I just love the creativity and originality that the pro-censor book banning dude uses in his explanation. Nothing like copy/paste to get the point accross. They really are intellectual giants, aren't they?
That accursed country and its lawless NWF as a matter of fact the whole country is a lawless pathetic joke run by the Taliban sharia enforcers. All the cajoling to the Mohammedans is not getting anywhere. Nothing will satisfy the Islamic machines until all of humanity enters its fold. That will be hell on earth.
What's really creepy about this creep reviewer is the sacchrine "kindly please Ban this Book" phrasology typical of Muslims in a weak position (hudna) trying to suck up to naive non-Muslims. As soon as this creep jihadi gets the upper hand, he'll slit your throat.
"Kindly please Ban Muslim immigration as it touches negative religious sentiments as it portrays the wrong way of how humans should treat each other and promotes vengeance and chaos and is not like Christianity and Judaism that have totally dissimilar creeds than Islam because they promote free will, charity and the Golden Rule."
I always look for a few of those reviews. Without them, how can I know if a book is worth reading? If a book about Islam doesn't offend Muslims, chances are that it's not worth reading. Now this is a user page.
Kindly please read this book and recommend it to others.
Robert, as I told you before, "The Truth about Muhammed" is really a great book and gives the readers all the good arguments. Anyway, you invite all your opponents to argue with you here on JW but nobody ever followed your request.
They must have very good reasons, probably because they are intellectual giants.
this muslim moron (with no disrespect intended to the mentally challenged) all he seems to know how to do is demand books telling the truth about islam
not surprising since it seems muslims have been trying to ban free speech
Kindly please Ban this Book as it touches negative religious sentiments as it portrays the wrong way of Islam and religions close to Islam like Christianity and Judaism that have close but not exact creeds.
There are NO religions close to Mohammedanism (wow! the spell check actually gave me that spelling) despite what this freak thinks he and his cultists might have in "common" with Christians and Jews.
Personally, I despise all religions (my apologies to those I've offended), but my ire is focused on islam -- cult, massive, but a cult regardless of fawning freaks of a bearded and highly oversexed Ferret.
I have to laugh really.
They do have such a nerve don't they? Muslims telling us in the west to ban freedom of speech is like us going to a Muslim country and banning Halal meat of Islam itself. What would happen if Non Muslims went to Muslim countries and tried to do that?
When in Rome as they say and it's time we got tough on Islam. We should ban Halal meat and make sure Muslims work to our standards and wishes and if they don't want to work in a supermarket handling pork and alcohol then they have a choice - do it or else there's the door.
Nothing in common: Islam, Judaism, Christianity??
Why then the meeting of Islam scholars in the Vatican, the convocation of interfaith leaders at Yale in July, the Christian/Islamic studies at the Hartford Seminary?
"Kindly please Ban this Book as it touches negative religious sentiments as it portrays the wrong way of Islam and religions close to Islam like Christianity and Judaism that have close but not exact creeds."
Good God. Moron. They would love to see our Free Speech curtailed or taken away.
How 'bout we ban the Koran? Now, that would be something!
*
Nothing in common: Islam, Judaism, Christianity??
Why then the meeting of Islam scholars in the Vatican, the convocation of interfaith leaders at Yale in July, the Christian/Islamic studies at the Hartford Seminary?
What we are dealing with, here, is a complete lack of respect for originality...
Talk about someone with too much time on his hands! Does this dork think, by posting an identical critique of multiple books, that anyone (even his fellow dorks) will think he's read any of them?
What's really creepy about this creep reviewer is the sacchrine "kindly please Ban this Book" phrasology typical of Muslims in a weak position (hudna) trying to suck up to naive non-Muslims. As soon as this creep jihadi gets the upper hand, he'll slit your throat.
Posted by: Max Publius at November 17, 2008 4:52 PM
Cut'n'paste--his reactions to "The Musharraf Factor: Leading Pakistan to Inevitable Demise", Ibn Warraq's "Why I am not a Muslim" and "Leaving Islam: Apostates Speak Out", and of course Robert Spencer's own "The Truth about Mohammed" are identical--a "kindly" request that Amazon ban the book.
"Kindly please Ban this Book as it touches negative religious sentiments as it portrays the wrong way of Islam and religions close to Islam like Christianity and Judaism that have close but not exact creeds."
Isn't it nice that after he refers to Islam, that he tosses in the usual codicil--passing references to those other "Abrahamic faiths". Doesn't it remind you of the UN ban on "defamation of Islam"--uh, I mean, "defamation of religions"--which always seems to refer to Islam in all its specifics, and other religions in only the most vague manner.
I also like the way he capitalizes "Ban"--clearly an important concept for this close reader, with his considered "reviews".
This is kind of apropos given that I tried to sell "The Truth About Mohammad" at a local used book store yesterday (Hey, I read it twice!). The bookstore guy said, "Do you want someone to burn down my bookstore? I can't put a book like that on my shelves". He said, "Look, they can't even stock matzo bread at the local safeway, because someone keeps vandalizes it." And I live in a small North American city with less than .1% Muslim population.
Nothing in common: Islam, Judaism, Christianity??
Why then the meeting of Islam scholars in the Vatican, the convocation of interfaith leaders at Yale in July, the Christian/Islamic studies at the Hartford Seminary?
Posted by: casart [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 18, 2008 7:58 AM
Good question! Judaism and Christianity have much in common but islam is in a league of its own. Islamic "scholars", all of whom believe that islam is the only legitimate religion, attend these useless interfaith gatherings in an attempt to legitimize their vile creed and to demand recognition as an "Abrahamic" faith. The only reason islam can call itself an "Abrahamic" faith is because islam expropriated the Biblical prophets, completely rewrote history, and named this evil deformity islam----greatest perversion to ever be called a religion.
Robert, looks like you are in good company.
I just love the creativity and originality that the pro-censor book banning dude uses in his explanation. Nothing like copy/paste to get the point accross. They really are intellectual giants, aren't they?
Kind regards,
That accursed country and its lawless NWF as a matter of fact the whole country is a lawless pathetic joke run by the Taliban sharia enforcers. All the cajoling to the Mohammedans is not getting anywhere. Nothing will satisfy the Islamic machines until all of humanity enters its fold. That will be hell on earth.
Not content with banning just one thing, is he? I wonder why so many excellent, objective, thoughtful, well-informed publications bother him so much?
What's really creepy about this creep reviewer is the sacchrine "kindly please Ban this Book" phrasology typical of Muslims in a weak position (hudna) trying to suck up to naive non-Muslims. As soon as this creep jihadi gets the upper hand, he'll slit your throat.
The proper way to fight speech is with more speech. If you think Spencer is wrong in his conclusions, then prove it! Exercise your speech!
In fact, I DARE YOU to prove Spencer wrong!
"Kindly please Ban Muslim immigration as it touches negative religious sentiments as it portrays the wrong way of how humans should treat each other and promotes vengeance and chaos and is not like Christianity and Judaism that have totally dissimilar creeds than Islam because they promote free will, charity and the Golden Rule."
I always look for a few of those reviews. Without them, how can I know if a book is worth reading? If a book about Islam doesn't offend Muslims, chances are that it's not worth reading. Now this is a user page.
I love freedom of speech.
Kindly please read this book and recommend it to others.
Robert, as I told you before, "The Truth about Muhammed" is really a great book and gives the readers all the good arguments. Anyway, you invite all your opponents to argue with you here on JW but nobody ever followed your request.
They must have very good reasons, probably because they are intellectual giants.
Kindly please ban Jihad
What a beautiful sentiment, Lazar.
I responded to them and also reported it to Amazon.
Jdamn,
Awesome testimony from Haroon. Thanks for posting that.
this muslim moron (with no disrespect intended to the mentally challenged) all he seems to know how to do is demand books telling the truth about islam
not surprising since it seems muslims have been trying to ban free speech
The comment states:
There are NO religions close to Mohammedanism (wow! the spell check actually gave me that spelling) despite what this freak thinks he and his cultists might have in "common" with Christians and Jews.
Personally, I despise all religions (my apologies to those I've offended), but my ire is focused on islam -- cult, massive, but a cult regardless of fawning freaks of a bearded and highly oversexed Ferret.
My, my, my -- that rat looks ripe for the takin'.
Isabellathecrusader - RIGHT ON!
I have to laugh really.
They do have such a nerve don't they? Muslims telling us in the west to ban freedom of speech is like us going to a Muslim country and banning Halal meat of Islam itself. What would happen if Non Muslims went to Muslim countries and tried to do that?
When in Rome as they say and it's time we got tough on Islam. We should ban Halal meat and make sure Muslims work to our standards and wishes and if they don't want to work in a supermarket handling pork and alcohol then they have a choice - do it or else there's the door.
It's not very hard really is it?
Nothing in common: Islam, Judaism, Christianity??
Why then the meeting of Islam scholars in the Vatican, the convocation of interfaith leaders at Yale in July, the Christian/Islamic studies at the Hartford Seminary?
"Kindly please Ban this Book as it touches negative religious sentiments as it portrays the wrong way of Islam and religions close to Islam like Christianity and Judaism that have close but not exact creeds."
Good God. Moron. They would love to see our Free Speech curtailed or taken away.
How 'bout we ban the Koran? Now, that would be something!
*
Nothing in common: Islam, Judaism, Christianity??
Why then the meeting of Islam scholars in the Vatican, the convocation of interfaith leaders at Yale in July, the Christian/Islamic studies at the Hartford Seminary?
Posted by: casart at November 18, 2008 7:58 AM
Are you joking? Sadly, I know you're not.
The only good thing is that he did ask "please".
However, the answer is still no.
What we are dealing with, here, is a complete lack of respect for originality...
Talk about someone with too much time on his hands! Does this dork think, by posting an identical critique of multiple books, that anyone (even his fellow dorks) will think he's read any of them?
What's really creepy about this creep reviewer is the sacchrine "kindly please Ban this Book" phrasology typical of Muslims in a weak position (hudna) trying to suck up to naive non-Muslims. As soon as this creep jihadi gets the upper hand, he'll slit your throat.
Posted by: Max Publius at November 17, 2008 4:52 PM
Exactly.
Sure, Ban a book. It raises the demand.
THIMK ABOWED IT!
Good grief--book banning spam!
Cut'n'paste--his reactions to "The Musharraf Factor: Leading Pakistan to Inevitable Demise", Ibn Warraq's "Why I am not a Muslim" and "Leaving Islam: Apostates Speak Out", and of course Robert Spencer's own "The Truth about Mohammed" are identical--a "kindly" request that Amazon ban the book.
"Kindly please Ban this Book as it touches negative religious sentiments as it portrays the wrong way of Islam and religions close to Islam like Christianity and Judaism that have close but not exact creeds."
Isn't it nice that after he refers to Islam, that he tosses in the usual codicil--passing references to those other "Abrahamic faiths". Doesn't it remind you of the UN ban on "defamation of Islam"--uh, I mean, "defamation of religions"--which always seems to refer to Islam in all its specifics, and other religions in only the most vague manner.
I also like the way he capitalizes "Ban"--clearly an important concept for this close reader, with his considered "reviews".
This is kind of apropos given that I tried to sell "The Truth About Mohammad" at a local used book store yesterday (Hey, I read it twice!). The bookstore guy said, "Do you want someone to burn down my bookstore? I can't put a book like that on my shelves". He said, "Look, they can't even stock matzo bread at the local safeway, because someone keeps vandalizes it." And I live in a small North American city with less than .1% Muslim population.
Nothing in common: Islam, Judaism, Christianity??
Why then the meeting of Islam scholars in the Vatican, the convocation of interfaith leaders at Yale in July, the Christian/Islamic studies at the Hartford Seminary?
Posted by: casart [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 18, 2008 7:58 AM
Good question! Judaism and Christianity have much in common but islam is in a league of its own. Islamic "scholars", all of whom believe that islam is the only legitimate religion, attend these useless interfaith gatherings in an attempt to legitimize their vile creed and to demand recognition as an "Abrahamic" faith. The only reason islam can call itself an "Abrahamic" faith is because islam expropriated the Biblical prophets, completely rewrote history, and named this evil deformity islam----greatest perversion to ever be called a religion.