Jury unable to decide whether writer of "Rules of Jihad" was trying to incite a terrorist act
Posted by Raymond on September 12, 2008 8:38 AM
After all, his lawyer argued that Belal Khazaal only authored a few paragraphs of that how-to-terrorize-manual. At least they didn't take the "[1] I was only kidding" road. Update on [2] this story.
"Jury discharged in terrorism book trial," from [3] ABC News, September 11 (thanks to Sylvia), September 11:
Belal Khazaal pleaded not guilty to two terrorism-related charges after producing a book published on the internet.The court heard it had information on how to blow up planes and an assassination hit-list.
Khazaal's lawyer argued he was the author of just a few paragraphs and that he compiled information that was available to anyone on the internet.
Yesterday a Supreme Court jury found the 38-year-old guilty of one charge - producing a book knowing it was connected with assisting a terrorist act.
But the jury has been unable to make a decision on the second charge of attempting to incite a terrorist act.
The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) is yet to decide if Khazaal will face a re-trial on that second charge.
Article printed from Jihad Watch: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/09/jury-unable-to-decide-whether-writer-of-rules-of-jihad-was-trying-to-incite-a-terrorist-act.html
URLs in this post:Click here to print.