Welcome to Eurabia! "Unrest continues near vacated Malmö mosque," from The Local, December 18 (thanks to Patrick Poole):
Fresh disturbances erupted on Wednesday evening near the basement location which had previously served as a mosque in Malmö's Rosengård district.Fireworks were aimed at police and several fires were lit when police arrived to blockade the basement office with containers.
Tensions in the area were still high as of 12.30am Thursday morning, according to police in Skåne.
One man was arrested during the evening on suspicions of preparing to commit assault. Three other men and boys were also detained.
The youngest, born in 1992, was taken home to his parents.
The police’s main goal for the evening was to ensure that emergency crews could perform their duties and extinguish the fires which continued to burn in the area.
More than ten fires were lit over the course of the evening.
The basement offices, which had previously served as a mosque for the Islamiska kulturföreningen (‘Islamic Cultural Association’), had been occupied since November 24th to protest against the landlord’s decision not to renew the association’s lease for the space, which it had held for the past 15 years.
On Monday, police forcibly removed the remaining three protesters from the space in front of a crowd of angry onlookers.
Emotions have been running high since the forced evacuation, resulting in sporadic disturbances throughout the week.
One small step for Swedish, Western, Infidel mankind.
And what will this do in regards to making the Swedish people see that Islam wants to Islamise them?
NOTHING! ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!
Well done that man ! A very brave thing to do & more should be standing up to this marching Islamification.
Richard you have a defeatist attitude. :-))
Katie,
My attitude is more 'realistic' than defeatist. My attack was not at the person who closed down the Mosque but aimed at the people of Sweden, seeing the riots, will still remain impartial on Muslims aggression in their country. Sweden is certainly not alone in dhimmi-ness in Europe. It is rather widespread.
It's like Rumsfeld said about Iraq, except now it's Europe: "when you fly over it it's not like the whole place is on fire." I think the Swedish are becoming acutely aware of what's up and they don't like it. Blonde women have always been jihad's first and most horribly-treated victims.
The landlord will soon be made an offer to buy out the whole building that he "wont be able to refuse".
This is the rude shock awaiting countries/societies/people/individuals blindly believeing in the Muti-culti/Feel-good/Lovey-Dovey liberalism.
A news item offers signs of some coming to their senses, even in Sweden:
Swedish police are mulling chartering special planes in anticipation of the government’s wishes to step up the pace of deportations of the thousands of unsuccessful asylum seekers estimated to be in the country.
“2009 is going to be a tough year for a lot of people,” said Dan Eliasson, the head of the Swedish Migration Board (Migrationsverket), to the TT news agency.
On Tuesday, a Swedish charter plane landed in Baghdad carrying twelve people whose asylum claims had been denied by Sweden.
Ahead of the trip, the twelve had been taken to Stockholm’s Arlanda airport from Örebro and Västerås in central Sweden, Gävle on the country’s east coast, Växjö in south central Sweden, as well as from Malmö and Stockholm.
The trip was the first of its kind to Iraq from Sweden.
A few weeks ago, a similar transport was arranged to Ulaanbaatar in Mongolia to return 42 rejected asylum seekers.
“We’re going to have more missions like this. The government has said that 2009 will be the year of the return, which puts the burden on us to bring a lot of people to their respective homelands,” said Peter Nilsson of the border police in Stockholm County.
So far most deportees have been returned piecemeal when space was available to regular commercial flights. But airline pilots are loathe to accept passengers which put up a struggle when brought on board their aircraft.
“A lot of people have learned that lesson. These are people who don’t want to return voluntarily. That’s why we’re doing these kinds of collective trips -- to make it safer, more dignified, and more economic,” said Nilsson.
The Migration Board’s Eliasson reckons that 2009 will be a busy year, especially for the police.
“Many who have had their applications denied should go home, and many of them don’t want to. That’s understandable, as they often return to a life with difficult conditions. The police have a very difficult task. I’m expecting people to raise the bar, and that’s what’s on the way,” said Eliasson.
Neither the police nor the Migration Board will reveal just how long the list of deportees is, however.
_________________________
Why should any Muslim from a Muslim-dominated country be considered for asylum status? Only those who are not Muslims should be allowed to seek "asylum" from a Muslim-dominated country, and then only after extensive checking for fraud, or to see if such people -- such as "Palestinian" Arab islamochrisetians -- in fact will further the Islamic agenda in Western Europe, and pose a special danger -- on campuses, on the streets -- to Christians who are not yet post-Christian, or to the Jews who despite everything have remained in Europe, and who long ago fully integrated into, and have been contributing to the cultural advancement of the societies of Western Europe, and surely do not deserve to have their situations and security, physical and societal, put at special, heightened risk by the influx of such clearly unintegrable and hostile Muslim "asylum-seekers."
Exactly. It's a good sign when Sweden starts wising up. Britain doesn't have the cojones to do it first. Italy's been doing this for some time, but they need to guard their borders better.
As Sweden expels hundreds of those rejected for asylum, they'll admit thousands more.
Oddly enough, if islam is so fundamental to those camel-molesters, why don't they try to seek asylum in Saudi Arabia or Somalia?
In those two sharia paradises, they'd be able to have islam from 4:30 in the morning (or earlier) in summer, when the first calls to prayer begin to be blasted from the local mosques, and the last one probably between 10:30 and 11:00 PM. If what they wore were deemed haram, they'd be immediately reminded to dress more appropriately by the mutaween in Saudi Arabia, or some band of jeep-riding, RPG-toting, sharia-law enforcers in Somalia. After a beating, they'd learn to keep enough skin under their clothes.
And when a solar or lunar eclipse took place, instead of regarding it as an astronomic phenomenon and admiring it for its beauty, they'd all start running around like headless chickens, asking allah (the imaginary) for forgiveness for not having been cruel and sadistic enough towards non-believers, as Ayaan Hirsi Ali described in "Infidel" when she saw an eclipse take place in Saudi Arabia in the late 1970s and how those Saudi morons reacted to it (they didn't specifically apologize for not having slayed more more non-muslims of course, but if they felt desperate for not having been devout enough, the thought of why they hadn't murdered more infidels must have certainly crossed their minds.)
Instead of having the option to pursue an education and a professional career, muslim women who relocated to those two countries would be able to look forward to a life of breeding (and inbreeding) would-be jihadists, cooking, cleaning, taking freqüent beatings and reading Mein Qurampf; not to mention the comfort of having to walk around under piles and piles of islamic garments for most of the year at temperatures above 100ºF. Instead of being able to marry someone they would choose themselves, they'd have someone else make that decision for them, most likely their fathers. Married off to some louse-ridden mohammed clone who would already have at least three other wives, they'd still have no assurance that they'd end up in heaven to watch their husbands enjoy the company of the 72 virgins or the boys that look like well-hidden pearls. Fear of burning in hell would forever dog them like the watchful eyes of those who live for no reason other than to inflict physical pain upon those who stray from the path of allah (the load of non-existing BS), be it their husbands or some religious police.
The list of such "wonders" that anyone can enjoy any time of the day, any time of the year (with the additional pleasure of starving oneself during the day, and porking out at between dusk and dawn, at Ramadan) is almost endless, not to mention that there would never be a shortage of places of worship for muslims in those countries. And those "wonders" have been a reality in islamic countries for centuries and will continue to be so way after there's no more oil to finance their sitting on their fat rear-ends all day.
So there is absolutely no reason why those who want more and stricter islam should go to infidel countries. All they need is in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan (especially its tribal areas), Yemen, Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Sudan, Somalia and a few other countries. And that's certainly where they should go.
-
But if we bring that up, maybe a few of them will remind us that they have a duty to get the whole world on its knees before their blood-thirsty imaginary deity and their desert pedophile, and use it as justification for why they won't just relocate somewhere else in the wasteland of Dar al-Islam.
And discussing their motives for trying to settle in the West more openly, and with less taqqiya, would compel those millions of Western would-be dhimmis who still regard islam as Colin Powell does to either side with the West or against it, since there are simply no more options on the table.
Hugh, you make a very astute point indeed.
I have asked myself over and over again this very question. Without people thinking I'm plugging the BNP, their asylum policy is the best of any party. It believes that Britain should only take Asylum seekers from Neighbouring countries and people should not be travelling half way around the world to come here. I completely agree with this policy.
Why would Mulsim Somalians come all the way to the UK instead of going to Yemen, Oman, Saudia Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Syria or Turkey, far closer than the UK or Europe?
More importantly the countries above ARE Muslim country and their culture, not alien like ours.
It goes to show one thing that Islam realises that it is an impossibility to defeat the West by attack so instead chooses population invasion.
The BNP rightfully states that all asylum seekers should go to their neighbouring countries first before any other. I believe in that also. It also means that neighbouring countries have an option and that is to either take in the continuing flow of Asylum Seekers, creating a problem in their country or else they send in troops to sort out the regime/dictatorship/military junta that is causing the mass exodus.
The Western governments should be saying to Muslim countries that if they like our society so much because they always want to come here, then why not implement western culture and civilisation in your countries, as your culture obviously isn't working.
We need more Nationalist governments in the West and that doesn't mean everyone voting for extreme right wing ones. There are quite a few nationalist parties that are not racist, but the left at the moment sees this danger and always has and is therefore stigmatizing them with Racism and Nazi slurs.
Stop all immigration into Europe from outside of it and only by Judeo/Christian cultures if Asylum is needed(although highly unlikely).
Proud_Kafir7908,
I posted my above post directly after seeing Hugh's as yours wasn't there. We're both on the same wave length as it seems. You must have posted yours, just as I started writing mine.
'Mein Qurampf'
LOL, excellent.
Could it be that these Muslims now consider that basement Dar-Al-Islam? It is now their property. How can a dhimmi exercise authority over them and take it? Sound familiar (Israel)??
The Muslim think that eventually the whole world will be theres' so they do not have to take this from "mere" Dhimmis. Good for the Landlord! Wake up people of the world! This is may be a late-up call for America but I hope they see and use it.
Good for our Nordic Brothers. Now that the USA is decending into Chaos, with de facto Martial Law and our Military openly on our streets,there will plenty of opportunities...of course, the sheeple will continue to creeple... Happy camper in the Dar Al Harb
@ Jarhead:
Martial Law? Did i miss something?
From comment above:
Permit me to emphasize again:
YES! YES! LET IT BE SO! 2009, the year of the return!
The madrassa that has been closed is one of the most radical ones in Sweden. The landlord does not want extremists harbouring one of their properties. This is really good news and Lionhart, it is starting to change here in Sweden and maybe even in Britain some time soon.
People are really fed up with Islam and Muslims and now the politicians gets it (waking up). The election is coming up in 2010 and the Swedish people has put pressure on them.
The Muslims have been aided in the turmoil by antonymous groups like AFA (Anti-fascism Action) which is even more violent than fascism ever was.
I wish that we could be more like the Danes but we're getting there just wait and see. I think within five years time, most free governments understands what threat they really pose to our freedom and way of life.
Richard, we'd have a lot less to worry about regarding the islamic threat if the political leaders who are supposed to mind our interests could read Hugh's comments, and clearly see the naked truth that they expose, the same way that we do.
Why should any Muslim "asylum seeker" be granted it in any country?
If you are a Muslim apostate, I see no issues. But Muslim "asylum seekers" are simply a part of the global jihad. They are a demographic army invading the "House of War".
SwedishWiking,
Although this is step in the right direction, the Politicians are still in charge, are still Dhimmis and are not listening to the people. This should have been done a looooong time ago along with every other Mosque and Madrassa in the West.
While the Politicians miss the wood for the trees, Islam grows, the fifth Columnists grows and their western hatred grows not forgetting, Muslims achieving positions of power with which to mould society into their ideology.
Proud_Kafir7908,
Very true, but why can't they see this? Simple, they'd rather take their 30 pieces of silver and sell out their society, disrespecting their heritage, people and ancestors, so as to live their days out comfortably, with Political immunity.
If you and I and everyone else on here(and our countries) can see just what Islam is doing, why not the people whom we elect to protect us? Something is definitely afoot and it smells of Saudi Arabia, Oil and greed quite frankly.
Speaking of Sweden . . .from the blog GatesofVienna.blogspot.com links:
If the Swedes want to re-claim their country, they'll have to step up the deportations from 12 or 42 every week or so to a 747-load every day.
Still, it's a start, and they deserve credit for that. Other European countries, please copy.
And Pres-elect BHO, so enamored of European ways, please copy as well.
I wonder what percentage of Swedes today would agree with the proposition that Sweden would be best off if not a single Muslim (other than embassy personnel) existed in their country. The response would be very telling of what lies ahead for Sweden.
There are factual errors in this report. I wouldn't trust it one bit (Im a swede, i ought to know).
The fireworks, for instance, we're not fired by the muslism protesting but of Swedish White Kids from AFA (Anti-Fascist Action. This organization claims to be antifascist but really only wants to fight with the police/neonazis).
I suggest you get some real sources, before citing the local. That magazine is obviously extremely biased, it only deals with immigration issues (and not in a very serious fashion).
If you want real sources, you should use Dagens Nyheter or Svenska Dagbladet. Here's my source, directly from Svenska Dagbladet (in swedish): http://sydsvenskan.se/malmo/article399436.ece
I clicked on the link to Svenska Dagbladet offered by the poster just above, who describes himself as a "Swede" (I don't know if this refers to someone who lives in, and has obtained the citizenship of, Sweden, or means something more)' the names mentioned in the story about the clash with police in Malmo are those of "Basem Mahmoud och Abu Hammad." It is unlikely that these are the names of "Swedish White Kids from AFA (Anti-Fascist Action" as the same poster suggests were the real culprits.
What use is it deporting a few failed asylum seekers (at great expense) if the remaining muslims have more babies than the number deported?
How on earth can you stop these new "Swedes" from out-breeding the previous indigeneous Swedes?
Strip them of citizenship? Isn't going to happen.
They have no choice, otherwise the asylum process is meaningless. A rejection or approval is exactly the same thing if they don't get shown the door. It would also deter frivolous or fraudulent applications. Even the ones with legitimate claims are going to Europe and the U.S. for economic reasons, instead of persecution.
It's probably a worth considering scuttling asylum protection altogether. It would be tough love, but a sound policy to preserve heterogeneity, so that they have to face their own "diversity" conundrums and force people to fight for social justice where they live. It takes courage to stand up to bad people. It takes almost no courage to run away, and even less to make your heroic stand to good people, in the form of demanding rule changes and accomodations.
Wellington,
Didn't we have a conversation over a year ago where you said something to the effect that, and I paraphrase, "You can always expect Muslims to behave like Muslims." in regards to Islamic integration, the wests tolerance for said integration, and the threshold flash point for massive civil unrest and or civil war. This, of course, all in regards to the jackalope (http://ww2.lafayette.edu/~hollidac/jackpics.html) otherwise known as an Islamic reformation, and which will come first, social chaos, or Islamic reformation. Anyways, it is going to be interesting to see this develops not disregarding the fact that Europe has an interesting history in regards integrating Semitic people, when they are perceived to disrupt social cohesion. "Interesting" in that there actually isn't a historical precedent for it, other than the Jews, whom have figured out that the best way to survive in Europe for any length of time as a minority has boiled down to not being heard, seen, and therefore known. Muslims are still learning how to survive as minorities in Europe. We'll have too see which comes first Islamic reformation, or the social threshold for civil unrest. I will have to hand it to us on this fact, these Muslims have survived far longer than our Grandparents would have allowed 70 years ago. So far that is the only president, we'll have to see how far the threshold has been raised.
Wellington posted sometime in 06-07.
"You can always expect Muslims to behave like Muslims." Yup.
Crap the jackalope link doesn't work!
Hugh asks:
Why should any Muslim from a Muslim-dominated country be considered for asylum status?
Answer:
Not for asylum. For economic advantage.
Why:
I happen to work at a very diverse workplace. A large percentage of the employees were foreign born. Almost to a man (or woman as the case may be) they answer the following question consistently.
Why did you come to the US?
95% answer for standard of living reasons. I think only one person I ever asked answered freedom and constitutional rights.
Then I ask the following question.
What would you do if there was a war and you or your children were called on to serve in the military? In addition, your country of origin was not a part of the war and your family would not need to serve in the military? Would you stay or return?
The same 95% stated that they would return to their county of origin to avoid service.
So Hugh, here is my answer to your hypothetical question, they are not seeking asylum, they are merely misstating their reason for emigrating to take advantage of more liberal treatment in the laws and regulations pertaining to asylum as they most likely are emigrating for economic advantages. For almost all, it is not for a wish to be a citizen of a constitutional form of government and the responsibilities and rights that attach to that citizenship.
ethoman: Muslims can regularly be expected to behave like Muslims? Yes, I remember posting something like that. I suppose the same could be said of Marxists or fascists (unless they're Italian, in which case they will find a way to magnificently corrupt Marxism or fascism from within so that these ideologies become largely innocuous----sadly the same cannot be said for Islam in Italy because Islam is a whole different kettle of fish). As Hugh has often written, Islam is a Total Belief System. Just so. That is why Muslims will always behave like Muslims, even the ho-hum moderate Muslims, just less so. And I don't believe there is any reforming Islam. I know folks like Bernard Lewis and Daniel Pipes think there is, but I don't buy it. Just as there is no such thing as a gentler, kinder Nazism, so there is no such Islam. The whole world is stuck with this stupid religion and it will be one of man's greatest challenges of all time figuring out what to do with it long term. Damn Mohammed. The guy's got to be one of the most malevolently influential individuals in all of history. Maybe the most.
Wellington
I think we were talking about whether or not this threshold I mentioned was inevitable, with a time scale sidebar, at some point you mentioned something about Muslims behaving like Muslims. I thought it summed up the situation well in simple and concise terms. It was funny to boil it down like that ... no need to over complicate the subject is how I took it. It is just interesting to see this developing after having had so many conversations about it over the last 6-7 years.
Concerning failed "asylum seekers" it would be interesting to hear what our Swedish contributors make of this report by a group of UK politicians.
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2Fnews%2Farticle-1094923%2FAsylum-seekers-benefits-says-leading-Tory-think-tank.html&ei=7KZKSfzOCJWgQZSs3McP&usg=AFQjCNEpra4kxElXrEGKTIvToOSPbUNFcA&sig2=iu_aJ83DNx6tDvC_beWV9g
They argue that they should continue to receive benefits (state handouts) to prevent them turning to crime. Why they are not just expelled is something he does not explain.
He cited the Swedish way of dealing with the problem as a model for Britain because,
"The Swedes get 80% of their failed asylum seekers to leave voluntarily and it only costs £1,100 each. It costs Britain £11,000 to force each one to leave."
I find the idea that 80% of those who seek asylum in Sweden leave voluntarily difficult to accept.
"Although this is step in the right direction, the Politicians are still in charge, are still Dhimmis and are not listening to the people. This should have been done a looooong time ago along with every other Mosque and Madrassa in the West.
While the Politicians miss the wood for the trees, Islam grows, the fifth Columnists grows and their western hatred grows not forgetting, Muslims achieving positions of power with which to mould society into their ideology."
Lionheart, you are absolutely right about this BUT almost every scenario is reversible except for AIDS & Nuclear meltdowns. What I see here is movements raising all over the free world and it's getting stronger and stronger. The day it has reached an acceptable level (when it is coordinated globally), I can lay back and focus on other more personal things.
"I wonder what percentage of Swedes today would agree with the proposition that Sweden would be best off if not a single Muslim (other than embassy personnel) existed in their country. The response would be very telling of what lies ahead for Sweden."
There was a poll last year and one of the question was if Islam is or could be a integrated part of the Swedish society and a wopping 67% said NO. Here are some other results...
• 80% thinks that all immigrants will have to integrate into Swedish customs and moral values.
• 71% thinks that immigrants should have the same social rights as the natives have.
• 63% thinks that if an immigrant commits a crime, the immigrant should be deported.
• 60% thinks that muslim women are more oppressed than other women in Sweden.
• 56% thinks that private religious schools should not be permitted.
Well, if the people ruled Sweden, we would have no problems at all... Not! But our politicians are worse!
Why on Earth are you guys not sending their countries of origin the bill, not just for the actual deportation, but for every penny they cost the taxpayer? That'll make those hellholes watch their borders. Why are we not doing that with Mexican illegals? Seriously. That's ridiculous.
Also, I fixed your jackelope link, Ethoman. You put an end parenthesis in the link. Easy mistake:
http://ww2.lafayette.edu/~hollidac/jackpics.html
ethoman: I think I averred what I did about Muslims in part because I don't expect Islam to reform itself. Individual Muslims might want that, even try it, but I think it will be of no use because so many disturbing (from the Western perspective) Islamic doctrines are there and are not going to go away. The Christian doctrines of the Trinity and the Resurrection are there too but doctrines like these pose no threat whatsoever to societies at large. No Christian doctrine does.
Many Islamic doctrines, though, such as dividing the world into the dar-al-Islam and dar-al-harb and requiring death for someone who leaves the Islamic faith, are bad news for the world at large. In short, it's not so much Muslims that are the problem (though many are), but rather the religion itself. When any Christian or Buddhist or Hindu or Jew or Zoroastrian or......is a problem, it doesn't stem from the religion but rather from a warped interpretation of that creed (not so many times when Muslims act upon their faith). So Christians behaving like Christians or Buddhists behaving like Buddhists is really not meant pejoratively at all. But to say that Muslims will behave like Muslims is a way of putting oneself and others on the alert for annoying, disturbing or even lethal things to come.
"Joel"
Here is another fact you should check on. Is there a historical precedent, either contemporary or historical, to support the idea that Islam can peacefully integrate into any non-Islamic society? Does contemporary Islamic Orthodoxy support the idea of equality between Muslims, and non-Muslims in Islamic societies? What do these questions mean for the future of any country that faces a future where its Islamic population is doubling every 10 years, while its native population is decreasing by 3% in the same time frame? What sort of future do you envision?
"What sort of future do you envision?"
-ethoman
Probably one devoid of party images like those present in the galleries of sources like "The Local." Until it goes underground and the 3rd-4th generation under Sharia revolts. Leftover vestige of a bygone era of freedom and all. It would take a future rekindling in the face of a demographic and ideological wave.
Totalitarian governments LOVE our generous "asylum" laws. When those governments drive their people out of the country, they get the remittance economy up and running very nicely.
We should scrap the entire edifice of asylum seeking. It now has become a monster which is ruining the host countries and exacerbating the nastiness of the countries the "refugees", whether legitimate or not, come from.
And Muslim "refugees" should not be accepted unless they are committed to leaving Islam, otherwise, as many here have pointed out, they are spreading the very evil they claim to be running from, which of course they never call by its correct name.
They are nearly all frauds. Yes, I know, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, but we have potentially lost everything just to get her?
An artikel in German press for you German speaking people:
Krawalle in Malmö
http://www.dasjournal.net/news/399/ARTICLE/15649/2008-12-19.html
interesting note is that Abu Laban has been to this cellar mosque preaching.
Ahmad Abu Laban of Muhammad Cartoon fame
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmad_Abu_Laban
Damn Mohammed. The guy's got to be one of the most malevolently influential individuals in all of history. Maybe the most.
Posted by: Wellington [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 18, 2008 2:02 PM
The gift that never stops giving--- perfection preserved in perpetuity. I can think of no person, real or imagined, who left such a heinous and enduring legacy, poisoning minds and ruining lives for almost 1400 years.
I have a feeling that many European societies will be either fighting some sort of reconquesta in the coming decades or will have to surrender their freedom.
Just picking up on the words 'landlord' and 'leasing' of the basement premises used as a mosque. Muslims renting property from infidels is surely most unusual. It is usually the other way round. Does this mean that funds for the purpose of Islamic expansionism, mostly from Saudi Arabia, is being rationed?
According to Islamic shariah law, once a building or piece of ground has been turned into a mosque, it belongs permanently to Allah and his Muhammadens.
Which is why, even if it's only a grubby basement and not a palatial building, it is no longer the "infidel" landlord's property but now Allah's property for eternity.
Moral of story:
All landlords must beware renting anything to Muhammadens. They can and do turn even spare rooms in their homes into mini-mosques called jamaat-khannas.
This is why apostates from Islam are not allowed to leave the cult. They belong permanently to Allah.
There are millions of Christians in the Middle East who are being prosecuted everyday by Muslims for their religious beliefs. These people are living in Hell yes Hell everyday. Why don't the EU and the US take them as refugees? These people need to escape Hell for they have been living it for too long. It would be a humanitarian thing to do and these people pose no threat to anyone. Instead, the EU and the US are taking Muslims as refugees as if they were fleeing the Christian prosecution. When allowing refugees to migrate to EU or US, a vast majority of these immigrants are Muslims who are bad immigrants who are nothing but trouble and many of them and their descendants turn terrorists.
Below are the estimated remaining Christians who are still being prosecuted for their religious beliefs in the Middle East:
Egypt 4-5 million Christians prosecuted
Iraq 700-900K Christians prosecuted
Lebanon 500-700K Christians prosecuted
Syria 300-500K Christians prosecuted
Others 100-200K Christians Prosecuted
There are between 5-million and 7-million Christians left in the Middle East and declining fast. These are the people who are still being prosecuted for their Christian beliefs. They would make good and peaceful immigrants/refugees.
I tried to help some a Sudanese family get asylum here. But I was given to understand that they had no hope, because If they can "practise their faith" in their country they are not considered refugees.
But Muslims are coming here in droves from Muslim countries, where not only can they "practise their faith" but can push the Christians around.
Why the double standard? Who knows/
I expect the official Swedish policy is to surrender to Muslim grievances. The landlord will be bought off handsomely by the government and the local tribe of Muslims will be gifted. And the Swedes will think this will please the Muslims and that this will not happen again.