requires an examination of Islamic doctrine and possibly even an acknowledgment of the religious basis for all of this violence and even an examination of the goals of the attackers. Israel's existence and "the plight of the Palestinians" aren't why we are being attacked but it's the reason they prefer to bring up. It's easier to show on the television screen.

Here is the text from a page I saved from a site that said just what we are experiencing.
The site is no longer on the web, by this name anyway.
Military Targets in the USA must be Attacked
(Arabic writing here)

The torture of Muslim prisoners in Iraq in the "rape rooms" at the American Abu Ghraib prison confirms that the so-called American war on terror is really a war on Islam.

George Bush has created a global gulag network of extra-legal and secret us prisons with thousands of inmates. This Gulag stretches from Afghanistan to Iraq, to Guantanamo and secret CIA prisons around the world. This Gulag exclusively holds Muslim prisoners.

In light of these revelations, AI-Mas akin would like to take this opportunity to remind the American Muslim Mujahedin, and our allies in the revolutionary and anti¬Imperialist left, that ROTC buildings, armed service recruiting centers, individual military personnel, and police officers are "military targets". These institutions must be violently and covertly attacked.

In fact, there are thousands of unarmed military targets walking around all over the United States. Outraged American citizens and American Muslims should have little difficulty making violent contact with recruits, cadets, marines, etc.

We strongly recommend that such contact be made with a very sharp knife, pepper spray, brass knuckles, baseball bats, firearms, explosives, or the bumper of a full sized automobile, buck or SUV.

AI-Mas akin http://maidur.htmlplanet. com

The last paragraph should read (I didn't know a scanner could mis-read a document, hmm)

or the bumper of a full sized automobile , truck or SUV.

Maybe they're thinking of mounting and driving male deer into us, hmmm?

Improvised weaponry.

Hey, it could happen.

"The 19-year-old had wanted to marry his cousin, and when she refused his offer, he decided to carry out a terror attack.."


it always happens when Muslims don't get their way...they go beserk...

Hugh said:

To the list of occuptations that may be dangerous for Muslims to have -- airline pilot or member of the crew, railroad engineer or member of the crew, schoolbus or regular bus driver, worker at any train station, airport, or bus station, water plant enginner, nuclear plant engineer or any member of the staff, and a thousand others -- ....

I must say this completely OT, but I know our Hugh just loves Sinatra...

Strangers on my Flight

Sorry for the diversion, but thought everyone would get a good laugh from this parody. I take anything involving airplanes/aviation personally.