"It is permissible to marry a one year-old girl"
Without ever pointing to Islam or its teachings. "Helsingin Sanomat Reports on Child Marriages, But Forgets to Mention Islam," from Europe News, October 14:
In what promised to be an interesting and informative story about the Islamic practice of adult males taking child brides for themselves , soon evaporated into an article describing another problem within the "developing world".The journalist totally ignored the fact that when it's an Islamic developing state in question, it can no longer be depicted as simply being a "cultural practice".
Islam or Muslim was not anywhere to be seen in the article:
"Even though the majority of child brides are mostly the problem of the world's poorest countries', also the Europeans are confronted with the phenomenon. For example, British newspapers have, throughout the year written about the disapperance of girls from British schools. It's suspected in Britain that underage girls are being sent abroad to enter into the marriage."
What girls is the journalist talking about? Does she expect us to believe that just "any girl" is being bundled up and sent abroad to get married to a waiting peadophile, or are these girls actually the daughters of immigrant Muslims who are sending them off against their will to be pyhsically and mentally abused by male Muslim adults?
It has to be said that there is the Islamic/religious element involved in the disgusting practice of "sex with prepubescent girls" which gives it not only a cloak of respectability, but also serves to ensure that the victimization of these young girls will remain as a permanent feature within these societies.
The writer of the article is guilty, though in a different way, of the same avoidance of Islam that he correctly recognizes in the article about child brides in Europe published in Helsingin Sanomat. For while he says that neither the words "Islam" or "Muslim" are mentioned by the writer of the article, he himself fails to explain exactly why child-brides are, according to orthodox Islam, perfectly fine. The reason is -- he may or may not know -- is to be found in the example of that Perfect Man, al-insan al-kamil, Muhammad, who first espied Aisha when she was six years old, and then married her, and more importantly, had sexual intercourse with her, when she was nine years old. And because Muhammad is the Perfect Man, for all time, and in all space, his example leads Muslims even today to assume that such marriages by Muslim men are fine, though of course Muslims need to find away, in the face of criticism by non-Muslims, to expalin away the practice not by truthfully referring to Muhammad, and what he did, but by vaguely pointing to "cultural practices" that, by implication, have nothing to do with Islam. In other words, they recognize what Islam teaches or rather inculcates, and accept it, but also see the need to deny that reality whenever it would prove too embarrassing. And this is their practice not only about nine-year-old brides, or other brides just a few years older, but about so much else, including the treatment of non-Muslims under Islam. They live a life, among Infidels, of constant subterfuge, deception, and lying. They must, perforce, defend Islam as best they can, and that includes lying about the nature, the texts, the tenets, of Islam. The effect this must have on the more morally advanced among them must be quite something.
Remember, however, and answer any Muslim who is prepared to jive you about these child-marriages, that the Ayatollah Khomeini himself, that learned Muslim theologian, on coming to power in Iran, promptly reduced the marriageable age of girls to nine years, and you know this perfectly well, and what's more, you know that that Muslim who is attempting to pull the wool over your eyes knows it too. Once he hears this from you, he will perhaps fluster a bit, attempt a little more lying, but the more you show just how much you so dangerously and unfoolably know, the more he will confusedly retreat, explain that he had been misunderstood, that yes of course some benighted Muslims think this, or, in the alternative, he may simply cease to argue with you, or even to speak with you, but silently walk away, his heart full of hate, his mind full of menace, and also worry -- worry that there may be too many Infidels now finding out too much about Islam.
That is the key: find out about Islam. And tell others. Not all of it, all at once, but things like little Aisha, and the Iranian law that was passed because Muhammad took her, in every sense, when she was nine years old. Start with that, and don't stop.
Islam's complete lack of any sort of empathic, human sexual morality is a reliable attack point. In addition to Mohammed's child molestation -- and I do use the term "child molester," not "pedophile," because the former hits much harder due to its flat accuracy -- it's worth mentioning a few other points.
Mohammed kept and used sex slaves. Islam insists on calling them "concubines," as if they were languid, pampered pets. Actually, they were the wives and daughters, sisters and mothers of men he brutally murdered, on several occasions right in front of the women. He kept these women imprisoned for his sexual pleasure, and encouraged his male followers to forcibly impregnate their own sex-slave victims.
Mohammed repeatedly threatened his wives with divorce and abandonment, lied to them, locked them inside and forbade them to speak, threatened them with hell if they should remarry after his ignominious death, ignored the vicious beatings his male followers dealt their own wives, and on at least one occasion punched out his own child-wife. He equated women to dirt in one hadith, stated that most would go to hell in another, and had a woman stripped naked for his viewing pleasure before her brutal stoning for adultery.
All these episodes are related, many with much lip-licking delight, in the Koran, the hadith, and the commentaries.
This man was a monster.
Can anyone say with any certainty whether girls are "disappearing" from American schools like in Britain? It would be hard to believe that it doesn't happen to some degree, but what are the chances that school and/or government officials would notice? And if they did, would they go public with something so politically toxic?
@Defenderofislam
Come on: How can you DEFEND ISLAM?
Do not you see it is evil in many parts of it?
I assume you must confess that it is evil?
So leave it! And you might become happy.
I love how that filthy pedophile cleric states right away Islam's conception of 'marriage' (i.e., incestuous Sharia sex slavery): it first is the permission to penetrate ('buku nikah') and then the actual penetration of the tiny, preferably brain-damaged, family member.
No consent. No 'love, honor, cherish.' No relationship at all other than that of slave owner and mutilated undead sex slave corpse-to-be-raped. No commitment. No monogamy. No fidelity. Nothing decent at all to in any way be implied in Muslim 'marriage' (i.e., incestuous Sharia sex slavery). And of course no mention of the fact that, of course, mutilated undead sex slave corpse-to-be-raped and baby factory for Allah's Army of inbred, baby-raping, Nazi terrorists are to be the extent of that poor little girl's life, aside from menial work and other forms of physical abuse and mental degradation. Disgusting. Truly despicable monsters they are, anyone who believes in Islam's sick doctrine of sheer, unmitigated evil.
Right there in the Sira. Mohammed marries Ayesha at age 6 and then "consummates" the marriage at age 9. This is common knowledge in the Islamic world, but it is haram for kufirs to bring it to the attention of Muslims.
Denial is not just a river in Egypt.