But what do you bet he wouldn't call the 9/11 attacks terrorism? "Prime Minister Terms US Attacks Inside Paksitan [sic] Terrorism," from Pakistan News, October 1 (thanks to Kyros):
ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani has termed the US attacks inside Pakistan’s territory as terrorism.Speaking to media persons at Prime Minister House here on Wednesday, Prime Minister Gilani said his government wants to take all the coalition partners on board on national issues. He said war against terrorism is Pakistan’s own war....
That doesn't seem to be quite coherent, unless he means that Pakistan will fight a "war against terrorism" against the U.S.
Maybe our attacks are terrorism, but their state is a threat to world peace. Isn't it about time we took out the Paki nuclear infrastructure? That would demonstrate resolve in the face of the mortgage meltdown.
time to declare Pakistan at least an un-cooperative ally...ban all immigration from Pakistan...immediately cut off all foreign aid , aka jiyzah...immediately stop supplying repair parts for all the military equipment (you know, all that nice equipment we provide to Pakistan that Pakistan refuses to use against the Muslim terrorists)...
Time to reconsider Pakistans current status as an "ally".
With all due respect to American people, they have little or no say in matters like immigration, aid etc... Their own elected POTUS has Saudi Arabia and Pakistan as 'allies'. Their Secretary of State calls Hamas a 'resistance'.
Sorry but almost loosk like their leadership is doing the opposite of what Americnas want them to do.
And Nobama will be SO much better!
Riiiiiiight!
لن استسلم
ABS
Is this the pot calling the kettle black?
Slightly OT
UK Hiz-but-Tahir call on Pakistan to wage nuclear against the US
http://www.hizb.org.uk/hizb/press-centre/press-release/it-s-america-not-pakistan-who-is-not-in-a-position-to-fight-an-open-war-with-pakistan.html
From the aticle:
There is no doubt that Pakistan's military arsenal and hardware doesn't overshadow that of America, however, a Pakistan, possessing nuclear weapons, missiles technology and half a million brave soldiers who are ready to attain martyrdom for Islam, is in a good position to injure and bruise an already battered America to an extent which she cannot afford to stomach right now.
American bases in Bagram and Doha, which America will never wish to be in danger, are within Pakistan's striking range both through our fighter planes and missiles. Had America attained the capacity to annihilate Pakistan with ease it would have done it long time ago. In fact the only way to destroy Pakistan is to implode it from within.
Ha ha ha these Mohammedans are loonies. This is the best I have heard. This is the response for all the billions of dollars we have given them. Islam is a curse upon civilization and humanity.
km: looked in the site you mentioned. The whole diatribe is in English and worth a read, but the Urdu original is below that. The guy who translated lost some of the idiom.
The last bit reads: "Today, if we want to save Pakistan, we must liberate our lives from the troika of Zardari and Gilani and Kiyani and establish the rule of the Caliphate. We need such a ruler and military commander who, while strengthening Islam, foster a desire for martyrdom in 16 crore (160 million) people, and remind the cowardly Umreekis (Americans) of the milk of the walking stick (can't accurately translate this, except that it implies a sound thrashing) who run into hiding from unarmed mujahideen in Iraq and Afhganistan."
OT, the motto of the Pak army used to be "Unity, Faith, Discipline". In Gen. Zia's time it was changed to "Faith, Piety, Jihad".
Have a nice day.
"In fact the only way to destroy Pakistan is to implode it from within."
From: the link offered by km
Yes. That's what we're waiting for. Pakistan's implosion may not be immanent, but it's inevitable. Why waste a perfectly good nuke on Pakistan?
Having terrorist training camps in your country, allowing those terrorists to attack Afghanistan and India and coming back to your country is an ACT OF WAR.
The U.S. coming into your country and attacking on your soil is an ACT OF WAR.
What would you like to do?
A nation attacking in another nation is an act of war, not terrorism.
Sorry but almost loosk like their leadership is doing the opposite of what Americnas want them to do.
Posted by: Alert
You got that right!
jewdog:
"Maybe our attacks are terrorism, but their state is a threat to world peace."
In the UK almost as many people think Bush is as big of a threat to world peace as OBL. More people think Bush is a bigger threat to world peace than Kim Jong Il. I guess they're crazy:
guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/nov/03/terrorism.northkorea