Those of you who read the comments here may be familiar with a commenter named "Abdullah Mikail," who is an American convert to Islam. This delightful gentleman sends me emails from time to time, in which more than once he has issued veiled threats to this site. And why not? How do you attempt to "strike terror into the hearts of the enemies of Allah" (Qur'an 8:60) while sitting comfortably behind a computer screen? Abdullah, bless his little heart, is doing his level best to find a viable answer to that question, and he at least deserves points for effort.
In an email to me last night, after railing against FrontPage Magazine for awhile, he added this:
...another blog I know of will go down rather suddenly.
Uh, gosh, which one, Abdullah? He himself kindly provides the answer in an earlier email:
Jihad Watch...clock's ticking, games almost up, what to do when the curtain comes down?...one does wonder?
Apparently our friend has forgotten that it is Muslim women, not men, who wear veils (unless, of course, we're talking about cowards who don burqas to flee the cops or noble mujahedin putting in practice Muhammad's timeless dictum, "war is deceit"). But anyway, is Abdullah threatening a cyber attack (which, after all, has just been given sanction by some of the foremost scholars in Sunni Islam) or some frivolous legal action? Another veiled threat he sent hinted at the latter:
I only question you. Have you followed all the rules? The wonderful thing about law, Robert, is that it is written down and anyone with a mind and reason can understand them if one applies ones self to the matter. So I ask, have you followed all the rules...every single one them...to the last nuance of the letter and intent of the law? And I am speaking of US law. Hind sight is 20/20. Some day, and maybe soon, you may remember that comment of mine and then understanding will dawn like a new day for you, although I feel your face will not shine then, yet only frown.
Uh, have I broken any laws, Abdullah? Well, if the Organization of the Islamic Conference gets its way and criminalizes all criticism of Islam, including examination of how jihadists use Islamic teachings to justify their action and gain recruits, then you can have me hauled off to jail. But until then, the answer is no.
But anyway, if Jihad Watch suddenly disappears, folks, for information look for our friend the "moderate" threat-issuer Abdullah Mikail. He'll be the one in the burqa.
>>Those of you who read the comments here may be familiar with a commenter named "Abdullah Mikail," who is an American convert to Islam. This delightful gentleman sends me emails from time to time, in which more than once he has issued veiled threats to this site."
Right. This is the Mohammedan who always signs off with "Peace."
I knew he was a total fraud. It's always rankled me to see that "peace" sign-off of his, as I knew it was fake as all-get-out.
'So I ask, have you followed all the rules...every single one them...to the last nuance of the letter and intent of the law? And I am speaking of US law. Hind sight is 20/20.' Even though she was an atheist ,Ayn Rands' grasp of the nature of earthly matters was remarkable. She frequently spoke of in her novels and non-fiction works of unknowable and complex law. Is there a single American alive who knows the nuance and intent of every single law?
The impossiblity of such a task makes it a convenient club to threaten a true American hero like Robert Spencer with. Threats only work with the faint of heart. It is crystal clear that Robert Spencer will never submit to intimidation and threats.
"The wonderful thing about law ... is that it is written down and anyone with a mind and reason can understand them ..."
Well, mindless Slave-of-Allah Mikail, you have clearly demonstrated you are unable to reason. Please crawl back under your rock, before you hurt yourself.
Be very careful who you vote for. Under a BHO administration our Muslim friend might get his wish. There will be thought, er I mean, hate crime legislation combined with the fairness doctrine extending to increased regulation and supervision of the internet. Bad news for free speech in America; BHO will move us in the direction of Canada and Europe.
I have had several exchanges with the Mikail, and he did seem moderate, with apparently well shored up explanations of the verse of the sword and the beating verses.
But, it ended up with him saying, that yes, he thought sharia law was better than our man-made laws, that he would live in Saudi Arabia and tacitly supported their suppression of freedoms and oppression of women.
Now he's threatening you Mr. Spencer? Disgraceful! Shame on you Abdullah! You, sir are a creep and miscreant and we would all like you to go away and don't come back.
As I have told him before, why doesn't he go explain to the jihadists why they're wrong? We infidels aren't the one quoting scripture as we murder innocents, all with the goal of a world ruled by an inhumane and cruel religious law.
Go threaten them. See how that works for ya!
I think it might be a good precaution for all of us who value the resources at this site to copy as many as possible of the articles and archives to our personal hard drives. Provided there is no objection from the owners of this material.
OT : I think some here will also be interested in reading and viewing video reports from a recent conference of ex-Muslims in London. There were notable contributions from Ibn Warraq, Richard Dawkins (on Harun Yahyah and creationism), and many others.
http://www.ex-muslim.org.uk/eng/pressreleases/press-pages/Video-Conference-Report-October10-2008.htm
"if Jihad Watch suddenly disappears"
-- from the comment above
If Jihad Watch suddenly disappears, one has only to turn to the Qur'an, Hadith, and Sira the contents of which are easily retrievable, often put up by Muslims themselves, and in the major European languages, and also employed, or appealed to as authority, on thousands of websites run by Muslims for Muslims (or targets of Da'wa). It is unclear how Muslims would go about banning the Qur'an, Hadith, and Sira, or for that matter, go about banning the day's Jihad news that, once one has been able to make the connection between what the texts of Islam incuclate, become far easier not only to understand, but to predict.
See, for example, Iraq. See, for example, Afghanistan. See, for example, the behavior of Muslims all over the Infidel lands, the Bilad al-kufr, and what it is they are trying, in all possible ways, to obtain: that is, a removal of all obstacles to the spread, and then the dominance, of Islam, all over the world.
Free speech, enshrined in the First Amendment, is, some understand, such an obstacle. And that is why the O.I.C. is doing its damnedest to make sure that the definition of "hate speech" is expanded to prevent examination and analysis and study, by those who are not steady apologists for Islam.
But even if that were to occur, there are still those ways to find copies of Qur'an, Hadith, and Sira and, in unmediated fashion, also see how they are employed so as to tell Muslims what is Commanded, and what is Prohibited. Will those sites, too, be shut down? Not likely, and therein the problem for those who want simultaneously to prevent any non-Muslims who are not Da'wa material from familiarizing themselves with such texts, and at the same time to continue the world-wide dissemination of such texts for their own fellow adherents, and those who -- the psychically and economically marginal (those on a Spiritual Search, those who want every act of theirs subject to Regulation, and those who want every anti-social act of theirs justified as part of a war on Infidel society) -- may be targetted for those well-financed campaigns of Da'wa.
All Abdullas (slaves to Allah) are fake because the prostrate themselves to a fake god.
But it's not their fault, fake is a requirement of the job. It is a functional assignment that is listed under the chapters on taqiyya, in both The Islamic Book of Dubious Destiny, and Ahadith.
Mikail's just following the directions on the side of the box...
Robert Spencer:
That's Abdullah Mikail Mackay, formerly Mike Mackay, of Richardson, Texas. Fellow J-Watchers Concerned Citizen, Mo Foe and myself exhanged some very revealing posts with U.S-born Islamic convert Mr Mackay a few months back in this thread.
As Robert points out, Abdullah Mikail's carefully contrived "moderation" is barely skin deep. Search around the Internet and you'll find plenty of examples of his extremist views - strong support for shariah punishments, defence of convicted terrorist enablers, and even criticism of CAIR for its support of some non-hardline Islamic groups:
This guy thinks CAIR are liberals! Take a read of the comments in the above Jihadwatch thread. There's plenty of other stuff we managed to coax out of the "moderate" Mr Mackay.
Speaking for myself, I came to realize the nature of Islamic Jihad ideology and all its history and associations, primarily through Jihad watch with its many archived lectures, conversations, challenges from angry Muslim 'moderates' refuted by our learned friends, and the process of sorting the wheat from the chaff of unmoderated comments.
I went on to find further elucidation and corroboration from other sites and from the Quran, Hadith and (especially) Ibn Ishaq, and other texts.
But I'm not sure I would have stayed the course but for the initial push from information gleaned here.
It would be useful if one who threatens this site were aware that a hundred JW mirror sites could appear overnight, he might think again.
Speech codes, blasphemy laws, and a revival of United Nations attempt to control the Internet are all on the table with an Obama ascendancy.
That's the asshat who first denies knowledge of anything unflattering about Islam and then when he's really in the corner he says that "most" Muslims don't believe that when he knows full-well that everyone who is actually Muslims does believe and follow it all to the letter, necessarily and by definition. Then he tries to act 'moderate' and halfway declare allegiance to his nation, just enough to not be clearly guilty of treasonous seditions, then, when pressed, he admits that Sharia is superior to Jeffersonian democracy.
I love the demopathy inherent in questioning Robert Spencer's adherence to the law, which is obvious and indisputable while he (a)commits treasonous sedition by pledging allegiance to the non-existent Ummah, which is punishable by death in the case of citizens,(b) funds terrorism with 2.5% of his income or $1725 annually, and (c) engages in racist hate speech (hate speech is defined as being relegated to statements made on the basis of race and gender, so any argument that criticizing Muslims is hate speech is crap, btw) five times a day by praying that Jews all die.
Robert wrote:
"Abdullah Mikail," who is an American convert to Islam"
I can understand Muslims from Islamic lands being Muslim as they are indoctrinated from a young age but when it comes to people who have grown up in the Christian West, that has given them freedom galore to do what ever they so choose to do, worse still, even more power with Political Correctness, I will never understand how on earth they could ever dream of converting to Islam.
In the West we have first hand experience of Apostates fleeing Islamic lands and warning us of the danger of Islam and yet idiots(and yes, idiots as there's no other way to describe them) like Abdullah Mikail who choose to ignore the many warnings and still convert.
It's like living your life as a free spirit, running around on the open fields, to all of a sudden be picked up and shoved into a box for as long as you decide to be a member of the Arabian Death Cult.
I think the government needs to change the 1st Amendment to 'freedom of religion BAR Islam'. Americans/British and Europeans who convert should automatically lose their Birth Nationality, have their passports removed and sent to live in an Islamic Land of their choosing. After all, they change their Christian and surnames to Islamic ones, why should we have to put up with them?
The West needs to seriously clamp down on Islam for its own safety.
Don't dispair...'You can't keep a good man down', applies especially to Spencer.
But if Obama is elected, it might be necessary to go to alternative plan B.
It would be interesting as to how the American public would act if Obama limited, or allowed to be limited, free speech to a point that even liberals and leftists were offended.
Liberals love to discuss politics in coffee shops around the nation...That's over with Obama.
When I told my flaming liberal sister that she will be sorry she voted for Obama, she came unglued and attacked Sarah Palin, and Geo Bush, like she thinks Bush is running...
Then she said she did not want to know anything about Obama, that she was going to stick her head in the sand and vote Obama no matter what...end of story...
My sister bless her heart is a typical liberal, and is the main reason Obama will win if he wins. He will be voted in by the head in the sand, willfully, and deliberately uniformed, liberal voter...
"Abby" has done this before. It is a sad attempt to try to dissuade Robert from speaking out about the true nature and doctrinal shape of Islam, as tauught by respected Muslim scholars globally.
I like it better when he is publicly apologizing to Robert:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/GoPostal/commentdetail.aspx?GUID=620acafa-13be-42fd-95a2-b1c482571d54&commentID=7757d7ca-53bd-44d5-a0e4-a7105ce86a27
or here:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/GoPostal/commentdetail.aspx?GUID=7ea6b23f-ac2b-44ef-be18-9b9a722e1a7d&commentID=f8bfb115-6dad-4c1f-9a34-c37ed4c3b468
or here:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/GoPostal/commentdetail.aspx?GUID=7ea6b23f-ac2b-44ef-be18-9b9a722e1a7d&commentID=38de82a0-c78b-4dbe-b7df-70d3b67e3ed1
"Abby" is trapped in Islam, like all Muslims are. Designed to only grow and spread, like a virus, Islam traps everyone who adheres to it. There is no turning back. There is no changing its course.
"Abby" cannot refute Spencer's statements because they are the one's held by the respected scholars who shape Islam. Abby can put forth his own opinions on Islam, but they are merely a single voice in a sea of over a billion.
The "moderate" Muslim is so difficult to find because it simply doesn't exist. There certainly are peaceful Muslims and nominal Muslims and cultural Muslims, but they all pale miserably to the ideology of Islam. A moderate imbiber of cyannide may not die does not render the cyannide any less lethal. That is analogous to Muslims and Islam.
With so many "misunderstanders" of Islam in Abby's estimation, one would think that he would dedicate more time educating his co-religionists, but alas, I do not know of other internet writings by Abby then his intentional griefing sessions here at JW and also at FPM.
Maybe "Abby" is changing the perception of over a billion Muslims worldwide to what true Islam is, one at a time. Robert and the lot of us could just sit idly on the sidelines for another 1000 + years or so and hopefully wait for its fruition, right?
The thinly veiled threat by the "moderate" Muslim is indicative of the supremist principle and arrogance inherent in Islam. It is merely a reflex.
It seems Mikail is just a reflection of those who are like him who hide in cowardice behind anything that they think will protect them from The Way, The Truth, and The Life. But the sad fact is that if they continue to reject The Way, The Truth, and The Life, They will stand before Jesus at the great white throne judgment and after being judged, shall be cast alive into the lake of fire. Pray for Mikail and those like him That they will accept The Way, The Truth, and The Life before it is too late.
The reverted Michael Mackay
Lost testes and mind in one day.
To "Allah" he now grovels,
While the dawa he shovels,
Proves he has nothing to say...
Hi Folks,,
Robert,, if these trolls take down this site,, I volunteer,, as much time needed to help rebuild it again. I'll even book days off work on leave,, if you need help,, straightup!
I know you keep backups of your data, and they CANNOT destroy this site. Consider this a permanent volunteer offer. All of us here,, I bet,, will say the same thing.
The truth about this medieval, barbaric religion is out,, it's VIRAL on the internet. WE the Infidel Nations,, have millions of web sites,, and pages at social networking sites.
We talk about it amonst our friends and families. We print out the murderous hateful verses,, right out of the books to show OUR PEOPLE!!
They cannot silence us all,, WE have the strength in our numbers, (muslims = 1.2 billion, INFIDELS = 5 + billion),,
It's like a poster said on a web I was reading yesterday,, a poster with a Magickal name,, of
Artemis
*who is the Goddess of the hunt,, the forest, and the full moon*,,
who asked,,
>>>>>
How come Robert Spencer, and Tom Trento,, need BODYGUARDS and SECURITY,, when they speak at lectures???? The islamics,, do not need such drastic measures, to PROTECT THEIR LIVES!!
>>>>>
This one question says alot about this "so called religion of peace",,
WAKE UP INFIDELS!!!!!
ALSO don't forget today,, Tom Trento is hosting a DEBATE on Obsession,, here is the info,, it's in Florida!
>>>
“Who’ s Really Obsessed? ”
America is at War!
• Is this a war on terror, or a secret war being waged with propaganda and misinformation?
• Does Islam promote an anti American ideology that has been adopted by Radicals?
• Who benefits from vilifying Islam and establishing a Us vs. Them environment?
Join us as we objectively present, discuss, and analyze “Obsession” with Mr. Tom Trento, Director of the Florida Security Council and the Watch
Obsession Citizens Education Program.
Emotions will run high and the tough questions will be asked. Don’t miss this historic and extremely important event Highlights
♦ Presentation from Mr. Tom Trento of the
Florida Security Council, and others
♦ Free viewing of the highly Controversial Film Obsession: Radical Islam's war against the west
♦ Panel Discussion with questions from the audience.
♦ An objective discussion about Islam in
America The Obsession Watch Project Presents (www.obsessionwatch.org)
Location: Marshall Student Center, Room 2708 ,
University of South Florida
Marshall Student Center
Room 2708
University of South Florida
4202 E Fowler Ave, MSC 2100
Saturday October 18, 2008 6-9PM
Contact the event coordinator at:
Ph: 239-839-0332/239-671-1761
Saturday October 18, 2008 6-9PM
Date: October 18, 2008 (Saturday)
Time: 6:00-9:00 PM
DON’T MISS THIS EVENT
>>>>>>>
solsticewitch13
HD4EVR
Richard Lionheart, there is no need to change our perfect (so much so that when it's not perfect it's amendable) Constitution or Bill of Rights. We just need to not recognize Islam as a religion. Pretty easy, because it isn't one. There are a couple of ways of doing this. One way is defining religions as ideologies which base their teachings and practices in morality, i.e., the GOlden Rule. There is no Golden Rule in Islam. Rather, there is a dualistic breakdown of the world into Muslims/infidel apes and pigs to raped, enslaved, slaughtered, parasitized, and plundered, men/mutilated, undead corpse, sex-slave baby factories, and then even Arab Muslims/inferior non-Arab Muslims and Christian infidels/Jew-rat infidels/even more inferior polytheist infidels who for some reason aren't as hated-on in rhetoric but who certainly get killed more. We could ban it on the basis of its hatred for infidels, women, and non-Arabs. There's also the Italy approach whereby we could make requirements of religions that Islam could never meet, like repudiation of violence committed in its name, recognition of and unyielding support for Israel, and a language requirement that services be conducted in English, which we could of course never do in America. That's a half-assed approach.
The important thing to remember is that Islam isn't a religion. It's not enough to not forget this. You must tell everyone how and why. It's a cult. It's a genocidal, supremacist, fascist, totalitarian, parasitic, regressive political ideology and a death-cult for the vilest, most shameless, degenerate of people. We don't have to change a thing to ban Islam. We just have to wake up. A single Islamic prayer constitutes treasonous sedition which is punishable by deportment or death. They pledge their allegiance to the Ummah, not America. They also fund terror with their zakat. Nothing about Islam is tolerable, so we just have to decide to not tolerate the intolerable, i.e., to put our money where our mouths are and respect democracy, freedom, and equality. We have to ENFORCE our laws, not change them.
Abscedere,
Nice limerick!
Here's my effort:
If you ever see Allah or Mo,
Say: 'there's one thing I'd like you to know'
When you're bringing some news to humanity,
Untranslatable languages are inanity,
You'd do better to try the Late Show
jdamn: Would that what you write be observed by all but I can assure you that you will go nowhere by claiming that Islam is not a religion. No court of law in this country would decreee that it is not. Yes, it is a totalitarian system as well, rotten throughout, the only religion which is so, but it is still a religion and thus receives First Amendment protection. Remember, even secular totalitarian systems which have as their design the complete restructuring of America are legal in this country. Marxism is a good example here. The Communist Party of America is perfectly free to exist in this nation, as it has for the better part of a century. The approach I would advise is to acknowledge that Islam is indeed a religion but the only major faith which is evil. It needs to be discredited in the same way Nazism and Marxism have so that some day it can be assigned to the trash heap of history.
Wellington, it's not a religion. Our courts have no legal definition of 'religion' anyway. It's more a matter of us as a culture not recognizing it as a religion and then treating it as such legally. If its teachings and practices aren't based in morality then it simply is not a religion. Period. There's a reason why these 'religious persecution' cases never go to court: because that is a very slippery slope for Islam. So they try to handle it all through threats of legal action, unions, and legislation which applies to 'religions' more generally because Muslims know that that is not a philosophical debate that they can win in court.
Nazism claimed a very similar theological basis, one which was actually shamelessly ripped straight from the Koran. Nobody recognized it as a religion because it had no basis in morality. If people understood Islam they would view it the same way. Aryans were Hitler's 'God's chosen people' just Arabs and Muslims are Allah's. But Islam's god is a hateful one who despises most of his children and wants them dead, who took entirely too much interest in a pervert's sex life and his plundering of infidels, who denigrates his own son by allowing Msulims to call Jesus Esau and claim that he was a fraud who wasn't God's son and who didn't die on the cross, and who chose as a prophet a rapist, pedophile, mass murderer, polygamist, slave-owner, racist, misogynist, narcissist, hypocrite, psychopath, necrophiliac, looter, pervert, incestuous, torturer, psychopath, monster, cult leader. I stand by my assertion that it's not a religion.
You go ahead and defend its 'divinity' and its 'theological basis' but as far as I'm concerned calling Islam a crock isn't enough. Allah is a psychopath's displaced narcissistic personality/alibi to justify his evildoings and disgusting worldview. It's a cult, it's an evil political movement, it's intolerable, and it's as 'theological' as Nazism. Islam is not a religion. Show me one unabrogated, moral Islamic teaching and I'll consider your point of view.
jdamn: Thank you for your comment but I am certain that trying to prove in any American court of law that Islam is not a religion will fail on its face. In fact, probably no court would even consider such a case. Islam believes in a monotheistic entity, has been around for some 1400 years and is full of eschatological elements. Moreover, its confused believers claim it is a religion most definitely. I share your complete distaste for Islam and think it the one major faith which is iniquitous, but it's a religion by virutally any definition of the term. It's just that it's a bad religion. Real bad.
Mike Mackay the convert to islam needs to realize that its not all that hard to track down a cyber terrorist that crashes web sites and it is good for a long time in the big house hay witch can we turn this toad into a muslim woman (evil grin)and send him\her to sowdi arabia bb grizly
What usually happens, at least whenever they succesfully hack FaithFreedom, they don't really hack it. They just bombard the server with messages and overload it until you get a new server. The site itself is aways fine. It's just a matter of getting it back up and running.
If the church of the Rev. Sun Myung Moon is recognized as a religion rather than a cult then it's hard to see how Islam can be treated any differently.
Excellent entry Robert. I am so sick of threats, veiled or otherwise.
Hmmmm. The mythical 'moderate' muslim again! A mere hairs breadth away from vioence and all the other things that extremist Muslims do.
Robert, Robert, Robert,
You do have the victim mantle on quite securely, don't you?
I have never threatened you or any of your work, this blogg, with anything...yes, maybe I have held it up to a standard of truth that you seem not to have. ( remember the alcohol retraction?)
Yeah, I guess you can say I held you up to the truth and you felt threatened by it.
Let's play a game, okay?
Let's call it, "hint hint; search on line for non partisan political bloggs" what do you come up with?
Does this blogg come up? Try it and see...
Oy, Vay! Try to give a guy a hint at where to look, and what does one get?
Caution a fellow American to look into ALL the rules surrounding what he's up to, and what does a guy get? Does he get a thank you?
No, No, No...Robert trips off into his dimnetia about "threats!"
"Uh, have I broken any laws, Abdullah?" Robert you asked, I just asked you to take a closer look at yourself, what you are up to, and noted that you yourself are your own worst enemy.
Gee, and here I thought I was helping you out? Go figure?
Truth
Abdullah Mikail
Dear Robert,
I am as you are a champion of free speech, and yet my last attempt to comment to awake was blocked?
Hmm? Was it intentional?
You and your published comments were the subject, of course, and if you can't handle being scrutinized in front of others just say so and I'll leave you alone.
Truth
Abdullah Mikail
Abdullah
Quite obviously you aren't blocked. You have always been free to publish your lies and distortions here, and have them scrutinized by others. If any comment didn't go through, I have no idea why it would be: TypeKey sometimes has glitches, but they are beyond my control, and sometimes the system holds up posts that are full of links.
Robert Spencer
Robert,
"You have always been free to publish your lies and distortions here, and have them scrutinized by others."
There you go calling names again. Prove it.
I can prove you are a liar...can you do the same?
Here Robert you were called out for lying:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/GoPostal/commentdetail.aspx?GUID=da1e80cd-91aa-4d39-bb16-c0ae320fa2e0&commentID=25000eb7-2d2a-4edb-89a4-cd786e0585fb
You slipped into stealth mode and printed a retraction under the radar, and I noted it here:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/GoPostal/commentdetail.aspx?GUID=da1e80cd-91aa-4d39-bb16-c0ae320fa2e0&commentID=6c269a8d-8d2b-4961-88ec-5881ee5528f6
You may like to cast about and name call, but Robert, can you prove it? No you can't.
I just did Robert...I don't have to call you a liar, becuase you are publically proven to be a liar.
What do you have to say about that?
Yes, I am a provacetuer, yes I like to play head games, yes I am determined to expose you for what you are...you can fool many, you don't fool me...but no, I am not a liar.
Truth
Abdullah Mikail
Abdullah Mikail - you are clearly the cowardly liar here, that is terribly obvious. Any attempt at this point to try and turn the tables on Robert is only going to fall on deaf ears and make you look even more foolish, because any rational thinking person can see that you are the liar, and that Robert is telling the Truth about Islam and about Muhammad.
And how dare you send Robert veiled threats through private e-mails - only a worm would do that. Coward!
Cowardly Liar
Abdullah Mikail
Wow, this Abdullah character sounds like he is suffering some form of dementia. But I guess it is par for the course. These delusions of grandeur seem quite common among the almost universally "psychically marginal" converts to Islam. Poor little Mikey never felt important, until now. Now 'Abdullah' is a bold, defiant soldier for Allah. Now he is part of something 'big.' Sort of like joining a gang, I suppose.
Abdullah Mikail,
So you are a convert? Would you tell us about how you came to be a Muslim? I for one am fascinated and want to hear more!
How about dropping some serious Dawa on us? Enough of this back and forth, this "he said she said". You've got an audience here. We are rapt and eagerly await your next post. Perhaps Allah has not placed a seal on all our hearts. I for one think we should let Abdullah Mikhail tell us his story and make his pitch.
Quijybo,
Quijybo
Quijybo,
I am not a convert. Robert does not know me.
I let Robert off on that one, as he most likely does not know and only falesy assumed.
Thanks for asking, though.
Peace
Abdullah Mikail
champ,
You are just being a cheeky girl! Puhleeze!
Robert is just being melodramatic with his "veiled threats" thing...poor guy...I guess hes had too many late nights typing away about the screaming Jihadi hordes hiding under his bed!
: )
Peace
Abdullah Mikail
Ladies and gentlemen -
I address any curious non-Muslim visitor who may happen to visit this thread before it closes, or who may come across it in future while touring the archives - I advise you to take a good, long look at the exchanges between the Muslim calling himself 'Abdullah Mikhail', and everyone else.
Look very, very carefully at the ways in which A. M. uses language.
Now reflect - practically every other Muslim poster who has ever appeared on this comments floor, in the four years that it has been operating, has behaved and spoken as A. M. has done...or with even worse vocabulary and manners, and in more insulting and aggressive ways.
Those who wage the jihad of the tongue and pen *do not* use language as we do. Truth and logic have, for them, no intrinsic interest or value. All they are interested in is 1. to deny/ evade/ confuse 2. to ATTACK. Words are a means by which to get and keep power over others.
If consistently confronted by a knowledgeable and fearless kafir interlocutor, pinned to the wall again and again, a Muslim who started out with sly flowery sweet-talk will progress, in the end, to naked aggression, boasting, insults, barefaced and bizarre lies, and may even - in extreme cases - morph into something inhuman, hostile and alien, like a cobra spitting poison. A. M. hasn't quite reached that point. He's still trying for Mr Cool; but the mask is slipping.
Every single conversation I have read, in the jihadwatch/ dhimmiwatch archives, between Mr Spencer (or any other intelligent kafir speaker) and an avowed Mohammedan apologist/ supremacist, has been like watching someone wrestling with a shapeshifter.
champ,
You are just being a cheeky girl! Puhleeze!
Robert is just being melodramatic with his "veiled threats" thing...poor guy...I guess hes had too many late nights typing away about the screaming Jihadi hordes hiding under his bed!
: )
Peace
"Champ"? "Peace"? Is this person arguing in support of his religion or is he repeating some article he read in "Teen" magazine? I also notice the smiley face! Is it just me is or this the most strange combination of smack talk and teenie bopper talk ever seen? Dude? Fur sure? Kewl?
And this one,
"Gee, and here I thought I was helping you out? Go figure?"
He thought he was "helping you out"? How did he sign this most blatant LIE? "Truth".
It is hard to imagine a more pathetic human being. I really, really am sorry, Mr. Mackay, for whatever horrible thing happened to you that caused you to be what you now appear to be.
He is probably the victim of sexual abuse from his father. It is widely accepted in Muslim society so he may feel more at home with others who were also raped by their fathers. Try to pity, instead of hating him.