CAIR, stung by the Holy Land Foundation terror charity verdict, which confirms Awad, Hooper, and Co. in their status as unindicted co-conspirators, says -- predictably enough -- that the case was all about hate and not at all about funding jihad terror. But it is -- predictably enough -- just an assertion, unsubstantiated by any facts.
"CAIR Says HLF Verdict Based on ‘Fear-Mongering,’" from CAIR.com, November 26 (thanks to A.):
“We believe this case was based more on fear-mongering than on the facts. It is particularly troubling that the government chose to use testimony from an anonymous witness, which deprives the defendants of their full right to confront their accusers. We expect the defendants to appeal this verdict and believe that it will eventually be overturned.”
Right. No anonymous witnesses. Everyone outed. Hmm. What would be the outcome of that, and who would be the beneficiaries?
Yes of course it only the Islamic Jihadis coming from the Islamic society that want to blow up non Muslims at a wholesale rate.
After 12,000 terrorist attacks, and hundreds of convictions, do these people real think any one truely believe them?
The great thing is, nobody cares what CAIR thinks!! LOL...ROTF!!!
'Give us the name of the anonymous witnesses, so we can go and talk to them..."
do these people real think any one truely believe them?
Posted by: senor doeboy at November 27, 2008 8:33 AM
Non-Mohammedans are really, really tired of that "Oh, you're a Hater" crap. Muslims have begun shooting themselves in their own feet with that same old tired and wrong propaganda.
This anonymous witness bullcrap is likely due to the fact that the first trial was a mistrial.
No judge is going to allow someone to testify without giving the defense the right to confront and cross examine that witness UNLESS some pretty specific circumstances exists. For example, if an FBI agent testified at the first trial and was fully cross examined by CAIR's lawyers, and come the second trial that FBI agent was dead, the transcript of his ENTIRE testimony, including CAIR's cross examination, could be used at the second trial. This often happens in second trials and there are specific rules to protect the rights of the defendants. And BTW, the same rule applies to the defense, if their witness died after the first trial, they could use that testimony as well.
This anonymous witness junk is part of spin doctors 'Hooper, and Awad's own post-trial mis-information campaign.
Abdullah The Quasi Apostate will probably appear and side with the 'hate/fear mongering' motivation.
Hate and fear are emotional based. The US government has no emotions. It's agents do, but the gov itself does not.
The gov won on solid evidence, that may be in dispute, but fear and hate mongering are not in evidence, and won't be considered on appeal...
This is just more whining and playing victim...
"CAIR Says HLF Verdict Based on ‘Fear-Mongering,’"
And again...their fellow foxes insist that no chickens were killed, and if they were, foxes were not responsible in any way. Doan matter that the foxes were caught with dead chickens and chicken blood and feathers all over them. It's fear mongering.
Wotta crock...
Islam is a lie and truth is killin' the hell out of it.
'Muslims have begun shooting themselves in their own feet with that same old tired and wrong propaganda.'
And ain't that just great, darcy? The more absurd the claims, the more "ordinary" Americans raise their eyebrows - and their curiosity level.
My Thanksgiving prayer is that CAIR and their ilk raise the bar, so to speak, and begin shooting themselves at higher levels.
Hmmm... Unanimous fear! Now what's THAT tell you?
Poor Muhammedan Victims!