Recession will cause racism, which will cause terrorism, says UK govt

Yep as poverty strikes, we'll be inundated with Hindu, Sikh and White terrorists, you can bet.

How they can be this wilfully stupid is amazing. Better watch out for those far right types, does she main Muslims, they're pretty far to the right in my opinion.

i'm going to tell the UK gov't that i need some money, pronto. if i'd don't get the money i'll resort to terrorist acts.

i'm sure the check is on its way. its been done by muslims all over the world.

Beware the expected attacks from the Sikh and Hindu community. They should outnumber attacks from the Muslim community since there are more Hindus and Sikhs in Britain than Muslims.

Coming Soon: "Improved economy could ignite new racism, terrorism likely to increase, says (Pick a Western county)..."

So long as there's a good excuse, either way.

It is absolutely necessary for NuLabour to convince the public that Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. So the government is providing excuses for Muslims, in advance, just in case they turn to terrorism.

l read on the Drudge report about the economy being the worst in sixty years, well maybe their social net that includes illegals with multiple wives might just add too much to the welfare rolls. they need a
Gringich who will bring in welfare reform among other spending cuts.

There is one thing that all Western governments can agree on: there is no possible way, under any circumstance, EVER, that Islamic terrorism is related to the tenants of Islam.

And that attitude leaves the rest of us feeling like the child who told the emperor he had no clothes.

But racism DOES lead to terrorism.

Arab racism leads to Islamic terrorism. Arab racism - the conceit that no one who believes differently from them is fit to live.

If an economic downturn will lead, inexorably, to an increase in terrorism, the logical result can only be one of two things:

1) Infidels must, within their own countries, and of course abroad in the Muslim lands, insure a constant level of prosperity, no matter how badly things may be for Infidels, and no matter how many trillions of dollars are raked in, and then not shared with other Muslims either within the same countries, or in other countries, by the plutocrats of Arabia and other Muslim OPEC members.

In other words, we must -- forever, apparently --, guarantee that Muslims are kept prosperous. This will be a tall order. Infidels limit their family size, while Muslims deliberately have huge families, and Muslim leaders (Khaddafy, Boumedienne, many others) speak openly about outbreeding Infidels in Europe and thus, slowly and inexorably, inheriting that continent. Polygamy, where practiced, even in Infidel lands where it is officially illegal, leads to still larger families. Muslims discourage education for women, and certainly discourage most kinds of work outside the home for women, even while regarding them as breeding machines. They are discouraged from free and skeptical inquiry, without which not only science, but a certain kind of entrepreneurial activity relies upon, the spirit of doing things in a novel way. The work-ethic, or lack of it, can be seen in visits to coffeehouses in Arab cities, Cairo or Damascus or Baghdad, where men idle away the day with hubble-bubble pipes, or watching television, or playing Arab board-games. In the oil-rich Muslim lands, they idle away the time differently, but idle it away they do, while foreign, chiefly Infidel, workers, keep things humming. Inshallah-fatalism helps to explain the comparatively poor economic performance of Muslim states, and of Muslims compared to Infidels in Infidel states.

Why then should it be the responsibility of Infidels to ignore this explanation for the failure of some Muslims to be prosperous (thouse who have the oil money to keep them afloat, as so many rich Arabs in the West do, are another story), and to think that it is the duty of Infidels to keep those Muslims prosperous, yesterday, today, tomorrow, forever? It makes no sense.

But if it were to be believed that the only way to keep Muslims from becoming dangerous is to ensure their prosperity, then another tack suggests itself. Why endure a Muslim presence in the West at all, if the only way those Muslims can remain here safely is if we, the Infidels, guarantee that they will be prosperous, for we will see to it, by transferring our wealth, or by hiring those who on merit alone would not deserve it? There is no need. The argument that Muslims will turn violent when the economy turns down -- the economy will always turn down -- is not an argument in favor of permanent Infidel support for Muslims, but for ending Muslim immigration, and reversing the current demographic trends by making the conduct of a Muslim life more, rather than less, difficult, all over the lands of the Infidel West.

That is the conclusion to be reached. But that is not what those who wrote this "government document" have dared to let themselves conclude.

So we've done it for them.

"In the oil-rich Muslim lands, they idle away the time differently, but idle it away they do, while foreign, chiefly Infidel, workers, keep things humming."
by Hugh

Imagine if the West evacuated all infidel workers from the oil-rich lands, and left them there to pump their own oil and run their own economies and grow their own food.
The key to its success would be universal compliance. No country sends its people to work in Islamdom.

"The argument that Muslims will turn violent when the economy turns down -- the economy will always turn down -- is not an argument in favor of permanent Infidel support for Muslims, but for ending Muslim immigration..."
Posted by: Hugh

Exactly! If there's an economic downturn, then there can be no new jobs for immigrants, and further immigration should be cancelled at once. Also, all temporary visas should be cancelled and their holders sent packing. Tell them they can apply for re-admission if things pick up in a few years.
If there is a recession, that will mean less oil revenue for the Gulf oil sheikhdoms, and less money to finance their grandiose construction projects, and in turn lay-offs for the foreign construction workers. How many of them will be allowed to remain in those countries, on the dole, until the economy rebounds? Not many, I'd wager! They'll all have their work-visas cancelled at once, and sent home on the first plane. Western countries should do the same.
Also, less oil revenue means that the Saudis will have fewer excess billions to spend on spreading radical Islam around the world -- less funding for "Moslem-Studies" departments at universities, for elaborate new mosques, for hate-spewing imams, and for propagandists and lobbyists like CAIR.

Why then should it be the responsibility of Infidels to ignore this explanation for the failure of some Muslims to be prosperous (thouse who have the oil money to keep them afloat, as so many rich Arabs in the West do, are another story), and to think that it is the duty of Infidels to keep those Muslims prosperous, yesterday, today, tomorrow, forever? It makes no sense.

Simple - it does not make sense, as it is the will of Allah.

Of course UK Muslims will blame the UK for their lack of prosperity, rather than the fact that they're by and large uneducated, inbred, unskilled, so unattractive and bad with people that they can't do most service jobs, and simply choose to ghettoize themselves so as to stay away from us filthy najis, just like they do in France. And even the educated ones, like doctors, don't tend to perform as well and even if they do most people don't want to go to them. I wouldn't go to a Muslim doctor, who devoted his life to killing infidels, who is from a tradition that sent blondes to Africa to be sold into slavery, who will call me a whore for showing him my broken leg, let alone a female doctor - as if American woman gynecologists weren't sadistic enough - who refuses to practice proper hygiene because it would require bearing her wrists. Who wants a doctor educated in he 3rd world anyway, who believes that women produce sperm and store it in their kidneys and that the mother's genetic material decided the sex of a baby?

I think there will always be jobs for Muslims in the UK, just like there will always be jobs for fresh-off-the-boat Mexicans in the US, at meat-packing plants and whatnot. But Muslims have a ridiculous sense of entitlement and are always victims so long as Hindus and Buddhists are alive and un-enslaved and Christians and Jews aren't paying them 50% of their income as jizya (which they damn near do in the UK anyway). As long as anyone has it better than they do - regardless of the fact that that is the case because they deserve it because they are ,ore intelligent and harder-working - they will be 'oppressed,' and 'victims.'

Imagine if just one kafir-majority country, somewhere in the world, decided to remove ALL known Mohammedans from within its territory, and replace them with, for example, Copts or Assyrian Christian or Sudanese Christian refugees from Jihad, or Hindus and Christians and Confucians from Malaysia and Indonesia or Hindus and Christians from Bangladesh and Pakistan [carefully vetted of course to exclude any Mohammedans pretending to be what they weren't].

I suspect that the economy of this country would experience an instant improvement due to a massive reduction in the amount of money needing to be spent on internal security measures, along with an end to the continual financial losses and wear-and-tear on infrastructure caused by Muslim welfare fraudsters and grand and petty Muslim criminals.

The new non-Muslim immigrants would be so delighted to be living somewhere where they did not have violent, aggressive, suspicious, and murderous Muslim neighbours, that they would jump in boots and all, roll up their sleeves, and start producing; they would probably celebrate their escape from the hell of the Islamosphere by engaging in a 'baby boom'. Many would doubtless sign up for the army in order to help their new homeland defend itself against any jihadi assault from outside.

More Islam = More terrorism

See? Math is easy once you get used to it...
Too bad Islam isn't...

This is just an excuse as others have noted. What I want to note is that this is what happens when men are not help responsible for their decisions and actions. These problems will usually mean a rougher time for perfectly innocent law abiding citizens. This to is because even though the trouble makers can be identified there is no will to go after them.

I really saddens me of these injustices and compounding all this is the muslim community gaming the system.

Between the lines of the posted article: "If we run out of money and can't pay the jizya, the Muslims will get mad and HIT us".

As an excuse for violence, a depression makes a change. Consider this,

Some years ago a young Turkish asylum seeker was killed in Glasgow and an unnamed policeman was quoted as saying “They (asylum seekers) are very popular with the local lassies” hint - it is about sexual jealousy. However TV clip gave another quite different cause of local resentment when an enraged Glaswegian said, “Look at it! They are giving them fully fitted flats and furniture and that man over there has been waiting 6 weeks to get a broken window fixed!”

It still goes on and last week the Sunday Times noted that an Albanian “refugee” got a flat from the authorities in London that an indigenous Londoner would a have to wait 10+ years for.

BTW the murdered Turk was the best-educated member of his family and they had all subscribed to pay for his English lessons and air ticket. I think they saw it as an investment, he came in as a visitor and after two weeks claimed asylum saying he was a member of a banned political party.

Look, you Islamophobes.

It's racist to get annoyed when your son/daughter can't get a job because an immigrant just off the boat has taken it for lower pay than your son/daughter can afford to live on.

It's racist to get annoyed when lessons at your child's school proceed at a snail's pace because of all the non-English speaking immigrant children the teacher is required to cater for.

It's racist to get annoyed when your job is exported to India because the lower wages there mean it's far cheaper to employ an Indian, which means that the bosses and shareholders of your ex-company make even more money for themselves while you wonder how you're going to get by.

It's racist to get annoyed when you turn up at your doctor's surgery to find a queue of immigrants already there complaining of miscellaneous exotic diseases that have been unknown in your country for decades but which your taxes now have to pay for treating.

It's racist to get annoyed when you can't take a drink on board an aircraft because some immigrants plotted to blow aircraft up using explosives planted in ordinary drink bottles.

It's racist to get annoyed when you notice that your neighbourhood has changed beyond recognition since all the shops and services catering for immigrants opened up, yet those immigrants could return to their own country whenever they liked and find it exactly the same as when they left.

It's racist to get annoyed when your son has been stabbed to death by an immigrant on benefits (paid for by you) who had previous convictions in his country of origin that his new host country didn't know about or even bother to enquire about.

It's racist to get annoyed when your husband/wife/son/daughter has been blown to pieces by a bomb planted by immigrants who have benefitted from their adopted country but hate it nonetheless.

Etc...

Remember: we need loads of new immigrants to build the houses and provide the services required by all the new immigrants.

And even more importantly: only white people can be racist.

/sarcasm

Economy downturn or upturn, Islam looks upon the West as it's prey. This type nonsense is just to distract us from the real danger of Islamic encroachment. Just like the snake advancing ever so slowly upon it's prey, all the while keeping the prey distracted so that the prey does not sense immediate danger.

The western world is reaching the end of a period of economic growth and stability that has lasted ten to twenty years.

During this time we have seen a massive rise in islamic terrorism.

The terrorism will increase because it is islamic. It has nothing to do with economics whatsoever.

Watling posted: only white people can be

This is a sociological and pschological problem that is in dire need of inverstigation.

Watling posted: only white people can be racist.

This is a sociological and pschological problem that is in dire need of investigation.