"We want the officer in question to be more responsible for his words because they touched on the sensitivities of Muslims."
How many times have we heard or read similar words? How often are similar phrases uttered in Western educational institutions? Every time one hears this sort of argument, this case may serve as a reminder of what lies farther down the slippery slope of sharia-based accommodation, and of the all-important question of where accommodation for the sake of avoiding conflict and ill will must stop. "Student officer’s remarks on Islam to be probed," from The Star, October 23:
PETALING JAYA: The Islamic Development Department will investigate a Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) student affairs officer over statements he had allegedly made on Islam.
The officer had allegedly told two female UPM students that it was “useless to be devout when one does not pay college fees.”
It was learnt that the two girls -- Nursha Fiqa Mohd Ali and Farhana Farzieana Azmi, both 21 -- were studying at UPM Serdang when they were banned on Oct 15 from living on campus a week before their examinations, which started Oct 20.
The two alleged that the officer had accused them of not paying their tuition fees when the bank had already disbursed the payments.
According to Nursha, the university took care of the loan transfer from the bank and the loan was released in early July.
“He gave no valid reason. He also made an excuse that we were evicted from the hostel because there were no rooms,” she said on Thursday.
The Islamic Student Association reported the matter to the Department in Putrajaya on Thursday.
Wanita PKR said the alleged remarks were irresponsible and confusing to Muslims, and wanted the Islamic Development Department to investigate the matter.
“We want the University to explain the matter,” said Wanita PKR chief Zuraida Kamruddin.
“The administration is supposed to set an example to students and not confuse them or display bad behaviour,” she said in a statement on Thursday.
“We want the officer in question to be more responsible for his words because they touched on the sensitivities of Muslims,” Zuraida added.
This sort of crap touches on my sensibilities.
My feelings will only be soothed and satisfied by the use of many large munitions.
But of course, when I say that it's called racist, because, of course, I am not a mohammedan.
But I'm not. I hate fascist bastards of every race.
:-)
Perhaps the only retribution, the only petty vengeance these muslimahs have in a life of pious, grinding degradation, is to lash out against a man in the way they are constantly, vigorously lashed.
"Honor" and "obedience" go both ways, "brother." Better watch your tongue.
Or else they're just confused and sensitive Muslims, like the lady said. What rational person can tell?
Sounds like another Muslim shakedown for more money...
It is a common Islamic tactic...
For such a misogynistic ideology, founded by such an - ahem - 'robust' individual, its adherents are all so terribly sensitive.
We want the officer in question to be more responsible for his words because they touched on the sensitivities of Muslims,” Zuraida added.
Oh yes, never forget it is haram for an infidel, or anyone, to 'touch on the sensitivities of Muslims'. They 'are' rather delicate.
Let's get this right now, only muslims have this sensitivity, so you don't have to lay off other religions. You can stomp on the sensitivities of Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindu's, Wiccans and
pigmy headhunters, but not Mohammadans.
They are 'special', supreme even. We should look up to them as saintly figures.
A good dhimmi never touches on the sensitivities of the masters...The penalties are severe, Allah willing, and he always is...
Reread the story. First the Student affair office was wrong to accue the two girls of not paying for college. I have than court offical who gave any jury
hopeful than hard time it they poor by not wear 1000
dollar handmake italy suit. I tried of it than after being dismiss by not being select for jury duty I complant to the judge about. A month later he was fired from his job. The Court bailmant said I did the right thing as many other court officer where tried of his attitude.
?????????????????????????????????????
"...touched on the sensitivities of Muslims."
From the article.
Screw their precious sensitivities. What about OUR sensitivities?