Stealth Jihad has been chosen as a Main Selection of the Conservative Book Club. Here is the CBC's review of the book:
EXPOSED: The Islamic plan to conquer the U.S. -- not by terrorist acts, but by stealth "A vital wake-up call of a book." -- Former CIA Director R. James WoolseyThere hasn't been a terrorist attack on U.S. soil since 9/11, and Al-Qaeda is on the run in Iraq -- and yet the terrorist threat is far from over. In fact, it's more severe than ever: in our country Islamic jihad groups and their allies are concentrating not solely on terror attacks (although another one of those could come any moment), but on stealthy efforts to introduce Islamic law into this country, step-by-step and bit-by-bit -- until finally America is transformed into an Islamic state. While the stealth jihadists may never attain this goal, they are already eroding our freedoms as they demand ever more accommodation of Islamic principles and practices -- and politically correct public officials are only too happy to oblige. Now, in Stealth Jihad: How Radical Islam is Subverting America without Guns or Bombs, jihad expert Robert Spencer unveils the full scope of the stealth jihad plan, and explains how the stealth jihadists are operating and the victories they've already achieved.
Muslims trying to take over the United States? It sounds unbelievable -- but Spencer (author of the bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad) lays bare the chilling details of a secret Muslim Brotherhood memorandum plotting their strategy for America -- a strategy of steady subversion and erosion of our freedoms and our culture, until finally Islam reigns supreme. He explains the all- encompassing, even totalitarian, nature of the Islamic law that the stealth jihadists are laboring to impose upon us, and shows the many ways in which this effort is advancing:
* by taking advantage of political correctness among government and law enforcement officials to keep them from even speaking about Islamic jihad, much less taking steps to resist it
* by demanding (ever more shrilly) accommodating of Muslim practices in public places, universities, schools, workplaces, and even banking and finance
* by smearing and silencing anti-jihad and anti-terror voices in America and worldwide
* by using "hate speech" laws to try to stifle all analysis of the elements of Islam that jihadists use to justify violence
* by transforming public school textbooks into tracts that proselytize for Islam
* and even by infiltrating the highest levels of the American government
Spencer also explains how the stealth jihadists can be stopped, detailing a ten-point plan that is far from politically correct, but may be our only option for survival as a free people. Here, then, is a much-needed wake-up call about a sinister agenda that could do nothing less than destroy the United States -- unless Americans discard political correctness and face the threat squarely and fully. Stealth Jihad shows how we can, and how we must.
Advancing Islamic supremacism in America -- by stealth:
* Terrorism without terror: the stealth jihadist plan to wage a "grand jihad" aimed at "eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within"
* How stealth jihad efforts and jihad violence work hand- in-glove for the same goal
* The main player in the stealth jihad: the shadowy, sinister, internationally powerful Muslim Brotherhood
* The partners: the "moderate" American Muslim organizations that are actually part of the stealth jihad
* How Islamic law teaches warfare against and the subjugation of unbelievers -- by any means possible
* Islamic law: the many ways in which it contradicts American law and custom
* How the common practice of Islamic organizations labeling all critics of jihadist activity as "bigots" and "hatemongers" helps advance the stealth jihad
* Washington's politically correct policy of avoiding all mention of "Islam" and "jihad" in connection with terrorism -- how it not only plays into the hands of the stealth jihadists, but was actually adopted on the advice of Muslim Brotherhood operatives
* How Islamic groups worldwide are using "hate speech" laws to try to criminalize free discussion of Islamic terrorism -- even in the United States
* The legal jihad: how stealth jihadists use the courts to battle against their critics -- and anti-jihadists in general
* Your house is our house: how efforts to force American businesses to change their practices to accommodate Islamic law are part of the stealth jihad -- and have stepped up considerably in recent years
* Prayer returns to public schools! (As long as it's Islamic prayer, it's just fine)
* How efforts at accommodation of Muslims again and again result in Islamic dominance and supremacism
* Separate and unequal: Islamic separatism in America
* Don't want to pay interest on your credit card? Simple: just tell the company you're Muslim! How Western financial institutions are bending over backwards to accommodate Islam
* Readin', writin', and subjugatin' the infidel: The stealth jihad in American schools
* How American public school textbooks have been Islamized under the noses of education authorities -- and often with their naive complicity
* Education or indoctrination? The Islamic ideological straitjacket in American universities
* Saudi money and what it buys in American universities today
* Compromised: Islamic terror groups' infiltration of the FBI, CIA, and Pentagon
"Robert Spencer makes a solid case that the major threat to our way of life does not come solely from those radical Islamists who embrace violence and terrorism. It also comes also from those who do not accept that they must live side-by-side on a basis of equality with those of other faiths in a civil society and who instead work in multiple ways toward obtaining special standing for Islam in our society and, ultimately, toward theocracy. A vital wake-up call of a book." -- R. James Woolsey, former Director of Central Intelligence
"Historically, the Islamist movement relied mostly on violence to attain its goal of a worldwide Islamic order. In recent years, however, the movement has recognized the limitations of revolution, coup d'etat, terrorism, and criminality -- and instead turned to legitimate activities, especially in the political, educational, and media arenas. With his signature research, accuracy, and boldness, Robert Spencer has written a pioneering survey of this 'stealth jihad' whose ambition and subtlety threaten the continuity of Western civilization." -- Daniel Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum
Great reviews Robert.
One heck of an important (and relevant) review!
"Non Profit Non Partisan political" blogg...hey, wait a minute? I someone selling commercial for profit products here?
Hmmmmm....I am going to have to think about this one....
Truth
Abdullah Mikail
Abdullah
I respectfully suggest that before issuing any more veiled legal threats, that you actually familiarize yourself with the laws regarding 501c3s, specifically in regard to the very issues you raise in your post above.
You then won't be able to issue any further threats, if you have any honesty left within you, but you might for that very reason feel better about yourself at the end of the day.
Robert Spencer
Robert,
In respect to your book, just like drugs, this won't help anyone if they buy it, it will only make them poorer.
But that's just an independant opinion.
Legal threats, pushaw!
You are always playing the special victim card aren't you?
Peace of Mind
Abdullah Mikail
I remember Bill O'Reilly telling a caller that we're too big a country and that kind of takeover could never happen.
What he ignores is that they will keep trying, one step at a time, winning lawsuits, appointments, and elections here and there for years and years and years.
Consider Rashida Tlaib, now the first Muslim woman to serve in the Michigan state legislature.
Have any of those Muslims who now serve in state or federally elected positions ever been publicly asked if they believe Islam--their complete way of life--is compatible with democracy, American law, and the United States Constitution?
Not that I'm aware.
Robert,
I may have to apologize...I am not sure?
That little George Washington icon you recently had in the lower left hand corner of your JW home page was lauding "My blogg is worth 2,400,000(appx) what's yours worth" (or something to that effect) and I may have mistakenly posted a week or so ago that it was lauding $24,000,000 ...my bad, I am sorry...I deal with large capital sums and that was just a slip of the finger...didn't notice...
Yeah, I think it was only 2.4 M or so you were bragging about then, wasn't it?
Truth
Abdullah Mikail
AM - so far you've left 3 comments on this thread concerning Robert's new book, but not a single comment on the thread above this one: "UK: Muslim man strangles, stabs, and slits throat of "petite" 19 year-old Catholic girl"
Where is your outrage over this barbaric, butchering murder?
Abdullah Mikail: Sometimes when I read your posts I catch myself thinking that this AM guy really believes the nonsense he spews. But then I realize that no one could be this delusional, self-deceiving, pompous and self-caricaturizing. Right?
Robert?
Hello? Hello?
Hmmm...must be in the can...
: )
Peace of Mind
Abdullah Mikail
champ,
"Where is your outrage over this barbaric, butchering murder?"
My outrage is no less than yours.
I do not misdirect and attempt to pull the negative pall over religion because Islam does not condone what he did.
I would like to be alone with him and exercise my outrage ... he got off light.
They should have execute him.
Truth
Abdullah Mikail
Posted by: PRCS at November 12, 2008 1:36 PM
"Have any of those Muslims who now serve in state or federally elected positions ever been publicly asked if they believe Islam--their complete way of life--is compatible with democracy, American law, and the United States Constitution?
Not that I'm aware."
Of course not because that is an Constitutionally forbidden question to ask.
"The "no religious test" clause of the United States Constitution is found in Article VI, section 3, and states that:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."
Simply being professional and capable of responsible leadership and having the support of your legally registerd peers at the polls is all that is required.
Truth
Abdullah Mikail
Abdullah Mikhail: It is not a constitutionally forbiden question to ask. Not in the least. A Muslim (or anyone else for that matter) can be asked if their religion is incompatible with the Constitution. All the Constitution maintains is that, whatever the answer, the individual in question cannot be deprived of holding office because of his specific religious adherence or lack thereof. But the question can most certainly be asked.
Besides, any Muslim holding any elective office in the United States and asked such a question would fall into one of two categories: Category One----the Muslim actually has convinced himself that his religion is not incompatible with the Constitution, in which case he is mistaken, if not delusional; Category Two----the Muslim knows his faith is incompatible with the Constitution but, being a good and informed Muslim, he lies about it and thus engages in "taqqiya." In short, and with the Constitution and America's welfare in mind, it's best not to elect any Muslim in the first place, just as it would be ill advised to elect an adherent of any other totalitarian ideology, say Marxism or fascism, to any office in America.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."
Posted by: Abdullah Mikail
Asking these Muslims if they support supplanting the law of man and the U.S. Constitution with sharia should not be considered a religious test. We should focus less on hate speech and more on sedition. We already have laws concerning sedition and treason; it's time we use them.
And I'll mention that my copy of Stealth Jihad arrives today. I'm anxious to start reading it. This will be the third of Robert's books to become part of my library, it won't be the last.
People better learn to embrace and respect the Western way of life or get out and go where camels get more respect than women - we will fight them all the way forever!
AM: "I do not misdirect and attempt to pull the negative pall over religion because Islam does not condone what he did."
Oh, so you aren't a "misunderstander of Islam", unlike many of your poor misguided fellow Muslims are, eh?
Actually, AM, I think that you are among the minority of Muslims who have chosen to create their own brand of Islam by repackaging it, and who have also given Muhammad a fresh makeover; and now you and others are trying to sell this New and Improved version of Islam to the world -- and if it were possible -- you even want to sell this Fluffy New Islam to other fellow Muslims, but they aren't buyin', are they?
Attempting to remake Islam, Muhammad, and even the Qur'an, through creative mental gymnastics no less, the kind of creative thinking one must engage in to soften the edges of it's violent text, is not going to work, because you are not dealing in the truth when you do that. Rewritting history does not make something Truth, AM, that makes it a Lie.
Your lies aren't even a "nice try".
champ,
If two surgeons are discussing a procedure and we overhear, just because you and I don't understand what they are discussing doesn't mean they are lying...it means we don't have the requisite knowledge to understand what they are saying.
Don't hold me accountable for your own lack of understanding.
Peace
Abdullah Mikail
Islam the psychopathic religion on a perpetual rage and violence. Mohammedans are the followers of the first Islamic terrorist, rapist, robber, child molester, mass murderer, liar Mohammad the idiotic prophet of Islam. What a sorry and imbecile prophet.
By emulating this EVIL prophet of Islam the Muhammadans have become crazy with blood lust and killing spree throughout the world. Then the other means of Jihad to spread their revolting and sick ideology of Muhammadanism is using stealth Jihad. Population explosion, immigration, money Jihad, and lies. Yep Islam the religion of criminals.
Lord, AM, you are not some superior being with special insights into the deeper meaning of Islam, et al. Just because you drank the Kool-Aid and converted to Islam does not make you a demi-god.
I do not hold you accountable for how I understand Islam, but I do hold you accountable for your obvious push to sell the Softer-Side of Islam crap. Try selling it to the "misunderstanders" of Islam. Oh, and good luck with that, you'll need it.
Ok then, the cat is out of the bag. Stealth Jihad will edify 50,000 people or so, with luck, millions. Now, HOW DO WE Legislate a FIX?!
If we can dispense with the apologists and the AM-types, what steps do we take to stop the trends and turn the tide?
A legislative aide said to me "I just can't see how sharia could be implemented here," and "we can't legislate against a particular religion." As if Islam is JUST a religion, HAH. If the MSM cared to investigate, the world would know Islam to have two faces: religious and political.
Legislators are under informed and over sensitive. They will be intimidated by the threat of religious bigotry or the false claim of racism. We are in a war for our Constitutional/cultural survival. What tools can we use?
Does one nation or group of people have the right to defend itself from another nation or group of people who have expressed the desire and various abilities to subjugate and/or replace it? YES! Now let’s focus on how to do it!
“Softer side?”
Sister, you are confused.
What you and others describe here is not a “side”.
It is a lunatic fringe of humanity that you people try to paint as the norm.
Truth
Abdullah Mikail
I ordered my copy, but haven't received it yet. So yep, I'll read Robert's 10 points and use them as I discuss legislation with my elected officials. I for one don't need more convincing, I just want to get on with protecting the US from what has happened across the globe since the 7th century.
Champ,
You are most correct by observing -
Since AM, and his fellow coreligionists, fully subscribe to the faith and tenents of murdering Mo' and his fairy tales, I'll rely on Adbullah Yusuf Ali's seminal The Meaning of the Holy Quran.
If you don't have a copy, I highly recommend getting a copy. Although the basic text of the Koran is pure psycho-babble pretending to be holy text, Ali's footnotes and appendices can be quite entertaining.
Let's make that comical reading, in that everything is justified basically with "My god is better than your God!"
Do you believe it to be your religious duty to overturn the US Constitution?
vs
Do you want to overturn the US Constitution?
There needs to be no "religious test."
Posted by: Civilus Defendus at November 12, 2008 5:02 PM
Civilus,
“If we can dispense with the apologists and the AM-types”…that will be the first and hardest let down for you and those like you.
You will never “dispense with” me.
I am an American citizen, and I am here to stay…born here, raised her, served here…and there are many more just like me, veterans that served our country and still serve, we strengthen it, we support it, and we defend it.
Whether you have firm grasp on reality or not doesn’t matter to us at all, as long as you abide by the laws of this great land you will be okay.
Violate them in support of some twisted fantasy you have about defending yourself from “stealth jihad” and the legal system will deal with you.
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness…
Peace
Abdullah Mikail
Hey, Boneshack -- I will check out that link more thoroughly, thank you.
Note AM's tactic of turning everything I say BACK on me, otherwise known as reversing. Reversing must be written in the "How-To-Manual for Defending Islam", which offers tips on keeping any and all legitimate questions in the spin cycle until hell freezes over.
Guess they would have to practice such tactics, since there is no REAL defense for Islam, right?
It is a lunatic fringe of humanity that you people try to paint as the norm.
Truth
Abdullah Mikail
Posted by: Abdullah Mikail
I would not call them "lunatic fringe" Muslims, but I consider them very devout Muslims. Unlike yourself.
Then AM, what is your objective? Given the preponderance of evidence, what are your suggestions to ensuring that at this point in history the US endures with its Constitution intact? If in fact you find that desirable.
AM -- if Islam is so peaceful -- then why are most terrorists Muslims?
champ,
Answer me quid pro quo: Why are most incarcerated criminals Christians?
Now on to your question...it is just a label.
There is an attacker and there is a defender. They scream at each other, "Terrorist!"
The word is just another of the tools of war that dehumanize an "enemy of the state" so that it is easier for young people to kill them.
Truth
Abdullah Mikail
Civilius,
I swore to defend it from all enemies both foreign and domestic, and the most damage that has been done to it recently is in this "WOT".
How can I not be seen as an enemy, being who I am, when I point at those on capitol hill who are the real enemies of the Constitution?
A lot of damage has been done to our Constitutional rights under the guise of the Patriot I & II.
As far as the "Given the preponderance of evidence," comment, it depends upon who reviews it and what you say is "evidence".
A lot of it has nothing to do with religion and everything with global politics...religion is used as a scapegoat by both sides of that issue and neither one truly cares.
For our part here in the US we are raising the next generation of Muslim Scholars here in this culture free from any historical or cultural bias...at least that is the goal.
The closest nation on Earth to that of an Islamic model of government is the United States because it is a governance by the people, to a certain extent, and human rights are guarded here and most closely mirror what is in truth dictated by Islam.
Peace
Abdullah Mikail
From the Quasi apostate AM...In respect to your book, just like drugs, this won't help anyone if they buy it, it will only make them poorer.
But that's just an independant opinion.
Haha you can say the same thing about the Quran...Especially the Quran...
But that's just an independent opinion...
It is a lunatic fringe of humanity that you people try to paint as the norm.
He's got the 'lunatic fringe of humanity' part right. It's just that that is the norm when it comes to Islam. Like those Somalis who took over an entire town. Like every HAMAS member/"citizen." Like the entire nations of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan, Indonesia (with the exceptions of the few Hindus, Buddhists, and Christians who are forced to live under Sharia), Libya, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iran, Afghanistan, etc., etc., etc. They're all just misunderstanding Islam, as is 'the Reliance of the Traveler,' al-Tabari, and every group that represents Islam in the Free World.
Furthermore, why is it only the 'lunatic fringe' leftists and Muslims (i.e., those who are hell-bent on committing endless acts of treasonous sedition or at leats being allowed to) who take issue with the Patriot Act?
"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled, or hanged." - Abraham Lincoln
Since, according to Islam, war is permanent, any representative who didn't vote for the Patriot Act, or who fails to defend it, is unfit to serve his/her country as long as Islam exists. I love the Patriot Act. I hope they're surveilling you right now, AM.
"The closest nation on Earth to that of an Islamic model of government is the United States because it is a governance by the people, to a certain extent, and human rights are guarded here and most closely mirror what is in truth dictated by Islam."
Wishful thinking -- a load of crap -- or both?
Both.
AM is talking about an Islam that he himself has dreamed up, and that exists only in his mind. I think he tells himself these "Truths" over, and over, and over agian, until he actually believes his own lies. Denial is no excuse, AM, it is no excuse for facing what you refuse to see, and that's Islam is evil at it's core, beginning, but not ending, with Muhammad himself. What about that guy, Muhammad, anyway, you never did answer my previous questions on other threads concerning his "LIFE".
Muhammad presents a real problem for Muslims, doesn't he? I realize that his evil life is impossible to defend, but avoiding the questions will not make them go away; so instead, you avoid the topic. Watch, you will avoid it once again, just as you have done in the past.
Muhammad is not going away. Nor will my questions concerning him. So, what about Muhammad's life? For starters, why don't you attempt to explain to me why he would have sex with a 9 year old? Waiting.
"The closest nation on Earth to that of an Islamic model of government is the United States because it is a governance by the people, to a certain extent, and human rights are guarded here and most closely mirror what is in truth dictated by Islam."
That would obviously be Saudi Arabia. They pretty much follow Sharia to the letter, with the exceptions of slavery, which exists but is not legal, allowing dhimmis (who, like all infidels, aren't suposed in Arabia), and female genital mutilation, which is optional, not mandatory.
Where are you, AM? In the can? ...still waiting!
Two observations now having followed this thread off and on throughout the day. One, Abdullah Mikhail convinces no one here at JW with his twisted arguments, not even remotely. Two, AM is living in an alternative universe to such an extent that no amount of reasoned opposition to his ideas will dissuade him from continuing to adhere to what he is convinced is the correct nature of things (so very typical of the true believer).
In light of this, may I propose that AM simply be ignored in the future. This approach, probably more than any other, will confuse and frustrate him. Letting him wither on the vine, with no one caring, would be arguably the most fitting chastisement for someone so deluded, so blind.
Abdullah,
Here, for your convenience, is a link to our prior incomplete discussion:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/023455.php#c597534
Islam is so retarded and evil that even the Devil himself jumped ship. Hell what he knows about Islam and that Monster called Mohammad has him running and making sure Islam does not purge his piece of territory.
AM, I am still interested to know if you think the US (Constitution, Culture, Arts, Sciences, Economic opportunities, and Freedoms related to speech, assembly, religion, education, etc) is at all threatened by Islam of the Quran, Sira and Hadith, and Muslims that follow it, whether identified as radical or not. And if you would identify immigration, non-integration, all manner of stealth or openly violent jihad, as part of any threat.
If you want to be free to practice your religion, you and those of like-minds must free it from its political strings and pacify its violent passages. To ignore they exist is partly why you may be seen as ‘the enemy.’ One can’t deny a nation its responsibility to protect itself, from threats within its boarders or beyond.
AM, my concern with attempting to have a dialog with you is your tendency to strike off on tangents rather than keep to the core of an argument. It is fine if you disagree with how the argument is framed, but there are better ways to continue the conversation than intellectually wondering off or sniping. You run the risk of appearing disingenuous and/or being ignored.
Champ...AM is talking about an Islam that he himself has dreamed up, and that exists only in his mind.
Exactly, I noticed this some time ago and is why I refer to him as a Quasi Apostate.
But I don't want to bang on him too hard, he is just following Mohammad's example as how to make up your own religion...
That's why he never relinquishes any points at all, he is making it up as he rolls along...He's a fun guy if you can get through the lies and pomposity...
Ignoring the disruptor is a good idea.
But I have another piece of advice that I have posted a number of times, in Muslim-Disruptor-infested threads, lately. It may help all of us to keep our tempers and stay on track.
It is this. In any thread where Michael McKay alias Abdullah [slave of allah] Mikail or 'dave742' or any other such person makes a huge effort to throw dust in people's eyes, all prudent non-Muslim visitors to the site should assume prima facie that whatever is in the original article, posted for reflection and discussion, involves something that Muslims most particularly do not want Infidels to look at or think about.
Therefore: do not merely grit your teeth and ignore the disruptor and continue conversation with the regulars at the bar; but scroll right back up to the top and re-read the posted article.
That is the one thing the Disruptor, or Disruptors, do. not. want you to do.
So do it.
This will be, from now on, my standard operating procedure whenver A.M. or anyone else like him makes a major appearance in a discussion thread; especially if and when they refuse any truly on-topic discussion and try to distract and confuse and hijack the thread with side-issues; I will simply go straight back to the original posted article and re-read it.
Civilus Defendus...I would not discourage you from trying to have a meaningful dialogue with AM, but I doubt it is forth coming...Good luck though...
dumbledoresarmy...I normally go back to the top and re-read the article, because I make an effort to read every post, and by the time I get to the end of the thread, I have forgotten the topic.
Sometimes it does not matter, but other times it does...It's a good idea anyway...
"I noticed this some time ago and is why I refer to him as a Quasi Apostate."
Hey, duh_swami! I like that term: Quasi Apostate, it's very spot on. Good one!
It's as though AM represents a side of Islam I've never heard of before, but I know it's because he'll say anything to candy coat the truth by attempting to sweeten up Islam; but what always keeps me grounded, is The Truth About Muhammad. Now that's some truth I can stand firmly AGAINST.
Champ...because he'll say anything to candy coat the truth by attempting to sweeten up Islam; but what always keeps me grounded, is The Truth About Muhammad. Now that's some truth I can stand firmly AGAINST.
That, and the 'fact', as far as I am concerned anyway, that Mohammad made it all up to begin with. Probably with a little help of his friends.
A pack of lies all the way to bedrock.
And this is what they defend...No matter how well you defend a pack of lies, no matter how articulate you are about it, a pack of lies is still a pack of lies...
Right Abdullah?
Duh_Swami -
"....that Mohammad made it all up to begin with. Probably with a little help of his friends."
Yeah, some friend his opium pipe turned out to be -- that and living alone in some cave -- a true recipe for disaster.
Champ: Yeah, some friend his opium pipe turned out to be....
I wonder what drugs if any, were used by Arabian Arabs of Mohammads time. Was there opium trade back then? I don't know that part of history.
Maybe Mohammad and his early companions were druggies, and needed to raid caravans for drug money...I don't think Allah ever told Mohammadans not to take drugs...
duh_swami, I found this info on opium I believe you will find most interesting:
"The Arabs both used opium and organised its trade. For the Prophet had prohibited the use of alcohol, not hashish or opiates."
"Opium was viewed as a medicine, not a drug of abuse."
Excerpts from this link: http://opiates.net/
I think it was very likely that Muhammad was an opium addict since it's use was widely accepted back then; and today it is still grown in Afghanistan, and I think they grow it in Pakistan too:
http://www.irinnews.org/InDepthMain.aspx?InDepthId=21&ReportId=62938
The only members of society that I have ever truly despised are liars, muggers, rapists, pedophiles, and murderers...I guess I'll never meet a muslim that I can admire, now will I?!!!
Champ: "Opium was viewed as a medicine, not a drug of abuse."
That explains why there are so many sick Arab Mohammadans in need of 'medication'.
'I only take it for medicinal purposes'...yeah right...
If Mohammad took this 'medicine' it might explain some of his hallucinations...
Previewing your Comment
Of course not because that is an Constitutionally forbidden question to ask.
Posted by: Abdullah Mikail at November 12, 2008 2:30 PM
Wrong answer, Bunky.
That religious test [h]as been interpreted to mean that no federal employee, whether elected or appointed, "career" or "political," can be REQUIRED to adhere to or accept any religion or belief. (Wikipedia)
One cannot be a slave of Allah and simultaneously swear to support and defend man-made secular laws which permit what Allah and Muhammad have prohibited.
Islam--your complete way of life--contradicts the principles of democracy and the individual rights embodied in the Constitution.
Hi All,
I've just responded to Abdullah's comments above by ordering two copies from Amazon.
I have all of Robert's books (in multiple copies so that when I lend one out to my family I always have at least one left) So far I have found them all to be well researched, well balanced and with the only agenda to be presenting the truth to make others aware of what Mr. Spencer has learned.
I am also using them as a base (cited) to put together an information paper on Islam to send out to as many organizations and government ministers that I can.
All I need to do now is wait for the rather long shipping times from the US to us here in Australia to read his latest book.
Cheers and keep up the good work Robert,
James
"Just because you drank the Kool-Aid and converted to Islam does not make you a demi-god."
Oh good grief! You mean this imbecile "Abdullah" is a retard, er, revert?
I'd say There's nothing quite as fanatical and depraved as a convert, except in the case of Islam, the REAL Muslims are much more demented in general.
Dude, wake up and grow a conscience. You are a lunatic following a lunar cult.
But, of course, nobody can talk reason to a revert. As someone else said here, there must have been a fatwa against reason.
But thanks for yet another example of a repulsive Muslim. Makes me hate Islam all the more.
Islam vs KKK wich one is more aggressive? or cruel? Show me how many Christians are in any Muslim governments?
They use our constitution to conquer and enslave our nation without a fight. Islam should be banned and keep an open eye on there activities.
Get your Sharia in your country you came from and stay there, the 21st century barbarians! Islam is a subjugation of the mind.
The world is run by 3 city states each with their own phallic symbol. They are Washington, DC(military), inner city of London(financial), and the Vatican(religions) all religions including atheism, secular humanism and satanism. All religions are like the freemasons, they have 2 parts the visible and the invisible. In the invisible they worship Lucyfer and know it, in the visible they worship Lucyfer without knowing it. As the Bible says the god of this world is satan/Lucyfer. These 3 city states make up the "crown" they are the top group on the power pyramid. These people control the "Jihadists", Zionists", Jesuits, etc. These groups of religious fanatics are only puppets or dupes. They are harmless compared to their masters. Their masters are globalists. The names "Jew", Zionist, Jihadist, neocon, neolib, etc are only made up names to confuse the masses. They seem to be doing a good job, because the masses are fighting each other instead of the globalists. Jihadist, Zionists, Jesuit/Catholic, Atheist, etc are only different sides of the same beast. This all goes back to Gen 3:16(Cain). The problem today is the serpent seed which controls the Jihadist, Zionist, Jesuit/Catholic beast. In fact many symbols of the muslims is the same as the catholic church. They have freemasony, and "Jewish" symbols in some of their mosques. The serpent seed starts with Cain, then Ham(Naamah, Noah's wife at time of flood), Canaanites(Ham and Naamah), Esau(married into the Canaanites, Ishmael's daughter, Spanish(Sephardic), Khazars(Ashkenazi), Hittites, Hivites, and other middle eastern nations and teamed up with Dan(serpent symbol). Esau(gen 27:40) wants his birthright back and will do anything to get it. Hebrews(12 tribes minus Dan) and the "Jews"(serpent seed) are two different entities. Jn 8:33 and on these descendants of Abraham said they had never been in bondage, up to that time the Hebrews had been in bondage twice. These were the descendants of Esau who had been "forced" to convert to what is now the Talmud by the Maccabees(John Hyrcanus). Some of these "converts" then went up to Khazaria and married into the Khazars and were there when the Rabbi's came to "convert" the pagan/satanists. In fact the King Herod of 2000 years ago was an Edomite Jew. The serpent seed makes up the forest of evil of which the Jihadists are a part of. When they have served their purpose, they will be disposed of. Concentrating on this or that tree is a waste of time. The people "defeated" the league of nations so they gave us the United Nations. Cut down one tree and they will grow another one. We need to question everything and think outside the box. There are too many people in this camp or that camp. The chance of both of them being right is ZERO. The chance of them both being wrong can be 100%.
Chi0ne1,
Ummm... what are you saying? WTF are you talking about? If my intuition is correct you are another Mohammedan, talking gibberish. I found that very true with Mohammedans they come up with these ludicrous and bizarre nonsensical deluded stories in order to register the schism between reality and the horrors of Islam in their minds. Mohammedans have fallen for a lost cause a big lie.
Savsiv, you might want to check your intuition and expand your horizon. Yes the leadership of the Muslims is evil(where did I say otherwise), but so is the rest of the religions and leaders of the other nations. Do you blame all americans for what their leaders do? Islam is a barbaric religion of the serpent seed. There are 2 types of people the elite and the masses. As long as the elite can keep the masses fighting each other they continue to win. Most of the masses are asleep, but those that are awake are in different camps saying the others are the problem. The chance of all being right is ZERO, the chance of the being all wrong can be 100%. I am guessing that you are in for a rude awakening, when you find out that the leadership of all sides is the same beast.
Thesis/antithesis/synthesis
Cheese and rice. Zionists, Jesuits, and Catholics are "religious fanatics?" Zionism is a political movement. It is the basis of the only nation to have had state religion for 60 years and to have not fallen decades if not millenia behind the ball in terms of financial growth, healthcare, standard of living, etc. This is because state religion is only theoretical in Israel. It is never imposed on anyone in any way. Hardly "fanatical." I also attended a Jesuit Catholic school for four years, and as a Jew, I think it gave me a semi-unique perspective on Jesuit Catholics. While I was made to take religion courses, nobody EVER crammed Catholicism down my throat. I studied world religions, morality, the Old Testament, and did a bunch of community service. 3 priests left the priesthood while I was there, all for personal reasons, and they were never shunned, persecuted, or even looked down upon as they continued to teach there. The crux of Jesuitism is a commitment to public service. Catholicism has, at times, been fanatical, but it isn't now and it never was in principle. I hate tu quoque logical fallacies and conspiracy theories which serve to deflect from the big purple elephant in the room. I would posit that this asshat is a communist, but she called atheism a religion, so if she is she's an incredibly ignorant one. Muslims always blame their leaders for their own failings and then still have the nerve to abhor democracy. I'm going with Muhammadan. And that elite/masses stuff is such crap. People who work hard and become successful are rarely leftists, so they're hardly elitists. The poor "masses" back the same leftist policies as elitists. Either way she's a nihilist who will never realize that conservative Jeffersonian democracy is the only non-cannibalizing political ideology.
jdamn,
Thanks you are a lifesaver. I was hoping someone would come decipher that stuff above. I mean it made no sense. Honestly I just did not understand WTF the person was saying.
jdamn & savsiv,
ChiOne1 has discerned--concocted, if you will, an exotic, esoteric Total Explanation of the Universe which makes sense of things as she sees them. Some of her notions are familiar, but peculiarly arranged and interpreted. She has fixed ideas like dogmatic Mohammedans do, just not revealed to a Final Prophet from Allah Himself, and not timelessly laid out in an immutable Holy Book. I think that each of us encounters crank systems of thought and their fringe exponents from time to time. Too bad that these ideas are of little use to us.
ChiOne1: You come across as Ayn Rand gone loony, with a little pseudo-Hegel thrown in for good measure. Since this lady was already a bit in the stratosphere, though possessed of some interesting ideas, reflect, if you will, where this leaves you. You are too clever by half------and tedious. By the way, do you despise Kant as much as Rand did? Done here.
Bottom line: beware those sinister Edomites calling themselves Jews, guys. They're behind the Mother of All Conspiracies, don'tya know.
They are half-way there! We have just elected an American Gorbachev.