Phoenix Airport allows special clothing for Muslim janitorial workers

When non-Muslims travel in Muslim countries, they have to adapt to Islamic mores. When Muslims immigrate to non-Muslim countries, non-Muslims have to adapt to Islamic mores. Got it?

Here again, people will say, What's the big deal if they wear skirts? Are you seriously saying that Somali Muslim janitorial staff wearing skirts in Phoenix is some threat to Western civilization? No, of course I'm not.

What I am saying is this: The Muslim Brotherhood's strategy in the United States is, in their own words, “a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

That's from "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America," a 1991 presentation by Muslim Brotherhood operative Mohamed Akram.

In that memorandum, the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP) is listed as an allied group. From the IAP came CAIR, which is behind this decision in Phoenix.

When a group has a declared supremacist agenda, aiming step-by-step and piece-by-piece to subvert American culture and impose Islamic norms upon the society, would it really be wise not to see initiatives like this one as part of that effort? After all, it reinforces a precedent that has already been set in other contexts: when Islamic practices are at variance with American ones, it is the American ones that must give way. What will be the outcome of following that precedent over a period of years?

Stealth Jihad Update: "Sky Harbor Allows Special Clothing For Somali Muslim Janitorial Workers," by Ray Stern for the Phoenix New Times Valley Fever blog, August 27:

Who wears the pants at Sky Harbor airport?

Not 30 Somali women who fought for the right to wear skirts on the job, and won.

The Muslim women balked at a planned policy change by their employer, GCA Services, (that's GCA's logo pictured above), that would have forced them to wear pants and a tucked-in shirt as they did their janitorial duties.

They'd been previously allowed to wear skirts; pants are too immodest for them.

After discussions between GCA managers, aiport officials, the Arizona chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Somali Association of Arizona, it was agreed the 30 women could wear black skirts and aprons in addition to a white shirt. Their right to wear the Muslim headscarves known as hijabs was never in question, says Hakim Osman of the Somali Association of Arizona.

Osman says that after hearing of the women immigrants' concern when GCA announced plans for a new uniform late last year, he wrote the company a letter asking for "reasonable accomodations."

The change was supposed to take effect on August 21, but never did, Osman says. Which is good, because the Somalis would have refused to wear pants on religious grounds, he says....

| 12 Comments
del.icio.us | Digg this | Email | FaceBook | Twitter | Print | Tweet

12 Comments

Do they take time off to pray five times a day? Where? Do they have a special prayer room, or is there a non-denominational chapel? When they do so, do they leave their cleaning carts unattended? Do they make up the time they have lost, or do they work less than their non-Muslim fellow-workers? These are some of the questions that naturally arise, in the minds of anyone, including those fellow workers who may find themselves disheartened and demoralized by the unequal treatment, and that kind of thing is never good for any workplace.

The atmosphere in the workplace, and the effect on non-Muslim workers when Muslims are given special dispensation for this and for that, is something to think about before making hiring decisions.

And it is not only this kind of thing that should be considered. What about the atmosphere in a work setting? The presence of Muslims, dour and ready to pounce, possibly even to sue, could inhibit free and easy discussion -- discussion about the treatment of women, discussion of religion, discussino of foreign policy and world politics, discussion of all kinds -- offering a chilling effect on those who work, in law firms as in universities, on those who supply services or make goods, of all kinds. The exercise of one of the pleasures of life that makes the workplace more endurable, conversation, the easy give-and-takeof banter or the possibility of a serious exchange of views -- becomes impossible, for it will be, in the presence of Muslims, so carefully, painfully constrained. And who can talk about Islam itself, a major problem for the Western world that must be discussed, if there are Muslims present?

Where I work, there are five or six people who have not been there for twenty-five years or longer. It's very difficult to get rid of old farts with Union membership, and there are more than enough of us to stop the line. Built on Hugh's questions, this is what we old farts would do, in similar circumstances...

Do they take time off to pray five times a day?

If the answer is "yes", we would time them, and see how long we could take off for independent extra-curricular coffee breaks. And we'd by God take them, too. We'd take our own time, by clocking out, or take the company's time, by remaining on the clock--Whichever the devout Mohammedans did.

Where?

Wherever it is, that's where we'll take our coffee.

Do they have a special prayer room, or is there a non-denominational chapel?

It would have to be non-denominational, in our workplace. The company is so PC, it's sickening. However, if they were to make it a prayer room only, as in "no coffee allowed", I'm sure we could all stand to pray a little. I could pray five rosaries a day, no sweat.

Do they make up the time they have lost, or do they work less than their non-Muslim fellow-workers?

They'd damned sure better have to clock out and take lost time, if the company thinks its going to discriminate in favor of Muslim prayers, by prohibiting and punishing non-Muslims for taking similar liberties.

That's what the rest of us have to do, when we have mid-shift appointments with dentists, doctors, etc. And, we do not get to make up the time.

Hugh alludes to the inhibition of conversation, and that's where we would be screwed. I've already seen this, first hand. Been involved with it, in fact. We might be able to prove that our workplace had been made hostile by this favored group--unless they beat us to it...

When you put the chill on conversation in the workplace there's nothing left to say unless it's complaint, gossip, or tattle.

I don't care what muslims wear to clean the toilets, as long as they clean the toilets.

Janitorial is ordained by Allah, so traditional muslim clothing is appropriate dress for the job.

I can see the stealth jihad in such demands, but in this case, the public should know who it is that is cleaning up rest room mess left by kuffars.

No one can mess up a rest room like a kuffar, ask any janitor.

It's amazing that any muslim would even take such a job...But I guess Allah is willing it...he always does...

We should force them to wear distinctive clothing.

Imagine the howling and wingeing....!

Somalis would have refused to wear pants on religious grounds, he says....

fire them until they learn to adapt to the expected standards in the usa thats what all immigrant groups have had to learn to accommodate the peaple that were already there why should muslims be any different

Sheik yer'mami makes an interesting point, although I'm not sure he quite intended to make it. We are not making them wear distinctive clothing, they are choosing to wear those clothes. Consequently, they are making themselves very conspicuous to others; they are obviously not "typical Americans." This will, one might surmise, make them the object of stares and even potentially harassment. They will be singled out for not conforming. They may even be made to feel "uncomfortable." Their co-workers may not respond this way, but the general public might, especially since they work at an airport. In other words, they are making themselves more obvious, and consequently, making themselves open to more scrutiny, which I don't think is a bad thing.

Make them wear PINK>..just like some other loonies do..they will easier to spot and the PINK color will give fair warning to normal people...

Hugh,

It is important to note that in the workplace, the determining criteria for "religious insensitivity" is that someone who heard the remarks "perceived them as offensive."

I did some work for a company with a sizable contingent of Muslim employees and it was made known that, "since we have people of many different religions," discussions of religion, politics and sex were forbidden as people had different cultural perceptions regarding these issues. Of course, "people of many different religions" was just the latest euphemism for Muslims.

These rules give Muslims tremendous power. A Christian employee asked someone from human resources whether it is "offensive" if someone asks him about his church during lunch and he tells them about it. The response from HR: it depends if a third party hears the comments and "perceives them as offensive."

There was a prayer room that we were told was there for anyone who wanted to use it...just remove your shoes. I never heard anyone that wasn't Muslim say that they use it.

fOR WORKING AT THE AIRPORT . I THINK IT IS OK.
AT LEAST WE CAN TELL WHO IS WHO...

"The response from HR: it depends if a third party hears the comments and "perceives them as offensive.""

4infidels,

That's the very same criterion used in my company. Unbelievable, isn't it? Once upon a time, when someone "perceived" an offense, he was free to quit the offensive job, and find another, more to his liking.

I find myself in disagreement with many of the comments here - not that I disagree that CAIR has this agenda, but that I don't believe it is reasonable to see this as primarily an example of it. In this case, as the article indicates, the women were told when hired that they could wear skirts - presumably they would not have taken the positions otherwise. Now the employer was proposing to change the rules in ways that would have forced them to quit (Orthodox Jewish women would have had the same issue). That makes the proposed rule change de facto religious discrimination, if the employer cannot demonstrate that it is necessary for proper on-the-job performance, which they clearly cannot in this case.

"Their right to wear the Muslim headscarves known as hijabs was never in question,..."

Is that true? Its my understanding from a few HR folks I know that an employer has a right to require a workplace that is free from disruption. Frankly, my sense of being an American is totaly disrupted by seeing non-assimilatating muslims in the workplace. Like the other quote above I would "perceive it to be offensive..." So much for the customer always being right.







Not Peace But A Sword by Robert SpencerDid Muhammad Exist? The Muslim Brotherhood in America, by Robert SpencerIslamophobia: Thoughtcrime of the Totalitarian FutureMuslim Persecution of Christians, by Robert Spencer Obama and IslamThe Ground Zero Mosque: Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks
The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran


Stealth Jihad


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


The Truth About Muhammad


What they’re saying about Robert Spencer
“My comrade-in-arms, my pal, my buddy.”
Oriana Fallaci

“Robert Spencer incarnates intellectual courage when, all over the world, governments, intellectuals, churches, universities and media crawl under a hegemonic Universal Caliphate’s New Order. His achievement in the battle for the survival of free speech and dignity of man will remain as a fundamental monument to the love of, and the self-sacrifice for, liberty.”
Bat Ye’or

“Robert Spencer is indefatigable. He is keeping up the good fight long after many have already given up. I do not know what we would do without him. I appreciate all the intelligence and courage it takes to keep going despite the appeasement of the West.”
Ibn Warraq

“America's most informed, fearless, and compelling voice on modern jihadism.”
Andrew C. McCarthy, Senior Fellow at National Review Institute

“Robert Spencer is the leading voice of scholarship and reason in a world gone mad. If the West is to be saved, we will owe Robert Spencer an incalculable debt.”
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

"The consummate Islam critic and expert." — Bruce Bawer

“Over the years, we have become friends, and I have received his assistance on several pieces of legislation I proposed.”
Former Congressman Tom Tancredo

“Few people are capable of applying scholarship, analytical reasoning, and objectivity to their topic -- while simultaneously being readable and witty -- as can Robert Spencer.”
Raymond Ibrahim

“A national treasure...The acclaimed scholar of Islam.”
Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy

“I am indeed honored to call him my friend.”
Brad Thor, novelist

“A top American analyst of Islam....A serious scholar...I learn from him.”
Daniel Pipes

“A brilliant scholar and writer.”
Douglas Murray

"One of my best teachers."
Ashraf Ramelah, Voice of the Copts

“Thank God there’s at least one man with balls left in the West.”
Kathy Shaidle, Five Feet of Fury

“I read people like [Mark Steyn] and Bob Spencer and the rest of them, and I say, ‘Boortz, you’re pretending you’re an author. These people really are. They really write some entertaining, some standup stuff.’”
Neal Boortz

“Robert Spencer is the Stephen King of Jihad.”
Chris Gaubatz, Muslim Mafia

“Armed with facts and fearlessness, Spencer stands up for Western civilization.”
Michelle Malkin

“Widely read in conservative foreign policy circles.”
New York Times

“Widely read in many quarters in Washington.”
Washington Post

“A canny operative who likely has the inside track on the State Department’s Middle East affairs desk should the tea party win the White House.”
New York Magazine

“A hero of the American right.”
Karen Armstrong

"The leading anti-Islamic intellectual in the United States....The go-to Islam expert for the right wing."
Salon Magazine

“Robert Spencer is an Edward Said turned upside down.”
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz

“One of the nation's most notorious Islamophobes.”
Hamas-linked CAIR

"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world. These people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas."
Heidi Beirach, Southern Poverty Law Center

“Satanic ignoramus.”
Khaleel Mohammed

“The Likud anti-Christ.”
Dar al-Hayat newspaper (Saudi Arabia)

“Zionist Crusader, missionary of hate, counter-Islam consultant.”
Al-Qaeda’s Adam Gadahn, “Azzam the American”



Follow me on Twitter
facebook islam
RSS feed

Monthly Archives



Donate
Jihad Watch is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Donations are tax-deductible.


Robert Spencer debates on The Quran Teaches WarVideo: Robert Spencer on CPAC Breitbart News
Crucified Again by Raymond Ibrahim
SIOAFreedom Defense InitiativeJihad Watch VideosAmerican Freedom Law Center
Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site.

» ACT for America
» Always on Watch
» American Center for Democracy
» American Coptic Association
» American Council for Kosovo
» American Freedom Alliance
» American Freedom Law Center
» American Islamic Forum for Democracy
» American Sheepdogs
» American Thinker
» Americans Against Hate
» Americans for Legal Immigration
» Amerisrael
» Amillennialist Contra Mundum
» Annaqed
» A New Dark Age Is Dawning
» Answering Islam
» Answering Muslims
» Anti-CAIR
» Apostates of Islam
» Aramaic Broadcasting Network (ABN)
» Armies of Liberation
» Assyrian International News Agency
» Atlas Shrugs
» Atour — The State of Assyria
» Australian Islamist Monitor
» Biafra Nation
» Blazing Cat Fur
» Bosch Fawstin
» Brad Thor
» Brussels Journal
» CAIR Watch
» Campus Watch
» Caroline Glick
» Christians Under Attack
» Citizen Warrior
» Coalition for the Defense of Human Rights
» Conservative Nation News
» Copts.com
» Creeping Sharia
» Daniel Pipes
» David Horowitz Freedom Center
» The David Project
» David Thompson
» David Yerushalmi Law
» D. C. Watson
» Dearborn Underground
» DEBKAfile
» Dhimmitude.org
» Dry Bones
» Ellis Washington Report
» Europe News
» Eye On Islam
» Ezra Levant
» Faith Freedom International
» Father Zakaria
» Federale
» Five Feet of Fury
» Foundation for Democracy in Iran
» Free Congress Foundation
» The Free Copts
» Freedom Defense Initiative
» FrontPage Magazine.com
» Geert Wilders
» Genocide1915.info
» Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center
» History of Jihad
» Hizb ut-Tahrir Watch
» Honest Reporting
» Honor Killings
» Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities
» India Defence
» Infidel Blogger’s Alliance
» Infidels Are Cool
» The Intelligence Summit
» International Analyst Network
» International Free Press Society
» Internet Haganah
» The Investigative Project on Terrorism
» IOwnTheWorld.com
» IranPressNews
» Iran va Jahan
» Islam Review
» Islam Speaks
» Islam Versus Europe
» Islam Watch
» Islamic Terrorism in India
» Islamist Watch — Middle East Forum
» Israel Matzav
» JihadOnBuddhists.org
» Kejda Gjermani
» KRSI: Radio Sedaye Iran
» Liberated
» Logan's Warning
» Looking At the Left
» Mahdi Watch
» Mapping Sharia
» Mark Steyn
» Martin Kramer
» MEMRI TV
» Middle East Facts
» Middle East Quarterly
» Middle-East-Info.org
» Middle East Media Research Institute
» Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA)
» Militant Islam Monitor
» Morning Star
» Muhammad Tube
» The Muslim Issue
» Muslim World Today
» Myths and Facts
» National Vietnam & Gulf War Veterans Coalition
» NewsReal Blog
» No Mosques At Ground Zero
» Nonie Darwish
» Northeast Intelligence Network
» Occidental Jihadist
» One Jerusalem
» Open Speech
» Operation Give
» Operation Gratitude
» Organiser
» Orwellian Culture
» Palestinian Media Watch
» PamelaGeller.com
» Panun Kashmir
» Pedestrian Infidel
» The People's Cube
» The People of the Book
» Persecution Project
» Political Islam
» Politically Incorrect
» Politiskt Inkorrekt
» Q Society of Australia
» Radio Farda
» Radio Jihad
» RAWA: Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan
» Raymond Ibrahim
» Red Alerts
» Refugee Resettlement Watch
» Religion of Peace
» Republican Riot
» Reuters Middle East Watch
» The “Reverend” Jim Sutter
» SANE: Society of Americans for National Existence
» The Second Draft
» Shire Network News
» SITE Intelligence Group
» Small Wars Journal
» Smoke-Filled World
» The Snooper Report
» Snow Report Blog
» StandWithUs
» Steve Lackner
» The Stiletto Blog
» STOP! Honour Killings
» Sultan Knish
» Tell the Children the Truth
» Terrorism Awareness Project
» Theodore’s World
» Tom Gross Media
» Translating Jihad
» Una via per Oriana
» Undaunted
» United States Central Command
» Urban Infidel
» Walid Shoebat
» Winds of Jihad
» Women Against Shariah
» World Council for the Cedars Revolution
» Yid With Lid
» Z Street
» Zilla of the Resistance
» Zionist Conspiracy
David LittmanOriana Fallaci Thousands of Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11The incredible Reza Aslan automated insult generator! iGoogle Gadget
Site Meter