"Now some might think I’m over-reacting here, but one only need look at Europe to see where this can all lead"

From a Frontpage Interview with Gregory Ross, Director of Communications for Clarion Fund, a group whose mission is to educate America about the jihad threat:

Ross: Look at the recent incident at the Tyson Foods plant in Tennessee. The plant, mostly comprised of Muslim immigrant workers, decided that they would like to swap our national holiday, Labor Day, for one of their own holidays. On the surface one might say, well if everyone at the plant agrees with it, but this undermines the cohesiveness that a society needs to survive. If they’d like to take a vacation day or sick day for their holiday that is one thing, but to decide to exist in a vacuum in this country, and cry foul and sue if they don’t get there way, will only lead to the disintegration of American society and it’s culture and values over time.

Now some might think I’m over-reacting here, but one only need look at Europe to see where this can all lead. In England, even members of parliament are now beginning to talk about allowing certain Muslim-only sections of England rule themselves by Sharia law, instead of English Common Law.

| 12 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

12 Comments

Obsession is a terrific product.

FP: Did you get a lot of protests from Muslims and leftists about the movie?

Ross: The people in our organization and our donors span a wide political spectrum and we work with moderate Muslims as well. We figure that by being evenhanded and just sticking to the facts that the only enemies we’ll be making are those that mean to cause us harm, and quite honestly we’re not too concerned about whether we ‘insult’ them or not.

However, yes, like with all things in life you will get all types that disagree when confronted with the truth, and sometimes people can get quite angry and that can lead to protesting. We welcome all forms of peaceful discussion.


From that quote: we work with moderate Muslims

That's where I cut the line. There is nothing moderate about Islam and therefore there can be no moderate Islam or moderate Muslim. Period.

Such thinking permits for infiltration and tainting of information.

Now, if by 'moderate' these folks are referring to apostates like Aayan Hirsi Ali, Walid Shoebat, Ibn Warraq, Ali Sina, Dr. Wafa Sultan, etc., then identify these individuals as such.

So long as the "Clarion Fund" associates with 'moderate' Muslims - believers - they risk credibility.

You see, in order for there to be "Moderate" Muslims, there has to be a moderate version of Islam. Since the Qur'an is the literal word of Allah, it can not be modified, changed or interpreted. Any "moderate" Muslim would be considered an apostate or heretic and subject to death by other Muslims. ("those who change their faith, kill them")

However, I would like to see "Obsession" and their new film.

The guy exaggerates on one hand - "Muslim-only sections of England rule themselves by Sharia law" and has a naive vision of Islam on the other hand - moderate muslims exist as much as moderate killings exist.

The supreme are never moderate unless the moderation supports their supremacy.

All apparent moderation on the part of the supreme, is then, fake.

Each time a muslim demand is met, fraud has been committed...

In England, even members of parliament are now beginning to talk about allowing certain Muslim-only sections of England rule themselves by Sharia law, instead of English Common Law.

If that happens, it will be the death knell of Western jurisprudence in the UK.

Ross: The concept of Jihad as defined by the radical Imams and terrorists is not just one of personal struggle, but the struggle of a nation to determine its manifest destiny. These people clearly state that the goal of their actions is to dominate the entire world and defeat or subdue the infidel, wherever he or she may live.

To dominate the entire world for Jihad? Manifest destiny? This was mandated by the founder of Islam from the very beginning, 1400 years ago, and it is still going on today, as the “Third Jihad.”

Mohammet was a clever fellow in a sneaky kind of way. He knew religion could be used to control the masses, so put out a dragnet for his caravan raiding Arabs to control them, by elevating one of the Pagan gods, the Mesopotamian moon god Allah, to promote his new ‘religion’ from above. Allah was raised up the One-God totem pole with his prophet as the only authorized mouthpiece for this new god. The Caliphs took this idea one step further by gathering up scraps of Mohammet’s sayings and raising them up the totem pole to the ‘uncreated’ immutable word of Allah. Then they effectively outlawed any criticism of either Allah or his prophet Mohammet, so ‘sealed’ the prophet’s ramblings for all time to come, with severe punishments for anyone who doubted. This raised the totem pole of Islam to an untouchable height, above all other religions, so all those who did not believe in Allah and Mohammet were now dubbed ‘infidels’, worthy of not only scorn but real physical abuse, like killing them if they refused to submit in total obedience. So there you have a tight full circle to control not only the primitive caravan raiding Arabs, but all humanity in the bargain, with this sneaky clever strategy of using a supremacist 'religion' to control everybody. But is this really what a religion is supposed to do? Or is this more what a religious-cult is expected to demand from its followers?

Ali Sina’s “Islam: Cult or Religion?” spells it out without apology: http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina50218.htm

Now compare what Mohammet and successor Caliphs did with their supremacist totem pole, and it begins to look very much the Cult-of-Allah. To seal off this Cult from further criticism, their prophet was raised up the pole to another height, that he was the ‘perfect man’ beyond doubt of any kind, and to say anything that discredits him is severely punishable, even with ‘death for apostasy’. The Hadiths and Sharia then insured these edicts up the Cult’s totem pole, even when not a member, so to demand apologies from anyone offending Islam becomes the norm. Then to top it all off, they use our own tolerance and laws against us to enforce these demands of total submission to the Cult. Nice and tight total mind and body control all around, for everyone, and then this in turn is made into ‘your personal struggle’ of Jihad, the ‘greater’. Not bad for a sneaky clever Arab caravan raider of the 7th century, is it? Religion? Not!

“Step right up folks, see the Totem Pole of Allah, and bow down in submission with the shahada! This is your last chance before you are forced to face the immutable word of God, and we strike at your necks and fintertips. Step right up, folks. This is your last chance to bow down in submission to your personal struggle for Jihad, and Sharia law in your neighborhood. Step right up!” --- Unfortunately, many of our clueless pols are stepping right up to appease this Cult.

The film “Obsession” is viewable here

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=obsession&emb=1#

In England, even members of parliament are now beginning to talk about allowing certain Muslim-only sections of England rule themselves by Sharia law,

the scum and bottom feaders that for the most part will suck up to any group they think will vote for them are to mps in parlement

How can there be such a thing as a MODERATE MUSLIM when they all read the same Qur'an?

Bet a Muslim coined the phrase "Moderate Muslim." (Never forget, DECEPTION is their goal!! And lying is their method of reaching it!!)

ALL Muslims believe the Qur'an is a direct transcription of Allah's words to Muhamad...

Hence, even "moderate" Muslims believe that:

"It is He [Allah] who has sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth, to show that it is ABOVE all other religions, however much the idolaters may hate this." Qur'an 9:38

... is the will of Allah.

How moderate is that?

Where are the MPs talking about sharia governed Muslim-only areas which justify this headline?

I have never heard any UK MP talk of this.

Moderate Muslims , peaceful Muslims. this association does not have to much experience .
Or you are a Muslim and follow the Koran and the Sharia law or you are not.
It is very difficult to make people understand in this country that the religion itself cannot mix with our society ,

It is teaching values totally opposed to our values.


and it will be good for us if Islam was not allowed to be taught here.

a Muslim cannot integrate in this society period. End of the discussion ..