Will there be an upset?
Voting will continue until Thursday night.
Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed
Vote for Mark Steyn! He’s got the guts to speak out for fairness and decency! He’s endured wrongful prosecution and persecution, but still come out on top! All it takes for evil to triumph, is for good men/women to do nothing!
You guys can also vote for the Self-Hating Jew Award over at Yid with Lid.
I’m still deciding on my choices. It’s especially hard because I like to apply Jewish takfir in my mind to any Islamist collaborators (cf. my list in the 10 Signs of a Closet Muslim Posing as a Token Jew in Academia).
Nominations are accepted for the following categories:
Most Self-Hating Jew (2007 Winner-Ehud Olmert)
Not Self-Hating Just Stupid (2007 Winner- Alan Colmes)
Most Self-Hating EX-Jew (2007 Winner-Daniel Sharon)
Most Self Hating Media (2007 Winner-NY Times)
Any nomination must be accompanied an article/post to that substantiates the nominee.
Send Sammy an email at firstname.lastname@example.org
For the “Self-Hating Jew Award” – what about Noah Feldman at Harvard? He loves the people (Muslims) who hate his guts!
Just as I would not consider Obama to be a dhimmi because I think he’s a Muslim, so would not vote for Feldman because I have applied Jewish tafsir to him. He’s a total closet Muslim posing as a token Jew in academia, just like Mearshimer, Walt, Beinin, etc. You can read my rant about him and his type here: http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/022948.php#c584133
Right below it is my defense of the term ‘self-hating Jew,’ for which Hugh chastised himself for printing before changing it. I actuually prefer ‘Jewicidal,’ but ‘self-hating’ is accurate in many cases.
Jewish “takfir,” not “tafsir.”
George the Dhimmi? Even with the glee shown him by the Muslim World over a pair of rank Shoes tossed his way?
Takfir, tafsir–it’s all the same thing, man. [Gotcha this time, jdamn] /sarc
“Never mind/What they wanna do/You gotta write/To your point of view!”
Vote Paul McCartney for Anti-Dhimmi Internationale!!!!!!
Alan Colmes is Jewish?? What a shame to a fine religion. Hes such a jerk.
He’s not a jerk, just an asshat, a harmless idiot.
I was looking for Ted Turner to be a Dhimmi candidate. This is the fellow who equates our FBI with the KGB as well as accusing the USA of being invaders of various places including Iraq.
Isn’t Mark Steyn Canadian?
Mark Steyn is basically living in the US in self-imposed exile. He enjoys free speech. And according to him, the only thing he really misses about Canada is good cheese. He can’t seem to find any in the US. Oh well. Can’t be everything.
While on the subject of Mark Steyn, while an excellent choice any time, I would like to campaign for Coughlin. He stood up for the right reason. The need to name the enemy as they are, not what PC says. He wrote a paper laying out the truth plain and clear and what does he get, the boot. He never retracted what he said, he stood by his work. So, again Mark is a good choice, but Stephen deserves the award this year.
Here’s who I voted for:
American Anti-Dhimmi: John Bolton (need more guys like him)
International Anti-Dhimmi: Geert Wilders (how could anyone not vote for this guy this year?)
American Dhimmi: Jimmy Carter (President Bush and Condi Rice haven’t done enough compared to this man)
International Dhimmi: Rowan Williams (need fewer archbishops like this guy)
Well, that’s it.
Wow, I’m spending too much time in the blogs. I voted for all four leading contenders.
I think a better description would be Stalin’s term “useful idiot”.
PS: Vote Paul McCartney for Anti-Dhimmi Internationale!!!!!!!
If each of us is only voting once in each of the categories, then – comparing the total number of votes, which is running at between 5000 and 6000 in each category (obviously, some people aren’t voting in this or that category – I almost decided not to vote in the American categories since I didn’t have enough clear knowledge of the candidates) – one must say that on top of the ?25-50 people who actively participate under our noms de plume, there must be around 4000 to 6000 people who drop in here regularly to read, without posting.
Think about it. Whatever you write here may be read by up to 5000 other people who are quietly leaning over your shoulder.
I told my husband that number – he’s a statistician and understands such things, and is reasonably internet savvy – and he said that’s pretty good for a website of this sort.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.
Contact Jihad Watch
Spambot blocker question
4 + 7 =
Articles at Jihad Watch by